blob: 669bd96c94dd590a6cc3be916589ed6bdeb29806 [file] [log] [blame]
Paul Beesleyfc9ee362019-03-07 15:47:15 +00001Firmware Design
2===============
Douglas Raillardd7c21b72017-06-28 15:23:03 +01003
Dan Handley610e7e12018-03-01 18:44:00 +00004Trusted Firmware-A (TF-A) implements a subset of the Trusted Board Boot
Paul Beesleyf8640672019-04-12 14:19:42 +01005Requirements (TBBR) Platform Design Document (PDD) for Arm reference
6platforms.
7
8The TBB sequence starts when the platform is powered on and runs up
Douglas Raillardd7c21b72017-06-28 15:23:03 +01009to the stage where it hands-off control to firmware running in the normal
10world in DRAM. This is the cold boot path.
11
Manish V Badarkhe9d24e9b2023-06-15 09:14:33 +010012TF-A also implements the `PSCI`_ as a runtime service. PSCI is the interface
13from normal world software to firmware implementing power management use-cases
14(for example, secondary CPU boot, hotplug and idle). Normal world software can
15access TF-A runtime services via the Arm SMC (Secure Monitor Call) instruction.
16The SMC instruction must be used as mandated by the SMC Calling Convention
17(`SMCCC`_).
Douglas Raillardd7c21b72017-06-28 15:23:03 +010018
Dan Handley610e7e12018-03-01 18:44:00 +000019TF-A implements a framework for configuring and managing interrupts generated
20in either security state. The details of the interrupt management framework
Paul Beesleyf8640672019-04-12 14:19:42 +010021and its design can be found in :ref:`Interrupt Management Framework`.
Douglas Raillardd7c21b72017-06-28 15:23:03 +010022
Dan Handley610e7e12018-03-01 18:44:00 +000023TF-A also implements a library for setting up and managing the translation
Paul Beesleyf8640672019-04-12 14:19:42 +010024tables. The details of this library can be found in
25:ref:`Translation (XLAT) Tables Library`.
Antonio Nino Diazb5d68092017-05-23 11:49:22 +010026
Dan Handley610e7e12018-03-01 18:44:00 +000027TF-A can be built to support either AArch64 or AArch32 execution state.
Zelalem Aweke023b1a42021-10-21 13:59:45 -050028
Harrison Mutai3005be02023-05-12 09:45:14 +010029.. note::
30 The descriptions in this chapter are for the Arm TrustZone architecture.
31 For changes to the firmware design for the `Arm Confidential Compute
32 Architecture (Arm CCA)`_ please refer to the chapter :ref:`Realm Management
33 Extension (RME)`.
Zelalem Aweke023b1a42021-10-21 13:59:45 -050034
Douglas Raillardd7c21b72017-06-28 15:23:03 +010035Cold boot
36---------
37
38The cold boot path starts when the platform is physically turned on. If
39``COLD_BOOT_SINGLE_CPU=0``, one of the CPUs released from reset is chosen as the
40primary CPU, and the remaining CPUs are considered secondary CPUs. The primary
41CPU is chosen through platform-specific means. The cold boot path is mainly
42executed by the primary CPU, other than essential CPU initialization executed by
43all CPUs. The secondary CPUs are kept in a safe platform-specific state until
44the primary CPU has performed enough initialization to boot them.
45
Paul Beesleyf8640672019-04-12 14:19:42 +010046Refer to the :ref:`CPU Reset` for more information on the effect of the
Douglas Raillardd7c21b72017-06-28 15:23:03 +010047``COLD_BOOT_SINGLE_CPU`` platform build option.
48
Dan Handley610e7e12018-03-01 18:44:00 +000049The cold boot path in this implementation of TF-A depends on the execution
50state. For AArch64, it is divided into five steps (in order of execution):
Douglas Raillardd7c21b72017-06-28 15:23:03 +010051
52- Boot Loader stage 1 (BL1) *AP Trusted ROM*
53- Boot Loader stage 2 (BL2) *Trusted Boot Firmware*
54- Boot Loader stage 3-1 (BL31) *EL3 Runtime Software*
55- Boot Loader stage 3-2 (BL32) *Secure-EL1 Payload* (optional)
56- Boot Loader stage 3-3 (BL33) *Non-trusted Firmware*
57
58For AArch32, it is divided into four steps (in order of execution):
59
60- Boot Loader stage 1 (BL1) *AP Trusted ROM*
61- Boot Loader stage 2 (BL2) *Trusted Boot Firmware*
62- Boot Loader stage 3-2 (BL32) *EL3 Runtime Software*
63- Boot Loader stage 3-3 (BL33) *Non-trusted Firmware*
64
Dan Handley610e7e12018-03-01 18:44:00 +000065Arm development platforms (Fixed Virtual Platforms (FVPs) and Juno) implement a
Douglas Raillardd7c21b72017-06-28 15:23:03 +010066combination of the following types of memory regions. Each bootloader stage uses
67one or more of these memory regions.
68
69- Regions accessible from both non-secure and secure states. For example,
70 non-trusted SRAM, ROM and DRAM.
71- Regions accessible from only the secure state. For example, trusted SRAM and
72 ROM. The FVPs also implement the trusted DRAM which is statically
73 configured. Additionally, the Base FVPs and Juno development platform
74 configure the TrustZone Controller (TZC) to create a region in the DRAM
75 which is accessible only from the secure state.
76
77The sections below provide the following details:
78
Soby Mathewb1bf0442018-02-16 14:52:52 +000079- dynamic configuration of Boot Loader stages
Douglas Raillardd7c21b72017-06-28 15:23:03 +010080- initialization and execution of the first three stages during cold boot
81- specification of the EL3 Runtime Software (BL31 for AArch64 and BL32 for
82 AArch32) entrypoint requirements for use by alternative Trusted Boot
83 Firmware in place of the provided BL1 and BL2
84
Soby Mathewb1bf0442018-02-16 14:52:52 +000085Dynamic Configuration during cold boot
86~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
87
88Each of the Boot Loader stages may be dynamically configured if required by the
89platform. The Boot Loader stage may optionally specify a firmware
90configuration file and/or hardware configuration file as listed below:
91
Manish V Badarkheece96fd2020-06-13 09:42:28 +010092- FW_CONFIG - The firmware configuration file. Holds properties shared across
93 all BLx images.
94 An example is the "dtb-registry" node, which contains the information about
95 the other device tree configurations (load-address, size, image_id).
Soby Mathewb1bf0442018-02-16 14:52:52 +000096- HW_CONFIG - The hardware configuration file. Can be shared by all Boot Loader
97 stages and also by the Normal World Rich OS.
98- TB_FW_CONFIG - Trusted Boot Firmware configuration file. Shared between BL1
99 and BL2.
100- SOC_FW_CONFIG - SoC Firmware configuration file. Used by BL31.
101- TOS_FW_CONFIG - Trusted OS Firmware configuration file. Used by Trusted OS
102 (BL32).
103- NT_FW_CONFIG - Non Trusted Firmware configuration file. Used by Non-trusted
104 firmware (BL33).
105
106The Arm development platforms use the Flattened Device Tree format for the
107dynamic configuration files.
108
109Each Boot Loader stage can pass up to 4 arguments via registers to the next
110stage. BL2 passes the list of the next images to execute to the *EL3 Runtime
111Software* (BL31 for AArch64 and BL32 for AArch32) via `arg0`. All the other
112arguments are platform defined. The Arm development platforms use the following
113convention:
114
115- BL1 passes the address of a meminfo_t structure to BL2 via ``arg1``. This
116 structure contains the memory layout available to BL2.
117- When dynamic configuration files are present, the firmware configuration for
118 the next Boot Loader stage is populated in the first available argument and
119 the generic hardware configuration is passed the next available argument.
120 For example,
121
Manish V Badarkheece96fd2020-06-13 09:42:28 +0100122 - FW_CONFIG is loaded by BL1, then its address is passed in ``arg0`` to BL2.
123 - TB_FW_CONFIG address is retrieved by BL2 from FW_CONFIG device tree.
Soby Mathewb1bf0442018-02-16 14:52:52 +0000124 - If HW_CONFIG is loaded by BL1, then its address is passed in ``arg2`` to
125 BL2. Note, ``arg1`` is already used for meminfo_t.
126 - If SOC_FW_CONFIG is loaded by BL2, then its address is passed in ``arg1``
127 to BL31. Note, ``arg0`` is used to pass the list of executable images.
128 - Similarly, if HW_CONFIG is loaded by BL1 or BL2, then its address is
129 passed in ``arg2`` to BL31.
130 - For other BL3x images, if the firmware configuration file is loaded by
131 BL2, then its address is passed in ``arg0`` and if HW_CONFIG is loaded
132 then its address is passed in ``arg1``.
Nishant Sharmae9d8c012023-10-13 11:23:50 +0100133 - In case SPMC_AT_EL3 is enabled, populate the BL32 image base, size and max
134 limit in the entry point information, since there is no platform function
135 to retrieve these in generic code. We choose ``arg2``, ``arg3`` and
136 ``arg4`` since the generic code uses ``arg1`` for stashing the SP manifest
137 size. The SPMC setup uses these arguments to update SP manifest with
138 actual SP's base address and it size.
Manish V Badarkhe70d8eee2022-04-12 21:11:56 +0100139 - In case of the Arm FVP platform, FW_CONFIG address passed in ``arg1`` to
140 BL31/SP_MIN, and the SOC_FW_CONFIG and HW_CONFIG details are retrieved
141 from FW_CONFIG device tree.
Soby Mathewb1bf0442018-02-16 14:52:52 +0000142
Douglas Raillardd7c21b72017-06-28 15:23:03 +0100143BL1
144~~~
145
146This stage begins execution from the platform's reset vector at EL3. The reset
147address is platform dependent but it is usually located in a Trusted ROM area.
148The BL1 data section is copied to trusted SRAM at runtime.
149
Dan Handley610e7e12018-03-01 18:44:00 +0000150On the Arm development platforms, BL1 code starts execution from the reset
Douglas Raillardd7c21b72017-06-28 15:23:03 +0100151vector defined by the constant ``BL1_RO_BASE``. The BL1 data section is copied
152to the top of trusted SRAM as defined by the constant ``BL1_RW_BASE``.
153
154The functionality implemented by this stage is as follows.
155
156Determination of boot path
157^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
158
159Whenever a CPU is released from reset, BL1 needs to distinguish between a warm
160boot and a cold boot. This is done using platform-specific mechanisms (see the
Paul Beesleyf8640672019-04-12 14:19:42 +0100161``plat_get_my_entrypoint()`` function in the :ref:`Porting Guide`). In the case
162of a warm boot, a CPU is expected to continue execution from a separate
Douglas Raillardd7c21b72017-06-28 15:23:03 +0100163entrypoint. In the case of a cold boot, the secondary CPUs are placed in a safe
164platform-specific state (see the ``plat_secondary_cold_boot_setup()`` function in
Paul Beesleyf8640672019-04-12 14:19:42 +0100165the :ref:`Porting Guide`) while the primary CPU executes the remaining cold boot
166path as described in the following sections.
Douglas Raillardd7c21b72017-06-28 15:23:03 +0100167
168This step only applies when ``PROGRAMMABLE_RESET_ADDRESS=0``. Refer to the
Paul Beesleyf8640672019-04-12 14:19:42 +0100169:ref:`CPU Reset` for more information on the effect of the
Douglas Raillardd7c21b72017-06-28 15:23:03 +0100170``PROGRAMMABLE_RESET_ADDRESS`` platform build option.
171
172Architectural initialization
173^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
174
175BL1 performs minimal architectural initialization as follows.
176
177- Exception vectors
178
179 BL1 sets up simple exception vectors for both synchronous and asynchronous
180 exceptions. The default behavior upon receiving an exception is to populate
181 a status code in the general purpose register ``X0/R0`` and call the
Paul Beesleyf8640672019-04-12 14:19:42 +0100182 ``plat_report_exception()`` function (see the :ref:`Porting Guide`). The
183 status code is one of:
Douglas Raillardd7c21b72017-06-28 15:23:03 +0100184
185 For AArch64:
186
187 ::
188
189 0x0 : Synchronous exception from Current EL with SP_EL0
190 0x1 : IRQ exception from Current EL with SP_EL0
191 0x2 : FIQ exception from Current EL with SP_EL0
192 0x3 : System Error exception from Current EL with SP_EL0
193 0x4 : Synchronous exception from Current EL with SP_ELx
194 0x5 : IRQ exception from Current EL with SP_ELx
195 0x6 : FIQ exception from Current EL with SP_ELx
196 0x7 : System Error exception from Current EL with SP_ELx
197 0x8 : Synchronous exception from Lower EL using aarch64
198 0x9 : IRQ exception from Lower EL using aarch64
199 0xa : FIQ exception from Lower EL using aarch64
200 0xb : System Error exception from Lower EL using aarch64
201 0xc : Synchronous exception from Lower EL using aarch32
202 0xd : IRQ exception from Lower EL using aarch32
203 0xe : FIQ exception from Lower EL using aarch32
204 0xf : System Error exception from Lower EL using aarch32
205
206 For AArch32:
207
208 ::
209
210 0x10 : User mode
211 0x11 : FIQ mode
212 0x12 : IRQ mode
213 0x13 : SVC mode
214 0x16 : Monitor mode
215 0x17 : Abort mode
216 0x1a : Hypervisor mode
217 0x1b : Undefined mode
218 0x1f : System mode
219
Dan Handley610e7e12018-03-01 18:44:00 +0000220 The ``plat_report_exception()`` implementation on the Arm FVP port programs
Douglas Raillardd7c21b72017-06-28 15:23:03 +0100221 the Versatile Express System LED register in the following format to
Paul Beesley1fbc97b2019-01-11 18:26:51 +0000222 indicate the occurrence of an unexpected exception:
Douglas Raillardd7c21b72017-06-28 15:23:03 +0100223
224 ::
225
226 SYS_LED[0] - Security state (Secure=0/Non-Secure=1)
227 SYS_LED[2:1] - Exception Level (EL3=0x3, EL2=0x2, EL1=0x1, EL0=0x0)
228 For AArch32 it is always 0x0
229 SYS_LED[7:3] - Exception Class (Sync/Async & origin). This is the value
230 of the status code
231
232 A write to the LED register reflects in the System LEDs (S6LED0..7) in the
233 CLCD window of the FVP.
234
235 BL1 does not expect to receive any exceptions other than the SMC exception.
236 For the latter, BL1 installs a simple stub. The stub expects to receive a
237 limited set of SMC types (determined by their function IDs in the general
238 purpose register ``X0/R0``):
239
240 - ``BL1_SMC_RUN_IMAGE``: This SMC is raised by BL2 to make BL1 pass control
241 to EL3 Runtime Software.
Paul Beesleyf8640672019-04-12 14:19:42 +0100242 - All SMCs listed in section "BL1 SMC Interface" in the :ref:`Firmware Update (FWU)`
Douglas Raillardd7c21b72017-06-28 15:23:03 +0100243 Design Guide are supported for AArch64 only. These SMCs are currently
244 not supported when BL1 is built for AArch32.
245
246 Any other SMC leads to an assertion failure.
247
248- CPU initialization
249
Boyan Karatotev1dcba8f2024-11-19 11:27:01 +0000250 BL1 calls the ``reset_handler`` macro/function which in turn calls the CPU
Douglas Raillardd7c21b72017-06-28 15:23:03 +0100251 specific reset handler function (see the section: "CPU specific operations
252 framework").
253
Douglas Raillardd7c21b72017-06-28 15:23:03 +0100254Platform initialization
255^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
256
Dan Handley610e7e12018-03-01 18:44:00 +0000257On Arm platforms, BL1 performs the following platform initializations:
Douglas Raillardd7c21b72017-06-28 15:23:03 +0100258
259- Enable the Trusted Watchdog.
260- Initialize the console.
261- Configure the Interconnect to enable hardware coherency.
262- Enable the MMU and map the memory it needs to access.
263- Configure any required platform storage to load the next bootloader image
264 (BL2).
Soby Mathewb1bf0442018-02-16 14:52:52 +0000265- If the BL1 dynamic configuration file, ``TB_FW_CONFIG``, is available, then
266 load it to the platform defined address and make it available to BL2 via
267 ``arg0``.
Soby Mathewd969a7e2018-06-11 16:40:36 +0100268- Configure the system timer and program the `CNTFRQ_EL0` for use by NS-BL1U
269 and NS-BL2U firmware update images.
Douglas Raillardd7c21b72017-06-28 15:23:03 +0100270
271Firmware Update detection and execution
272^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
273
274After performing platform setup, BL1 common code calls
Paul Beesleyf8640672019-04-12 14:19:42 +0100275``bl1_plat_get_next_image_id()`` to determine if :ref:`Firmware Update (FWU)` is
276required or to proceed with the normal boot process. If the platform code
277returns ``BL2_IMAGE_ID`` then the normal boot sequence is executed as described
278in the next section, else BL1 assumes that :ref:`Firmware Update (FWU)` is
279required and execution passes to the first image in the
280:ref:`Firmware Update (FWU)` process. In either case, BL1 retrieves a descriptor
281of the next image by calling ``bl1_plat_get_image_desc()``. The image descriptor
282contains an ``entry_point_info_t`` structure, which BL1 uses to initialize the
283execution state of the next image.
Douglas Raillardd7c21b72017-06-28 15:23:03 +0100284
285BL2 image load and execution
286^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
287
288In the normal boot flow, BL1 execution continues as follows:
289
290#. BL1 prints the following string from the primary CPU to indicate successful
291 execution of the BL1 stage:
292
293 ::
294
295 "Booting Trusted Firmware"
296
Soby Mathewb1bf0442018-02-16 14:52:52 +0000297#. BL1 loads a BL2 raw binary image from platform storage, at a
298 platform-specific base address. Prior to the load, BL1 invokes
299 ``bl1_plat_handle_pre_image_load()`` which allows the platform to update or
300 use the image information. If the BL2 image file is not present or if
Douglas Raillardd7c21b72017-06-28 15:23:03 +0100301 there is not enough free trusted SRAM the following error message is
302 printed:
303
304 ::
305
306 "Failed to load BL2 firmware."
307
Soby Mathewb1bf0442018-02-16 14:52:52 +0000308#. BL1 invokes ``bl1_plat_handle_post_image_load()`` which again is intended
309 for platforms to take further action after image load. This function must
310 populate the necessary arguments for BL2, which may also include the memory
311 layout. Further description of the memory layout can be found later
312 in this document.
Douglas Raillardd7c21b72017-06-28 15:23:03 +0100313
314#. BL1 passes control to the BL2 image at Secure EL1 (for AArch64) or at
315 Secure SVC mode (for AArch32), starting from its load address.
316
Douglas Raillardd7c21b72017-06-28 15:23:03 +0100317BL2
318~~~
319
320BL1 loads and passes control to BL2 at Secure-EL1 (for AArch64) or at Secure
321SVC mode (for AArch32) . BL2 is linked against and loaded at a platform-specific
322base address (more information can be found later in this document).
323The functionality implemented by BL2 is as follows.
324
325Architectural initialization
326^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
327
328For AArch64, BL2 performs the minimal architectural initialization required
Dan Handley610e7e12018-03-01 18:44:00 +0000329for subsequent stages of TF-A and normal world software. EL1 and EL0 are given
Peng Fan9632c9c2020-08-21 10:47:17 +0800330access to Floating Point and Advanced SIMD registers by setting the
Dan Handley610e7e12018-03-01 18:44:00 +0000331``CPACR.FPEN`` bits.
Douglas Raillardd7c21b72017-06-28 15:23:03 +0100332
333For AArch32, the minimal architectural initialization required for subsequent
Dan Handley610e7e12018-03-01 18:44:00 +0000334stages of TF-A and normal world software is taken care of in BL1 as both BL1
335and BL2 execute at PL1.
Douglas Raillardd7c21b72017-06-28 15:23:03 +0100336
337Platform initialization
338^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
339
Dan Handley610e7e12018-03-01 18:44:00 +0000340On Arm platforms, BL2 performs the following platform initializations:
Douglas Raillardd7c21b72017-06-28 15:23:03 +0100341
342- Initialize the console.
343- Configure any required platform storage to allow loading further bootloader
344 images.
