blob: cf8cbc760513bc82bbd797279d42583b7034735a [file] [log] [blame]
Paul Beesleyfc9ee362019-03-07 15:47:15 +00001Firmware Design
2===============
Douglas Raillardd7c21b72017-06-28 15:23:03 +01003
Dan Handley610e7e12018-03-01 18:44:00 +00004Trusted Firmware-A (TF-A) implements a subset of the Trusted Board Boot
Paul Beesleyf8640672019-04-12 14:19:42 +01005Requirements (TBBR) Platform Design Document (PDD) for Arm reference
6platforms.
7
8The TBB sequence starts when the platform is powered on and runs up
Douglas Raillardd7c21b72017-06-28 15:23:03 +01009to the stage where it hands-off control to firmware running in the normal
10world in DRAM. This is the cold boot path.
11
Manish V Badarkhe9d24e9b2023-06-15 09:14:33 +010012TF-A also implements the `PSCI`_ as a runtime service. PSCI is the interface
13from normal world software to firmware implementing power management use-cases
14(for example, secondary CPU boot, hotplug and idle). Normal world software can
15access TF-A runtime services via the Arm SMC (Secure Monitor Call) instruction.
16The SMC instruction must be used as mandated by the SMC Calling Convention
17(`SMCCC`_).
Douglas Raillardd7c21b72017-06-28 15:23:03 +010018
Dan Handley610e7e12018-03-01 18:44:00 +000019TF-A implements a framework for configuring and managing interrupts generated
20in either security state. The details of the interrupt management framework
Paul Beesleyf8640672019-04-12 14:19:42 +010021and its design can be found in :ref:`Interrupt Management Framework`.
Douglas Raillardd7c21b72017-06-28 15:23:03 +010022
Dan Handley610e7e12018-03-01 18:44:00 +000023TF-A also implements a library for setting up and managing the translation
Paul Beesleyf8640672019-04-12 14:19:42 +010024tables. The details of this library can be found in
25:ref:`Translation (XLAT) Tables Library`.
Antonio Nino Diazb5d68092017-05-23 11:49:22 +010026
Dan Handley610e7e12018-03-01 18:44:00 +000027TF-A can be built to support either AArch64 or AArch32 execution state.
Zelalem Aweke023b1a42021-10-21 13:59:45 -050028
Harrison Mutai3005be02023-05-12 09:45:14 +010029.. note::
30 The descriptions in this chapter are for the Arm TrustZone architecture.
31 For changes to the firmware design for the `Arm Confidential Compute
32 Architecture (Arm CCA)`_ please refer to the chapter :ref:`Realm Management
33 Extension (RME)`.
Zelalem Aweke023b1a42021-10-21 13:59:45 -050034
Douglas Raillardd7c21b72017-06-28 15:23:03 +010035Cold boot
36---------
37
38The cold boot path starts when the platform is physically turned on. If
39``COLD_BOOT_SINGLE_CPU=0``, one of the CPUs released from reset is chosen as the
40primary CPU, and the remaining CPUs are considered secondary CPUs. The primary
41CPU is chosen through platform-specific means. The cold boot path is mainly
42executed by the primary CPU, other than essential CPU initialization executed by
43all CPUs. The secondary CPUs are kept in a safe platform-specific state until
44the primary CPU has performed enough initialization to boot them.
45
Paul Beesleyf8640672019-04-12 14:19:42 +010046Refer to the :ref:`CPU Reset` for more information on the effect of the
Douglas Raillardd7c21b72017-06-28 15:23:03 +010047``COLD_BOOT_SINGLE_CPU`` platform build option.
48
Dan Handley610e7e12018-03-01 18:44:00 +000049The cold boot path in this implementation of TF-A depends on the execution
50state. For AArch64, it is divided into five steps (in order of execution):
Douglas Raillardd7c21b72017-06-28 15:23:03 +010051
52- Boot Loader stage 1 (BL1) *AP Trusted ROM*
53- Boot Loader stage 2 (BL2) *Trusted Boot Firmware*
54- Boot Loader stage 3-1 (BL31) *EL3 Runtime Software*
55- Boot Loader stage 3-2 (BL32) *Secure-EL1 Payload* (optional)
56- Boot Loader stage 3-3 (BL33) *Non-trusted Firmware*
57
58For AArch32, it is divided into four steps (in order of execution):
59
60- Boot Loader stage 1 (BL1) *AP Trusted ROM*
61- Boot Loader stage 2 (BL2) *Trusted Boot Firmware*
62- Boot Loader stage 3-2 (BL32) *EL3 Runtime Software*
63- Boot Loader stage 3-3 (BL33) *Non-trusted Firmware*
64
Dan Handley610e7e12018-03-01 18:44:00 +000065Arm development platforms (Fixed Virtual Platforms (FVPs) and Juno) implement a
Douglas Raillardd7c21b72017-06-28 15:23:03 +010066combination of the following types of memory regions. Each bootloader stage uses
67one or more of these memory regions.
68
69- Regions accessible from both non-secure and secure states. For example,
70 non-trusted SRAM, ROM and DRAM.
71- Regions accessible from only the secure state. For example, trusted SRAM and
72 ROM. The FVPs also implement the trusted DRAM which is statically
73 configured. Additionally, the Base FVPs and Juno development platform
74 configure the TrustZone Controller (TZC) to create a region in the DRAM
75 which is accessible only from the secure state.
76
77The sections below provide the following details:
78
Soby Mathewb1bf0442018-02-16 14:52:52 +000079- dynamic configuration of Boot Loader stages
Douglas Raillardd7c21b72017-06-28 15:23:03 +010080- initialization and execution of the first three stages during cold boot
81- specification of the EL3 Runtime Software (BL31 for AArch64 and BL32 for
82 AArch32) entrypoint requirements for use by alternative Trusted Boot
83 Firmware in place of the provided BL1 and BL2
84
Soby Mathewb1bf0442018-02-16 14:52:52 +000085Dynamic Configuration during cold boot
86~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
87
88Each of the Boot Loader stages may be dynamically configured if required by the
89platform. The Boot Loader stage may optionally specify a firmware
90configuration file and/or hardware configuration file as listed below:
91
Manish V Badarkheece96fd2020-06-13 09:42:28 +010092- FW_CONFIG - The firmware configuration file. Holds properties shared across
93 all BLx images.
94 An example is the "dtb-registry" node, which contains the information about
95 the other device tree configurations (load-address, size, image_id).
Soby Mathewb1bf0442018-02-16 14:52:52 +000096- HW_CONFIG - The hardware configuration file. Can be shared by all Boot Loader
97 stages and also by the Normal World Rich OS.
98- TB_FW_CONFIG - Trusted Boot Firmware configuration file. Shared between BL1
99 and BL2.
100- SOC_FW_CONFIG - SoC Firmware configuration file. Used by BL31.
101- TOS_FW_CONFIG - Trusted OS Firmware configuration file. Used by Trusted OS
102 (BL32).
103- NT_FW_CONFIG - Non Trusted Firmware configuration file. Used by Non-trusted
104 firmware (BL33).
105
106The Arm development platforms use the Flattened Device Tree format for the
107dynamic configuration files.
108
109Each Boot Loader stage can pass up to 4 arguments via registers to the next
110stage. BL2 passes the list of the next images to execute to the *EL3 Runtime
111Software* (BL31 for AArch64 and BL32 for AArch32) via `arg0`. All the other
112arguments are platform defined. The Arm development platforms use the following
113convention:
114
115- BL1 passes the address of a meminfo_t structure to BL2 via ``arg1``. This
116 structure contains the memory layout available to BL2.
117- When dynamic configuration files are present, the firmware configuration for
118 the next Boot Loader stage is populated in the first available argument and
119 the generic hardware configuration is passed the next available argument.
120 For example,
121
Manish V Badarkheece96fd2020-06-13 09:42:28 +0100122 - FW_CONFIG is loaded by BL1, then its address is passed in ``arg0`` to BL2.
123 - TB_FW_CONFIG address is retrieved by BL2 from FW_CONFIG device tree.
Soby Mathewb1bf0442018-02-16 14:52:52 +0000124 - If HW_CONFIG is loaded by BL1, then its address is passed in ``arg2`` to
125 BL2. Note, ``arg1`` is already used for meminfo_t.
126 - If SOC_FW_CONFIG is loaded by BL2, then its address is passed in ``arg1``
127 to BL31. Note, ``arg0`` is used to pass the list of executable images.
128 - Similarly, if HW_CONFIG is loaded by BL1 or BL2, then its address is
129 passed in ``arg2`` to BL31.
130 - For other BL3x images, if the firmware configuration file is loaded by
131 BL2, then its address is passed in ``arg0`` and if HW_CONFIG is loaded
132 then its address is passed in ``arg1``.
Nishant Sharmae9d8c012023-10-13 11:23:50 +0100133 - In case SPMC_AT_EL3 is enabled, populate the BL32 image base, size and max
134 limit in the entry point information, since there is no platform function
135 to retrieve these in generic code. We choose ``arg2``, ``arg3`` and
136 ``arg4`` since the generic code uses ``arg1`` for stashing the SP manifest
137 size. The SPMC setup uses these arguments to update SP manifest with
138 actual SP's base address and it size.
Manish V Badarkhe70d8eee2022-04-12 21:11:56 +0100139 - In case of the Arm FVP platform, FW_CONFIG address passed in ``arg1`` to
140 BL31/SP_MIN, and the SOC_FW_CONFIG and HW_CONFIG details are retrieved
141 from FW_CONFIG device tree.
Soby Mathewb1bf0442018-02-16 14:52:52 +0000142
Douglas Raillardd7c21b72017-06-28 15:23:03 +0100143BL1
144~~~
145
146This stage begins execution from the platform's reset vector at EL3. The reset
147address is platform dependent but it is usually located in a Trusted ROM area.
148The BL1 data section is copied to trusted SRAM at runtime.
149
Dan Handley610e7e12018-03-01 18:44:00 +0000150On the Arm development platforms, BL1 code starts execution from the reset
Douglas Raillardd7c21b72017-06-28 15:23:03 +0100151vector defined by the constant ``BL1_RO_BASE``. The BL1 data section is copied
152to the top of trusted SRAM as defined by the constant ``BL1_RW_BASE``.
153
154The functionality implemented by this stage is as follows.
155
156Determination of boot path
157^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
158
159Whenever a CPU is released from reset, BL1 needs to distinguish between a warm
160boot and a cold boot. This is done using platform-specific mechanisms (see the
Paul Beesleyf8640672019-04-12 14:19:42 +0100161``plat_get_my_entrypoint()`` function in the :ref:`Porting Guide`). In the case
162of a warm boot, a CPU is expected to continue execution from a separate
Douglas Raillardd7c21b72017-06-28 15:23:03 +0100163entrypoint. In the case of a cold boot, the secondary CPUs are placed in a safe
164platform-specific state (see the ``plat_secondary_cold_boot_setup()`` function in
Paul Beesleyf8640672019-04-12 14:19:42 +0100165the :ref:`Porting Guide`) while the primary CPU executes the remaining cold boot
166path as described in the following sections.