345- Enable the MMU and map the memory it needs to access.
346- Perform platform security setup to allow access to controlled components.
347- Reserve some memory for passing information to the next bootloader image
348 EL3 Runtime Software and populate it.
349- Define the extents of memory available for loading each subsequent
350 bootloader image.
Soby Mathewb1bf0442018-02-16 14:52:52 +0000351- If BL1 has passed TB_FW_CONFIG dynamic configuration file in ``arg0``,
352 then parse it.
Douglas Raillardd7c21b72017-06-28 15:23:03 +0100353
354Image loading in BL2
355^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
356
Roberto Vargas025946a2018-09-24 17:20:48 +0100357BL2 generic code loads the images based on the list of loadable images
358provided by the platform. BL2 passes the list of executable images
359provided by the platform to the next handover BL image.
Douglas Raillardd7c21b72017-06-28 15:23:03 +0100360
Soby Mathewb1bf0442018-02-16 14:52:52 +0000361The list of loadable images provided by the platform may also contain
362dynamic configuration files. The files are loaded and can be parsed as
363needed in the ``bl2_plat_handle_post_image_load()`` function. These
364configuration files can be passed to next Boot Loader stages as arguments
365by updating the corresponding entrypoint information in this function.
366
Sandrine Bailleux15530dd2019-02-08 15:26:36 +0100367SCP_BL2 (System Control Processor Firmware) image load
368^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Douglas Raillardd7c21b72017-06-28 15:23:03 +0100369
370Some systems have a separate System Control Processor (SCP) for power, clock,
Sandrine Bailleux15530dd2019-02-08 15:26:36 +0100371reset and system control. BL2 loads the optional SCP_BL2 image from platform
Douglas Raillardd7c21b72017-06-28 15:23:03 +0100372storage into a platform-specific region of secure memory. The subsequent
Sandrine Bailleux15530dd2019-02-08 15:26:36 +0100373handling of SCP_BL2 is platform specific. For example, on the Juno Arm
Douglas Raillardd7c21b72017-06-28 15:23:03 +0100374development platform port the image is transferred into SCP's internal memory
375using the Boot Over MHU (BOM) protocol after being loaded in the trusted SRAM
Sandrine Bailleux15530dd2019-02-08 15:26:36 +0100376memory. The SCP executes SCP_BL2 and signals to the Application Processor (AP)
Douglas Raillardd7c21b72017-06-28 15:23:03 +0100377for BL2 execution to continue.
378
379EL3 Runtime Software image load
380^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
381
382BL2 loads the EL3 Runtime Software image from platform storage into a platform-
383specific address in trusted SRAM. If there is not enough memory to load the
Roberto Vargas025946a2018-09-24 17:20:48 +0100384image or image is missing it leads to an assertion failure.
Douglas Raillardd7c21b72017-06-28 15:23:03 +0100385
386AArch64 BL32 (Secure-EL1 Payload) image load
387^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
388
389BL2 loads the optional BL32 image from platform storage into a platform-
390specific region of secure memory. The image executes in the secure world. BL2
391relies on BL31 to pass control to the BL32 image, if present. Hence, BL2
392populates a platform-specific area of memory with the entrypoint/load-address
393of the BL32 image. The value of the Saved Processor Status Register (``SPSR``)
394for entry into BL32 is not determined by BL2, it is initialized by the
395Secure-EL1 Payload Dispatcher (see later) within BL31, which is responsible for
396managing interaction with BL32. This information is passed to BL31.
397
398BL33 (Non-trusted Firmware) image load
399^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
400
401BL2 loads the BL33 image (e.g. UEFI or other test or boot software) from
402platform storage into non-secure memory as defined by the platform.
403
404BL2 relies on EL3 Runtime Software to pass control to BL33 once secure state
405initialization is complete. Hence, BL2 populates a platform-specific area of
406memory with the entrypoint and Saved Program Status Register (``SPSR``) of the
407normal world software image. The entrypoint is the load address of the BL33
408image. The ``SPSR`` is determined as specified in Section 5.13 of the
Manish V Badarkhe9d24e9b2023-06-15 09:14:33 +0100409`PSCI`_. This information is passed to the EL3 Runtime Software.
Douglas Raillardd7c21b72017-06-28 15:23:03 +0100410
411AArch64 BL31 (EL3 Runtime Software) execution
412^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
413
414BL2 execution continues as follows:
415
416#. BL2 passes control back to BL1 by raising an SMC, providing BL1 with the
417 BL31 entrypoint. The exception is handled by the SMC exception handler
418 installed by BL1.
419
420#. BL1 turns off the MMU and flushes the caches. It clears the
421 ``SCTLR_EL3.M/I/C`` bits, flushes the data cache to the point of coherency
422 and invalidates the TLBs.
423
424#. BL1 passes control to BL31 at the specified entrypoint at EL3.
425
Roberto Vargasb1584272017-11-20 13:36:10 +0000426Running BL2 at EL3 execution level
427~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
428
Dan Handley610e7e12018-03-01 18:44:00 +0000429Some platforms have a non-TF-A Boot ROM that expects the next boot stage
430to execute at EL3. On these platforms, TF-A BL1 is a waste of memory
431as its only purpose is to ensure TF-A BL2 is entered at S-EL1. To avoid
Roberto Vargasb1584272017-11-20 13:36:10 +0000432this waste, a special mode enables BL2 to execute at EL3, which allows
Dan Handley610e7e12018-03-01 18:44:00 +0000433a non-TF-A Boot ROM to load and jump directly to BL2. This mode is selected
Arvind Ram Prakash11b9b492022-11-22 14:41:00 -0600434when the build flag RESET_TO_BL2 is enabled.
435The main differences in this mode are:
Roberto Vargasb1584272017-11-20 13:36:10 +0000436
437#. BL2 includes the reset code and the mailbox mechanism to differentiate
438 cold boot and warm boot. It runs at EL3 doing the arch
439 initialization required for EL3.
440
441#. BL2 does not receive the meminfo information from BL1 anymore. This
442 information can be passed by the Boot ROM or be internal to the
443 BL2 image.
444
445#. Since BL2 executes at EL3, BL2 jumps directly to the next image,
446 instead of invoking the RUN_IMAGE SMC call.
447
448
449We assume 3 different types of BootROM support on the platform:
450
451#. The Boot ROM always jumps to the same address, for both cold
452 and warm boot. In this case, we will need to keep a resident part
453 of BL2 whose memory cannot be reclaimed by any other image. The
454 linker script defines the symbols __TEXT_RESIDENT_START__ and
455 __TEXT_RESIDENT_END__ that allows the platform to configure
456 correctly the memory map.
457#. The platform has some mechanism to indicate the jump address to the
458 Boot ROM. Platform code can then program the jump address with
459 psci_warmboot_entrypoint during cold boot.
460#. The platform has some mechanism to program the reset address using
461 the PROGRAMMABLE_RESET_ADDRESS feature. Platform code can then
462 program the reset address with psci_warmboot_entrypoint during
463 cold boot, bypassing the boot ROM for warm boot.
464
465In the last 2 cases, no part of BL2 needs to remain resident at
466runtime. In the first 2 cases, we expect the Boot ROM to be able to
467differentiate between warm and cold boot, to avoid loading BL2 again
468during warm boot.
469
470This functionality can be tested with FVP loading the image directly
471in memory and changing the address where the system jumps at reset.
472For example:
473
Dimitris Papastamos25836492018-06-11 11:07:58 +0100474 -C cluster0.cpu0.RVBAR=0x4022000
475 --data cluster0.cpu0=bl2.bin@0x4022000
Roberto Vargasb1584272017-11-20 13:36:10 +0000476
477With this configuration, FVP is like a platform of the first case,
478where the Boot ROM jumps always to the same address. For simplification,
479BL32 is loaded in DRAM in this case, to avoid other images reclaiming
480BL2 memory.
481
482
Douglas Raillardd7c21b72017-06-28 15:23:03 +0100483AArch64 BL31
484~~~~~~~~~~~~
485
486The image for this stage is loaded by BL2 and BL1 passes control to BL31 at
487EL3. BL31 executes solely in trusted SRAM. BL31 is linked against and
488loaded at a platform-specific base address (more information can be found later
489in this document). The functionality implemented by BL31 is as follows.
490
491Architectural initialization
492^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
493
494Currently, BL31 performs a similar architectural initialization to BL1 as
495far as system register settings are concerned. Since BL1 code resides in ROM,
496architectural initialization in BL31 allows override of any previous
497initialization done by BL1.
498
499BL31 initializes the per-CPU data framework, which provides a cache of
500frequently accessed per-CPU data optimised for fast, concurrent manipulation
501on different CPUs. This buffer includes pointers to per-CPU contexts, crash
502buffer, CPU reset and power down operations, PSCI data, platform data and so on.
503
504It then replaces the exception vectors populated by BL1 with its own. BL31
505exception vectors implement more elaborate support for handling SMCs since this
506is the only mechanism to access the runtime services implemented by BL31 (PSCI
507for example). BL31 checks each SMC for validity as specified by the
Sandrine Bailleuxd9202df2020-04-17 14:06:52 +0200508`SMC Calling Convention`_ before passing control to the required SMC
Douglas Raillardd7c21b72017-06-28 15:23:03 +0100509handler routine.
510
511BL31 programs the ``CNTFRQ_EL0`` register with the clock frequency of the system
512counter, which is provided by the platform.
513
514Platform initialization
515^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
516
517BL31 performs detailed platform initialization, which enables normal world
518software to function correctly.
519
Dan Handley610e7e12018-03-01 18:44:00 +0000520On Arm platforms, this consists of the following:
Douglas Raillardd7c21b72017-06-28 15:23:03 +0100521
522- Initialize the console.
523- Configure the Interconnect to enable hardware coherency.
524- Enable the MMU and map the memory it needs to access.
525- Initialize the generic interrupt controller.
526- Initialize the power controller device.
527- Detect the system topology.
528
529Runtime services initialization
530^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
531
532BL31 is responsible for initializing the runtime services. One of them is PSCI.
533
534As part of the PSCI initializations, BL31 detects the system topology. It also
535initializes the data structures that implement the state machine used to track
536the state of power domain nodes. The state can be one of ``OFF``, ``RUN`` or
537``RETENTION``. All secondary CPUs are initially in the ``OFF`` state. The cluster
538that the primary CPU belongs to is ``ON``; any other cluster is ``OFF``. It also
539initializes the locks that protect them. BL31 accesses the state of a CPU or
540cluster immediately after reset and before the data cache is enabled in the
541warm boot path. It is not currently possible to use 'exclusive' based spinlocks,
542therefore BL31 uses locks based on Lamport's Bakery algorithm instead.
543
544The runtime service framework and its initialization is described in more
545detail in the "EL3 runtime services framework" section below.
546
547Details about the status of the PSCI implementation are provided in the
548"Power State Coordination Interface" section below.
549
550AArch64 BL32 (Secure-EL1 Payload) image initialization
551^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
552
553If a BL32 image is present then there must be a matching Secure-EL1 Payload
554Dispatcher (SPD) service (see later for details). During initialization
555that service must register a function to carry out initialization of BL32
556once the runtime services are fully initialized. BL31 invokes such a
557registered function to initialize BL32 before running BL33. This initialization
558is not necessary for AArch32 SPs.
559
560Details on BL32 initialization and the SPD's role are described in the
Paul Beesleyd2fcc4e2019-05-29 13:59:40 +0100561:ref:`firmware_design_sel1_spd` section below.
Douglas Raillardd7c21b72017-06-28 15:23:03 +0100562
563BL33 (Non-trusted Firmware) execution
564^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
565
566EL3 Runtime Software initializes the EL2 or EL1 processor context for normal-
567world cold boot, ensuring that no secure state information finds its way into
568the non-secure execution state. EL3 Runtime Software uses the entrypoint
569information provided by BL2 to jump to the Non-trusted firmware image (BL33)
570at the highest available Exception Level (EL2 if available, otherwise EL1).
571
572Using alternative Trusted Boot Firmware in place of BL1 & BL2 (AArch64 only)
573~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
574
575Some platforms have existing implementations of Trusted Boot Firmware that
Dan Handley610e7e12018-03-01 18:44:00 +0000576would like to use TF-A BL31 for the EL3 Runtime Software. To enable this
577firmware architecture it is important to provide a fully documented and stable
578interface between the Trusted Boot Firmware and BL31.
Douglas Raillardd7c21b72017-06-28 15:23:03 +0100579
580Future changes to the BL31 interface will be done in a backwards compatible
581way, and this enables these firmware components to be independently enhanced/
582updated to develop and exploit new functionality.
583
584Required CPU state when calling ``bl31_entrypoint()`` during cold boot
585^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
586
587This function must only be called by the primary CPU.
588
589On entry to this function the calling primary CPU must be executing in AArch64
590EL3, little-endian data access, and all interrupt sources masked:
591
592::
593
594 PSTATE.EL = 3
595 PSTATE.RW = 1
596 PSTATE.DAIF = 0xf
597 SCTLR_EL3.EE = 0
598
599X0 and X1 can be used to pass information from the Trusted Boot Firmware to the
600platform code in BL31:
601
602::
603
Dan Handley610e7e12018-03-01 18:44:00 +0000604 X0 : Reserved for common TF-A information
Douglas Raillardd7c21b72017-06-28 15:23:03 +0100605 X1 : Platform specific information
606
607BL31 zero-init sections (e.g. ``.bss``) should not contain valid data on entry,
608these will be zero filled prior to invoking platform setup code.
609
610Use of the X0 and X1 parameters
611'''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''
612
613The parameters are platform specific and passed from ``bl31_entrypoint()`` to
614``bl31_early_platform_setup()``. The value of these parameters is never directly
615used by the common BL31 code.
616
617The convention is that ``X0`` conveys information regarding the BL31, BL32 and
618BL33 images from the Trusted Boot firmware and ``X1`` can be used for other
Dan Handley610e7e12018-03-01 18:44:00 +0000619platform specific purpose. This convention allows platforms which use TF-A's
620BL1 and BL2 images to transfer additional platform specific information from
621Secure Boot without conflicting with future evolution of TF-A using ``X0`` to
622pass a ``bl31_params`` structure.
Douglas Raillardd7c21b72017-06-28 15:23:03 +0100623
624BL31 common and SPD initialization code depends on image and entrypoint
625information about BL33 and BL32, which is provided via BL31 platform APIs.
626This information is required until the start of execution of BL33. This
627information can be provided in a platform defined manner, e.g. compiled into
628the platform code in BL31, or provided in a platform defined memory location
629by the Trusted Boot firmware, or passed from the Trusted Boot Firmware via the
630Cold boot Initialization parameters. This data may need to be cleaned out of
631the CPU caches if it is provided by an earlier boot stage and then accessed by
632BL31 platform code before the caches are enabled.
633
Dan Handley610e7e12018-03-01 18:44:00 +0000634TF-A's BL2 implementation passes a ``bl31_params`` structure in
635``X0`` and the Arm development platforms interpret this in the BL31 platform
Douglas Raillardd7c21b72017-06-28 15:23:03 +0100636code.
637
638MMU, Data caches & Coherency
639''''''''''''''''''''''''''''
640
641BL31 does not depend on the enabled state of the MMU, data caches or
642interconnect coherency on entry to ``bl31_entrypoint()``. If these are disabled
643on entry, these should be enabled during ``bl31_plat_arch_setup()``.
644
645Data structures used in the BL31 cold boot interface
646''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''
647
Harrison Mutai5b0366b2024-01-30 14:21:12 +0000648In the cold boot flow, ``entry_point_info`` is used to represent the execution
649state of an image; that is, the state of general purpose registers, PC, and
650SPSR.
651
652There are two variants of this structure, for AArch64:
653
654.. code:: c
655
656 typedef struct entry_point_info {
657 param_header_t h;
658 uintptr_t pc;
659 uint32_t spsr;
660
661 aapcs64_params_t args;
662 }
663
664and, AArch32:
665
666.. code:: c
667
668 typedef struct entry_point_info {
669 param_header_t h;
670 uintptr_t pc;
671 uint32_t spsr;
672
673 uintptr_t lr_svc;
674 aapcs32_params_t args;
675 } entry_point_info_t;
676
Douglas Raillardd7c21b72017-06-28 15:23:03 +0100677These structures are designed to support compatibility and independent
678evolution of the structures and the firmware images. For example, a version of
679BL31 that can interpret the BL3x image information from different versions of
Sandrine Bailleux15530dd2019-02-08 15:26:36 +0100680BL2, a platform that uses an extended entry_point_info structure to convey
Douglas Raillardd7c21b72017-06-28 15:23:03 +0100681additional register information to BL31, or a ELF image loader that can convey
682more details about the firmware images.
683
684To support these scenarios the structures are versioned and sized, which enables
685BL31 to detect which information is present and respond appropriately. The
686``param_header`` is defined to capture this information:
687
688.. code:: c
689
690 typedef struct param_header {
691 uint8_t type; /* type of the structure */
692 uint8_t version; /* version of this structure */
693 uint16_t size; /* size of this structure in bytes */
Harrison Mutai5b0366b2024-01-30 14:21:12 +0000694 uint32_t attr; /* attributes */
Douglas Raillardd7c21b72017-06-28 15:23:03 +0100695 } param_header_t;
696
Harrison Mutai5b0366b2024-01-30 14:21:12 +0000697In `entry_point_info`, Bits 0 and 5 of ``attr`` field are used to encode the
698security state; in other words, whether the image is to be executed in Secure,
699Non-Secure, or Realm mode.
700
701Other structures using this format are ``image_info`` and ``bl31_params``. The
702code that allocates and populates these structures must set the header fields
703appropriately, the ``SET_PARAM_HEAD()`` macro is defined to simplify this
704action.
Douglas Raillardd7c21b72017-06-28 15:23:03 +0100705
706Required CPU state for BL31 Warm boot initialization
707^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
708
Dan Handley610e7e12018-03-01 18:44:00 +0000709When requesting a CPU power-on, or suspending a running CPU, TF-A provides
710the platform power management code with a Warm boot initialization
711entry-point, to be invoked by the CPU immediately after the reset handler.
712On entry to the Warm boot initialization function the calling CPU must be in
713AArch64 EL3, little-endian data access and all interrupt sources masked:
Douglas Raillardd7c21b72017-06-28 15:23:03 +0100714
715::
716
717 PSTATE.EL = 3
718 PSTATE.RW = 1
719 PSTATE.DAIF = 0xf
720 SCTLR_EL3.EE = 0
721
722The PSCI implementation will initialize the processor state and ensure that the
723platform power management code is then invoked as required to initialize all
724necessary system, cluster and CPU resources.
725
726AArch32 EL3 Runtime Software entrypoint interface
727~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
728
729To enable this firmware architecture it is important to provide a fully
730documented and stable interface between the Trusted Boot Firmware and the
731AArch32 EL3 Runtime Software.
732
733Future changes to the entrypoint interface will be done in a backwards
734compatible way, and this enables these firmware components to be independently
735enhanced/updated to develop and exploit new functionality.
736
737Required CPU state when entering during cold boot
738^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
739
740This function must only be called by the primary CPU.
741
742On entry to this function the calling primary CPU must be executing in AArch32
743EL3, little-endian data access, and all interrupt sources masked:
744
745::
746
747 PSTATE.AIF = 0x7
748 SCTLR.EE = 0
749
750R0 and R1 are used to pass information from the Trusted Boot Firmware to the
751platform code in AArch32 EL3 Runtime Software:
752
753::
754
Dan Handley610e7e12018-03-01 18:44:00 +0000755 R0 : Reserved for common TF-A information
Douglas Raillardd7c21b72017-06-28 15:23:03 +0100756 R1 : Platform specific information
757
758Use of the R0 and R1 parameters
759'''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''
760
761The parameters are platform specific and the convention is that ``R0`` conveys
762information regarding the BL3x images from the Trusted Boot firmware and ``R1``
763can be used for other platform specific purpose. This convention allows
Dan Handley610e7e12018-03-01 18:44:00 +0000764platforms which use TF-A's BL1 and BL2 images to transfer additional platform
765specific information from Secure Boot without conflicting with future
766evolution of TF-A using ``R0`` to pass a ``bl_params`` structure.
Douglas Raillardd7c21b72017-06-28 15:23:03 +0100767
768The AArch32 EL3 Runtime Software is responsible for entry into BL33. This
769information can be obtained in a platform defined manner, e.g. compiled into
770the AArch32 EL3 Runtime Software, or provided in a platform defined memory
771location by the Trusted Boot firmware, or passed from the Trusted Boot Firmware
772via the Cold boot Initialization parameters. This data may need to be cleaned
773out of the CPU caches if it is provided by an earlier boot stage and then
774accessed by AArch32 EL3 Runtime Software before the caches are enabled.
775
Dan Handley610e7e12018-03-01 18:44:00 +0000776When using AArch32 EL3 Runtime Software, the Arm development platforms pass a
Douglas Raillardd7c21b72017-06-28 15:23:03 +0100777``bl_params`` structure in ``R0`` from BL2 to be interpreted by AArch32 EL3 Runtime
778Software platform code.
779
780MMU, Data caches & Coherency
781''''''''''''''''''''''''''''
782
783AArch32 EL3 Runtime Software must not depend on the enabled state of the MMU,
784data caches or interconnect coherency in its entrypoint. They must be explicitly
785enabled if required.
786
787Data structures used in cold boot interface
788'''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''
789
790The AArch32 EL3 Runtime Software cold boot interface uses ``bl_params`` instead
791of ``bl31_params``. The ``bl_params`` structure is based on the convention
792described in AArch64 BL31 cold boot interface section.
793
794Required CPU state for warm boot initialization
795^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
796
797When requesting a CPU power-on, or suspending a running CPU, AArch32 EL3
798Runtime Software must ensure execution of a warm boot initialization entrypoint.
Sandrine Bailleux15530dd2019-02-08 15:26:36 +0100799If TF-A BL1 is used and the PROGRAMMABLE_RESET_ADDRESS build flag is false,
Dan Handley610e7e12018-03-01 18:44:00 +0000800then AArch32 EL3 Runtime Software must ensure that BL1 branches to the warm
801boot entrypoint by arranging for the BL1 platform function,
Sandrine Bailleux15530dd2019-02-08 15:26:36 +0100802plat_get_my_entrypoint(), to return a non-zero value.
Douglas Raillardd7c21b72017-06-28 15:23:03 +0100803
804In this case, the warm boot entrypoint must be in AArch32 EL3, little-endian
805data access and all interrupt sources masked:
806
807::
808
809 PSTATE.AIF = 0x7
810 SCTLR.EE = 0
811
Dan Handley610e7e12018-03-01 18:44:00 +0000812The warm boot entrypoint may be implemented by using TF-A
Douglas Raillardd7c21b72017-06-28 15:23:03 +0100813``psci_warmboot_entrypoint()`` function. In that case, the platform must fulfil
Paul Beesleyf8640672019-04-12 14:19:42 +0100814the pre-requisites mentioned in the
815:ref:`PSCI Library Integration guide for Armv8-A AArch32 systems`.
Douglas Raillardd7c21b72017-06-28 15:23:03 +0100816
817EL3 runtime services framework
818------------------------------
819
820Software executing in the non-secure state and in the secure state at exception
821levels lower than EL3 will request runtime services using the Secure Monitor
822Call (SMC) instruction. These requests will follow the convention described in
823the SMC Calling Convention PDD (`SMCCC`_). The `SMCCC`_ assigns function
824identifiers to each SMC request and describes how arguments are passed and
825returned.
826
827The EL3 runtime services framework enables the development of services by
828different providers that can be easily integrated into final product firmware.
829The following sections describe the framework which facilitates the
830registration, initialization and use of runtime services in EL3 Runtime
831Software (BL31).
832
833The design of the runtime services depends heavily on the concepts and
834definitions described in the `SMCCC`_, in particular SMC Function IDs, Owning
835Entity Numbers (OEN), Fast and Yielding calls, and the SMC32 and SMC64 calling
836conventions. Please refer to that document for more detailed explanation of
837these terms.
838
839The following runtime services are expected to be implemented first. They have
840not all been instantiated in the current implementation.
841
842#. Standard service calls
843
844 This service is for management of the entire system. The Power State
845 Coordination Interface (`PSCI`_) is the first set of standard service calls
Dan Handley610e7e12018-03-01 18:44:00 +0000846 defined by Arm (see PSCI section later).
Douglas Raillardd7c21b72017-06-28 15:23:03 +0100847
848#. Secure-EL1 Payload Dispatcher service
849
850 If a system runs a Trusted OS or other Secure-EL1 Payload (SP) then
851 it also requires a *Secure Monitor* at EL3 to switch the EL1 processor
852 context between the normal world (EL1/EL2) and trusted world (Secure-EL1).
853 The Secure Monitor will make these world switches in response to SMCs. The
854 `SMCCC`_ provides for such SMCs with the Trusted OS Call and Trusted
855 Application Call OEN ranges.
856
857 The interface between the EL3 Runtime Software and the Secure-EL1 Payload is
858 not defined by the `SMCCC`_ or any other standard. As a result, each
859 Secure-EL1 Payload requires a specific Secure Monitor that runs as a runtime
Dan Handley610e7e12018-03-01 18:44:00 +0000860 service - within TF-A this service is referred to as the Secure-EL1 Payload
861 Dispatcher (SPD).
Douglas Raillardd7c21b72017-06-28 15:23:03 +0100862
Dan Handley610e7e12018-03-01 18:44:00 +0000863 TF-A provides a Test Secure-EL1 Payload (TSP) and its associated Dispatcher
864 (TSPD). Details of SPD design and TSP/TSPD operation are described in the
Paul Beesleyd2fcc4e2019-05-29 13:59:40 +0100865 :ref:`firmware_design_sel1_spd` section below.
Douglas Raillardd7c21b72017-06-28 15:23:03 +0100866
867#. CPU implementation service
868
869 This service will provide an interface to CPU implementation specific
870 services for a given platform e.g. access to processor errata workarounds.
871 This service is currently unimplemented.
872
Dan Handley610e7e12018-03-01 18:44:00 +0000873Additional services for Arm Architecture, SiP and OEM calls can be implemented.
Douglas Raillardd7c21b72017-06-28 15:23:03 +0100874Each implemented service handles a range of SMC function identifiers as
875described in the `SMCCC`_.
876
877Registration
878~~~~~~~~~~~~
879
880A runtime service is registered using the ``DECLARE_RT_SVC()`` macro, specifying
881the name of the service, the range of OENs covered, the type of service and
882initialization and call handler functions. This macro instantiates a ``const struct rt_svc_desc`` for the service with these details (see ``runtime_svc.h``).
Chris Kay33bfc5e2023-02-14 11:30:04 +0000883This structure is allocated in a special ELF section ``.rt_svc_descs``, enabling
Douglas Raillardd7c21b72017-06-28 15:23:03 +0100884the framework to find all service descriptors included into BL31.
885
886The specific service for a SMC Function is selected based on the OEN and call
887type of the Function ID, and the framework uses that information in the service
888descriptor to identify the handler for the SMC Call.
889
890The service descriptors do not include information to identify the precise set
891of SMC function identifiers supported by this service implementation, the
892security state from which such calls are valid nor the capability to support
89364-bit and/or 32-bit callers (using SMC32 or SMC64). Responding appropriately
894to these aspects of a SMC call is the responsibility of the service
895implementation, the framework is focused on integration of services from
896different providers and minimizing the time taken by the framework before the
897service handler is invoked.
898
899Details of the parameters, requirements and behavior of the initialization and
900call handling functions are provided in the following sections.
901
902Initialization
903~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
904
905``runtime_svc_init()`` in ``runtime_svc.c`` initializes the runtime services
906framework running on the primary CPU during cold boot as part of the BL31
907initialization. This happens prior to initializing a Trusted OS and running
908Normal world boot firmware that might in turn use these services.
909Initialization involves validating each of the declared runtime service
910descriptors, calling the service initialization function and populating the
911index used for runtime lookup of the service.
912
913The BL31 linker script collects all of the declared service descriptors into a
914single array and defines symbols that allow the framework to locate and traverse
915the array, and determine its size.
916
917The framework does basic validation of each descriptor to halt firmware
918initialization if service declaration errors are detected. The framework does
919not check descriptors for the following error conditions, and may behave in an
920unpredictable manner under such scenarios:
921
922#. Overlapping OEN ranges
923#. Multiple descriptors for the same range of OENs and ``call_type``
924#. Incorrect range of owning entity numbers for a given ``call_type``
925
926Once validated, the service ``init()`` callback is invoked. This function carries
927out any essential EL3 initialization before servicing requests. The ``init()``
928function is only invoked on the primary CPU during cold boot. If the service
929uses per-CPU data this must either be initialized for all CPUs during this call,
930or be done lazily when a CPU first issues an SMC call to that service. If
931``init()`` returns anything other than ``0``, this is treated as an initialization
932error and the service is ignored: this does not cause the firmware to halt.
933
934The OEN and call type fields present in the SMC Function ID cover a total of
935128 distinct services, but in practice a single descriptor can cover a range of
936OENs, e.g. SMCs to call a Trusted OS function. To optimize the lookup of a
937service handler, the framework uses an array of 128 indices that map every
938distinct OEN/call-type combination either to one of the declared services or to
939indicate the service is not handled. This ``rt_svc_descs_indices[]`` array is
940populated for all of the OENs covered by a service after the service ``init()``
941function has reported success. So a service that fails to initialize will never
942have it's ``handle()`` function invoked.
943
944The following figure shows how the ``rt_svc_descs_indices[]`` index maps the SMC
945Function ID call type and OEN onto a specific service handler in the
946``rt_svc_descs[]`` array.
947
948|Image 1|
949
Madhukar Pappireddy86350ae2020-07-29 09:37:25 -0500950.. _handling-an-smc:
951
Douglas Raillardd7c21b72017-06-28 15:23:03 +0100952Handling an SMC
953~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
954
955When the EL3 runtime services framework receives a Secure Monitor Call, the SMC
956Function ID is passed in W0 from the lower exception level (as per the
957`SMCCC`_). If the calling register width is AArch32, it is invalid to invoke an
958SMC Function which indicates the SMC64 calling convention: such calls are
959ignored and return the Unknown SMC Function Identifier result code ``0xFFFFFFFF``
960in R0/X0.
961
962Bit[31] (fast/yielding call) and bits[29:24] (owning entity number) of the SMC
963Function ID are combined to index into the ``rt_svc_descs_indices[]`` array. The
964resulting value might indicate a service that has no handler, in this case the
965framework will also report an Unknown SMC Function ID. Otherwise, the value is
966used as a further index into the ``rt_svc_descs[]`` array to locate the required
967service and handler.
968
969The service's ``handle()`` callback is provided with five of the SMC parameters
970directly, the others are saved into memory for retrieval (if needed) by the
971handler. The handler is also provided with an opaque ``handle`` for use with the
972supporting library for parameter retrieval, setting return values and context
Olivier Deprez33dd8452022-10-11 15:38:27 +0200973manipulation. The ``flags`` parameter indicates the security state of the caller
974and the state of the SVE hint bit per the SMCCCv1.3. The framework finally sets
975up the execution stack for the handler, and invokes the services ``handle()``
976function.
Douglas Raillardd7c21b72017-06-28 15:23:03 +0100977
Madhukar Pappireddy20be0772019-11-09 23:28:08 -0600978On return from the handler the result registers are populated in X0-X7 as needed
979before restoring the stack and CPU state and returning from the original SMC.
Douglas Raillardd7c21b72017-06-28 15:23:03 +0100980
Jeenu Viswambharancbb40d52017-10-18 14:30:53 +0100981Exception Handling Framework
982----------------------------
983
johpow017402f072020-07-28 13:07:25 -0500984Please refer to the :ref:`Exception Handling Framework` document.
Jeenu Viswambharancbb40d52017-10-18 14:30:53 +0100985
Douglas Raillardd7c21b72017-06-28 15:23:03 +0100986Power State Coordination Interface
987----------------------------------
988
989TODO: Provide design walkthrough of PSCI implementation.
990
Roberto Vargasd963e3e2017-09-12 10:28:35 +0100991The PSCI v1.1 specification categorizes APIs as optional and mandatory. All the
992mandatory APIs in PSCI v1.1, PSCI v1.0 and in PSCI v0.2 draft specification
Manish V Badarkhe9d24e9b2023-06-15 09:14:33 +0100993`PSCI`_ are implemented. The table lists the PSCI v1.1 APIs and their support
994in generic code.
Douglas Raillardd7c21b72017-06-28 15:23:03 +0100995
Sandrine Bailleux15530dd2019-02-08 15:26:36 +0100996An API implementation might have a dependency on platform code e.g. CPU_SUSPEND
Douglas Raillardd7c21b72017-06-28 15:23:03 +0100997requires the platform to export a part of the implementation. Hence the level
998of support of the mandatory APIs depends upon the support exported by the
999platform port as well. The Juno and FVP (all variants) platforms export all the
1000required support.
1001
1002+-----------------------------+-------------+-------------------------------+
Roberto Vargasd963e3e2017-09-12 10:28:35 +01001003| PSCI v1.1 API | Supported | Comments |
Douglas Raillardd7c21b72017-06-28 15:23:03 +01001004+=============================+=============+===============================+
Roberto Vargasd963e3e2017-09-12 10:28:35 +01001005| ``PSCI_VERSION`` | Yes | The version returned is 1.1 |
Douglas Raillardd7c21b72017-06-28 15:23:03 +01001006+-----------------------------+-------------+-------------------------------+
1007| ``CPU_SUSPEND`` | Yes\* | |
1008+-----------------------------+-------------+-------------------------------+
1009| ``CPU_OFF`` | Yes\* | |
1010+-----------------------------+-------------+-------------------------------+
1011| ``CPU_ON`` | Yes\* | |
1012+-----------------------------+-------------+-------------------------------+
1013| ``AFFINITY_INFO`` | Yes | |
1014+-----------------------------+-------------+-------------------------------+
1015| ``MIGRATE`` | Yes\*\* | |
1016+-----------------------------+-------------+-------------------------------+
1017| ``MIGRATE_INFO_TYPE`` | Yes\*\* | |
1018+-----------------------------+-------------+-------------------------------+
1019| ``MIGRATE_INFO_CPU`` | Yes\*\* | |
1020+-----------------------------+-------------+-------------------------------+
1021| ``SYSTEM_OFF`` | Yes\* | |
1022+-----------------------------+-------------+-------------------------------+
1023| ``SYSTEM_RESET`` | Yes\* | |
1024+-----------------------------+-------------+-------------------------------+
1025| ``PSCI_FEATURES`` | Yes | |
1026+-----------------------------+-------------+-------------------------------+
1027| ``CPU_FREEZE`` | No | |
1028+-----------------------------+-------------+-------------------------------+
1029| ``CPU_DEFAULT_SUSPEND`` | No | |
1030+-----------------------------+-------------+-------------------------------+
1031| ``NODE_HW_STATE`` | Yes\* | |
1032+-----------------------------+-------------+-------------------------------+
1033| ``SYSTEM_SUSPEND`` | Yes\* | |
1034+-----------------------------+-------------+-------------------------------+
1035| ``PSCI_SET_SUSPEND_MODE`` | No | |
1036+-----------------------------+-------------+-------------------------------+
1037| ``PSCI_STAT_RESIDENCY`` | Yes\* | |
1038+-----------------------------+-------------+-------------------------------+
1039| ``PSCI_STAT_COUNT`` | Yes\* | |
1040+-----------------------------+-------------+-------------------------------+
Roberto Vargasd963e3e2017-09-12 10:28:35 +01001041| ``SYSTEM_RESET2`` | Yes\* | |
1042+-----------------------------+-------------+-------------------------------+
1043| ``MEM_PROTECT`` | Yes\* | |
1044+-----------------------------+-------------+-------------------------------+
1045| ``MEM_PROTECT_CHECK_RANGE`` | Yes\* | |
1046+-----------------------------+-------------+-------------------------------+
Douglas Raillardd7c21b72017-06-28 15:23:03 +01001047
1048\*Note : These PSCI APIs require platform power management hooks to be
1049registered with the generic PSCI code to be supported.
1050
1051\*\*Note : These PSCI APIs require appropriate Secure Payload Dispatcher
1052hooks to be registered with the generic PSCI code to be supported.
1053
Dan Handley610e7e12018-03-01 18:44:00 +00001054The PSCI implementation in TF-A is a library which can be integrated with
1055AArch64 or AArch32 EL3 Runtime Software for Armv8-A systems. A guide to
1056integrating PSCI library with AArch32 EL3 Runtime Software can be found
Paul Beesleyf8640672019-04-12 14:19:42 +01001057at :ref:`PSCI Library Integration guide for Armv8-A AArch32 systems`.
1058
Arvind Ram Prakash0f5a1ec2025-05-07 10:01:57 -05001059DSU driver
1060----------
1061
1062Platforms that include a DSU (DynamIQ Shared Unit) can define
1063the ``USE_DSU_DRIVER`` build flag to enable the DSU driver.
1064This driver is responsible for configuring DSU-related powerdown
1065and power feature settings using ``dsu_driver_init()`` and for
1066preserving the context of DSU PMU system registers.
1067
1068To support the DSU driver, platforms must define the ``plat_dsu_data``
1069structure.
1070
Paul Beesleyf8640672019-04-12 14:19:42 +01001071.. _firmware_design_sel1_spd:
Douglas Raillardd7c21b72017-06-28 15:23:03 +01001072
1073Secure-EL1 Payloads and Dispatchers
1074-----------------------------------
1075
1076On a production system that includes a Trusted OS running in Secure-EL1/EL0,
1077the Trusted OS is coupled with a companion runtime service in the BL31
1078firmware. This service is responsible for the initialisation of the Trusted
1079OS and all communications with it. The Trusted OS is the BL32 stage of the
Dan Handley610e7e12018-03-01 18:44:00 +00001080boot flow in TF-A. The firmware will attempt to locate, load and execute a
1081BL32 image.
Douglas Raillardd7c21b72017-06-28 15:23:03 +01001082
Dan Handley610e7e12018-03-01 18:44:00 +00001083TF-A uses a more general term for the BL32 software that runs at Secure-EL1 -
1084the *Secure-EL1 Payload* - as it is not always a Trusted OS.
Douglas Raillardd7c21b72017-06-28 15:23:03 +01001085
Dan Handley610e7e12018-03-01 18:44:00 +00001086TF-A provides a Test Secure-EL1 Payload (TSP) and a Test Secure-EL1 Payload
1087Dispatcher (TSPD) service as an example of how a Trusted OS is supported on a
1088production system using the Runtime Services Framework. On such a system, the
1089Test BL32 image and service are replaced by the Trusted OS and its dispatcher
1090service. The TF-A build system expects that the dispatcher will define the
1091build flag ``NEED_BL32`` to enable it to include the BL32 in the build either
1092as a binary or to compile from source depending on whether the ``BL32`` build
1093option is specified or not.
Douglas Raillardd7c21b72017-06-28 15:23:03 +01001094
1095The TSP runs in Secure-EL1. It is designed to demonstrate synchronous
1096communication with the normal-world software running in EL1/EL2. Communication
1097is initiated by the normal-world software
1098
1099- either directly through a Fast SMC (as defined in the `SMCCC`_)
1100
1101- or indirectly through a `PSCI`_ SMC. The `PSCI`_ implementation in turn
1102 informs the TSPD about the requested power management operation. This allows
1103 the TSP to prepare for or respond to the power state change
1104
1105The TSPD service is responsible for.
1106
1107- Initializing the TSP
1108
1109- Routing requests and responses between the secure and the non-secure
1110 states during the two types of communications just described
1111
1112Initializing a BL32 Image
1113~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
1114
1115The Secure-EL1 Payload Dispatcher (SPD) service is responsible for initializing
1116the BL32 image. It needs access to the information passed by BL2 to BL31 to do
1117so. This is provided by:
1118
1119.. code:: c
1120
1121 entry_point_info_t *bl31_plat_get_next_image_ep_info(uint32_t);
1122
1123which returns a reference to the ``entry_point_info`` structure corresponding to
1124the image which will be run in the specified security state. The SPD uses this
1125API to get entry point information for the SECURE image, BL32.