Douglas Raillardd7c21b72017-06-28 15:23:03 +0100167
168This step only applies when ``PROGRAMMABLE_RESET_ADDRESS=0``. Refer to the
Paul Beesleyf8640672019-04-12 14:19:42 +0100169:ref:`CPU Reset` for more information on the effect of the
Douglas Raillardd7c21b72017-06-28 15:23:03 +0100170``PROGRAMMABLE_RESET_ADDRESS`` platform build option.
171
172Architectural initialization
173^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
174
175BL1 performs minimal architectural initialization as follows.
176
177- Exception vectors
178
179 BL1 sets up simple exception vectors for both synchronous and asynchronous
180 exceptions. The default behavior upon receiving an exception is to populate
181 a status code in the general purpose register ``X0/R0`` and call the
Paul Beesleyf8640672019-04-12 14:19:42 +0100182 ``plat_report_exception()`` function (see the :ref:`Porting Guide`). The
183 status code is one of:
Douglas Raillardd7c21b72017-06-28 15:23:03 +0100184
185 For AArch64:
186
187 ::
188
189 0x0 : Synchronous exception from Current EL with SP_EL0
190 0x1 : IRQ exception from Current EL with SP_EL0
191 0x2 : FIQ exception from Current EL with SP_EL0
192 0x3 : System Error exception from Current EL with SP_EL0
193 0x4 : Synchronous exception from Current EL with SP_ELx
194 0x5 : IRQ exception from Current EL with SP_ELx
195 0x6 : FIQ exception from Current EL with SP_ELx
196 0x7 : System Error exception from Current EL with SP_ELx
197 0x8 : Synchronous exception from Lower EL using aarch64
198 0x9 : IRQ exception from Lower EL using aarch64
199 0xa : FIQ exception from Lower EL using aarch64
200 0xb : System Error exception from Lower EL using aarch64
201 0xc : Synchronous exception from Lower EL using aarch32
202 0xd : IRQ exception from Lower EL using aarch32
203 0xe : FIQ exception from Lower EL using aarch32
204 0xf : System Error exception from Lower EL using aarch32
205
206 For AArch32:
207
208 ::
209
210 0x10 : User mode
211 0x11 : FIQ mode
212 0x12 : IRQ mode
213 0x13 : SVC mode
214 0x16 : Monitor mode
215 0x17 : Abort mode
216 0x1a : Hypervisor mode
217 0x1b : Undefined mode
218 0x1f : System mode
219
Dan Handley610e7e12018-03-01 18:44:00 +0000220 The ``plat_report_exception()`` implementation on the Arm FVP port programs
Douglas Raillardd7c21b72017-06-28 15:23:03 +0100221 the Versatile Express System LED register in the following format to
Paul Beesley1fbc97b2019-01-11 18:26:51 +0000222 indicate the occurrence of an unexpected exception:
Douglas Raillardd7c21b72017-06-28 15:23:03 +0100223
224 ::
225
226 SYS_LED[0] - Security state (Secure=0/Non-Secure=1)
227 SYS_LED[2:1] - Exception Level (EL3=0x3, EL2=0x2, EL1=0x1, EL0=0x0)
228 For AArch32 it is always 0x0
229 SYS_LED[7:3] - Exception Class (Sync/Async & origin). This is the value
230 of the status code
231
232 A write to the LED register reflects in the System LEDs (S6LED0..7) in the
233 CLCD window of the FVP.
234
235 BL1 does not expect to receive any exceptions other than the SMC exception.
236 For the latter, BL1 installs a simple stub. The stub expects to receive a
237 limited set of SMC types (determined by their function IDs in the general
238 purpose register ``X0/R0``):
239
240 - ``BL1_SMC_RUN_IMAGE``: This SMC is raised by BL2 to make BL1 pass control
241 to EL3 Runtime Software.
Paul Beesleyf8640672019-04-12 14:19:42 +0100242 - All SMCs listed in section "BL1 SMC Interface" in the :ref:`Firmware Update (FWU)`
Douglas Raillardd7c21b72017-06-28 15:23:03 +0100243 Design Guide are supported for AArch64 only. These SMCs are currently
244 not supported when BL1 is built for AArch32.
245
246 Any other SMC leads to an assertion failure.
247
248- CPU initialization
249
Boyan Karatotev1dcba8f2024-11-19 11:27:01 +0000250 BL1 calls the ``reset_handler`` macro/function which in turn calls the CPU
Douglas Raillardd7c21b72017-06-28 15:23:03 +0100251 specific reset handler function (see the section: "CPU specific operations
252 framework").
253
Douglas Raillardd7c21b72017-06-28 15:23:03 +0100254Platform initialization
255^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
256
Dan Handley610e7e12018-03-01 18:44:00 +0000257On Arm platforms, BL1 performs the following platform initializations:
Douglas Raillardd7c21b72017-06-28 15:23:03 +0100258
259- Enable the Trusted Watchdog.
260- Initialize the console.
261- Configure the Interconnect to enable hardware coherency.
262- Enable the MMU and map the memory it needs to access.
263- Configure any required platform storage to load the next bootloader image
264 (BL2).
Soby Mathewb1bf0442018-02-16 14:52:52 +0000265- If the BL1 dynamic configuration file, ``TB_FW_CONFIG``, is available, then
266 load it to the platform defined address and make it available to BL2 via
267 ``arg0``.
Soby Mathewd969a7e2018-06-11 16:40:36 +0100268- Configure the system timer and program the `CNTFRQ_EL0` for use by NS-BL1U
269 and NS-BL2U firmware update images.
Douglas Raillardd7c21b72017-06-28 15:23:03 +0100270
271Firmware Update detection and execution
272^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
273
274After performing platform setup, BL1 common code calls
Paul Beesleyf8640672019-04-12 14:19:42 +0100275``bl1_plat_get_next_image_id()`` to determine if :ref:`Firmware Update (FWU)` is
276required or to proceed with the normal boot process. If the platform code
277returns ``BL2_IMAGE_ID`` then the normal boot sequence is executed as described
278in the next section, else BL1 assumes that :ref:`Firmware Update (FWU)` is
279required and execution passes to the first image in the
280:ref:`Firmware Update (FWU)` process. In either case, BL1 retrieves a descriptor
281of the next image by calling ``bl1_plat_get_image_desc()``. The image descriptor
282contains an ``entry_point_info_t`` structure, which BL1 uses to initialize the
283execution state of the next image.
Douglas Raillardd7c21b72017-06-28 15:23:03 +0100284
285BL2 image load and execution
286^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
287
288In the normal boot flow, BL1 execution continues as follows:
289
290#. BL1 prints the following string from the primary CPU to indicate successful
291 execution of the BL1 stage:
292
293 ::
294
295 "Booting Trusted Firmware"
296
Soby Mathewb1bf0442018-02-16 14:52:52 +0000297#. BL1 loads a BL2 raw binary image from platform storage, at a
298 platform-specific base address. Prior to the load, BL1 invokes
299 ``bl1_plat_handle_pre_image_load()`` which allows the platform to update or
300 use the image information. If the BL2 image file is not present or if
Douglas Raillardd7c21b72017-06-28 15:23:03 +0100301 there is not enough free trusted SRAM the following error message is
302 printed:
303
304 ::
305
306 "Failed to load BL2 firmware."
307
Soby Mathewb1bf0442018-02-16 14:52:52 +0000308#. BL1 invokes ``bl1_plat_handle_post_image_load()`` which again is intended
309 for platforms to take further action after image load. This function must
310 populate the necessary arguments for BL2, which may also include the memory
311 layout. Further description of the memory layout can be found later
312 in this document.
Douglas Raillardd7c21b72017-06-28 15:23:03 +0100313
314#. BL1 passes control to the BL2 image at Secure EL1 (for AArch64) or at
315 Secure SVC mode (for AArch32), starting from its load address.
316
Douglas Raillardd7c21b72017-06-28 15:23:03 +0100317BL2
318~~~
319
320BL1 loads and passes control to BL2 at Secure-EL1 (for AArch64) or at Secure
321SVC mode (for AArch32) . BL2 is linked against and loaded at a platform-specific
322base address (more information can be found later in this document).
323The functionality implemented by BL2 is as follows.
324
325Architectural initialization
326^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
327
328For AArch64, BL2 performs the minimal architectural initialization required
Dan Handley610e7e12018-03-01 18:44:00 +0000329for subsequent stages of TF-A and normal world software. EL1 and EL0 are given
Peng Fan9632c9c2020-08-21 10:47:17 +0800330access to Floating Point and Advanced SIMD registers by setting the
Dan Handley610e7e12018-03-01 18:44:00 +0000331``CPACR.FPEN`` bits.
Douglas Raillardd7c21b72017-06-28 15:23:03 +0100332
333For AArch32, the minimal architectural initialization required for subsequent
Dan Handley610e7e12018-03-01 18:44:00 +0000334stages of TF-A and normal world software is taken care of in BL1 as both BL1
335and BL2 execute at PL1.
Douglas Raillardd7c21b72017-06-28 15:23:03 +0100336
337Platform initialization
338^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
339
Dan Handley610e7e12018-03-01 18:44:00 +0000340On Arm platforms, BL2 performs the following platform initializations:
Douglas Raillardd7c21b72017-06-28 15:23:03 +0100341
342- Initialize the console.
343- Configure any required platform storage to allow loading further bootloader
344 images.
345- Enable the MMU and map the memory it needs to access.
346- Perform platform security setup to allow access to controlled components.
347- Reserve some memory for passing information to the next bootloader image
348 EL3 Runtime Software and populate it.
349- Define the extents of memory available for loading each subsequent
350 bootloader image.
Soby Mathewb1bf0442018-02-16 14:52:52 +0000351- If BL1 has passed TB_FW_CONFIG dynamic configuration file in ``arg0``,
352 then parse it.
Douglas Raillardd7c21b72017-06-28 15:23:03 +0100353
354Image loading in BL2
355^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
356
Roberto Vargas025946a2018-09-24 17:20:48 +0100357BL2 generic code loads the images based on the list of loadable images
358provided by the platform. BL2 passes the list of executable images
359provided by the platform to the next handover BL image.
Douglas Raillardd7c21b72017-06-28 15:23:03 +0100360
Soby Mathewb1bf0442018-02-16 14:52:52 +0000361The list of loadable images provided by the platform may also contain
362dynamic configuration files. The files are loaded and can be parsed as
363needed in the ``bl2_plat_handle_post_image_load()`` function. These
364configuration files can be passed to next Boot Loader stages as arguments
365by updating the corresponding entrypoint information in this function.