1126
1127In the absence of a BL32 image, BL31 passes control to the normal world
1128bootloader image (BL33). When the BL32 image is present, it is typical
1129that the SPD wants control to be passed to BL32 first and then later to BL33.
1130
1131To do this the SPD has to register a BL32 initialization function during
1132initialization of the SPD service. The BL32 initialization function has this
1133prototype:
1134
1135.. code:: c
1136
1137 int32_t init(void);
1138
1139and is registered using the ``bl31_register_bl32_init()`` function.
1140
Dan Handley610e7e12018-03-01 18:44:00 +00001141TF-A supports two approaches for the SPD to pass control to BL32 before
1142returning through EL3 and running the non-trusted firmware (BL33):
Douglas Raillardd7c21b72017-06-28 15:23:03 +01001143
1144#. In the BL32 setup function, use ``bl31_set_next_image_type()`` to
1145 request that the exit from ``bl31_main()`` is to the BL32 entrypoint in
1146 Secure-EL1. BL31 will exit to BL32 using the asynchronous method by
1147 calling ``bl31_prepare_next_image_entry()`` and ``el3_exit()``.
1148
1149 When the BL32 has completed initialization at Secure-EL1, it returns to
1150 BL31 by issuing an SMC, using a Function ID allocated to the SPD. On
1151 receipt of this SMC, the SPD service handler should switch the CPU context
1152 from trusted to normal world and use the ``bl31_set_next_image_type()`` and
1153 ``bl31_prepare_next_image_entry()`` functions to set up the initial return to
1154 the normal world firmware BL33. On return from the handler the framework
1155 will exit to EL2 and run BL33.
1156
1157#. The BL32 setup function registers an initialization function using
1158 ``bl31_register_bl32_init()`` which provides a SPD-defined mechanism to
1159 invoke a 'world-switch synchronous call' to Secure-EL1 to run the BL32
1160 entrypoint.
Paul Beesleyba3ed402019-03-13 16:20:44 +00001161
1162 .. note::
1163 The Test SPD service included with TF-A provides one implementation
1164 of such a mechanism.
Douglas Raillardd7c21b72017-06-28 15:23:03 +01001165
1166 On completion BL32 returns control to BL31 via a SMC, and on receipt the
1167 SPD service handler invokes the synchronous call return mechanism to return
1168 to the BL32 initialization function. On return from this function,
1169 ``bl31_main()`` will set up the return to the normal world firmware BL33 and
1170 continue the boot process in the normal world.
1171
Manish Pandey493bdc42023-07-21 13:08:53 +01001172Exception handling in BL31
1173--------------------------
1174
1175When exception occurs, PE must execute handler corresponding to exception. The
1176location in memory where the handler is stored is called the exception vector.
1177For ARM architecture, exception vectors are stored in a table, called the exception
1178vector table.
1179
1180Each EL (except EL0) has its own vector table, VBAR_ELn register stores the base
1181of vector table. Refer to `AArch64 exception vector table`_
1182
1183Current EL with SP_EL0
1184~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
1185
1186- Sync exception : Not expected except for BRK instruction, its debugging tool which
1187 a programmer may place at specific points in a program, to check the state of
1188 processor flags at these points in the code.
1189
1190- IRQ/FIQ : Unexpected exception, panic
1191
1192- SError : "plat_handle_el3_ea", defaults to panic
1193
1194Current EL with SP_ELx
1195~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
1196
1197- Sync exception : Unexpected exception, panic
1198
1199- IRQ/FIQ : Unexpected exception, panic
1200
1201- SError : "plat_handle_el3_ea" Except for special handling of lower EL's SError exception
1202 which gets triggered in EL3 when PSTATE.A is unmasked. Its only applicable when lower
1203 EL's EA is routed to EL3 (FFH_SUPPORT=1).
1204
1205Lower EL Exceptions
1206~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
1207
1208Applies to all the exceptions in both AArch64/AArch32 mode of lower EL.
1209
1210Before handling any lower EL exception, we synchronize the errors at EL3 entry to ensure
1211that any errors pertaining to lower EL is isolated/identified. If we continue without
1212identifying these errors early on then these errors will trigger in EL3 (as SError from
1213current EL) any time after PSTATE.A is unmasked. This is wrong because the error originated
1214in lower EL but exception happened in EL3.
1215
1216To solve this problem, synchronize the errors at EL3 entry and check for any pending
1217errors (async EA). If there is no pending error then continue with original exception.
1218If there is a pending error then, handle them based on routing model of EA's. Refer to
1219:ref:`Reliability, Availability, and Serviceability (RAS) Extensions` for details about
1220routing models.
1221
1222- KFH : Reflect it back to lower EL using **reflect_pending_async_ea_to_lower_el()**
1223
1224- FFH : Handle the synchronized error first using **handle_pending_async_ea()** after
1225 that continue with original exception. It is the only scenario where EL3 is capable
1226 of doing nested exception handling.
1227
1228After synchronizing and handling lower EL SErrors, unmask EA (PSTATE.A) to ensure
1229that any further EA's caused by EL3 are caught.
1230
Jeenu Viswambharanb60420a2017-08-24 15:43:44 +01001231Crash Reporting in BL31
1232-----------------------
Douglas Raillardd7c21b72017-06-28 15:23:03 +01001233
1234BL31 implements a scheme for reporting the processor state when an unhandled
1235exception is encountered. The reporting mechanism attempts to preserve all the
1236register contents and report it via a dedicated UART (PL011 console). BL31
1237reports the general purpose, EL3, Secure EL1 and some EL2 state registers.
1238
1239A dedicated per-CPU crash stack is maintained by BL31 and this is retrieved via
1240the per-CPU pointer cache. The implementation attempts to minimise the memory
1241required for this feature. The file ``crash_reporting.S`` contains the
1242implementation for crash reporting.
1243
1244The sample crash output is shown below.
1245
1246::
1247
Alexei Fedorov813c9f92020-03-03 13:31:58 +00001248 x0 = 0x000000002a4a0000
1249 x1 = 0x0000000000000001
1250 x2 = 0x0000000000000002
1251 x3 = 0x0000000000000003
1252 x4 = 0x0000000000000004
1253 x5 = 0x0000000000000005
1254 x6 = 0x0000000000000006
1255 x7 = 0x0000000000000007
1256 x8 = 0x0000000000000008
1257 x9 = 0x0000000000000009
1258 x10 = 0x0000000000000010
1259 x11 = 0x0000000000000011
1260 x12 = 0x0000000000000012
1261 x13 = 0x0000000000000013
1262 x14 = 0x0000000000000014
1263 x15 = 0x0000000000000015
1264 x16 = 0x0000000000000016
1265 x17 = 0x0000000000000017
1266 x18 = 0x0000000000000018
1267 x19 = 0x0000000000000019
1268 x20 = 0x0000000000000020
1269 x21 = 0x0000000000000021
1270 x22 = 0x0000000000000022
1271 x23 = 0x0000000000000023
1272 x24 = 0x0000000000000024
1273 x25 = 0x0000000000000025
1274 x26 = 0x0000000000000026
1275 x27 = 0x0000000000000027
1276 x28 = 0x0000000000000028
1277 x29 = 0x0000000000000029
1278 x30 = 0x0000000088000b78
1279 scr_el3 = 0x000000000003073d
1280 sctlr_el3 = 0x00000000b0cd183f
1281 cptr_el3 = 0x0000000000000000
1282 tcr_el3 = 0x000000008080351c
1283 daif = 0x00000000000002c0
1284 mair_el3 = 0x00000000004404ff
1285 spsr_el3 = 0x0000000060000349
1286 elr_el3 = 0x0000000088000114
1287 ttbr0_el3 = 0x0000000004018201
1288 esr_el3 = 0x00000000be000000
1289 far_el3 = 0x0000000000000000
1290 spsr_el1 = 0x0000000000000000
1291 elr_el1 = 0x0000000000000000
1292 spsr_abt = 0x0000000000000000
1293 spsr_und = 0x0000000000000000
1294 spsr_irq = 0x0000000000000000
1295 spsr_fiq = 0x0000000000000000
1296 sctlr_el1 = 0x0000000030d00800
1297 actlr_el1 = 0x0000000000000000
1298 cpacr_el1 = 0x0000000000000000
1299 csselr_el1 = 0x0000000000000000
1300 sp_el1 = 0x0000000000000000
1301 esr_el1 = 0x0000000000000000
1302 ttbr0_el1 = 0x0000000000000000
1303 ttbr1_el1 = 0x0000000000000000
1304 mair_el1 = 0x0000000000000000
1305 amair_el1 = 0x0000000000000000
1306 tcr_el1 = 0x0000000000000000
1307 tpidr_el1 = 0x0000000000000000
1308 tpidr_el0 = 0x0000000000000000
1309 tpidrro_el0 = 0x0000000000000000
1310 par_el1 = 0x0000000000000000
1311 mpidr_el1 = 0x0000000080000000
1312 afsr0_el1 = 0x0000000000000000
1313 afsr1_el1 = 0x0000000000000000
1314 contextidr_el1 = 0x0000000000000000
1315 vbar_el1 = 0x0000000000000000
1316 cntp_ctl_el0 = 0x0000000000000000
1317 cntp_cval_el0 = 0x0000000000000000
1318 cntv_ctl_el0 = 0x0000000000000000
1319 cntv_cval_el0 = 0x0000000000000000
1320 cntkctl_el1 = 0x0000000000000000
1321 sp_el0 = 0x0000000004014940
1322 isr_el1 = 0x0000000000000000
1323 dacr32_el2 = 0x0000000000000000
1324 ifsr32_el2 = 0x0000000000000000
1325 icc_hppir0_el1 = 0x00000000000003ff
1326 icc_hppir1_el1 = 0x00000000000003ff
1327 icc_ctlr_el3 = 0x0000000000080400
1328 gicd_ispendr regs (Offsets 0x200-0x278)
1329 Offset Value
1330 0x200: 0x0000000000000000
1331 0x208: 0x0000000000000000
1332 0x210: 0x0000000000000000
1333 0x218: 0x0000000000000000
1334 0x220: 0x0000000000000000
1335 0x228: 0x0000000000000000
1336 0x230: 0x0000000000000000
1337 0x238: 0x0000000000000000
1338 0x240: 0x0000000000000000
1339 0x248: 0x0000000000000000
1340 0x250: 0x0000000000000000
1341 0x258: 0x0000000000000000
1342 0x260: 0x0000000000000000
1343 0x268: 0x0000000000000000
1344 0x270: 0x0000000000000000
1345 0x278: 0x0000000000000000
Douglas Raillardd7c21b72017-06-28 15:23:03 +01001346
1347Guidelines for Reset Handlers
1348-----------------------------
1349
Dan Handley610e7e12018-03-01 18:44:00 +00001350TF-A implements a framework that allows CPU and platform ports to perform
1351actions very early after a CPU is released from reset in both the cold and warm
Boyan Karatotev1dcba8f2024-11-19 11:27:01 +00001352boot paths. This is done by calling the ``reset_handler`` macro/function in both
Dan Handley610e7e12018-03-01 18:44:00 +00001353the BL1 and BL31 images. It in turn calls the platform and CPU specific reset
1354handling functions.
Douglas Raillardd7c21b72017-06-28 15:23:03 +01001355
1356Details for implementing a CPU specific reset handler can be found in
Boyan Karatotevd71b5d72023-02-07 15:46:50 +00001357:ref:`firmware_design_cpu_specific_reset_handling`. Details for implementing a
1358platform specific reset handler can be found in the :ref:`Porting Guide` (see
1359the``plat_reset_handler()`` function).
Douglas Raillardd7c21b72017-06-28 15:23:03 +01001360
1361When adding functionality to a reset handler, keep in mind that if a different
1362reset handling behavior is required between the first and the subsequent
1363invocations of the reset handling code, this should be detected at runtime.
1364In other words, the reset handler should be able to detect whether an action has
1365already been performed and act as appropriate. Possible courses of actions are,
1366e.g. skip the action the second time, or undo/redo it.
1367
Madhukar Pappireddy86350ae2020-07-29 09:37:25 -05001368.. _configuring-secure-interrupts:
1369
Jeenu Viswambharanaeb267c2017-09-22 08:32:09 +01001370Configuring secure interrupts
1371-----------------------------
1372
1373The GIC driver is responsible for performing initial configuration of secure
1374interrupts on the platform. To this end, the platform is expected to provide the
1375GIC driver (either GICv2 or GICv3, as selected by the platform) with the
1376interrupt configuration during the driver initialisation.
1377
Antonio Nino Diaz29b9f5b2018-09-24 17:23:24 +01001378Secure interrupt configuration are specified in an array of secure interrupt
1379properties. In this scheme, in both GICv2 and GICv3 driver data structures, the
1380``interrupt_props`` member points to an array of interrupt properties. Each
Antonio Nino Diaz56b68ad2019-02-28 13:35:21 +00001381element of the array specifies the interrupt number and its attributes
1382(priority, group, configuration). Each element of the array shall be populated
1383by the macro ``INTR_PROP_DESC()``. The macro takes the following arguments:
Jeenu Viswambharanaeb267c2017-09-22 08:32:09 +01001384
Ming Huang1bea7aa2023-02-01 14:03:44 +08001385- 13-bit interrupt number,
Jeenu Viswambharanaeb267c2017-09-22 08:32:09 +01001386
Antonio Nino Diaz29b9f5b2018-09-24 17:23:24 +01001387- 8-bit interrupt priority,
Jeenu Viswambharanaeb267c2017-09-22 08:32:09 +01001388
Antonio Nino Diaz29b9f5b2018-09-24 17:23:24 +01001389- Interrupt type (one of ``INTR_TYPE_EL3``, ``INTR_TYPE_S_EL1``,
1390 ``INTR_TYPE_NS``),
Jeenu Viswambharanaeb267c2017-09-22 08:32:09 +01001391
Antonio Nino Diaz29b9f5b2018-09-24 17:23:24 +01001392- Interrupt configuration (either ``GIC_INTR_CFG_LEVEL`` or
1393 ``GIC_INTR_CFG_EDGE``).
Jeenu Viswambharanaeb267c2017-09-22 08:32:09 +01001394
Paul Beesleyf8640672019-04-12 14:19:42 +01001395.. _firmware_design_cpu_ops_fwk:
1396
Douglas Raillardd7c21b72017-06-28 15:23:03 +01001397CPU specific operations framework
1398---------------------------------
1399
Dan Handley610e7e12018-03-01 18:44:00 +00001400Certain aspects of the Armv8-A architecture are implementation defined,
1401that is, certain behaviours are not architecturally defined, but must be
1402defined and documented by individual processor implementations. TF-A
1403implements a framework which categorises the common implementation defined
1404behaviours and allows a processor to export its implementation of that
Douglas Raillardd7c21b72017-06-28 15:23:03 +01001405behaviour. The categories are:
1406
1407#. Processor specific reset sequence.
1408
1409#. Processor specific power down sequences.
1410
1411#. Processor specific register dumping as a part of crash reporting.
1412
1413#. Errata status reporting.
1414
1415Each of the above categories fulfils a different requirement.
1416
1417#. allows any processor specific initialization before the caches and MMU
1418 are turned on, like implementation of errata workarounds, entry into
1419 the intra-cluster coherency domain etc.
1420
1421#. allows each processor to implement the power down sequence mandated in
1422 its Technical Reference Manual (TRM).
1423
1424#. allows a processor to provide additional information to the developer
1425 in the event of a crash, for example Cortex-A53 has registers which
1426 can expose the data cache contents.
1427
1428#. allows a processor to define a function that inspects and reports the status
1429 of all errata workarounds on that processor.
1430
1431Please note that only 2. is mandated by the TRM.
1432
1433The CPU specific operations framework scales to accommodate a large number of
1434different CPUs during power down and reset handling. The platform can specify
1435any CPU optimization it wants to enable for each CPU. It can also specify
1436the CPU errata workarounds to be applied for each CPU type during reset
1437handling by defining CPU errata compile time macros. Details on these macros
Paul Beesleyf8640672019-04-12 14:19:42 +01001438can be found in the :ref:`Arm CPU Specific Build Macros` document.
Douglas Raillardd7c21b72017-06-28 15:23:03 +01001439
1440The CPU specific operations framework depends on the ``cpu_ops`` structure which
1441needs to be exported for each type of CPU in the platform. It is defined in
1442``include/lib/cpus/aarch64/cpu_macros.S`` and has the following fields : ``midr``,
1443``reset_func()``, ``cpu_pwr_down_ops`` (array of power down functions) and
1444``cpu_reg_dump()``.
1445
1446The CPU specific files in ``lib/cpus`` export a ``cpu_ops`` data structure with
1447suitable handlers for that CPU. For example, ``lib/cpus/aarch64/cortex_a53.S``
1448exports the ``cpu_ops`` for Cortex-A53 CPU. According to the platform
1449configuration, these CPU specific files must be included in the build by
1450the platform makefile. The generic CPU specific operations framework code exists
1451in ``lib/cpus/aarch64/cpu_helpers.S``.
1452
Boyan Karatotevd71b5d72023-02-07 15:46:50 +00001453CPU PCS
1454~~~~~~~
1455
1456All assembly functions in CPU files are asked to follow a modified version of
1457the Procedure Call Standard (PCS) in their internals. This is done to ensure
1458calling these functions from outside the file doesn't unexpectedly corrupt
1459registers in the very early environment and to help the internals to be easier
1460to understand. Please see the :ref:`firmware_design_cpu_errata_implementation`
1461for any function specific restrictions.
1462
1463+--------------+---------------------------------+
1464| register | use |
1465+==============+=================================+
1466| x0 - x15 | scratch |
1467+--------------+---------------------------------+
1468| x16, x17 | do not use (used by the linker) |
1469+--------------+---------------------------------+
1470| x18 | do not use (platform register) |
1471+--------------+---------------------------------+
1472| x19 - x28 | callee saved |
1473+--------------+---------------------------------+
1474| x29, x30 | FP, LR |
1475+--------------+---------------------------------+
1476
1477.. _firmware_design_cpu_specific_reset_handling:
1478
Douglas Raillardd7c21b72017-06-28 15:23:03 +01001479CPU specific Reset Handling
1480~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
1481
1482After a reset, the state of the CPU when it calls generic reset handler is:
Boyan Karatotevd71b5d72023-02-07 15:46:50 +00001483MMU turned off, both instruction and data caches turned off, not part
1484of any coherency domain and no stack.
Douglas Raillardd7c21b72017-06-28 15:23:03 +01001485
1486The BL entrypoint code first invokes the ``plat_reset_handler()`` to allow
1487the platform to perform any system initialization required and any system
1488errata workarounds that needs to be applied. The ``get_cpu_ops_ptr()`` reads
1489the current CPU midr, finds the matching ``cpu_ops`` entry in the ``cpu_ops``
1490array and returns it. Note that only the part number and implementer fields
1491in midr are used to find the matching ``cpu_ops`` entry. The ``reset_func()`` in
1492the returned ``cpu_ops`` is then invoked which executes the required reset
1493handling for that CPU and also any errata workarounds enabled by the platform.
Douglas Raillardd7c21b72017-06-28 15:23:03 +01001494
Boyan Karatotevd71b5d72023-02-07 15:46:50 +00001495It should be defined using the ``cpu_reset_func_{start,end}`` macros and its
Boyan Karatotev74ddacc2025-01-22 13:54:43 +00001496body may only clobber x0 to x14 with x14 being the cpu_rev parameter. The cpu
1497file should also include a call to ``cpu_reset_prologue`` at the start of the
1498file for errata to work correctly.
Douglas Raillardd7c21b72017-06-28 15:23:03 +01001499
1500CPU specific power down sequence
1501~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
1502
1503During the BL31 initialization sequence, the pointer to the matching ``cpu_ops``
1504entry is stored in per-CPU data by ``init_cpu_ops()`` so that it can be quickly
1505retrieved during power down sequences.
1506
1507Various CPU drivers register handlers to perform power down at certain power
1508levels for that specific CPU. The PSCI service, upon receiving a power down
1509request, determines the highest power level at which to execute power down
1510sequence for a particular CPU. It uses the ``prepare_cpu_pwr_dwn()`` function to
1511pick the right power down handler for the requested level. The function
1512retrieves ``cpu_ops`` pointer member of per-CPU data, and from that, further
1513retrieves ``cpu_pwr_down_ops`` array, and indexes into the required level. If the
1514requested power level is higher than what a CPU driver supports, the handler
1515registered for highest level is invoked.