366
Sandrine Bailleux15530dd2019-02-08 15:26:36 +0100367SCP_BL2 (System Control Processor Firmware) image load
368^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Douglas Raillardd7c21b72017-06-28 15:23:03 +0100369
370Some systems have a separate System Control Processor (SCP) for power, clock,
Sandrine Bailleux15530dd2019-02-08 15:26:36 +0100371reset and system control. BL2 loads the optional SCP_BL2 image from platform
Douglas Raillardd7c21b72017-06-28 15:23:03 +0100372storage into a platform-specific region of secure memory. The subsequent
Sandrine Bailleux15530dd2019-02-08 15:26:36 +0100373handling of SCP_BL2 is platform specific. For example, on the Juno Arm
Douglas Raillardd7c21b72017-06-28 15:23:03 +0100374development platform port the image is transferred into SCP's internal memory
375using the Boot Over MHU (BOM) protocol after being loaded in the trusted SRAM
Sandrine Bailleux15530dd2019-02-08 15:26:36 +0100376memory. The SCP executes SCP_BL2 and signals to the Application Processor (AP)
Douglas Raillardd7c21b72017-06-28 15:23:03 +0100377for BL2 execution to continue.
378
379EL3 Runtime Software image load
380^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
381
382BL2 loads the EL3 Runtime Software image from platform storage into a platform-
383specific address in trusted SRAM. If there is not enough memory to load the
Roberto Vargas025946a2018-09-24 17:20:48 +0100384image or image is missing it leads to an assertion failure.
Douglas Raillardd7c21b72017-06-28 15:23:03 +0100385
386AArch64 BL32 (Secure-EL1 Payload) image load
387^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
388
389BL2 loads the optional BL32 image from platform storage into a platform-
390specific region of secure memory. The image executes in the secure world. BL2
391relies on BL31 to pass control to the BL32 image, if present. Hence, BL2
392populates a platform-specific area of memory with the entrypoint/load-address
393of the BL32 image. The value of the Saved Processor Status Register (``SPSR``)
394for entry into BL32 is not determined by BL2, it is initialized by the
395Secure-EL1 Payload Dispatcher (see later) within BL31, which is responsible for
396managing interaction with BL32. This information is passed to BL31.
397
398BL33 (Non-trusted Firmware) image load
399^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
400
401BL2 loads the BL33 image (e.g. UEFI or other test or boot software) from
402platform storage into non-secure memory as defined by the platform.
403
404BL2 relies on EL3 Runtime Software to pass control to BL33 once secure state
405initialization is complete. Hence, BL2 populates a platform-specific area of
406memory with the entrypoint and Saved Program Status Register (``SPSR``) of the
407normal world software image. The entrypoint is the load address of the BL33
408image. The ``SPSR`` is determined as specified in Section 5.13 of the
Manish V Badarkhe9d24e9b2023-06-15 09:14:33 +0100409`PSCI`_. This information is passed to the EL3 Runtime Software.
Douglas Raillardd7c21b72017-06-28 15:23:03 +0100410
411AArch64 BL31 (EL3 Runtime Software) execution
412^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
413
414BL2 execution continues as follows:
415
416#. BL2 passes control back to BL1 by raising an SMC, providing BL1 with the
417 BL31 entrypoint. The exception is handled by the SMC exception handler
418 installed by BL1.
419
420#. BL1 turns off the MMU and flushes the caches. It clears the
421 ``SCTLR_EL3.M/I/C`` bits, flushes the data cache to the point of coherency
422 and invalidates the TLBs.
423
424#. BL1 passes control to BL31 at the specified entrypoint at EL3.
425
Roberto Vargasb1584272017-11-20 13:36:10 +0000426Running BL2 at EL3 execution level
427~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
428
Dan Handley610e7e12018-03-01 18:44:00 +0000429Some platforms have a non-TF-A Boot ROM that expects the next boot stage
430to execute at EL3. On these platforms, TF-A BL1 is a waste of memory
431as its only purpose is to ensure TF-A BL2 is entered at S-EL1. To avoid
Roberto Vargasb1584272017-11-20 13:36:10 +0000432this waste, a special mode enables BL2 to execute at EL3, which allows
Dan Handley610e7e12018-03-01 18:44:00 +0000433a non-TF-A Boot ROM to load and jump directly to BL2. This mode is selected
Arvind Ram Prakash11b9b492022-11-22 14:41:00 -0600434when the build flag RESET_TO_BL2 is enabled.
435The main differences in this mode are:
Roberto Vargasb1584272017-11-20 13:36:10 +0000436
437#. BL2 includes the reset code and the mailbox mechanism to differentiate
438 cold boot and warm boot. It runs at EL3 doing the arch
439 initialization required for EL3.
440
441#. BL2 does not receive the meminfo information from BL1 anymore. This
442 information can be passed by the Boot ROM or be internal to the
443 BL2 image.
444
445#. Since BL2 executes at EL3, BL2 jumps directly to the next image,
446 instead of invoking the RUN_IMAGE SMC call.
447
448
449We assume 3 different types of BootROM support on the platform:
450
451#. The Boot ROM always jumps to the same address, for both cold
452 and warm boot. In this case, we will need to keep a resident part
453 of BL2 whose memory cannot be reclaimed by any other image. The
454 linker script defines the symbols __TEXT_RESIDENT_START__ and
455 __TEXT_RESIDENT_END__ that allows the platform to configure
456 correctly the memory map.
457#. The platform has some mechanism to indicate the jump address to the
458 Boot ROM. Platform code can then program the jump address with
459 psci_warmboot_entrypoint during cold boot.
460#. The platform has some mechanism to program the reset address using
461 the PROGRAMMABLE_RESET_ADDRESS feature. Platform code can then
462 program the reset address with psci_warmboot_entrypoint during
463 cold boot, bypassing the boot ROM for warm boot.
464
465In the last 2 cases, no part of BL2 needs to remain resident at
466runtime. In the first 2 cases, we expect the Boot ROM to be able to
467differentiate between warm and cold boot, to avoid loading BL2 again
468during warm boot.
469
470This functionality can be tested with FVP loading the image directly
471in memory and changing the address where the system jumps at reset.
472For example:
473
Dimitris Papastamos25836492018-06-11 11:07:58 +0100474 -C cluster0.cpu0.RVBAR=0x4022000
475 --data cluster0.cpu0=bl2.bin@0x4022000
Roberto Vargasb1584272017-11-20 13:36:10 +0000476
477With this configuration, FVP is like a platform of the first case,
478where the Boot ROM jumps always to the same address. For simplification,
479BL32 is loaded in DRAM in this case, to avoid other images reclaiming
480BL2 memory.
481
482
Douglas Raillardd7c21b72017-06-28 15:23:03 +0100483AArch64 BL31
484~~~~~~~~~~~~
485
486The image for this stage is loaded by BL2 and BL1 passes control to BL31 at
487EL3. BL31 executes solely in trusted SRAM. BL31 is linked against and
488loaded at a platform-specific base address (more information can be found later
489in this document). The functionality implemented by BL31 is as follows.
490
491Architectural initialization
492^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
493
494Currently, BL31 performs a similar architectural initialization to BL1 as
495far as system register settings are concerned. Since BL1 code resides in ROM,
496architectural initialization in BL31 allows override of any previous
497initialization done by BL1.
498
499BL31 initializes the per-CPU data framework, which provides a cache of
500frequently accessed per-CPU data optimised for fast, concurrent manipulation
501on different CPUs. This buffer includes pointers to per-CPU contexts, crash
502buffer, CPU reset and power down operations, PSCI data, platform data and so on.
503
504It then replaces the exception vectors populated by BL1 with its own. BL31
505exception vectors implement more elaborate support for handling SMCs since this
506is the only mechanism to access the runtime services implemented by BL31 (PSCI
507for example). BL31 checks each SMC for validity as specified by the
Sandrine Bailleuxd9202df2020-04-17 14:06:52 +0200508`SMC Calling Convention`_ before passing control to the required SMC
Douglas Raillardd7c21b72017-06-28 15:23:03 +0100509handler routine.
510
511BL31 programs the ``CNTFRQ_EL0`` register with the clock frequency of the system
512counter, which is provided by the platform.
513
514Platform initialization
515^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
516
517BL31 performs detailed platform initialization, which enables normal world
518software to function correctly.
519
Dan Handley610e7e12018-03-01 18:44:00 +0000520On Arm platforms, this consists of the following:
Douglas Raillardd7c21b72017-06-28 15:23:03 +0100521
522- Initialize the console.
523- Configure the Interconnect to enable hardware coherency.
524- Enable the MMU and map the memory it needs to access.
525- Initialize the generic interrupt controller.
526- Initialize the power controller device.
527- Detect the system topology.
528
529Runtime services initialization
530^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
531
532BL31 is responsible for initializing the runtime services. One of them is PSCI.
533
534As part of the PSCI initializations, BL31 detects the system topology. It also
535initializes the data structures that implement the state machine used to track
536the state of power domain nodes. The state can be one of ``OFF``, ``RUN`` or
537``RETENTION``. All secondary CPUs are initially in the ``OFF`` state. The cluster
538that the primary CPU belongs to is ``ON``; any other cluster is ``OFF``. It also
539initializes the locks that protect them. BL31 accesses the state of a CPU or
540cluster immediately after reset and before the data cache is enabled in the
541warm boot path. It is not currently possible to use 'exclusive' based spinlocks,
542therefore BL31 uses locks based on Lamport's Bakery algorithm instead.
543
544The runtime service framework and its initialization is described in more
545detail in the "EL3 runtime services framework" section below.
546
547Details about the status of the PSCI implementation are provided in the
548"Power State Coordination Interface" section below.
549
550AArch64 BL32 (Secure-EL1 Payload) image initialization
551^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
552
553If a BL32 image is present then there must be a matching Secure-EL1 Payload
554Dispatcher (SPD) service (see later for details). During initialization
555that service must register a function to carry out initialization of BL32
556once the runtime services are fully initialized. BL31 invokes such a
557registered function to initialize BL32 before running BL33. This initialization
558is not necessary for AArch32 SPs.
559
560Details on BL32 initialization and the SPD's role are described in the
Paul Beesleyd2fcc4e2019-05-29 13:59:40 +0100561:ref:`firmware_design_sel1_spd` section below.
Douglas Raillardd7c21b72017-06-28 15:23:03 +0100562
563BL33 (Non-trusted Firmware) execution
564^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
565
566EL3 Runtime Software initializes the EL2 or EL1 processor context for normal-
567world cold boot, ensuring that no secure state information finds its way into
568the non-secure execution state. EL3 Runtime Software uses the entrypoint
569information provided by BL2 to jump to the Non-trusted firmware image (BL33)
570at the highest available Exception Level (EL2 if available, otherwise EL1).
571
572Using alternative Trusted Boot Firmware in place of BL1 & BL2 (AArch64 only)
573~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
574
575Some platforms have existing implementations of Trusted Boot Firmware that
Dan Handley610e7e12018-03-01 18:44:00 +0000576would like to use TF-A BL31 for the EL3 Runtime Software. To enable this
577firmware architecture it is important to provide a fully documented and stable
578interface between the Trusted Boot Firmware and BL31.
Douglas Raillardd7c21b72017-06-28 15:23:03 +0100579
580Future changes to the BL31 interface will be done in a backwards compatible
581way, and this enables these firmware components to be independently enhanced/
582updated to develop and exploit new functionality.
583
584Required CPU state when calling ``bl31_entrypoint()`` during cold boot
585^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
586
587This function must only be called by the primary CPU.
588
589On entry to this function the calling primary CPU must be executing in AArch64
590EL3, little-endian data access, and all interrupt sources masked:
591
592::
593
594 PSTATE.EL = 3
595 PSTATE.RW = 1
596 PSTATE.DAIF = 0xf
597 SCTLR_EL3.EE = 0
598
599X0 and X1 can be used to pass information from the Trusted Boot Firmware to the
600platform code in BL31:
601
602::
603
Dan Handley610e7e12018-03-01 18:44:00 +0000604 X0 : Reserved for common TF-A information
Douglas Raillardd7c21b72017-06-28 15:23:03 +0100605 X1 : Platform specific information
606
607BL31 zero-init sections (e.g. ``.bss``) should not contain valid data on entry,
608these will be zero filled prior to invoking platform setup code.
609
610Use of the X0 and X1 parameters
611'''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''
612
613The parameters are platform specific and passed from ``bl31_entrypoint()`` to
614``bl31_early_platform_setup()``. The value of these parameters is never directly
615used by the common BL31 code.
616
617The convention is that ``X0`` conveys information regarding the BL31, BL32 and
618BL33 images from the Trusted Boot firmware and ``X1`` can be used for other
Dan Handley610e7e12018-03-01 18:44:00 +0000619platform specific purpose. This convention allows platforms which use TF-A's
620BL1 and BL2 images to transfer additional platform specific information from
621Secure Boot without conflicting with future evolution of TF-A using ``X0`` to
622pass a ``bl31_params`` structure.
Douglas Raillardd7c21b72017-06-28 15:23:03 +0100623
624BL31 common and SPD initialization code depends on image and entrypoint
625information about BL33 and BL32, which is provided via BL31 platform APIs.
626This information is required until the start of execution of BL33. This
627information can be provided in a platform defined manner, e.g. compiled into
628the platform code in BL31, or provided in a platform defined memory location
629by the Trusted Boot firmware, or passed from the Trusted Boot Firmware via the
630Cold boot Initialization parameters. This data may need to be cleaned out of
631the CPU caches if it is provided by an earlier boot stage and then accessed by
632BL31 platform code before the caches are enabled.
633
Dan Handley610e7e12018-03-01 18:44:00 +0000634TF-A's BL2 implementation passes a ``bl31_params`` structure in
635``X0`` and the Arm development platforms interpret this in the BL31 platform
Douglas Raillardd7c21b72017-06-28 15:23:03 +0100636code.
637
638MMU, Data caches & Coherency
639''''''''''''''''''''''''''''
640
641BL31 does not depend on the enabled state of the MMU, data caches or
642interconnect coherency on entry to ``bl31_entrypoint()``. If these are disabled
643on entry, these should be enabled during ``bl31_plat_arch_setup()``.
644
645Data structures used in the BL31 cold boot interface
646''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''
647
Harrison Mutai5b0366b2024-01-30 14:21:12 +0000648In the cold boot flow, ``entry_point_info`` is used to represent the execution
649state of an image; that is, the state of general purpose registers, PC, and
650SPSR.
651
652There are two variants of this structure, for AArch64:
653
654.. code:: c
655
656 typedef struct entry_point_info {
657 param_header_t h;
658 uintptr_t pc;
659 uint32_t spsr;
660
661 aapcs64_params_t args;
662 }
663
664and, AArch32:
665
666.. code:: c
667
668 typedef struct entry_point_info {
669 param_header_t h;
670 uintptr_t pc;
671 uint32_t spsr;
672
673 uintptr_t lr_svc;
674 aapcs32_params_t args;
675 } entry_point_info_t;
676
Douglas Raillardd7c21b72017-06-28 15:23:03 +0100677These structures are designed to support compatibility and independent
678evolution of the structures and the firmware images. For example, a version of
679BL31 that can interpret the BL3x image information from different versions of
Sandrine Bailleux15530dd2019-02-08 15:26:36 +0100680BL2, a platform that uses an extended entry_point_info structure to convey
Douglas Raillardd7c21b72017-06-28 15:23:03 +0100681additional register information to BL31, or a ELF image loader that can convey
682more details about the firmware images.
683
684To support these scenarios the structures are versioned and sized, which enables
685BL31 to detect which information is present and respond appropriately. The
686``param_header`` is defined to capture this information:
687
688.. code:: c
689
690 typedef struct param_header {
691 uint8_t type; /* type of the structure */
692 uint8_t version; /* version of this structure */
693 uint16_t size; /* size of this structure in bytes */
Harrison Mutai5b0366b2024-01-30 14:21:12 +0000694 uint32_t attr; /* attributes */
Douglas Raillardd7c21b72017-06-28 15:23:03 +0100695 } param_header_t;
696
Harrison Mutai5b0366b2024-01-30 14:21:12 +0000697In `entry_point_info`, Bits 0 and 5 of ``attr`` field are used to encode the
698security state; in other words, whether the image is to be executed in Secure,
699Non-Secure, or Realm mode.
700
701Other structures using this format are ``image_info`` and ``bl31_params``. The
702code that allocates and populates these structures must set the header fields
703appropriately, the ``SET_PARAM_HEAD()`` macro is defined to simplify this
704action.
Douglas Raillardd7c21b72017-06-28 15:23:03 +0100705
706Required CPU state for BL31 Warm boot initialization
707^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
708
Dan Handley610e7e12018-03-01 18:44:00 +0000709When requesting a CPU power-on, or suspending a running CPU, TF-A provides
710the platform power management code with a Warm boot initialization
711entry-point, to be invoked by the CPU immediately after the reset handler.
712On entry to the Warm boot initialization function the calling CPU must be in
713AArch64 EL3, little-endian data access and all interrupt sources masked:
Douglas Raillardd7c21b72017-06-28 15:23:03 +0100714
715::
716
717 PSTATE.EL = 3
718 PSTATE.RW = 1
719 PSTATE.DAIF = 0xf
720 SCTLR_EL3.EE = 0
721
722The PSCI implementation will initialize the processor state and ensure that the
723platform power management code is then invoked as required to initialize all
724necessary system, cluster and CPU resources.
725
726AArch32 EL3 Runtime Software entrypoint interface
727~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
728
729To enable this firmware architecture it is important to provide a fully
730documented and stable interface between the Trusted Boot Firmware and the
731AArch32 EL3 Runtime Software.
732
733Future changes to the entrypoint interface will be done in a backwards
734compatible way, and this enables these firmware components to be independently
735enhanced/updated to develop and exploit new functionality.
736
737Required CPU state when entering during cold boot
738^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
739
740This function must only be called by the primary CPU.
741
742On entry to this function the calling primary CPU must be executing in AArch32
743EL3, little-endian data access, and all interrupt sources masked:
744
745::
746
747 PSTATE.AIF = 0x7
748 SCTLR.EE = 0
749
750R0 and R1 are used to pass information from the Trusted Boot Firmware to the
751platform code in AArch32 EL3 Runtime Software:
752
753::
754
Dan Handley610e7e12018-03-01 18:44:00 +0000755 R0 : Reserved for common TF-A information
Douglas Raillardd7c21b72017-06-28 15:23:03 +0100756 R1 : Platform specific information
757
758Use of the R0 and R1 parameters
759'''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''
760
761The parameters are platform specific and the convention is that ``R0`` conveys
762information regarding the BL3x images from the Trusted Boot firmware and ``R1``
763can be used for other platform specific purpose. This convention allows
Dan Handley610e7e12018-03-01 18:44:00 +0000764platforms which use TF-A's BL1 and BL2 images to transfer additional platform
765specific information from Secure Boot without conflicting with future
766evolution of TF-A using ``R0`` to pass a ``bl_params`` structure.
Douglas Raillardd7c21b72017-06-28 15:23:03 +0100767
768The AArch32 EL3 Runtime Software is responsible for entry into BL33. This
769information can be obtained in a platform defined manner, e.g. compiled into
770the AArch32 EL3 Runtime Software, or provided in a platform defined memory
771location by the Trusted Boot firmware, or passed from the Trusted Boot Firmware
772via the Cold boot Initialization parameters. This data may need to be cleaned
773out of the CPU caches if it is provided by an earlier boot stage and then
774accessed by AArch32 EL3 Runtime Software before the caches are enabled.
775
Dan Handley610e7e12018-03-01 18:44:00 +0000776When using AArch32 EL3 Runtime Software, the Arm development platforms pass a
Douglas Raillardd7c21b72017-06-28 15:23:03 +0100777``bl_params`` structure in ``R0`` from BL2 to be interpreted by AArch32 EL3 Runtime
778Software platform code.
779
780MMU, Data caches & Coherency
781''''''''''''''''''''''''''''
782
783AArch32 EL3 Runtime Software must not depend on the enabled state of the MMU,
784data caches or interconnect coherency in its entrypoint. They must be explicitly
785enabled if required.
786
787Data structures used in cold boot interface
788'''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''
789
790The AArch32 EL3 Runtime Software cold boot interface uses ``bl_params`` instead
791of ``bl31_params``. The ``bl_params`` structure is based on the convention
792described in AArch64 BL31 cold boot interface section.
793
794Required CPU state for warm boot initialization
795^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
796
797When requesting a CPU power-on, or suspending a running CPU, AArch32 EL3
798Runtime Software must ensure execution of a warm boot initialization entrypoint.
Sandrine Bailleux15530dd2019-02-08 15:26:36 +0100799If TF-A BL1 is used and the PROGRAMMABLE_RESET_ADDRESS build flag is false,
Dan Handley610e7e12018-03-01 18:44:00 +0000800then AArch32 EL3 Runtime Software must ensure that BL1 branches to the warm
801boot entrypoint by arranging for the BL1 platform function,
Sandrine Bailleux15530dd2019-02-08 15:26:36 +0100802plat_get_my_entrypoint(), to return a non-zero value.
Douglas Raillardd7c21b72017-06-28 15:23:03 +0100803
804In this case, the warm boot entrypoint must be in AArch32 EL3, little-endian
805data access and all interrupt sources masked:
806
807::
808
809 PSTATE.AIF = 0x7
810 SCTLR.EE = 0
811
Dan Handley610e7e12018-03-01 18:44:00 +0000812The warm boot entrypoint may be implemented by using TF-A
Douglas Raillardd7c21b72017-06-28 15:23:03 +0100813``psci_warmboot_entrypoint()`` function. In that case, the platform must fulfil
Paul Beesleyf8640672019-04-12 14:19:42 +0100814the pre-requisites mentioned in the
815:ref:`PSCI Library Integration guide for Armv8-A AArch32 systems`.
Douglas Raillardd7c21b72017-06-28 15:23:03 +0100816
817EL3 runtime services framework
818------------------------------
819
820Software executing in the non-secure state and in the secure state at exception
821levels lower than EL3 will request runtime services using the Secure Monitor
822Call (SMC) instruction. These requests will follow the convention described in
823the SMC Calling Convention PDD (`SMCCC`_). The `SMCCC`_ assigns function
824identifiers to each SMC request and describes how arguments are passed and
825returned.