1516
1517At runtime the platform hooks for power down are invoked by the PSCI service to
1518perform platform specific operations during a power down sequence, for example
1519turning off CCI coherency during a cluster power down.
1520
Boyan Karatotev7262eff2024-12-19 16:07:29 +00001521Newer CPUs include a feature called "powerdown abandon". The feature is based on
1522the observation that events like GIC wakeups have a high likelihood of happening
1523while the core is in the middle of its powerdown sequence (at ``wfi``). Older
1524cores will powerdown and immediately power back up when this happens. To save on
1525the work and latency involved, the newer cores will "give up" mid way through if
1526no context has been lost yet. This is possible as the powerdown operation is
1527lengthy and a large part of it does not lose context.
1528
1529To cater for this possibility, the powerdown hook will be called a second time
1530after a wakeup. The expectation is that the first call will operate as before,
1531while the second call will undo anything the first call did. This should be done
1532statelessly, for example by toggling the relevant bits.
1533
Douglas Raillardd7c21b72017-06-28 15:23:03 +01001534CPU specific register reporting during crash
1535~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
1536
1537If the crash reporting is enabled in BL31, when a crash occurs, the crash
1538reporting framework calls ``do_cpu_reg_dump`` which retrieves the matching
1539``cpu_ops`` using ``get_cpu_ops_ptr()`` function. The ``cpu_reg_dump()`` in
1540``cpu_ops`` is invoked, which then returns the CPU specific register values to
1541be reported and a pointer to the ASCII list of register names in a format
1542expected by the crash reporting framework.
1543
Boyan Karatotevd71b5d72023-02-07 15:46:50 +00001544.. _firmware_design_cpu_errata_implementation:
Paul Beesleyf8640672019-04-12 14:19:42 +01001545
Boyan Karatotevd71b5d72023-02-07 15:46:50 +00001546CPU errata implementation
1547~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Douglas Raillardd7c21b72017-06-28 15:23:03 +01001548
Dan Handley610e7e12018-03-01 18:44:00 +00001549Errata workarounds for CPUs supported in TF-A are applied during both cold and
1550warm boots, shortly after reset. Individual Errata workarounds are enabled as
1551build options. Some errata workarounds have potential run-time implications;
1552therefore some are enabled by default, others not. Platform ports shall
1553override build options to enable or disable errata as appropriate. The CPU
Douglas Raillardd7c21b72017-06-28 15:23:03 +01001554drivers take care of applying errata workarounds that are enabled and applicable
Boyan Karatotevd71b5d72023-02-07 15:46:50 +00001555to a given CPU.
Douglas Raillardd7c21b72017-06-28 15:23:03 +01001556
Boyan Karatotevd71b5d72023-02-07 15:46:50 +00001557Each erratum has a build flag in ``lib/cpus/cpu-ops.mk`` of the form:
1558``ERRATA_<cpu_num>_<erratum_id>``. It also has a short description in
1559:ref:`arm_cpu_macros_errata_workarounds` on when it should apply.
Douglas Raillardd7c21b72017-06-28 15:23:03 +01001560
Boyan Karatotevd71b5d72023-02-07 15:46:50 +00001561Errata framework
1562^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Douglas Raillardd7c21b72017-06-28 15:23:03 +01001563
Boyan Karatotevd71b5d72023-02-07 15:46:50 +00001564The errata framework is a convention and a small library to allow errata to be
1565automatically discovered. It enables compliant errata to be automatically
1566applied and reported at runtime (either by status reporting or the errata ABI).
Douglas Raillardd7c21b72017-06-28 15:23:03 +01001567
Boyan Karatotevd71b5d72023-02-07 15:46:50 +00001568To write a compliant mitigation for erratum number ``erratum_id`` on a cpu that
1569declared itself (with ``declare_cpu_ops``) as ``cpu_name`` one needs 3 things:
Douglas Raillardd7c21b72017-06-28 15:23:03 +01001570
Boyan Karatotevd71b5d72023-02-07 15:46:50 +00001571#. A CPU revision checker function: ``check_erratum_<cpu_name>_<erratum_id>``
Douglas Raillardd7c21b72017-06-28 15:23:03 +01001572
Boyan Karatotevd71b5d72023-02-07 15:46:50 +00001573 It should check whether this erratum applies on this revision of this CPU.
1574 It will be called with the CPU revision as its first parameter (x0) and
1575 should return one of ``ERRATA_APPLIES`` or ``ERRATA_NOT_APPLIES``.
Douglas Raillardd7c21b72017-06-28 15:23:03 +01001576
Boyan Karatotevd71b5d72023-02-07 15:46:50 +00001577 It may only clobber x0 to x4. The rest should be treated as callee-saved.
Douglas Raillardd7c21b72017-06-28 15:23:03 +01001578
Boyan Karatotevd71b5d72023-02-07 15:46:50 +00001579#. A workaround function: ``erratum_<cpu_name>_<erratum_id>_wa``
1580
1581 It should obtain the cpu revision (with ``cpu_get_rev_var``), call its
1582 revision checker, and perform the mitigation, should the erratum apply.
1583
1584 It may only clobber x0 to x8. The rest should be treated as callee-saved.
Douglas Raillardd7c21b72017-06-28 15:23:03 +01001585
Boyan Karatotevd71b5d72023-02-07 15:46:50 +00001586#. Register itself to the framework
Douglas Raillardd7c21b72017-06-28 15:23:03 +01001587
Boyan Karatotevd71b5d72023-02-07 15:46:50 +00001588 Do this with
1589 ``add_erratum_entry <cpu_name>, ERRATUM(<erratum_id>), <errata_flag>``
1590 where the ``errata_flag`` is the enable flag in ``cpu-ops.mk`` described
1591 above.
Douglas Raillardd7c21b72017-06-28 15:23:03 +01001592
Boyan Karatotevd71b5d72023-02-07 15:46:50 +00001593See the next section on how to do this easily.
Douglas Raillardd7c21b72017-06-28 15:23:03 +01001594
Boyan Karatotevd71b5d72023-02-07 15:46:50 +00001595.. note::
Douglas Raillardd7c21b72017-06-28 15:23:03 +01001596
Boyan Karatotevd71b5d72023-02-07 15:46:50 +00001597 CVEs have the format ``CVE_<year>_<number>``. To fit them in the framework, the
1598 ``erratum_id`` for the checker and the workaround functions become the
1599 ``number`` part of its name and the ``ERRATUM(<number>)`` part of the
1600 registration should instead be ``CVE(<year>, <number>)``. In the extremely
1601 unlikely scenario where a CVE and an erratum numbers clash, the CVE number
1602 should be prefixed with a zero.
Douglas Raillardd7c21b72017-06-28 15:23:03 +01001603
Boyan Karatotevd71b5d72023-02-07 15:46:50 +00001604 Also, their build flag should be ``WORKAROUND_CVE_<year>_<number>``.
1605
1606.. note::
1607
1608 AArch32 uses the legacy convention. The checker function has the format
1609 ``check_errata_<erratum_id>`` and the workaround has the format
1610 ``errata_<cpu_number>_<erratum_id>_wa`` where ``cpu_number`` is the shortform
1611 letter and number name of the CPU.
1612
1613 For CVEs the ``erratum_id`` also becomes ``cve_<year>_<number>``.
1614
1615Errata framework helpers
1616^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
1617
1618Writing these errata involves lots of boilerplate and repetitive code. On
1619AArch64 there are helpers to omit most of this. They are located in
1620``include/lib/cpus/aarch64/cpu_macros.S`` and the preferred way to implement
1621errata. Please see their comments on how to use them.
1622
1623The most common type of erratum workaround, one that just sets a "chicken" bit
1624in some arbitrary register, would have an implementation for the Cortex-A77,
1625erratum #1925769 like::
1626
1627 workaround_reset_start cortex_a77, ERRATUM(1925769), ERRATA_A77_1925769
1628 sysreg_bit_set CORTEX_A77_CPUECTLR_EL1, CORTEX_A77_CPUECTLR_EL1_BIT_8
1629 workaround_reset_end cortex_a77, ERRATUM(1925769)
1630
1631 check_erratum_ls cortex_a77, ERRATUM(1925769), CPU_REV(1, 1)
1632
1633Status reporting
1634^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
1635
1636In a debug build of TF-A, on a CPU that comes out of reset, both BL1 and the
1637runtime firmware (BL31 in AArch64, and BL32 in AArch32) will invoke a generic
1638errata status reporting function. It will read the ``errata_entries`` list of
1639that cpu and will report whether each known erratum was applied and, if not,
1640whether it should have been.
Douglas Raillardd7c21b72017-06-28 15:23:03 +01001641
1642Reporting the status of errata workaround is for informational purpose only; it
1643has no functional significance.
1644
1645Memory layout of BL images
1646--------------------------
1647
1648Each bootloader image can be divided in 2 parts:
1649
1650- the static contents of the image. These are data actually stored in the
1651 binary on the disk. In the ELF terminology, they are called ``PROGBITS``
1652 sections;
1653
1654- the run-time contents of the image. These are data that don't occupy any
1655 space in the binary on the disk. The ELF binary just contains some
1656 metadata indicating where these data will be stored at run-time and the
1657 corresponding sections need to be allocated and initialized at run-time.
1658 In the ELF terminology, they are called ``NOBITS`` sections.
1659
1660All PROGBITS sections are grouped together at the beginning of the image,
Dan Handley610e7e12018-03-01 18:44:00 +00001661followed by all NOBITS sections. This is true for all TF-A images and it is
1662governed by the linker scripts. This ensures that the raw binary images are
1663as small as possible. If a NOBITS section was inserted in between PROGBITS
1664sections then the resulting binary file would contain zero bytes in place of
1665this NOBITS section, making the image unnecessarily bigger. Smaller images
1666allow faster loading from the FIP to the main memory.
Douglas Raillardd7c21b72017-06-28 15:23:03 +01001667
Samuel Holland31a14e12018-10-17 21:40:18 -05001668For BL31, a platform can specify an alternate location for NOBITS sections
1669(other than immediately following PROGBITS sections) by setting
1670``SEPARATE_NOBITS_REGION`` to 1 and defining ``BL31_NOBITS_BASE`` and
1671``BL31_NOBITS_LIMIT``.
1672
Douglas Raillardd7c21b72017-06-28 15:23:03 +01001673Linker scripts and symbols
1674~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
1675
1676Each bootloader stage image layout is described by its own linker script. The
1677linker scripts export some symbols into the program symbol table. Their values
Dan Handley610e7e12018-03-01 18:44:00 +00001678correspond to particular addresses. TF-A code can refer to these symbols to
1679figure out the image memory layout.
Douglas Raillardd7c21b72017-06-28 15:23:03 +01001680
Dan Handley610e7e12018-03-01 18:44:00 +00001681Linker symbols follow the following naming convention in TF-A.
Douglas Raillardd7c21b72017-06-28 15:23:03 +01001682
1683- ``__<SECTION>_START__``
1684
1685 Start address of a given section named ``<SECTION>``.
1686
1687- ``__<SECTION>_END__``
1688
1689 End address of a given section named ``<SECTION>``. If there is an alignment
1690 constraint on the section's end address then ``__<SECTION>_END__`` corresponds
1691 to the end address of the section's actual contents, rounded up to the right
1692 boundary. Refer to the value of ``__<SECTION>_UNALIGNED_END__`` to know the
1693 actual end address of the section's contents.
1694
1695- ``__<SECTION>_UNALIGNED_END__``
1696
1697 End address of a given section named ``<SECTION>`` without any padding or
1698 rounding up due to some alignment constraint.
1699
1700- ``__<SECTION>_SIZE__``
1701
1702 Size (in bytes) of a given section named ``<SECTION>``. If there is an
1703 alignment constraint on the section's end address then ``__<SECTION>_SIZE__``
1704 corresponds to the size of the section's actual contents, rounded up to the
1705 right boundary. In other words, ``__<SECTION>_SIZE__ = __<SECTION>_END__ - _<SECTION>_START__``. Refer to the value of ``__<SECTION>_UNALIGNED_SIZE__``
1706 to know the actual size of the section's contents.
1707
1708- ``__<SECTION>_UNALIGNED_SIZE__``
1709
1710 Size (in bytes) of a given section named ``<SECTION>`` without any padding or
1711 rounding up due to some alignment constraint. In other words,
1712 ``__<SECTION>_UNALIGNED_SIZE__ = __<SECTION>_UNALIGNED_END__ - __<SECTION>_START__``.
1713
Dan Handley610e7e12018-03-01 18:44:00 +00001714Some of the linker symbols are mandatory as TF-A code relies on them to be
1715defined. They are listed in the following subsections. Some of them must be
1716provided for each bootloader stage and some are specific to a given bootloader
1717stage.
Douglas Raillardd7c21b72017-06-28 15:23:03 +01001718
1719The linker scripts define some extra, optional symbols. They are not actually
1720used by any code but they help in understanding the bootloader images' memory
1721layout as they are easy to spot in the link map files.
1722
1723Common linker symbols
1724^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
1725
1726All BL images share the following requirements:
1727
1728- The BSS section must be zero-initialised before executing any C code.
1729- The coherent memory section (if enabled) must be zero-initialised as well.
1730- The MMU setup code needs to know the extents of the coherent and read-only
1731 memory regions to set the right memory attributes. When
1732 ``SEPARATE_CODE_AND_RODATA=1``, it needs to know more specifically how the
1733 read-only memory region is divided between code and data.
1734
1735The following linker symbols are defined for this purpose:
1736
1737- ``__BSS_START__``
1738- ``__BSS_SIZE__``
1739- ``__COHERENT_RAM_START__`` Must be aligned on a page-size boundary.
1740- ``__COHERENT_RAM_END__`` Must be aligned on a page-size boundary.
1741- ``__COHERENT_RAM_UNALIGNED_SIZE__``
1742- ``__RO_START__``
1743- ``__RO_END__``
1744- ``__TEXT_START__``
Michal Simek80c530e2023-04-27 14:26:03 +02001745- ``__TEXT_END_UNALIGNED__``
Douglas Raillardd7c21b72017-06-28 15:23:03 +01001746- ``__TEXT_END__``
1747- ``__RODATA_START__``
Michal Simek80c530e2023-04-27 14:26:03 +02001748- ``__RODATA_END_UNALIGNED__``
Douglas Raillardd7c21b72017-06-28 15:23:03 +01001749- ``__RODATA_END__``
1750
1751BL1's linker symbols
1752^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
1753
1754BL1 being the ROM image, it has additional requirements. BL1 resides in ROM and
1755it is entirely executed in place but it needs some read-write memory for its
1756mutable data. Its ``.data`` section (i.e. its allocated read-write data) must be
1757relocated from ROM to RAM before executing any C code.
1758
1759The following additional linker symbols are defined for BL1:
1760
1761- ``__BL1_ROM_END__`` End address of BL1's ROM contents, covering its code
1762 and ``.data`` section in ROM.
1763- ``__DATA_ROM_START__`` Start address of the ``.data`` section in ROM. Must be
1764 aligned on a 16-byte boundary.
1765- ``__DATA_RAM_START__`` Address in RAM where the ``.data`` section should be
1766 copied over. Must be aligned on a 16-byte boundary.
1767- ``__DATA_SIZE__`` Size of the ``.data`` section (in ROM or RAM).
1768- ``__BL1_RAM_START__`` Start address of BL1 read-write data.
1769- ``__BL1_RAM_END__`` End address of BL1 read-write data.
1770
1771How to choose the right base addresses for each bootloader stage image
1772~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
1773
Dan Handley610e7e12018-03-01 18:44:00 +00001774There is currently no support for dynamic image loading in TF-A. This means
1775that all bootloader images need to be linked against their ultimate runtime
1776locations and the base addresses of each image must be chosen carefully such
1777that images don't overlap each other in an undesired way. As the code grows,
1778the base addresses might need adjustments to cope with the new memory layout.
Douglas Raillardd7c21b72017-06-28 15:23:03 +01001779
1780The memory layout is completely specific to the platform and so there is no
1781general recipe for choosing the right base addresses for each bootloader image.
1782However, there are tools to aid in understanding the memory layout. These are
1783the link map files: ``build/<platform>/<build-type>/bl<x>/bl<x>.map``, with ``<x>``
1784being the stage bootloader. They provide a detailed view of the memory usage of
1785each image. Among other useful information, they provide the end address of
1786each image.
1787
1788- ``bl1.map`` link map file provides ``__BL1_RAM_END__`` address.
1789- ``bl2.map`` link map file provides ``__BL2_END__`` address.
1790- ``bl31.map`` link map file provides ``__BL31_END__`` address.
1791- ``bl32.map`` link map file provides ``__BL32_END__`` address.
1792
1793For each bootloader image, the platform code must provide its start address
1794as well as a limit address that it must not overstep. The latter is used in the
1795linker scripts to check that the image doesn't grow past that address. If that
1796happens, the linker will issue a message similar to the following:
1797
1798::
1799
1800 aarch64-none-elf-ld: BLx has exceeded its limit.
1801
1802Additionally, if the platform memory layout implies some image overlaying like
1803on FVP, BL31 and TSP need to know the limit address that their PROGBITS
1804sections must not overstep. The platform code must provide those.
1805
Soby Mathew97b1bff2018-09-27 16:46:41 +01001806TF-A does not provide any mechanism to verify at boot time that the memory
1807to load a new image is free to prevent overwriting a previously loaded image.
1808The platform must specify the memory available in the system for all the
1809relevant BL images to be loaded.
Douglas Raillardd7c21b72017-06-28 15:23:03 +01001810
1811For example, in the case of BL1 loading BL2, ``bl1_plat_sec_mem_layout()`` will
1812return the region defined by the platform where BL1 intends to load BL2. The
1813``load_image()`` function performs bounds check for the image size based on the
1814base and maximum image size provided by the platforms. Platforms must take
1815this behaviour into account when defining the base/size for each of the images.
1816
Dan Handley610e7e12018-03-01 18:44:00 +00001817Memory layout on Arm development platforms
Douglas Raillardd7c21b72017-06-28 15:23:03 +01001818^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
1819
Dan Handley610e7e12018-03-01 18:44:00 +00001820The following list describes the memory layout on the Arm development platforms:
Douglas Raillardd7c21b72017-06-28 15:23:03 +01001821
1822- A 4KB page of shared memory is used for communication between Trusted
1823 Firmware and the platform's power controller. This is located at the base of
1824 Trusted SRAM. The amount of Trusted SRAM available to load the bootloader
1825 images is reduced by the size of the shared memory.
1826
1827 The shared memory is used to store the CPUs' entrypoint mailbox. On Juno,
1828 this is also used for the MHU payload when passing messages to and from the
1829 SCP.
1830
Soby Mathew492e2452018-06-06 16:03:10 +01001831- Another 4 KB page is reserved for passing memory layout between BL1 and BL2
1832 and also the dynamic firmware configurations.
1833
Douglas Raillardd7c21b72017-06-28 15:23:03 +01001834- On FVP, BL1 is originally sitting in the Trusted ROM at address ``0x0``. On
1835 Juno, BL1 resides in flash memory at address ``0x0BEC0000``. BL1 read-write
1836 data are relocated to the top of Trusted SRAM at runtime.
1837
Soby Mathew492e2452018-06-06 16:03:10 +01001838- BL2 is loaded below BL1 RW
1839
Sandrine Bailleux15530dd2019-02-08 15:26:36 +01001840- EL3 Runtime Software, BL31 for AArch64 and BL32 for AArch32 (e.g. SP_MIN),
Douglas Raillardd7c21b72017-06-28 15:23:03 +01001841 is loaded at the top of the Trusted SRAM, such that its NOBITS sections will
Soby Mathew492e2452018-06-06 16:03:10 +01001842 overwrite BL1 R/W data and BL2. This implies that BL1 global variables
1843 remain valid only until execution reaches the EL3 Runtime Software entry
1844 point during a cold boot.
Douglas Raillardd7c21b72017-06-28 15:23:03 +01001845
Sandrine Bailleux15530dd2019-02-08 15:26:36 +01001846- On Juno, SCP_BL2 is loaded temporarily into the EL3 Runtime Software memory
Paul Beesleyf2ec7142019-10-04 16:17:46 +00001847 region and transferred to the SCP before being overwritten by EL3 Runtime
Douglas Raillardd7c21b72017-06-28 15:23:03 +01001848 Software.
1849
1850- BL32 (for AArch64) can be loaded in one of the following locations:
1851
1852 - Trusted SRAM
1853 - Trusted DRAM (FVP only)
1854 - Secure region of DRAM (top 16MB of DRAM configured by the TrustZone
1855 controller)
1856
Soby Mathew492e2452018-06-06 16:03:10 +01001857 When BL32 (for AArch64) is loaded into Trusted SRAM, it is loaded below
1858 BL31.
Douglas Raillardd7c21b72017-06-28 15:23:03 +01001859
Douglas Raillardd7c21b72017-06-28 15:23:03 +01001860The location of the BL32 image will result in different memory maps. This is
1861illustrated for both FVP and Juno in the following diagrams, using the TSP as
1862an example.
1863
Paul Beesleyba3ed402019-03-13 16:20:44 +00001864.. note::
1865 Loading the BL32 image in TZC secured DRAM doesn't change the memory
1866 layout of the other images in Trusted SRAM.
Douglas Raillardd7c21b72017-06-28 15:23:03 +01001867
Sathees Balya90950092018-11-15 14:22:30 +00001868CONFIG section in memory layouts shown below contains:
1869
1870::
1871
1872 +--------------------+
1873 |bl2_mem_params_descs|
1874 |--------------------|
1875 | fw_configs |
1876 +--------------------+
1877
1878``bl2_mem_params_descs`` contains parameters passed from BL2 to next the
1879BL image during boot.
1880
Manish V Badarkheece96fd2020-06-13 09:42:28 +01001881``fw_configs`` includes soc_fw_config, tos_fw_config, tb_fw_config and fw_config.
Sathees Balya90950092018-11-15 14:22:30 +00001882
Soby Mathew492e2452018-06-06 16:03:10 +01001883**FVP with TSP in Trusted SRAM with firmware configs :**
Douglas Raillardd7c21b72017-06-28 15:23:03 +01001884(These diagrams only cover the AArch64 case)
1885
1886::
1887
Soby Mathew492e2452018-06-06 16:03:10 +01001888 DRAM
1889 0xffffffff +----------+
Manish V Badarkhe638ac182023-03-07 10:21:30 +00001890 | EL3 TZC |
1891 0xffe00000 |----------| (secure)
1892 | AP TZC |
1893 0xff000000 +----------+
Soby Mathew492e2452018-06-06 16:03:10 +01001894 : :
Manish V Badarkhe70d8eee2022-04-12 21:11:56 +01001895 0x82100000 |----------|
Soby Mathew492e2452018-06-06 16:03:10 +01001896 |HW_CONFIG |
Manish V Badarkhe70d8eee2022-04-12 21:11:56 +01001897 0x82000000 |----------| (non-secure)
Soby Mathew492e2452018-06-06 16:03:10 +01001898 | |
1899 0x80000000 +----------+
1900
Manish V Badarkhe70d8eee2022-04-12 21:11:56 +01001901 Trusted DRAM
1902 0x08000000 +----------+
1903 |HW_CONFIG |
1904 0x07f00000 |----------|
1905 : :
1906 | |
1907 0x06000000 +----------+
1908
Douglas Raillardd7c21b72017-06-28 15:23:03 +01001909 Trusted SRAM
Soby Mathew492e2452018-06-06 16:03:10 +01001910 0x04040000 +----------+ loaded by BL2 +----------------+
1911 | BL1 (rw) | <<<<<<<<<<<<< | |
1912 |----------| <<<<<<<<<<<<< | BL31 NOBITS |
1913 | BL2 | <<<<<<<<<<<<< | |
Douglas Raillardd7c21b72017-06-28 15:23:03 +01001914 |----------| <<<<<<<<<<<<< |----------------|
1915 | | <<<<<<<<<<<<< | BL31 PROGBITS |
Soby Mathew492e2452018-06-06 16:03:10 +01001916 | | <<<<<<<<<<<<< |----------------|
1917 | | <<<<<<<<<<<<< | BL32 |
Manish V Badarkheece96fd2020-06-13 09:42:28 +01001918 0x04003000 +----------+ +----------------+
Sathees Balya90950092018-11-15 14:22:30 +00001919 | CONFIG |
Soby Mathew492e2452018-06-06 16:03:10 +01001920 0x04001000 +----------+
Douglas Raillardd7c21b72017-06-28 15:23:03 +01001921 | Shared |
1922 0x04000000 +----------+
1923
1924 Trusted ROM
1925 0x04000000 +----------+
1926 | BL1 (ro) |
1927 0x00000000 +----------+
1928
Soby Mathew492e2452018-06-06 16:03:10 +01001929**FVP with TSP in Trusted DRAM with firmware configs (default option):**
Douglas Raillardd7c21b72017-06-28 15:23:03 +01001930
1931::
1932
Soby Mathewb1bf0442018-02-16 14:52:52 +00001933 DRAM
1934 0xffffffff +--------------+
Manish V Badarkhe638ac182023-03-07 10:21:30 +00001935 | EL3 TZC |
1936 0xffe00000 |--------------| (secure)
1937 | AP TZC |
1938 0xff000000 +--------------+
Soby Mathewb1bf0442018-02-16 14:52:52 +00001939 : :
Manish V Badarkhe70d8eee2022-04-12 21:11:56 +01001940 0x82100000 |--------------|
Soby Mathewb1bf0442018-02-16 14:52:52 +00001941 | HW_CONFIG |
Manish V Badarkhe70d8eee2022-04-12 21:11:56 +01001942 0x82000000 |--------------| (non-secure)
Soby Mathewb1bf0442018-02-16 14:52:52 +00001943 | |
1944 0x80000000 +--------------+
Douglas Raillardd7c21b72017-06-28 15:23:03 +01001945
Manish V Badarkhe70d8eee2022-04-12 21:11:56 +01001946 Trusted DRAM
Soby Mathewb1bf0442018-02-16 14:52:52 +00001947 0x08000000 +--------------+
Manish V Badarkhe70d8eee2022-04-12 21:11:56 +01001948 | HW_CONFIG |
1949 0x07f00000 |--------------|
1950 : :
1951 | BL32 |
Soby Mathewb1bf0442018-02-16 14:52:52 +00001952 0x06000000 +--------------+
Douglas Raillardd7c21b72017-06-28 15:23:03 +01001953
Soby Mathewb1bf0442018-02-16 14:52:52 +00001954 Trusted SRAM
Soby Mathew492e2452018-06-06 16:03:10 +01001955 0x04040000 +--------------+ loaded by BL2 +----------------+
1956 | BL1 (rw) | <<<<<<<<<<<<< | |
1957 |--------------| <<<<<<<<<<<<< | BL31 NOBITS |
1958 | BL2 | <<<<<<<<<<<<< | |
Soby Mathewb1bf0442018-02-16 14:52:52 +00001959 |--------------| <<<<<<<<<<<<< |----------------|
1960 | | <<<<<<<<<<<<< | BL31 PROGBITS |
Soby Mathew492e2452018-06-06 16:03:10 +01001961 | | +----------------+
Manish V Badarkheece96fd2020-06-13 09:42:28 +01001962 0x04003000 +--------------+
Sathees Balya90950092018-11-15 14:22:30 +00001963 | CONFIG |
Soby Mathewb1bf0442018-02-16 14:52:52 +00001964 0x04001000 +--------------+
1965 | Shared |
1966 0x04000000 +--------------+
1967
1968 Trusted ROM
1969 0x04000000 +--------------+
1970 | BL1 (ro) |
1971 0x00000000 +--------------+
Douglas Raillardd7c21b72017-06-28 15:23:03 +01001972
Soby Mathew492e2452018-06-06 16:03:10 +01001973**FVP with TSP in TZC-Secured DRAM with firmware configs :**
Douglas Raillardd7c21b72017-06-28 15:23:03 +01001974
1975::
1976
1977 DRAM
1978 0xffffffff +----------+
Manish V Badarkhe638ac182023-03-07 10:21:30 +00001979 | EL3 TZC |
1980 0xffe00000 |----------| (secure)
1981 | AP TZC |
1982 | (BL32) |
Douglas Raillardd7c21b72017-06-28 15:23:03 +01001983 0xff000000 +----------+
1984 | |
Manish V Badarkhe70d8eee2022-04-12 21:11:56 +01001985 0x82100000 |----------|
Soby Mathew492e2452018-06-06 16:03:10 +01001986 |HW_CONFIG |
Manish V Badarkhe70d8eee2022-04-12 21:11:56 +01001987 0x82000000 |----------| (non-secure)
Douglas Raillardd7c21b72017-06-28 15:23:03 +01001988 | |
1989 0x80000000 +----------+
1990
Manish V Badarkhe70d8eee2022-04-12 21:11:56 +01001991 Trusted DRAM
1992 0x08000000 +----------+
1993 |HW_CONFIG |
1994 0x7f000000 |----------|
1995 : :
1996 | |
1997 0x06000000 +----------+
1998
Douglas Raillardd7c21b72017-06-28 15:23:03 +01001999 Trusted SRAM
Soby Mathew492e2452018-06-06 16:03:10 +01002000 0x04040000 +----------+ loaded by BL2 +----------------+
2001 | BL1 (rw) | <<<<<<<<<<<<< | |
2002 |----------| <<<<<<<<<<<<< | BL31 NOBITS |
2003 | BL2 | <<<<<<<<<<<<< | |
Douglas Raillardd7c21b72017-06-28 15:23:03 +01002004 |----------| <<<<<<<<<<<<< |----------------|
2005 | | <<<<<<<<<<<<< | BL31 PROGBITS |
Soby Mathew492e2452018-06-06 16:03:10 +01002006 | | +----------------+
Manish V Badarkheece96fd2020-06-13 09:42:28 +01002007 0x04003000 +----------+
Sathees Balya90950092018-11-15 14:22:30 +00002008 | CONFIG |
Douglas Raillardd7c21b72017-06-28 15:23:03 +01002009 0x04001000 +----------+
2010 | Shared |
2011 0x04000000 +----------+
2012
2013 Trusted ROM
2014 0x04000000 +----------+
2015 | BL1 (ro) |
2016 0x00000000 +----------+
2017
Soby Mathew492e2452018-06-06 16:03:10 +01002018**Juno with BL32 in Trusted SRAM :**
Douglas Raillardd7c21b72017-06-28 15:23:03 +01002019
2020::
2021
Manish V Badarkhe638ac182023-03-07 10:21:30 +00002022 DRAM
2023 0xFFFFFFFF +----------+
2024 | SCP TZC |
2025 0xFFE00000 |----------|
2026 | EL3 TZC |
2027 0xFFC00000 |----------| (secure)
2028 | AP TZC |
2029 0xFF000000 +----------+
2030 | |
2031 : : (non-secure)
2032 | |
2033 0x80000000 +----------+
2034
2035
Douglas Raillardd7c21b72017-06-28 15:23:03 +01002036 Flash0
2037 0x0C000000 +----------+
2038 : :
2039 0x0BED0000 |----------|
2040 | BL1 (ro) |
2041 0x0BEC0000 |----------|
2042 : :
2043 0x08000000 +----------+ BL31 is loaded
2044 after SCP_BL2 has
2045 Trusted SRAM been sent to SCP
Soby Mathew492e2452018-06-06 16:03:10 +01002046 0x04040000 +----------+ loaded by BL2 +----------------+
2047 | BL1 (rw) | <<<<<<<<<<<<< | |
2048 |----------| <<<<<<<<<<<<< | BL31 NOBITS |
2049 | BL2 | <<<<<<<<<<<<< | |
Douglas Raillardd7c21b72017-06-28 15:23:03 +01002050 |----------| <<<<<<<<<<<<< |----------------|
2051 | SCP_BL2 | <<<<<<<<<<<<< | BL31 PROGBITS |
Chris Kayf8fa4652020-03-12 13:50:26 +00002052 | | <<<<<<<<<<<<< |----------------|
Soby Mathew492e2452018-06-06 16:03:10 +01002053 | | <<<<<<<<<<<<< | BL32 |
2054 | | +----------------+
2055 | |
2056 0x04001000 +----------+
Douglas Raillardd7c21b72017-06-28 15:23:03 +01002057 | MHU |
2058 0x04000000 +----------+
2059
Soby Mathew492e2452018-06-06 16:03:10 +01002060**Juno with BL32 in TZC-secured DRAM :**
Douglas Raillardd7c21b72017-06-28 15:23:03 +01002061
2062::
2063
2064 DRAM
Manish V Badarkhe638ac182023-03-07 10:21:30 +00002065 0xFFFFFFFF +----------+
2066 | SCP TZC |
2067 0xFFE00000 |----------|
2068 | EL3 TZC |
2069 0xFFC00000 |----------| (secure)
2070 | AP TZC |
2071 | (BL32) |
2072 0xFF000000 +----------+
Douglas Raillardd7c21b72017-06-28 15:23:03 +01002073 | |
2074 : : (non-secure)
2075 | |
2076 0x80000000 +----------+
2077
2078 Flash0
2079 0x0C000000 +----------+
2080 : :
2081 0x0BED0000 |----------|
2082 | BL1 (ro) |
2083 0x0BEC0000 |----------|
2084 : :
2085 0x08000000 +----------+ BL31 is loaded
2086 after SCP_BL2 has
2087 Trusted SRAM been sent to SCP
Soby Mathew492e2452018-06-06 16:03:10 +01002088 0x04040000 +----------+ loaded by BL2 +----------------+
2089 | BL1 (rw) | <<<<<<<<<<<<< | |
2090 |----------| <<<<<<<<<<<<< | BL31 NOBITS |
2091 | BL2 | <<<<<<<<<<<<< | |
Douglas Raillardd7c21b72017-06-28 15:23:03 +01002092 |----------| <<<<<<<<<<<<< |----------------|
2093 | SCP_BL2 | <<<<<<<<<<<<< | BL31 PROGBITS |
Chris Kayf8fa4652020-03-12 13:50:26 +00002094 | | +----------------+
Douglas Raillardd7c21b72017-06-28 15:23:03 +01002095 0x04001000 +----------+
2096 | MHU |
2097 0x04000000 +----------+
2098
Paul Beesleyd2fcc4e2019-05-29 13:59:40 +01002099.. _firmware_design_fip:
Sathees Balya17d8eed2019-01-30 15:56:44 +00002100
Douglas Raillardd7c21b72017-06-28 15:23:03 +01002101Firmware Image Package (FIP)
2102----------------------------
2103
2104Using a Firmware Image Package (FIP) allows for packing bootloader images (and
Dan Handley610e7e12018-03-01 18:44:00 +00002105potentially other payloads) into a single archive that can be loaded by TF-A
2106from non-volatile platform storage. A driver to load images from a FIP has
2107been added to the storage layer and allows a package to be read from supported
2108platform storage. A tool to create Firmware Image Packages is also provided
2109and described below.
Douglas Raillardd7c21b72017-06-28 15:23:03 +01002110
2111Firmware Image Package layout
2112~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
2113
2114The FIP layout consists of a table of contents (ToC) followed by payload data.
2115The ToC itself has a header followed by one or more table entries. The ToC is
Jett Zhou75566102017-11-24 16:03:58 +08002116terminated by an end marker entry, and since the size of the ToC is 0 bytes,
2117the offset equals the total size of the FIP file. All ToC entries describe some
2118payload data that has been appended to the end of the binary package. With the
2119information provided in the ToC entry the corresponding payload data can be
2120retrieved.
Douglas Raillardd7c21b72017-06-28 15:23:03 +01002121
2122::
2123
2124 ------------------
2125 | ToC Header |
2126 |----------------|
2127 | ToC Entry 0 |
2128 |----------------|
2129 | ToC Entry 1 |
2130 |----------------|
2131 | ToC End Marker |
2132 |----------------|
2133 | |
2134 | Data 0 |
2135 | |
2136 |----------------|
2137 | |
2138 | Data 1 |
2139 | |
2140 ------------------
2141
2142The ToC header and entry formats are described in the header file
2143``include/tools_share/firmware_image_package.h``. This file is used by both the
Dan Handley610e7e12018-03-01 18:44:00 +00002144tool and TF-A.
Douglas Raillardd7c21b72017-06-28 15:23:03 +01002145
2146The ToC header has the following fields:
2147
2148::
2149
2150 `name`: The name of the ToC. This is currently used to validate the header.
2151 `serial_number`: A non-zero number provided by the creation tool
2152 `flags`: Flags associated with this data.
2153 Bits 0-31: Reserved
2154 Bits 32-47: Platform defined
2155 Bits 48-63: Reserved
2156
2157A ToC entry has the following fields:
2158
2159::
2160
2161 `uuid`: All files are referred to by a pre-defined Universally Unique
2162 IDentifier [UUID] . The UUIDs are defined in
2163 `include/tools_share/firmware_image_package.h`. The platform translates
2164 the requested image name into the corresponding UUID when accessing the
2165 package.
2166 `offset_address`: The offset address at which the corresponding payload data
2167 can be found. The offset is calculated from the ToC base address.
2168 `size`: The size of the corresponding payload data in bytes.
Etienne Carriere7421bf12017-08-23 15:43:33 +02002169 `flags`: Flags associated with this entry. None are yet defined.
Douglas Raillardd7c21b72017-06-28 15:23:03 +01002170
2171Firmware Image Package creation tool
2172~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
2173
Dan Handley610e7e12018-03-01 18:44:00 +00002174The FIP creation tool can be used to pack specified images into a binary
2175package that can be loaded by TF-A from platform storage. The tool currently
2176only supports packing bootloader images. Additional image definitions can be
2177added to the tool as required.
Douglas Raillardd7c21b72017-06-28 15:23:03 +01002178
2179The tool can be found in ``tools/fiptool``.
2180
2181Loading from a Firmware Image Package (FIP)
2182~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
2183
2184The Firmware Image Package (FIP) driver can load images from a binary package on
Dan Handley610e7e12018-03-01 18:44:00 +00002185non-volatile platform storage. For the Arm development platforms, this is
Douglas Raillardd7c21b72017-06-28 15:23:03 +01002186currently NOR FLASH.
2187
2188Bootloader images are loaded according to the platform policy as specified by
Dan Handley610e7e12018-03-01 18:44:00 +00002189the function ``plat_get_image_source()``. For the Arm development platforms, this
Douglas Raillardd7c21b72017-06-28 15:23:03 +01002190means the platform will attempt to load images from a Firmware Image Package
2191located at the start of NOR FLASH0.
2192
Dan Handley610e7e12018-03-01 18:44:00 +00002193The Arm development platforms' policy is to only allow loading of a known set of
Douglas Raillardd7c21b72017-06-28 15:23:03 +01002194images. The platform policy can be modified to allow additional images.
2195
Dan Handley610e7e12018-03-01 18:44:00 +00002196Use of coherent memory in TF-A
2197------------------------------
Douglas Raillardd7c21b72017-06-28 15:23:03 +01002198
2199There might be loss of coherency when physical memory with mismatched
2200shareability, cacheability and memory attributes is accessed by multiple CPUs
Dan Handley610e7e12018-03-01 18:44:00 +00002201(refer to section B2.9 of `Arm ARM`_ for more details). This possibility occurs
2202in TF-A during power up/down sequences when coherency, MMU and caches are
2203turned on/off incrementally.
Douglas Raillardd7c21b72017-06-28 15:23:03 +01002204
Dan Handley610e7e12018-03-01 18:44:00 +00002205TF-A defines coherent memory as a region of memory with Device nGnRE attributes
2206in the translation tables. The translation granule size in TF-A is 4KB. This
2207is the smallest possible size of the coherent memory region.
Douglas Raillardd7c21b72017-06-28 15:23:03 +01002208
2209By default, all data structures which are susceptible to accesses with
2210mismatched attributes from various CPUs are allocated in a coherent memory
Paul Beesleyf8640672019-04-12 14:19:42 +01002211region (refer to section 2.1 of :ref:`Porting Guide`). The coherent memory
2212region accesses are Outer Shareable, non-cacheable and they can be accessed with
2213the Device nGnRE attributes when the MMU is turned on. Hence, at the expense of
2214at least an extra page of memory, TF-A is able to work around coherency issues
2215due to mismatched memory attributes.