826
827The EL3 runtime services framework enables the development of services by
828different providers that can be easily integrated into final product firmware.
829The following sections describe the framework which facilitates the
830registration, initialization and use of runtime services in EL3 Runtime
831Software (BL31).
832
833The design of the runtime services depends heavily on the concepts and
834definitions described in the `SMCCC`_, in particular SMC Function IDs, Owning
835Entity Numbers (OEN), Fast and Yielding calls, and the SMC32 and SMC64 calling
836conventions. Please refer to that document for more detailed explanation of
837these terms.
838
839The following runtime services are expected to be implemented first. They have
840not all been instantiated in the current implementation.
841
842#. Standard service calls
843
844 This service is for management of the entire system. The Power State
845 Coordination Interface (`PSCI`_) is the first set of standard service calls
Dan Handley610e7e12018-03-01 18:44:00 +0000846 defined by Arm (see PSCI section later).
Douglas Raillardd7c21b72017-06-28 15:23:03 +0100847
848#. Secure-EL1 Payload Dispatcher service
849
850 If a system runs a Trusted OS or other Secure-EL1 Payload (SP) then
851 it also requires a *Secure Monitor* at EL3 to switch the EL1 processor
852 context between the normal world (EL1/EL2) and trusted world (Secure-EL1).
853 The Secure Monitor will make these world switches in response to SMCs. The
854 `SMCCC`_ provides for such SMCs with the Trusted OS Call and Trusted
855 Application Call OEN ranges.
856
857 The interface between the EL3 Runtime Software and the Secure-EL1 Payload is
858 not defined by the `SMCCC`_ or any other standard. As a result, each
859 Secure-EL1 Payload requires a specific Secure Monitor that runs as a runtime
Dan Handley610e7e12018-03-01 18:44:00 +0000860 service - within TF-A this service is referred to as the Secure-EL1 Payload
861 Dispatcher (SPD).
Douglas Raillardd7c21b72017-06-28 15:23:03 +0100862
Dan Handley610e7e12018-03-01 18:44:00 +0000863 TF-A provides a Test Secure-EL1 Payload (TSP) and its associated Dispatcher
864 (TSPD). Details of SPD design and TSP/TSPD operation are described in the
Paul Beesleyd2fcc4e2019-05-29 13:59:40 +0100865 :ref:`firmware_design_sel1_spd` section below.
Douglas Raillardd7c21b72017-06-28 15:23:03 +0100866
867#. CPU implementation service
868
869 This service will provide an interface to CPU implementation specific
870 services for a given platform e.g. access to processor errata workarounds.
871 This service is currently unimplemented.
872
Dan Handley610e7e12018-03-01 18:44:00 +0000873Additional services for Arm Architecture, SiP and OEM calls can be implemented.
Douglas Raillardd7c21b72017-06-28 15:23:03 +0100874Each implemented service handles a range of SMC function identifiers as
875described in the `SMCCC`_.
876
877Registration
878~~~~~~~~~~~~
879
880A runtime service is registered using the ``DECLARE_RT_SVC()`` macro, specifying
881the name of the service, the range of OENs covered, the type of service and
882initialization and call handler functions. This macro instantiates a ``const struct rt_svc_desc`` for the service with these details (see ``runtime_svc.h``).
Chris Kay33bfc5e2023-02-14 11:30:04 +0000883This structure is allocated in a special ELF section ``.rt_svc_descs``, enabling
Douglas Raillardd7c21b72017-06-28 15:23:03 +0100884the framework to find all service descriptors included into BL31.
885
886The specific service for a SMC Function is selected based on the OEN and call
887type of the Function ID, and the framework uses that information in the service
888descriptor to identify the handler for the SMC Call.
889
890The service descriptors do not include information to identify the precise set
891of SMC function identifiers supported by this service implementation, the
892security state from which such calls are valid nor the capability to support
89364-bit and/or 32-bit callers (using SMC32 or SMC64). Responding appropriately
894to these aspects of a SMC call is the responsibility of the service
895implementation, the framework is focused on integration of services from
896different providers and minimizing the time taken by the framework before the
897service handler is invoked.
898
899Details of the parameters, requirements and behavior of the initialization and
900call handling functions are provided in the following sections.
901
902Initialization
903~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
904
905``runtime_svc_init()`` in ``runtime_svc.c`` initializes the runtime services
906framework running on the primary CPU during cold boot as part of the BL31
907initialization. This happens prior to initializing a Trusted OS and running
908Normal world boot firmware that might in turn use these services.
909Initialization involves validating each of the declared runtime service
910descriptors, calling the service initialization function and populating the
911index used for runtime lookup of the service.
912
913The BL31 linker script collects all of the declared service descriptors into a
914single array and defines symbols that allow the framework to locate and traverse
915the array, and determine its size.
916
917The framework does basic validation of each descriptor to halt firmware
918initialization if service declaration errors are detected. The framework does
919not check descriptors for the following error conditions, and may behave in an
920unpredictable manner under such scenarios:
921
922#. Overlapping OEN ranges
923#. Multiple descriptors for the same range of OENs and ``call_type``
924#. Incorrect range of owning entity numbers for a given ``call_type``
925
926Once validated, the service ``init()`` callback is invoked. This function carries
927out any essential EL3 initialization before servicing requests. The ``init()``
928function is only invoked on the primary CPU during cold boot. If the service
929uses per-CPU data this must either be initialized for all CPUs during this call,
930or be done lazily when a CPU first issues an SMC call to that service. If
931``init()`` returns anything other than ``0``, this is treated as an initialization
932error and the service is ignored: this does not cause the firmware to halt.
933
934The OEN and call type fields present in the SMC Function ID cover a total of
935128 distinct services, but in practice a single descriptor can cover a range of
936OENs, e.g. SMCs to call a Trusted OS function. To optimize the lookup of a
937service handler, the framework uses an array of 128 indices that map every
938distinct OEN/call-type combination either to one of the declared services or to
939indicate the service is not handled. This ``rt_svc_descs_indices[]`` array is
940populated for all of the OENs covered by a service after the service ``init()``
941function has reported success. So a service that fails to initialize will never
942have it's ``handle()`` function invoked.
943
944The following figure shows how the ``rt_svc_descs_indices[]`` index maps the SMC
945Function ID call type and OEN onto a specific service handler in the
946``rt_svc_descs[]`` array.
947
948|Image 1|
949
Madhukar Pappireddy86350ae2020-07-29 09:37:25 -0500950.. _handling-an-smc:
951
Douglas Raillardd7c21b72017-06-28 15:23:03 +0100952Handling an SMC
953~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
954
955When the EL3 runtime services framework receives a Secure Monitor Call, the SMC
956Function ID is passed in W0 from the lower exception level (as per the
957`SMCCC`_). If the calling register width is AArch32, it is invalid to invoke an
958SMC Function which indicates the SMC64 calling convention: such calls are
959ignored and return the Unknown SMC Function Identifier result code ``0xFFFFFFFF``
960in R0/X0.
961
962Bit[31] (fast/yielding call) and bits[29:24] (owning entity number) of the SMC
963Function ID are combined to index into the ``rt_svc_descs_indices[]`` array. The
964resulting value might indicate a service that has no handler, in this case the
965framework will also report an Unknown SMC Function ID. Otherwise, the value is
966used as a further index into the ``rt_svc_descs[]`` array to locate the required
967service and handler.
968
969The service's ``handle()`` callback is provided with five of the SMC parameters
970directly, the others are saved into memory for retrieval (if needed) by the
971handler. The handler is also provided with an opaque ``handle`` for use with the
972supporting library for parameter retrieval, setting return values and context
Olivier Deprez33dd8452022-10-11 15:38:27 +0200973manipulation. The ``flags`` parameter indicates the security state of the caller
974and the state of the SVE hint bit per the SMCCCv1.3. The framework finally sets
975up the execution stack for the handler, and invokes the services ``handle()``
976function.
Douglas Raillardd7c21b72017-06-28 15:23:03 +0100977
Madhukar Pappireddy20be0772019-11-09 23:28:08 -0600978On return from the handler the result registers are populated in X0-X7 as needed
979before restoring the stack and CPU state and returning from the original SMC.
Douglas Raillardd7c21b72017-06-28 15:23:03 +0100980
Jeenu Viswambharancbb40d52017-10-18 14:30:53 +0100981Exception Handling Framework
982----------------------------
983
johpow017402f072020-07-28 13:07:25 -0500984Please refer to the :ref:`Exception Handling Framework` document.
Jeenu Viswambharancbb40d52017-10-18 14:30:53 +0100985
Douglas Raillardd7c21b72017-06-28 15:23:03 +0100986Power State Coordination Interface
987----------------------------------
988
989TODO: Provide design walkthrough of PSCI implementation.
990
Roberto Vargasd963e3e2017-09-12 10:28:35 +0100991The PSCI v1.1 specification categorizes APIs as optional and mandatory. All the
992mandatory APIs in PSCI v1.1, PSCI v1.0 and in PSCI v0.2 draft specification
Manish V Badarkhe9d24e9b2023-06-15 09:14:33 +0100993`PSCI`_ are implemented. The table lists the PSCI v1.1 APIs and their support
994in generic code.
Douglas Raillardd7c21b72017-06-28 15:23:03 +0100995
Sandrine Bailleux15530dd2019-02-08 15:26:36 +0100996An API implementation might have a dependency on platform code e.g. CPU_SUSPEND
Douglas Raillardd7c21b72017-06-28 15:23:03 +0100997requires the platform to export a part of the implementation. Hence the level
998of support of the mandatory APIs depends upon the support exported by the
999platform port as well. The Juno and FVP (all variants) platforms export all the
1000required support.
1001
1002+-----------------------------+-------------+-------------------------------+
Roberto Vargasd963e3e2017-09-12 10:28:35 +01001003| PSCI v1.1 API | Supported | Comments |
Douglas Raillardd7c21b72017-06-28 15:23:03 +01001004+=============================+=============+===============================+
Roberto Vargasd963e3e2017-09-12 10:28:35 +01001005| ``PSCI_VERSION`` | Yes | The version returned is 1.1 |
Douglas Raillardd7c21b72017-06-28 15:23:03 +01001006+-----------------------------+-------------+-------------------------------+
1007| ``CPU_SUSPEND`` | Yes\* | |
1008+-----------------------------+-------------+-------------------------------+
1009| ``CPU_OFF`` | Yes\* | |
1010+-----------------------------+-------------+-------------------------------+
1011| ``CPU_ON`` | Yes\* | |
1012+-----------------------------+-------------+-------------------------------+
1013| ``AFFINITY_INFO`` | Yes | |
1014+-----------------------------+-------------+-------------------------------+
1015| ``MIGRATE`` | Yes\*\* | |
1016+-----------------------------+-------------+-------------------------------+
1017| ``MIGRATE_INFO_TYPE`` | Yes\*\* | |
1018+-----------------------------+-------------+-------------------------------+
1019| ``MIGRATE_INFO_CPU`` | Yes\*\* | |
1020+-----------------------------+-------------+-------------------------------+
1021| ``SYSTEM_OFF`` | Yes\* | |
1022+-----------------------------+-------------+-------------------------------+
1023| ``SYSTEM_RESET`` | Yes\* | |
1024+-----------------------------+-------------+-------------------------------+
1025| ``PSCI_FEATURES`` | Yes | |
1026+-----------------------------+-------------+-------------------------------+
1027| ``CPU_FREEZE`` | No | |
1028+-----------------------------+-------------+-------------------------------+
1029| ``CPU_DEFAULT_SUSPEND`` | No | |
1030+-----------------------------+-------------+-------------------------------+
1031| ``NODE_HW_STATE`` | Yes\* | |
1032+-----------------------------+-------------+-------------------------------+
1033| ``SYSTEM_SUSPEND`` | Yes\* | |
1034+-----------------------------+-------------+-------------------------------+
1035| ``PSCI_SET_SUSPEND_MODE`` | No | |
1036+-----------------------------+-------------+-------------------------------+
1037| ``PSCI_STAT_RESIDENCY`` | Yes\* | |
1038+-----------------------------+-------------+-------------------------------+
1039| ``PSCI_STAT_COUNT`` | Yes\* | |
1040+-----------------------------+-------------+-------------------------------+
Roberto Vargasd963e3e2017-09-12 10:28:35 +01001041| ``SYSTEM_RESET2`` | Yes\* | |
1042+-----------------------------+-------------+-------------------------------+
1043| ``MEM_PROTECT`` | Yes\* | |
1044+-----------------------------+-------------+-------------------------------+
1045| ``MEM_PROTECT_CHECK_RANGE`` | Yes\* | |
1046+-----------------------------+-------------+-------------------------------+
Douglas Raillardd7c21b72017-06-28 15:23:03 +01001047
1048\*Note : These PSCI APIs require platform power management hooks to be
1049registered with the generic PSCI code to be supported.
1050
1051\*\*Note : These PSCI APIs require appropriate Secure Payload Dispatcher
1052hooks to be registered with the generic PSCI code to be supported.
1053
Dan Handley610e7e12018-03-01 18:44:00 +00001054The PSCI implementation in TF-A is a library which can be integrated with
1055AArch64 or AArch32 EL3 Runtime Software for Armv8-A systems. A guide to
1056integrating PSCI library with AArch32 EL3 Runtime Software can be found
Paul Beesleyf8640672019-04-12 14:19:42 +01001057at :ref:`PSCI Library Integration guide for Armv8-A AArch32 systems`.
1058
1059.. _firmware_design_sel1_spd:
Douglas Raillardd7c21b72017-06-28 15:23:03 +01001060
1061Secure-EL1 Payloads and Dispatchers
1062-----------------------------------
1063
1064On a production system that includes a Trusted OS running in Secure-EL1/EL0,
1065the Trusted OS is coupled with a companion runtime service in the BL31
1066firmware. This service is responsible for the initialisation of the Trusted
1067OS and all communications with it. The Trusted OS is the BL32 stage of the
Dan Handley610e7e12018-03-01 18:44:00 +00001068boot flow in TF-A. The firmware will attempt to locate, load and execute a
1069BL32 image.
Douglas Raillardd7c21b72017-06-28 15:23:03 +01001070
Dan Handley610e7e12018-03-01 18:44:00 +00001071TF-A uses a more general term for the BL32 software that runs at Secure-EL1 -
1072the *Secure-EL1 Payload* - as it is not always a Trusted OS.
Douglas Raillardd7c21b72017-06-28 15:23:03 +01001073
Dan Handley610e7e12018-03-01 18:44:00 +00001074TF-A provides a Test Secure-EL1 Payload (TSP) and a Test Secure-EL1 Payload
1075Dispatcher (TSPD) service as an example of how a Trusted OS is supported on a
1076production system using the Runtime Services Framework. On such a system, the
1077Test BL32 image and service are replaced by the Trusted OS and its dispatcher
1078service. The TF-A build system expects that the dispatcher will define the
1079build flag ``NEED_BL32`` to enable it to include the BL32 in the build either
1080as a binary or to compile from source depending on whether the ``BL32`` build
1081option is specified or not.
Douglas Raillardd7c21b72017-06-28 15:23:03 +01001082
1083The TSP runs in Secure-EL1. It is designed to demonstrate synchronous
1084communication with the normal-world software running in EL1/EL2. Communication
1085is initiated by the normal-world software
1086
1087- either directly through a Fast SMC (as defined in the `SMCCC`_)
1088
1089- or indirectly through a `PSCI`_ SMC. The `PSCI`_ implementation in turn
1090 informs the TSPD about the requested power management operation. This allows
1091 the TSP to prepare for or respond to the power state change
1092
1093The TSPD service is responsible for.
1094
1095- Initializing the TSP
1096
1097- Routing requests and responses between the secure and the non-secure
1098 states during the two types of communications just described
1099
1100Initializing a BL32 Image
1101~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
1102
1103The Secure-EL1 Payload Dispatcher (SPD) service is responsible for initializing
1104the BL32 image. It needs access to the information passed by BL2 to BL31 to do
1105so. This is provided by:
1106
1107.. code:: c
1108
1109 entry_point_info_t *bl31_plat_get_next_image_ep_info(uint32_t);
1110
1111which returns a reference to the ``entry_point_info`` structure corresponding to
1112the image which will be run in the specified security state. The SPD uses this
1113API to get entry point information for the SECURE image, BL32.
1114
1115In the absence of a BL32 image, BL31 passes control to the normal world
1116bootloader image (BL33). When the BL32 image is present, it is typical
1117that the SPD wants control to be passed to BL32 first and then later to BL33.
1118
1119To do this the SPD has to register a BL32 initialization function during
1120initialization of the SPD service. The BL32 initialization function has this
1121prototype:
1122
1123.. code:: c
1124
1125 int32_t init(void);
1126
1127and is registered using the ``bl31_register_bl32_init()`` function.
1128
Dan Handley610e7e12018-03-01 18:44:00 +00001129TF-A supports two approaches for the SPD to pass control to BL32 before
1130returning through EL3 and running the non-trusted firmware (BL33):
Douglas Raillardd7c21b72017-06-28 15:23:03 +01001131
1132#. In the BL32 setup function, use ``bl31_set_next_image_type()`` to
1133 request that the exit from ``bl31_main()`` is to the BL32 entrypoint in
1134 Secure-EL1. BL31 will exit to BL32 using the asynchronous method by
1135 calling ``bl31_prepare_next_image_entry()`` and ``el3_exit()``.
1136
1137 When the BL32 has completed initialization at Secure-EL1, it returns to
1138 BL31 by issuing an SMC, using a Function ID allocated to the SPD. On
1139 receipt of this SMC, the SPD service handler should switch the CPU context
1140 from trusted to normal world and use the ``bl31_set_next_image_type()`` and
1141 ``bl31_prepare_next_image_entry()`` functions to set up the initial return to
1142 the normal world firmware BL33. On return from the handler the framework
1143 will exit to EL2 and run BL33.
1144
1145#. The BL32 setup function registers an initialization function using
1146 ``bl31_register_bl32_init()`` which provides a SPD-defined mechanism to
1147 invoke a 'world-switch synchronous call' to Secure-EL1 to run the BL32
1148 entrypoint.
Paul Beesleyba3ed402019-03-13 16:20:44 +00001149
1150 .. note::
1151 The Test SPD service included with TF-A provides one implementation
1152 of such a mechanism.
Douglas Raillardd7c21b72017-06-28 15:23:03 +01001153
1154 On completion BL32 returns control to BL31 via a SMC, and on receipt the
1155 SPD service handler invokes the synchronous call return mechanism to return
1156 to the BL32 initialization function. On return from this function,
1157 ``bl31_main()`` will set up the return to the normal world firmware BL33 and
1158 continue the boot process in the normal world.
1159
Manish Pandey493bdc42023-07-21 13:08:53 +01001160Exception handling in BL31
1161--------------------------
1162
1163When exception occurs, PE must execute handler corresponding to exception. The
1164location in memory where the handler is stored is called the exception vector.
1165For ARM architecture, exception vectors are stored in a table, called the exception
1166vector table.
1167
1168Each EL (except EL0) has its own vector table, VBAR_ELn register stores the base
1169of vector table. Refer to `AArch64 exception vector table`_
1170
1171Current EL with SP_EL0
1172~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
1173
1174- Sync exception : Not expected except for BRK instruction, its debugging tool which
1175 a programmer may place at specific points in a program, to check the state of
1176 processor flags at these points in the code.
1177
1178- IRQ/FIQ : Unexpected exception, panic
1179
1180- SError : "plat_handle_el3_ea", defaults to panic
1181
1182Current EL with SP_ELx
1183~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
1184
1185- Sync exception : Unexpected exception, panic
1186
1187- IRQ/FIQ : Unexpected exception, panic
1188
1189- SError : "plat_handle_el3_ea" Except for special handling of lower EL's SError exception
1190 which gets triggered in EL3 when PSTATE.A is unmasked. Its only applicable when lower
1191 EL's EA is routed to EL3 (FFH_SUPPORT=1).
1192
1193Lower EL Exceptions
1194~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
1195
1196Applies to all the exceptions in both AArch64/AArch32 mode of lower EL.
1197
1198Before handling any lower EL exception, we synchronize the errors at EL3 entry to ensure
1199that any errors pertaining to lower EL is isolated/identified. If we continue without
1200identifying these errors early on then these errors will trigger in EL3 (as SError from
1201current EL) any time after PSTATE.A is unmasked. This is wrong because the error originated
1202in lower EL but exception happened in EL3.
1203
1204To solve this problem, synchronize the errors at EL3 entry and check for any pending
1205errors (async EA). If there is no pending error then continue with original exception.
1206If there is a pending error then, handle them based on routing model of EA's. Refer to
1207:ref:`Reliability, Availability, and Serviceability (RAS) Extensions` for details about
1208routing models.
1209
1210- KFH : Reflect it back to lower EL using **reflect_pending_async_ea_to_lower_el()**
1211
1212- FFH : Handle the synchronized error first using **handle_pending_async_ea()** after
1213 that continue with original exception. It is the only scenario where EL3 is capable
1214 of doing nested exception handling.
1215
1216After synchronizing and handling lower EL SErrors, unmask EA (PSTATE.A) to ensure
1217that any further EA's caused by EL3 are caught.
1218
Jeenu Viswambharanb60420a2017-08-24 15:43:44 +01001219Crash Reporting in BL31
1220-----------------------
Douglas Raillardd7c21b72017-06-28 15:23:03 +01001221
1222BL31 implements a scheme for reporting the processor state when an unhandled
1223exception is encountered. The reporting mechanism attempts to preserve all the
1224register contents and report it via a dedicated UART (PL011 console). BL31
1225reports the general purpose, EL3, Secure EL1 and some EL2 state registers.