Douglas Raillardd7c21b72017-06-28 15:23:03 +01002216
2217The alternative to the above approach is to allocate the susceptible data
2218structures in Normal WriteBack WriteAllocate Inner shareable memory. This
2219approach requires the data structures to be designed so that it is possible to
2220work around the issue of mismatched memory attributes by performing software
2221cache maintenance on them.
2222
Dan Handley610e7e12018-03-01 18:44:00 +00002223Disabling the use of coherent memory in TF-A
2224~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Douglas Raillardd7c21b72017-06-28 15:23:03 +01002225
2226It might be desirable to avoid the cost of allocating coherent memory on
Dan Handley610e7e12018-03-01 18:44:00 +00002227platforms which are memory constrained. TF-A enables inclusion of coherent
2228memory in firmware images through the build flag ``USE_COHERENT_MEM``.
Douglas Raillardd7c21b72017-06-28 15:23:03 +01002229This flag is enabled by default. It can be disabled to choose the second
2230approach described above.
2231
2232The below sections analyze the data structures allocated in the coherent memory
2233region and the changes required to allocate them in normal memory.
2234
2235Coherent memory usage in PSCI implementation
2236~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
2237
2238The ``psci_non_cpu_pd_nodes`` data structure stores the platform's power domain
2239tree information for state management of power domains. By default, this data
Dan Handley610e7e12018-03-01 18:44:00 +00002240structure is allocated in the coherent memory region in TF-A because it can be
Paul Beesley1fbc97b2019-01-11 18:26:51 +00002241accessed by multiple CPUs, either with caches enabled or disabled.
Douglas Raillardd7c21b72017-06-28 15:23:03 +01002242
2243.. code:: c
2244
2245 typedef struct non_cpu_pwr_domain_node {
2246 /*
2247 * Index of the first CPU power domain node level 0 which has this node
2248 * as its parent.
2249 */
2250 unsigned int cpu_start_idx;
2251
2252 /*
2253 * Number of CPU power domains which are siblings of the domain indexed
2254 * by 'cpu_start_idx' i.e. all the domains in the range 'cpu_start_idx
2255 * -> cpu_start_idx + ncpus' have this node as their parent.
2256 */
2257 unsigned int ncpus;
2258
2259 /*
2260 * Index of the parent power domain node.
Douglas Raillardd7c21b72017-06-28 15:23:03 +01002261 */
2262 unsigned int parent_node;
2263
2264 plat_local_state_t local_state;
2265
2266 unsigned char level;
2267
2268 /* For indexing the psci_lock array*/
2269 unsigned char lock_index;
2270 } non_cpu_pd_node_t;
2271
2272In order to move this data structure to normal memory, the use of each of its
2273fields must be analyzed. Fields like ``cpu_start_idx``, ``ncpus``, ``parent_node``
2274``level`` and ``lock_index`` are only written once during cold boot. Hence removing
2275them from coherent memory involves only doing a clean and invalidate of the
2276cache lines after these fields are written.
2277
2278The field ``local_state`` can be concurrently accessed by multiple CPUs in
2279different cache states. A Lamport's Bakery lock ``psci_locks`` is used to ensure
Paul Beesley1fbc97b2019-01-11 18:26:51 +00002280mutual exclusion to this field and a clean and invalidate is needed after it
Douglas Raillardd7c21b72017-06-28 15:23:03 +01002281is written.
2282
2283Bakery lock data
2284~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
2285
2286The bakery lock data structure ``bakery_lock_t`` is allocated in coherent memory
2287and is accessed by multiple CPUs with mismatched attributes. ``bakery_lock_t`` is
2288defined as follows:
2289
2290.. code:: c
2291
2292 typedef struct bakery_lock {
2293 /*
2294 * The lock_data is a bit-field of 2 members:
2295 * Bit[0] : choosing. This field is set when the CPU is
2296 * choosing its bakery number.
2297 * Bits[1 - 15] : number. This is the bakery number allocated.
2298 */
2299 volatile uint16_t lock_data[BAKERY_LOCK_MAX_CPUS];
2300 } bakery_lock_t;
2301
2302It is a characteristic of Lamport's Bakery algorithm that the volatile per-CPU
2303fields can be read by all CPUs but only written to by the owning CPU.
2304
2305Depending upon the data cache line size, the per-CPU fields of the
2306``bakery_lock_t`` structure for multiple CPUs may exist on a single cache line.
2307These per-CPU fields can be read and written during lock contention by multiple
2308CPUs with mismatched memory attributes. Since these fields are a part of the
2309lock implementation, they do not have access to any other locking primitive to
2310safeguard against the resulting coherency issues. As a result, simple software
2311cache maintenance is not enough to allocate them in coherent memory. Consider
2312the following example.
2313
2314CPU0 updates its per-CPU field with data cache enabled. This write updates a
2315local cache line which contains a copy of the fields for other CPUs as well. Now
2316CPU1 updates its per-CPU field of the ``bakery_lock_t`` structure with data cache
2317disabled. CPU1 then issues a DCIVAC operation to invalidate any stale copies of
2318its field in any other cache line in the system. This operation will invalidate
2319the update made by CPU0 as well.
2320
2321To use bakery locks when ``USE_COHERENT_MEM`` is disabled, the lock data structure
2322has been redesigned. The changes utilise the characteristic of Lamport's Bakery
Sandrine Bailleux15530dd2019-02-08 15:26:36 +01002323algorithm mentioned earlier. The bakery_lock structure only allocates the memory
Douglas Raillardd7c21b72017-06-28 15:23:03 +01002324for a single CPU. The macro ``DEFINE_BAKERY_LOCK`` allocates all the bakery locks
Chris Kay33bfc5e2023-02-14 11:30:04 +00002325needed for a CPU into a section ``.bakery_lock``. The linker allocates the memory
Sandrine Bailleux15530dd2019-02-08 15:26:36 +01002326for other cores by using the total size allocated for the bakery_lock section
2327and multiplying it with (PLATFORM_CORE_COUNT - 1). This enables software to
Douglas Raillardd7c21b72017-06-28 15:23:03 +01002328perform software cache maintenance on the lock data structure without running
2329into coherency issues associated with mismatched attributes.
2330
2331The bakery lock data structure ``bakery_info_t`` is defined for use when
2332``USE_COHERENT_MEM`` is disabled as follows:
2333
2334.. code:: c
2335
2336 typedef struct bakery_info {
2337 /*
2338 * The lock_data is a bit-field of 2 members:
2339 * Bit[0] : choosing. This field is set when the CPU is
2340 * choosing its bakery number.
2341 * Bits[1 - 15] : number. This is the bakery number allocated.
2342 */
2343 volatile uint16_t lock_data;
2344 } bakery_info_t;
2345
2346The ``bakery_info_t`` represents a single per-CPU field of one lock and
2347the combination of corresponding ``bakery_info_t`` structures for all CPUs in the
2348system represents the complete bakery lock. The view in memory for a system
2349with n bakery locks are:
2350
2351::
2352
Chris Kay33bfc5e2023-02-14 11:30:04 +00002353 .bakery_lock section start
Douglas Raillardd7c21b72017-06-28 15:23:03 +01002354 |----------------|
2355 | `bakery_info_t`| <-- Lock_0 per-CPU field
2356 | Lock_0 | for CPU0
2357 |----------------|
2358 | `bakery_info_t`| <-- Lock_1 per-CPU field
2359 | Lock_1 | for CPU0
2360 |----------------|
2361 | .... |
2362 |----------------|
2363 | `bakery_info_t`| <-- Lock_N per-CPU field
2364 | Lock_N | for CPU0
2365 ------------------
2366 | XXXXX |
2367 | Padding to |
2368 | next Cache WB | <--- Calculate PERCPU_BAKERY_LOCK_SIZE, allocate
2369 | Granule | continuous memory for remaining CPUs.
2370 ------------------
2371 | `bakery_info_t`| <-- Lock_0 per-CPU field
2372 | Lock_0 | for CPU1
2373 |----------------|
2374 | `bakery_info_t`| <-- Lock_1 per-CPU field
2375 | Lock_1 | for CPU1
2376 |----------------|
2377 | .... |
2378 |----------------|
2379 | `bakery_info_t`| <-- Lock_N per-CPU field
2380 | Lock_N | for CPU1
2381 ------------------
2382 | XXXXX |
2383 | Padding to |
2384 | next Cache WB |
2385 | Granule |
2386 ------------------
2387
2388Consider a system of 2 CPUs with 'N' bakery locks as shown above. For an
Sandrine Bailleux15530dd2019-02-08 15:26:36 +01002389operation on Lock_N, the corresponding ``bakery_info_t`` in both CPU0 and CPU1
Chris Kay33bfc5e2023-02-14 11:30:04 +00002390``.bakery_lock`` section need to be fetched and appropriate cache operations need
Douglas Raillardd7c21b72017-06-28 15:23:03 +01002391to be performed for each access.
2392
Dan Handley610e7e12018-03-01 18:44:00 +00002393On Arm Platforms, bakery locks are used in psci (``psci_locks``) and power controller
Douglas Raillardd7c21b72017-06-28 15:23:03 +01002394driver (``arm_lock``).
2395
2396Non Functional Impact of removing coherent memory
2397~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
2398
2399Removal of the coherent memory region leads to the additional software overhead
2400of performing cache maintenance for the affected data structures. However, since
2401the memory where the data structures are allocated is cacheable, the overhead is
2402mostly mitigated by an increase in performance.
2403
2404There is however a performance impact for bakery locks, due to:
2405
2406- Additional cache maintenance operations, and
2407- Multiple cache line reads for each lock operation, since the bakery locks
2408 for each CPU are distributed across different cache lines.
2409
2410The implementation has been optimized to minimize this additional overhead.
2411Measurements indicate that when bakery locks are allocated in Normal memory, the
2412minimum latency of acquiring a lock is on an average 3-4 micro seconds whereas
2413in Device memory the same is 2 micro seconds. The measurements were done on the
Dan Handley610e7e12018-03-01 18:44:00 +00002414Juno Arm development platform.
Douglas Raillardd7c21b72017-06-28 15:23:03 +01002415
2416As mentioned earlier, almost a page of memory can be saved by disabling
2417``USE_COHERENT_MEM``. Each platform needs to consider these trade-offs to decide
2418whether coherent memory should be used. If a platform disables
2419``USE_COHERENT_MEM`` and needs to use bakery locks in the porting layer, it can
2420optionally define macro ``PLAT_PERCPU_BAKERY_LOCK_SIZE`` (see the
Paul Beesleyf8640672019-04-12 14:19:42 +01002421:ref:`Porting Guide`). Refer to the reference platform code for examples.
Douglas Raillardd7c21b72017-06-28 15:23:03 +01002422
2423Isolating code and read-only data on separate memory pages
2424----------------------------------------------------------
2425
Dan Handley610e7e12018-03-01 18:44:00 +00002426In the Armv8-A VMSA, translation table entries include fields that define the
Douglas Raillardd7c21b72017-06-28 15:23:03 +01002427properties of the target memory region, such as its access permissions. The
2428smallest unit of memory that can be addressed by a translation table entry is
2429a memory page. Therefore, if software needs to set different permissions on two
2430memory regions then it needs to map them using different memory pages.
2431
2432The default memory layout for each BL image is as follows:
2433
2434::
2435
2436 | ... |
2437 +-------------------+
2438 | Read-write data |
2439 +-------------------+ Page boundary
2440 | <Padding> |
2441 +-------------------+
2442 | Exception vectors |
2443 +-------------------+ 2 KB boundary
2444 | <Padding> |
2445 +-------------------+
2446 | Read-only data |
2447 +-------------------+
2448 | Code |
2449 +-------------------+ BLx_BASE
2450
Paul Beesleyba3ed402019-03-13 16:20:44 +00002451.. note::
2452 The 2KB alignment for the exception vectors is an architectural
2453 requirement.
Douglas Raillardd7c21b72017-06-28 15:23:03 +01002454
2455The read-write data start on a new memory page so that they can be mapped with
2456read-write permissions, whereas the code and read-only data below are configured
2457as read-only.
2458
2459However, the read-only data are not aligned on a page boundary. They are
2460contiguous to the code. Therefore, the end of the code section and the beginning
2461of the read-only data one might share a memory page. This forces both to be
2462mapped with the same memory attributes. As the code needs to be executable, this
2463means that the read-only data stored on the same memory page as the code are
2464executable as well. This could potentially be exploited as part of a security
2465attack.
2466
2467TF provides the build flag ``SEPARATE_CODE_AND_RODATA`` to isolate the code and
2468read-only data on separate memory pages. This in turn allows independent control
2469of the access permissions for the code and read-only data. In this case,
2470platform code gets a finer-grained view of the image layout and can
2471appropriately map the code region as executable and the read-only data as
2472execute-never.
2473
2474This has an impact on memory footprint, as padding bytes need to be introduced
Paul Beesley1fbc97b2019-01-11 18:26:51 +00002475between the code and read-only data to ensure the segregation of the two. To
Douglas Raillardd7c21b72017-06-28 15:23:03 +01002476limit the memory cost, this flag also changes the memory layout such that the
2477code and exception vectors are now contiguous, like so:
2478
2479::
2480
2481 | ... |
2482 +-------------------+
2483 | Read-write data |
2484 +-------------------+ Page boundary
2485 | <Padding> |
2486 +-------------------+
2487 | Read-only data |
2488 +-------------------+ Page boundary
2489 | <Padding> |
2490 +-------------------+
2491 | Exception vectors |
2492 +-------------------+ 2 KB boundary
2493 | <Padding> |
2494 +-------------------+
2495 | Code |
2496 +-------------------+ BLx_BASE
2497
2498With this more condensed memory layout, the separation of read-only data will
2499add zero or one page to the memory footprint of each BL image. Each platform
2500should consider the trade-off between memory footprint and security.
2501
Dan Handley610e7e12018-03-01 18:44:00 +00002502This build flag is disabled by default, minimising memory footprint. On Arm
Douglas Raillardd7c21b72017-06-28 15:23:03 +01002503platforms, it is enabled.
2504
Jeenu Viswambharane3f22002017-09-22 08:32:10 +01002505Publish and Subscribe Framework
2506-------------------------------
2507
2508The Publish and Subscribe Framework allows EL3 components to define and publish
2509events, to which other EL3 components can subscribe.
2510
2511The following macros are provided by the framework:
2512
2513- ``REGISTER_PUBSUB_EVENT(event)``: Defines an event, and takes one argument,
2514 the event name, which must be a valid C identifier. All calls to
2515 ``REGISTER_PUBSUB_EVENT`` macro must be placed in the file
2516 ``pubsub_events.h``.
2517
2518- ``PUBLISH_EVENT_ARG(event, arg)``: Publishes a defined event, by iterating
2519 subscribed handlers and calling them in turn. The handlers will be passed the
2520 parameter ``arg``. The expected use-case is to broadcast an event.
2521
2522- ``PUBLISH_EVENT(event)``: Like ``PUBLISH_EVENT_ARG``, except that the value
2523 ``NULL`` is passed to subscribed handlers.
2524
2525- ``SUBSCRIBE_TO_EVENT(event, handler)``: Registers the ``handler`` to
2526 subscribe to ``event``. The handler will be executed whenever the ``event``
2527 is published.
2528
2529- ``for_each_subscriber(event, subscriber)``: Iterates through all handlers
2530 subscribed for ``event``. ``subscriber`` must be a local variable of type
2531 ``pubsub_cb_t *``, and will point to each subscribed handler in turn during
2532 iteration. This macro can be used for those patterns that none of the
2533 ``PUBLISH_EVENT_*()`` macros cover.
2534
2535Publishing an event that wasn't defined using ``REGISTER_PUBSUB_EVENT`` will
2536result in build error. Subscribing to an undefined event however won't.
2537
2538Subscribed handlers must be of type ``pubsub_cb_t``, with following function
2539signature:
2540
Paul Beesley493e3492019-03-13 15:11:04 +00002541.. code:: c
Jeenu Viswambharane3f22002017-09-22 08:32:10 +01002542
2543 typedef void* (*pubsub_cb_t)(const void *arg);
2544
2545There may be arbitrary number of handlers registered to the same event. The
2546order in which subscribed handlers are notified when that event is published is
2547not defined. Subscribed handlers may be executed in any order; handlers should
2548not assume any relative ordering amongst them.
2549
2550Publishing an event on a PE will result in subscribed handlers executing on that
2551PE only; it won't cause handlers to execute on a different PE.
2552
2553Note that publishing an event on a PE blocks until all the subscribed handlers
2554finish executing on the PE.
2555
Dan Handley610e7e12018-03-01 18:44:00 +00002556TF-A generic code publishes and subscribes to some events within. Platform
2557ports are discouraged from subscribing to them. These events may be withdrawn,
2558renamed, or have their semantics altered in the future. Platforms may however
2559register, publish, and subscribe to platform-specific events.
Dimitris Papastamosa7921b92017-10-13 15:27:58 +01002560
Jeenu Viswambharane3f22002017-09-22 08:32:10 +01002561Publish and Subscribe Example
2562~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
2563
2564A publisher that wants to publish event ``foo`` would:
2565
2566- Define the event ``foo`` in the ``pubsub_events.h``.
2567
Paul Beesley493e3492019-03-13 15:11:04 +00002568 .. code:: c
Jeenu Viswambharane3f22002017-09-22 08:32:10 +01002569
2570 REGISTER_PUBSUB_EVENT(foo);
2571
2572- Depending on the nature of event, use one of ``PUBLISH_EVENT_*()`` macros to
2573 publish the event at the appropriate path and time of execution.
2574
2575A subscriber that wants to subscribe to event ``foo`` published above would
2576implement:
2577
Sandrine Bailleuxf5a91002019-02-08 10:50:28 +01002578.. code:: c
Jeenu Viswambharane3f22002017-09-22 08:32:10 +01002579
Sandrine Bailleuxf5a91002019-02-08 10:50:28 +01002580 void *foo_handler(const void *arg)
2581 {
2582 void *result;
Jeenu Viswambharane3f22002017-09-22 08:32:10 +01002583
Sandrine Bailleuxf5a91002019-02-08 10:50:28 +01002584 /* Do handling ... */
Jeenu Viswambharane3f22002017-09-22 08:32:10 +01002585
Sandrine Bailleuxf5a91002019-02-08 10:50:28 +01002586 return result;
2587 }
Jeenu Viswambharane3f22002017-09-22 08:32:10 +01002588
Sandrine Bailleuxf5a91002019-02-08 10:50:28 +01002589 SUBSCRIBE_TO_EVENT(foo, foo_handler);
Jeenu Viswambharane3f22002017-09-22 08:32:10 +01002590
Daniel Boulby468f0d72018-09-18 11:45:51 +01002591
2592Reclaiming the BL31 initialization code
2593~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
2594
2595A significant amount of the code used for the initialization of BL31 is never
2596needed again after boot time. In order to reduce the runtime memory
2597footprint, the memory used for this code can be reclaimed after initialization
2598has finished and be used for runtime data.
2599
2600The build option ``RECLAIM_INIT_CODE`` can be set to mark this boot time code
2601with a ``.text.init.*`` attribute which can be filtered and placed suitably
Paul Beesley1fbc97b2019-01-11 18:26:51 +00002602within the BL image for later reclamation by the platform. The platform can
2603specify the filter and the memory region for this init section in BL31 via the
Daniel Boulby468f0d72018-09-18 11:45:51 +01002604plat.ld.S linker script. For example, on the FVP, this section is placed
2605overlapping the secondary CPU stacks so that after the cold boot is done, this
2606memory can be reclaimed for the stacks. The init memory section is initially
Paul Beesley1fbc97b2019-01-11 18:26:51 +00002607mapped with ``RO``, ``EXECUTE`` attributes. After BL31 initialization has
Daniel Boulby468f0d72018-09-18 11:45:51 +01002608completed, the FVP changes the attributes of this section to ``RW``,
2609``EXECUTE_NEVER`` allowing it to be used for runtime data. The memory attributes
2610are changed within the ``bl31_plat_runtime_setup`` platform hook. The init
2611section section can be reclaimed for any data which is accessed after cold
2612boot initialization and it is upto the platform to make the decision.