1226
1227A dedicated per-CPU crash stack is maintained by BL31 and this is retrieved via
1228the per-CPU pointer cache. The implementation attempts to minimise the memory
1229required for this feature. The file ``crash_reporting.S`` contains the
1230implementation for crash reporting.
1231
1232The sample crash output is shown below.
1233
1234::
1235
Alexei Fedorov813c9f92020-03-03 13:31:58 +00001236 x0 = 0x000000002a4a0000
1237 x1 = 0x0000000000000001
1238 x2 = 0x0000000000000002
1239 x3 = 0x0000000000000003
1240 x4 = 0x0000000000000004
1241 x5 = 0x0000000000000005
1242 x6 = 0x0000000000000006
1243 x7 = 0x0000000000000007
1244 x8 = 0x0000000000000008
1245 x9 = 0x0000000000000009
1246 x10 = 0x0000000000000010
1247 x11 = 0x0000000000000011
1248 x12 = 0x0000000000000012
1249 x13 = 0x0000000000000013
1250 x14 = 0x0000000000000014
1251 x15 = 0x0000000000000015
1252 x16 = 0x0000000000000016
1253 x17 = 0x0000000000000017
1254 x18 = 0x0000000000000018
1255 x19 = 0x0000000000000019
1256 x20 = 0x0000000000000020
1257 x21 = 0x0000000000000021
1258 x22 = 0x0000000000000022
1259 x23 = 0x0000000000000023
1260 x24 = 0x0000000000000024
1261 x25 = 0x0000000000000025
1262 x26 = 0x0000000000000026
1263 x27 = 0x0000000000000027
1264 x28 = 0x0000000000000028
1265 x29 = 0x0000000000000029
1266 x30 = 0x0000000088000b78
1267 scr_el3 = 0x000000000003073d
1268 sctlr_el3 = 0x00000000b0cd183f
1269 cptr_el3 = 0x0000000000000000
1270 tcr_el3 = 0x000000008080351c
1271 daif = 0x00000000000002c0
1272 mair_el3 = 0x00000000004404ff
1273 spsr_el3 = 0x0000000060000349
1274 elr_el3 = 0x0000000088000114
1275 ttbr0_el3 = 0x0000000004018201
1276 esr_el3 = 0x00000000be000000
1277 far_el3 = 0x0000000000000000
1278 spsr_el1 = 0x0000000000000000
1279 elr_el1 = 0x0000000000000000
1280 spsr_abt = 0x0000000000000000
1281 spsr_und = 0x0000000000000000
1282 spsr_irq = 0x0000000000000000
1283 spsr_fiq = 0x0000000000000000
1284 sctlr_el1 = 0x0000000030d00800
1285 actlr_el1 = 0x0000000000000000
1286 cpacr_el1 = 0x0000000000000000
1287 csselr_el1 = 0x0000000000000000
1288 sp_el1 = 0x0000000000000000
1289 esr_el1 = 0x0000000000000000
1290 ttbr0_el1 = 0x0000000000000000
1291 ttbr1_el1 = 0x0000000000000000
1292 mair_el1 = 0x0000000000000000
1293 amair_el1 = 0x0000000000000000
1294 tcr_el1 = 0x0000000000000000
1295 tpidr_el1 = 0x0000000000000000
1296 tpidr_el0 = 0x0000000000000000
1297 tpidrro_el0 = 0x0000000000000000
1298 par_el1 = 0x0000000000000000
1299 mpidr_el1 = 0x0000000080000000
1300 afsr0_el1 = 0x0000000000000000
1301 afsr1_el1 = 0x0000000000000000
1302 contextidr_el1 = 0x0000000000000000
1303 vbar_el1 = 0x0000000000000000
1304 cntp_ctl_el0 = 0x0000000000000000
1305 cntp_cval_el0 = 0x0000000000000000
1306 cntv_ctl_el0 = 0x0000000000000000
1307 cntv_cval_el0 = 0x0000000000000000
1308 cntkctl_el1 = 0x0000000000000000
1309 sp_el0 = 0x0000000004014940
1310 isr_el1 = 0x0000000000000000
1311 dacr32_el2 = 0x0000000000000000
1312 ifsr32_el2 = 0x0000000000000000
1313 icc_hppir0_el1 = 0x00000000000003ff
1314 icc_hppir1_el1 = 0x00000000000003ff
1315 icc_ctlr_el3 = 0x0000000000080400
1316 gicd_ispendr regs (Offsets 0x200-0x278)
1317 Offset Value
1318 0x200: 0x0000000000000000
1319 0x208: 0x0000000000000000
1320 0x210: 0x0000000000000000
1321 0x218: 0x0000000000000000
1322 0x220: 0x0000000000000000
1323 0x228: 0x0000000000000000
1324 0x230: 0x0000000000000000
1325 0x238: 0x0000000000000000
1326 0x240: 0x0000000000000000
1327 0x248: 0x0000000000000000
1328 0x250: 0x0000000000000000
1329 0x258: 0x0000000000000000
1330 0x260: 0x0000000000000000
1331 0x268: 0x0000000000000000
1332 0x270: 0x0000000000000000
1333 0x278: 0x0000000000000000
Douglas Raillardd7c21b72017-06-28 15:23:03 +01001334
1335Guidelines for Reset Handlers
1336-----------------------------
1337
Dan Handley610e7e12018-03-01 18:44:00 +00001338TF-A implements a framework that allows CPU and platform ports to perform
1339actions very early after a CPU is released from reset in both the cold and warm
Boyan Karatotev1dcba8f2024-11-19 11:27:01 +00001340boot paths. This is done by calling the ``reset_handler`` macro/function in both
Dan Handley610e7e12018-03-01 18:44:00 +00001341the BL1 and BL31 images. It in turn calls the platform and CPU specific reset
1342handling functions.
Douglas Raillardd7c21b72017-06-28 15:23:03 +01001343
1344Details for implementing a CPU specific reset handler can be found in
Boyan Karatotevd71b5d72023-02-07 15:46:50 +00001345:ref:`firmware_design_cpu_specific_reset_handling`. Details for implementing a
1346platform specific reset handler can be found in the :ref:`Porting Guide` (see
1347the``plat_reset_handler()`` function).
Douglas Raillardd7c21b72017-06-28 15:23:03 +01001348
1349When adding functionality to a reset handler, keep in mind that if a different
1350reset handling behavior is required between the first and the subsequent
1351invocations of the reset handling code, this should be detected at runtime.
1352In other words, the reset handler should be able to detect whether an action has
1353already been performed and act as appropriate. Possible courses of actions are,
1354e.g. skip the action the second time, or undo/redo it.
1355
Madhukar Pappireddy86350ae2020-07-29 09:37:25 -05001356.. _configuring-secure-interrupts:
1357
Jeenu Viswambharanaeb267c2017-09-22 08:32:09 +01001358Configuring secure interrupts
1359-----------------------------
1360
1361The GIC driver is responsible for performing initial configuration of secure
1362interrupts on the platform. To this end, the platform is expected to provide the
1363GIC driver (either GICv2 or GICv3, as selected by the platform) with the
1364interrupt configuration during the driver initialisation.
1365
Antonio Nino Diaz29b9f5b2018-09-24 17:23:24 +01001366Secure interrupt configuration are specified in an array of secure interrupt
1367properties. In this scheme, in both GICv2 and GICv3 driver data structures, the
1368``interrupt_props`` member points to an array of interrupt properties. Each
Antonio Nino Diaz56b68ad2019-02-28 13:35:21 +00001369element of the array specifies the interrupt number and its attributes
1370(priority, group, configuration). Each element of the array shall be populated
1371by the macro ``INTR_PROP_DESC()``. The macro takes the following arguments:
Jeenu Viswambharanaeb267c2017-09-22 08:32:09 +01001372
Ming Huang1bea7aa2023-02-01 14:03:44 +08001373- 13-bit interrupt number,
Jeenu Viswambharanaeb267c2017-09-22 08:32:09 +01001374
Antonio Nino Diaz29b9f5b2018-09-24 17:23:24 +01001375- 8-bit interrupt priority,
Jeenu Viswambharanaeb267c2017-09-22 08:32:09 +01001376
Antonio Nino Diaz29b9f5b2018-09-24 17:23:24 +01001377- Interrupt type (one of ``INTR_TYPE_EL3``, ``INTR_TYPE_S_EL1``,
1378 ``INTR_TYPE_NS``),
Jeenu Viswambharanaeb267c2017-09-22 08:32:09 +01001379
Antonio Nino Diaz29b9f5b2018-09-24 17:23:24 +01001380- Interrupt configuration (either ``GIC_INTR_CFG_LEVEL`` or
1381 ``GIC_INTR_CFG_EDGE``).
Jeenu Viswambharanaeb267c2017-09-22 08:32:09 +01001382
Paul Beesleyf8640672019-04-12 14:19:42 +01001383.. _firmware_design_cpu_ops_fwk:
1384
Douglas Raillardd7c21b72017-06-28 15:23:03 +01001385CPU specific operations framework
1386---------------------------------
1387
Dan Handley610e7e12018-03-01 18:44:00 +00001388Certain aspects of the Armv8-A architecture are implementation defined,
1389that is, certain behaviours are not architecturally defined, but must be
1390defined and documented by individual processor implementations. TF-A
1391implements a framework which categorises the common implementation defined
1392behaviours and allows a processor to export its implementation of that
Douglas Raillardd7c21b72017-06-28 15:23:03 +01001393behaviour. The categories are:
1394
1395#. Processor specific reset sequence.
1396
1397#. Processor specific power down sequences.
1398
1399#. Processor specific register dumping as a part of crash reporting.
1400
1401#. Errata status reporting.
1402
1403Each of the above categories fulfils a different requirement.
1404
1405#. allows any processor specific initialization before the caches and MMU
1406 are turned on, like implementation of errata workarounds, entry into
1407 the intra-cluster coherency domain etc.
1408
1409#. allows each processor to implement the power down sequence mandated in
1410 its Technical Reference Manual (TRM).
1411
1412#. allows a processor to provide additional information to the developer
1413 in the event of a crash, for example Cortex-A53 has registers which
1414 can expose the data cache contents.
1415
1416#. allows a processor to define a function that inspects and reports the status
1417 of all errata workarounds on that processor.
1418
1419Please note that only 2. is mandated by the TRM.
1420
1421The CPU specific operations framework scales to accommodate a large number of
1422different CPUs during power down and reset handling. The platform can specify
1423any CPU optimization it wants to enable for each CPU. It can also specify
1424the CPU errata workarounds to be applied for each CPU type during reset
1425handling by defining CPU errata compile time macros. Details on these macros
Paul Beesleyf8640672019-04-12 14:19:42 +01001426can be found in the :ref:`Arm CPU Specific Build Macros` document.