2613
Boyan Karatotevc25cf632025-04-07 15:23:09 +01002614Please note that this will disable inlining for any functions with the __init
2615attribute.
2616
Paul Beesleyf8640672019-04-12 14:19:42 +01002617.. _firmware_design_pmf:
2618
Douglas Raillardd7c21b72017-06-28 15:23:03 +01002619Performance Measurement Framework
2620---------------------------------
2621
2622The Performance Measurement Framework (PMF) facilitates collection of
Dan Handley610e7e12018-03-01 18:44:00 +00002623timestamps by registered services and provides interfaces to retrieve them
2624from within TF-A. A platform can choose to expose appropriate SMCs to
2625retrieve these collected timestamps.
Douglas Raillardd7c21b72017-06-28 15:23:03 +01002626
2627By default, the global physical counter is used for the timestamp
2628value and is read via ``CNTPCT_EL0``. The framework allows to retrieve
2629timestamps captured by other CPUs.
2630
2631Timestamp identifier format
2632~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
2633
2634A PMF timestamp is uniquely identified across the system via the
2635timestamp ID or ``tid``. The ``tid`` is composed as follows:
2636
2637::
2638
2639 Bits 0-7: The local timestamp identifier.
2640 Bits 8-9: Reserved.
2641 Bits 10-15: The service identifier.
2642 Bits 16-31: Reserved.
2643
2644#. The service identifier. Each PMF service is identified by a
2645 service name and a service identifier. Both the service name and
2646 identifier are unique within the system as a whole.
2647
2648#. The local timestamp identifier. This identifier is unique within a given
2649 service.
2650
2651Registering a PMF service
2652~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
2653
2654To register a PMF service, the ``PMF_REGISTER_SERVICE()`` macro from ``pmf.h``
2655is used. The arguments required are the service name, the service ID,
2656the total number of local timestamps to be captured and a set of flags.
2657
2658The ``flags`` field can be specified as a bitwise-OR of the following values:
2659
2660::
2661
2662 PMF_STORE_ENABLE: The timestamp is stored in memory for later retrieval.
2663 PMF_DUMP_ENABLE: The timestamp is dumped on the serial console.
2664
2665The ``PMF_REGISTER_SERVICE()`` reserves memory to store captured
2666timestamps in a PMF specific linker section at build time.
2667Additionally, it defines necessary functions to capture and
2668retrieve a particular timestamp for the given service at runtime.
2669
Dan Handley610e7e12018-03-01 18:44:00 +00002670The macro ``PMF_REGISTER_SERVICE()`` only enables capturing PMF timestamps
2671from within TF-A. In order to retrieve timestamps from outside of TF-A, the
Douglas Raillardd7c21b72017-06-28 15:23:03 +01002672``PMF_REGISTER_SERVICE_SMC()`` macro must be used instead. This macro
2673accepts the same set of arguments as the ``PMF_REGISTER_SERVICE()``
2674macro but additionally supports retrieving timestamps using SMCs.
2675
2676Capturing a timestamp
2677~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
2678
2679PMF timestamps are stored in a per-service timestamp region. On a
2680system with multiple CPUs, each timestamp is captured and stored
2681in a per-CPU cache line aligned memory region.
2682
2683Having registered the service, the ``PMF_CAPTURE_TIMESTAMP()`` macro can be
2684used to capture a timestamp at the location where it is used. The macro
2685takes the service name, a local timestamp identifier and a flag as arguments.
2686
2687The ``flags`` field argument can be zero, or ``PMF_CACHE_MAINT`` which
2688instructs PMF to do cache maintenance following the capture. Cache
2689maintenance is required if any of the service's timestamps are captured
2690with data cache disabled.
2691
2692To capture a timestamp in assembly code, the caller should use
2693``pmf_calc_timestamp_addr`` macro (defined in ``pmf_asm_macros.S``) to
2694calculate the address of where the timestamp would be stored. The
2695caller should then read ``CNTPCT_EL0`` register to obtain the timestamp
2696and store it at the determined address for later retrieval.
2697
2698Retrieving a timestamp
2699~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
2700
Dan Handley610e7e12018-03-01 18:44:00 +00002701From within TF-A, timestamps for individual CPUs can be retrieved using either
2702``PMF_GET_TIMESTAMP_BY_MPIDR()`` or ``PMF_GET_TIMESTAMP_BY_INDEX()`` macros.
2703These macros accept the CPU's MPIDR value, or its ordinal position
2704respectively.
Douglas Raillardd7c21b72017-06-28 15:23:03 +01002705
Dan Handley610e7e12018-03-01 18:44:00 +00002706From outside TF-A, timestamps for individual CPUs can be retrieved by calling
2707into ``pmf_smc_handler()``.
Douglas Raillardd7c21b72017-06-28 15:23:03 +01002708
Paul Beesley493e3492019-03-13 15:11:04 +00002709::
Douglas Raillardd7c21b72017-06-28 15:23:03 +01002710
2711 Interface : pmf_smc_handler()
2712 Argument : unsigned int smc_fid, u_register_t x1,
2713 u_register_t x2, u_register_t x3,
2714 u_register_t x4, void *cookie,
2715 void *handle, u_register_t flags
2716 Return : uintptr_t
2717
2718 smc_fid: Holds the SMC identifier which is either `PMF_SMC_GET_TIMESTAMP_32`
2719 when the caller of the SMC is running in AArch32 mode
2720 or `PMF_SMC_GET_TIMESTAMP_64` when the caller is running in AArch64 mode.
2721 x1: Timestamp identifier.
2722 x2: The `mpidr` of the CPU for which the timestamp has to be retrieved.
2723 This can be the `mpidr` of a different core to the one initiating
2724 the SMC. In that case, service specific cache maintenance may be
2725 required to ensure the updated copy of the timestamp is returned.
2726 x3: A flags value that is either 0 or `PMF_CACHE_MAINT`. If
2727 `PMF_CACHE_MAINT` is passed, then the PMF code will perform a
2728 cache invalidate before reading the timestamp. This ensures
2729 an updated copy is returned.
2730
2731The remaining arguments, ``x4``, ``cookie``, ``handle`` and ``flags`` are unused
2732in this implementation.
2733
2734PMF code structure
2735~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
2736
2737#. ``pmf_main.c`` consists of core functions that implement service registration,
2738 initialization, storing, dumping and retrieving timestamps.
2739
2740#. ``pmf_smc.c`` contains the SMC handling for registered PMF services.
2741
2742#. ``pmf.h`` contains the public interface to Performance Measurement Framework.
2743
2744#. ``pmf_asm_macros.S`` consists of macros to facilitate capturing timestamps in
2745 assembly code.
2746
2747#. ``pmf_helpers.h`` is an internal header used by ``pmf.h``.
2748
Dan Handley610e7e12018-03-01 18:44:00 +00002749Armv8-A Architecture Extensions
2750-------------------------------
Douglas Raillardd7c21b72017-06-28 15:23:03 +01002751
Dan Handley610e7e12018-03-01 18:44:00 +00002752TF-A makes use of Armv8-A Architecture Extensions where applicable. This
2753section lists the usage of Architecture Extensions, and build flags
2754controlling them.
Douglas Raillardd7c21b72017-06-28 15:23:03 +01002755
Manish Pandeyacdaac22023-05-12 14:51:39 +01002756Build options
2757~~~~~~~~~~~~~
2758
2759``ARM_ARCH_MAJOR`` and ``ARM_ARCH_MINOR``
2760
2761These build options serve dual purpose
2762
2763- Determine the architecture extension support in TF-A build: All the mandatory
2764 architectural features up to ``ARM_ARCH_MAJOR.ARM_ARCH_MINOR`` are included
2765 and unconditionally enabled by TF-A build system.
2766
Govindraj Raja81525652023-07-18 13:55:33 -05002767- ``ARM_ARCH_MAJOR`` and ``ARM_ARCH_MINOR`` are passed to a march.mk build utility
2768 this will try to come up with an appropriate -march value to be passed to compiler
2769 by probing the compiler and checking what's supported by the compiler and what's best
2770 that can be used. But if platform provides a ``MARCH_DIRECTIVE`` then it will used
2771 directly and compiler probing will be skipped.
Manish Pandeyacdaac22023-05-12 14:51:39 +01002772
2773The build system requires that the platform provides a valid numeric value based on
2774CPU architecture extension, otherwise it defaults to base Armv8.0-A architecture.
2775Subsequent Arm Architecture versions also support extensions which were introduced
2776in previous versions.
Douglas Raillardd7c21b72017-06-28 15:23:03 +01002777
Paul Beesleyd2fcc4e2019-05-29 13:59:40 +01002778.. seealso:: :ref:`Build Options`
Douglas Raillardd7c21b72017-06-28 15:23:03 +01002779
2780For details on the Architecture Extension and available features, please refer
2781to the respective Architecture Extension Supplement.
2782
Dan Handley610e7e12018-03-01 18:44:00 +00002783Armv8.1-A
2784~~~~~~~~~
Douglas Raillardd7c21b72017-06-28 15:23:03 +01002785
2786This Architecture Extension is targeted when ``ARM_ARCH_MAJOR`` >= 8, or when
2787``ARM_ARCH_MAJOR`` == 8 and ``ARM_ARCH_MINOR`` >= 1.
2788
Soby Mathewad042012019-09-25 14:03:41 +01002789- By default, a load-/store-exclusive instruction pair is used to implement
2790 spinlocks. The ``USE_SPINLOCK_CAS`` build option when set to 1 selects the
2791 spinlock implementation using the ARMv8.1-LSE Compare and Swap instruction.
2792 Notice this instruction is only available in AArch64 execution state, so
2793 the option is only available to AArch64 builds.
Douglas Raillardd7c21b72017-06-28 15:23:03 +01002794
Dan Handley610e7e12018-03-01 18:44:00 +00002795Armv8.2-A
2796~~~~~~~~~
Isla Mitchellc4a1a072017-08-07 11:20:13 +01002797
Antonio Nino Diaz633703a2019-02-19 13:14:06 +00002798- The presence of ARMv8.2-TTCNP is detected at runtime. When it is present, the
2799 Common not Private (TTBRn_ELx.CnP) bit is enabled to indicate that multiple
Sandrine Bailleuxfee6e262018-01-29 14:48:15 +01002800 Processing Elements in the same Inner Shareable domain use the same
2801 translation table entries for a given stage of translation for a particular
2802 translation regime.
Isla Mitchellc4a1a072017-08-07 11:20:13 +01002803
Jeenu Viswambharancbad6612018-08-15 14:29:29 +01002804Armv8.3-A
2805~~~~~~~~~
2806
Antonio Nino Diaz594811b2019-01-31 11:58:00 +00002807- Pointer authentication features of Armv8.3-A are unconditionally enabled in
2808 the Non-secure world so that lower ELs are allowed to use them without
2809 causing a trap to EL3.
2810
2811 In order to enable the Secure world to use it, ``CTX_INCLUDE_PAUTH_REGS``
2812 must be set to 1. This will add all pointer authentication system registers
2813 to the context that is saved when doing a world switch.
Jeenu Viswambharancbad6612018-08-15 14:29:29 +01002814
Alexei Fedorov2831d582019-03-13 11:05:07 +00002815 The TF-A itself has support for pointer authentication at runtime
Alexei Fedorov90f2e882019-05-24 12:17:09 +01002816 that can be enabled by setting ``BRANCH_PROTECTION`` option to non-zero and
Antonio Nino Diaz25cda672019-02-19 11:53:51 +00002817 ``CTX_INCLUDE_PAUTH_REGS`` to 1. This enables pointer authentication in BL1,
2818 BL2, BL31, and the TSP if it is used.
2819
Alexei Fedorov2831d582019-03-13 11:05:07 +00002820 Note that Pointer Authentication is enabled for Non-secure world irrespective
2821 of the value of these build flags if the CPU supports it.
2822
Alexei Fedorovb567e5d2019-03-11 16:51:47 +00002823 If ``ARM_ARCH_MAJOR == 8`` and ``ARM_ARCH_MINOR >= 3`` the code footprint of
2824 enabling PAuth is lower because the compiler will use the optimized
2825 PAuth instructions rather than the backwards-compatible ones.
2826
Alexei Fedorov90f2e882019-05-24 12:17:09 +01002827Armv8.5-A
2828~~~~~~~~~
2829
2830- Branch Target Identification feature is selected by ``BRANCH_PROTECTION``
Manish Pandey34a305e2021-10-21 21:53:49 +01002831 option set to 1. This option defaults to 0.
Justin Chadwell55c73512019-07-18 16:16:32 +01002832
Govindraj Rajac1be66f2024-03-07 14:42:20 -06002833- Memory Tagging Extension feature has few variants but not all of them require
2834 enablement from EL3 to be used at lower EL. e.g. Memory tagging only at
2835 EL0(MTE) does not require EL3 configuration however memory tagging at
2836 EL2/EL1 (MTE2) does require EL3 enablement and we need to set this option
2837 ``ENABLE_FEAT_MTE2`` to 1. This option defaults to 0.
Alexei Fedorov90f2e882019-05-24 12:17:09 +01002838
Dan Handley610e7e12018-03-01 18:44:00 +00002839Armv7-A
2840~~~~~~~
Etienne Carriere1374fcb2017-11-08 13:48:40 +01002841
2842This Architecture Extension is targeted when ``ARM_ARCH_MAJOR`` == 7.
2843
Dan Handley610e7e12018-03-01 18:44:00 +00002844There are several Armv7-A extensions available. Obviously the TrustZone
2845extension is mandatory to support the TF-A bootloader and runtime services.
Etienne Carriere1374fcb2017-11-08 13:48:40 +01002846
Dan Handley610e7e12018-03-01 18:44:00 +00002847Platform implementing an Armv7-A system can to define from its target
Etienne Carriere1374fcb2017-11-08 13:48:40 +01002848Cortex-A architecture through ``ARM_CORTEX_A<X> = yes`` in their
Paul Beesley1fbc97b2019-01-11 18:26:51 +00002849``platform.mk`` script. For example ``ARM_CORTEX_A15=yes`` for a
Etienne Carriere1374fcb2017-11-08 13:48:40 +01002850Cortex-A15 target.
2851
2852Platform can also set ``ARM_WITH_NEON=yes`` to enable neon support.
Paul Beesleyf2ec7142019-10-04 16:17:46 +00002853Note that using neon at runtime has constraints on non secure world context.
Dan Handley610e7e12018-03-01 18:44:00 +00002854TF-A does not yet provide VFP context management.
Etienne Carriere1374fcb2017-11-08 13:48:40 +01002855
2856Directive ``ARM_CORTEX_A<x>`` and ``ARM_WITH_NEON`` are used to set
2857the toolchain target architecture directive.
2858
2859Platform may choose to not define straight the toolchain target architecture
Govindraj Rajacd10c6e2023-05-30 16:52:15 -05002860directive by defining ``MARCH_DIRECTIVE``.
Etienne Carriere1374fcb2017-11-08 13:48:40 +01002861I.e:
2862
Paul Beesley493e3492019-03-13 15:11:04 +00002863.. code:: make
Etienne Carriere1374fcb2017-11-08 13:48:40 +01002864
Govindraj Raja81525652023-07-18 13:55:33 -05002865 MARCH_DIRECTIVE := -march=armv7-a
Etienne Carriere1374fcb2017-11-08 13:48:40 +01002866
Douglas Raillardd7c21b72017-06-28 15:23:03 +01002867Code Structure
2868--------------
2869
Dan Handley610e7e12018-03-01 18:44:00 +00002870TF-A code is logically divided between the three boot loader stages mentioned
2871in the previous sections. The code is also divided into the following
2872categories (present as directories in the source code):
Douglas Raillardd7c21b72017-06-28 15:23:03 +01002873
2874- **Platform specific.** Choice of architecture specific code depends upon
2875 the platform.
2876- **Common code.** This is platform and architecture agnostic code.
2877- **Library code.** This code comprises of functionality commonly used by all
2878 other code. The PSCI implementation and other EL3 runtime frameworks reside
2879 as Library components.
2880- **Stage specific.** Code specific to a boot stage.
2881- **Drivers.**
2882- **Services.** EL3 runtime services (eg: SPD). Specific SPD services
2883 reside in the ``services/spd`` directory (e.g. ``services/spd/tspd``).
2884
2885Each boot loader stage uses code from one or more of the above mentioned
2886categories. Based upon the above, the code layout looks like this:
2887
2888::
2889
2890 Directory Used by BL1? Used by BL2? Used by BL31?
2891 bl1 Yes No No
2892 bl2 No Yes No
2893 bl31 No No Yes
2894 plat Yes Yes Yes
2895 drivers Yes No Yes
2896 common Yes Yes Yes
2897 lib Yes Yes Yes
2898 services No No Yes
2899
Sandrine Bailleux15530dd2019-02-08 15:26:36 +01002900The build system provides a non configurable build option IMAGE_BLx for each
2901boot loader stage (where x = BL stage). e.g. for BL1 , IMAGE_BL1 will be
Dan Handley610e7e12018-03-01 18:44:00 +00002902defined by the build system. This enables TF-A to compile certain code only
2903for specific boot loader stages
Douglas Raillardd7c21b72017-06-28 15:23:03 +01002904
2905All assembler files have the ``.S`` extension. The linker source files for each
2906boot stage have the extension ``.ld.S``. These are processed by GCC to create the
2907linker scripts which have the extension ``.ld``.
2908
2909FDTs provide a description of the hardware platform and are used by the Linux
2910kernel at boot time. These can be found in the ``fdts`` directory.
2911
Paul Beesleyf8640672019-04-12 14:19:42 +01002912.. rubric:: References
Douglas Raillardd7c21b72017-06-28 15:23:03 +01002913
Paul Beesleyf8640672019-04-12 14:19:42 +01002914- `Trusted Board Boot Requirements CLIENT (TBBR-CLIENT) Armv8-A (ARM DEN0006D)`_
2915
Manish V Badarkhe9d24e9b2023-06-15 09:14:33 +01002916- `PSCI`_
Paul Beesleyf8640672019-04-12 14:19:42 +01002917
Sandrine Bailleuxd9202df2020-04-17 14:06:52 +02002918- `SMC Calling Convention`_
Paul Beesleyf8640672019-04-12 14:19:42 +01002919
2920- :ref:`Interrupt Management Framework`
Douglas Raillardd7c21b72017-06-28 15:23:03 +01002921
2922--------------
2923
Boyan Karatotev1dcba8f2024-11-19 11:27:01 +00002924*Copyright (c) 2013-2025, Arm Limited and Contributors. All rights reserved.*
Douglas Raillardd7c21b72017-06-28 15:23:03 +01002925
laurenw-arm03e7e612020-04-16 10:02:17 -05002926.. _SMCCC: https://developer.arm.com/docs/den0028/latest
Manish V Badarkhe9d24e9b2023-06-15 09:14:33 +01002927.. _PSCI: https://developer.arm.com/documentation/den0022/latest/
Petre-Ionut Tudor620a7022019-09-27 15:13:21 +01002928.. _Arm ARM: https://developer.arm.com/docs/ddi0487/latest
laurenw-arm03e7e612020-04-16 10:02:17 -05002929.. _SMC Calling Convention: https://developer.arm.com/docs/den0028/latest
Sandrine Bailleuxf2384172024-02-02 11:16:12 +01002930.. _Trusted Board Boot Requirements CLIENT (TBBR-CLIENT) Armv8-A (ARM DEN0006D): https://developer.arm.com/docs/den0006/latest
Zelalem Aweke023b1a42021-10-21 13:59:45 -05002931.. _Arm Confidential Compute Architecture (Arm CCA): https://www.arm.com/why-arm/architecture/security-features/arm-confidential-compute-architecture
Manish Pandey493bdc42023-07-21 13:08:53 +01002932.. _AArch64 exception vector table: https://developer.arm.com/documentation/100933/0100/AArch64-exception-vector-table
Douglas Raillardd7c21b72017-06-28 15:23:03 +01002933
Paul Beesley814f8c02019-03-13 15:49:27 +00002934.. |Image 1| image:: ../resources/diagrams/rt-svc-descs-layout.png