Douglas Raillardd7c21b72017-06-28 15:23:03 +01001427
1428The CPU specific operations framework depends on the ``cpu_ops`` structure which
1429needs to be exported for each type of CPU in the platform. It is defined in
1430``include/lib/cpus/aarch64/cpu_macros.S`` and has the following fields : ``midr``,
1431``reset_func()``, ``cpu_pwr_down_ops`` (array of power down functions) and
1432``cpu_reg_dump()``.
1433
1434The CPU specific files in ``lib/cpus`` export a ``cpu_ops`` data structure with
1435suitable handlers for that CPU. For example, ``lib/cpus/aarch64/cortex_a53.S``
1436exports the ``cpu_ops`` for Cortex-A53 CPU. According to the platform
1437configuration, these CPU specific files must be included in the build by
1438the platform makefile. The generic CPU specific operations framework code exists
1439in ``lib/cpus/aarch64/cpu_helpers.S``.
1440
Boyan Karatotevd71b5d72023-02-07 15:46:50 +00001441CPU PCS
1442~~~~~~~
1443
1444All assembly functions in CPU files are asked to follow a modified version of
1445the Procedure Call Standard (PCS) in their internals. This is done to ensure
1446calling these functions from outside the file doesn't unexpectedly corrupt
1447registers in the very early environment and to help the internals to be easier
1448to understand. Please see the :ref:`firmware_design_cpu_errata_implementation`
1449for any function specific restrictions.
1450
1451+--------------+---------------------------------+
1452| register | use |
1453+==============+=================================+
1454| x0 - x15 | scratch |
1455+--------------+---------------------------------+
1456| x16, x17 | do not use (used by the linker) |
1457+--------------+---------------------------------+
1458| x18 | do not use (platform register) |
1459+--------------+---------------------------------+
1460| x19 - x28 | callee saved |
1461+--------------+---------------------------------+
1462| x29, x30 | FP, LR |
1463+--------------+---------------------------------+
1464
1465.. _firmware_design_cpu_specific_reset_handling:
1466
Douglas Raillardd7c21b72017-06-28 15:23:03 +01001467CPU specific Reset Handling
1468~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
1469
1470After a reset, the state of the CPU when it calls generic reset handler is:
Boyan Karatotevd71b5d72023-02-07 15:46:50 +00001471MMU turned off, both instruction and data caches turned off, not part
1472of any coherency domain and no stack.
Douglas Raillardd7c21b72017-06-28 15:23:03 +01001473
1474The BL entrypoint code first invokes the ``plat_reset_handler()`` to allow
1475the platform to perform any system initialization required and any system
1476errata workarounds that needs to be applied. The ``get_cpu_ops_ptr()`` reads
1477the current CPU midr, finds the matching ``cpu_ops`` entry in the ``cpu_ops``
1478array and returns it. Note that only the part number and implementer fields
1479in midr are used to find the matching ``cpu_ops`` entry. The ``reset_func()`` in
1480the returned ``cpu_ops`` is then invoked which executes the required reset
1481handling for that CPU and also any errata workarounds enabled by the platform.
Douglas Raillardd7c21b72017-06-28 15:23:03 +01001482
Boyan Karatotevd71b5d72023-02-07 15:46:50 +00001483It should be defined using the ``cpu_reset_func_{start,end}`` macros and its
Boyan Karatotev74ddacc2025-01-22 13:54:43 +00001484body may only clobber x0 to x14 with x14 being the cpu_rev parameter. The cpu
1485file should also include a call to ``cpu_reset_prologue`` at the start of the
1486file for errata to work correctly.
Douglas Raillardd7c21b72017-06-28 15:23:03 +01001487
1488CPU specific power down sequence
1489~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
1490
1491During the BL31 initialization sequence, the pointer to the matching ``cpu_ops``
1492entry is stored in per-CPU data by ``init_cpu_ops()`` so that it can be quickly
1493retrieved during power down sequences.
1494
1495Various CPU drivers register handlers to perform power down at certain power
1496levels for that specific CPU. The PSCI service, upon receiving a power down
1497request, determines the highest power level at which to execute power down
1498sequence for a particular CPU. It uses the ``prepare_cpu_pwr_dwn()`` function to
1499pick the right power down handler for the requested level. The function
1500retrieves ``cpu_ops`` pointer member of per-CPU data, and from that, further
1501retrieves ``cpu_pwr_down_ops`` array, and indexes into the required level. If the
1502requested power level is higher than what a CPU driver supports, the handler
1503registered for highest level is invoked.
1504
1505At runtime the platform hooks for power down are invoked by the PSCI service to
1506perform platform specific operations during a power down sequence, for example
1507turning off CCI coherency during a cluster power down.
1508
Boyan Karatotev7262eff2024-12-19 16:07:29 +00001509Newer CPUs include a feature called "powerdown abandon". The feature is based on
1510the observation that events like GIC wakeups have a high likelihood of happening
1511while the core is in the middle of its powerdown sequence (at ``wfi``). Older
1512cores will powerdown and immediately power back up when this happens. To save on
1513the work and latency involved, the newer cores will "give up" mid way through if
1514no context has been lost yet. This is possible as the powerdown operation is
1515lengthy and a large part of it does not lose context.
1516
1517To cater for this possibility, the powerdown hook will be called a second time
1518after a wakeup. The expectation is that the first call will operate as before,
1519while the second call will undo anything the first call did. This should be done
1520statelessly, for example by toggling the relevant bits.
1521
Douglas Raillardd7c21b72017-06-28 15:23:03 +01001522CPU specific register reporting during crash
1523~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
1524
1525If the crash reporting is enabled in BL31, when a crash occurs, the crash
1526reporting framework calls ``do_cpu_reg_dump`` which retrieves the matching
1527``cpu_ops`` using ``get_cpu_ops_ptr()`` function. The ``cpu_reg_dump()`` in
1528``cpu_ops`` is invoked, which then returns the CPU specific register values to
1529be reported and a pointer to the ASCII list of register names in a format
1530expected by the crash reporting framework.
1531
Boyan Karatotevd71b5d72023-02-07 15:46:50 +00001532.. _firmware_design_cpu_errata_implementation:
Paul Beesleyf8640672019-04-12 14:19:42 +01001533
Boyan Karatotevd71b5d72023-02-07 15:46:50 +00001534CPU errata implementation
1535~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Douglas Raillardd7c21b72017-06-28 15:23:03 +01001536
Dan Handley610e7e12018-03-01 18:44:00 +00001537Errata workarounds for CPUs supported in TF-A are applied during both cold and
1538warm boots, shortly after reset. Individual Errata workarounds are enabled as
1539build options. Some errata workarounds have potential run-time implications;
1540therefore some are enabled by default, others not. Platform ports shall
1541override build options to enable or disable errata as appropriate. The CPU
Douglas Raillardd7c21b72017-06-28 15:23:03 +01001542drivers take care of applying errata workarounds that are enabled and applicable
Boyan Karatotevd71b5d72023-02-07 15:46:50 +00001543to a given CPU.
Douglas Raillardd7c21b72017-06-28 15:23:03 +01001544
Boyan Karatotevd71b5d72023-02-07 15:46:50 +00001545Each erratum has a build flag in ``lib/cpus/cpu-ops.mk`` of the form:
1546``ERRATA_<cpu_num>_<erratum_id>``. It also has a short description in
1547:ref:`arm_cpu_macros_errata_workarounds` on when it should apply.
Douglas Raillardd7c21b72017-06-28 15:23:03 +01001548
Boyan Karatotevd71b5d72023-02-07 15:46:50 +00001549Errata framework
1550^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Douglas Raillardd7c21b72017-06-28 15:23:03 +01001551
Boyan Karatotevd71b5d72023-02-07 15:46:50 +00001552The errata framework is a convention and a small library to allow errata to be
1553automatically discovered. It enables compliant errata to be automatically
1554applied and reported at runtime (either by status reporting or the errata ABI).
Douglas Raillardd7c21b72017-06-28 15:23:03 +01001555
Boyan Karatotevd71b5d72023-02-07 15:46:50 +00001556To write a compliant mitigation for erratum number ``erratum_id`` on a cpu that
1557declared itself (with ``declare_cpu_ops``) as ``cpu_name`` one needs 3 things:
Douglas Raillardd7c21b72017-06-28 15:23:03 +01001558
Boyan Karatotevd71b5d72023-02-07 15:46:50 +00001559#. A CPU revision checker function: ``check_erratum_<cpu_name>_<erratum_id>``
Douglas Raillardd7c21b72017-06-28 15:23:03 +01001560
Boyan Karatotevd71b5d72023-02-07 15:46:50 +00001561 It should check whether this erratum applies on this revision of this CPU.
1562 It will be called with the CPU revision as its first parameter (x0) and
1563 should return one of ``ERRATA_APPLIES`` or ``ERRATA_NOT_APPLIES``.
Douglas Raillardd7c21b72017-06-28 15:23:03 +01001564
Boyan Karatotevd71b5d72023-02-07 15:46:50 +00001565 It may only clobber x0 to x4. The rest should be treated as callee-saved.
Douglas Raillardd7c21b72017-06-28 15:23:03 +01001566
Boyan Karatotevd71b5d72023-02-07 15:46:50 +00001567#. A workaround function: ``erratum_<cpu_name>_<erratum_id>_wa``
1568
1569 It should obtain the cpu revision (with ``cpu_get_rev_var``), call its
1570 revision checker, and perform the mitigation, should the erratum apply.
1571
1572 It may only clobber x0 to x8. The rest should be treated as callee-saved.
Douglas Raillardd7c21b72017-06-28 15:23:03 +01001573
Boyan Karatotevd71b5d72023-02-07 15:46:50 +00001574#. Register itself to the framework
Douglas Raillardd7c21b72017-06-28 15:23:03 +01001575
Boyan Karatotevd71b5d72023-02-07 15:46:50 +00001576 Do this with
1577 ``add_erratum_entry <cpu_name>, ERRATUM(<erratum_id>), <errata_flag>``
1578 where the ``errata_flag`` is the enable flag in ``cpu-ops.mk`` described
1579 above.
Douglas Raillardd7c21b72017-06-28 15:23:03 +01001580
Boyan Karatotevd71b5d72023-02-07 15:46:50 +00001581See the next section on how to do this easily.
Douglas Raillardd7c21b72017-06-28 15:23:03 +01001582
Boyan Karatotevd71b5d72023-02-07 15:46:50 +00001583.. note::
Douglas Raillardd7c21b72017-06-28 15:23:03 +01001584
Boyan Karatotevd71b5d72023-02-07 15:46:50 +00001585 CVEs have the format ``CVE_<year>_<number>``. To fit them in the framework, the
1586 ``erratum_id`` for the checker and the workaround functions become the
1587 ``number`` part of its name and the ``ERRATUM(<number>)`` part of the
1588 registration should instead be ``CVE(<year>, <number>)``. In the extremely
1589 unlikely scenario where a CVE and an erratum numbers clash, the CVE number
1590 should be prefixed with a zero.
Douglas Raillardd7c21b72017-06-28 15:23:03 +01001591
Boyan Karatotevd71b5d72023-02-07 15:46:50 +00001592 Also, their build flag should be ``WORKAROUND_CVE_<year>_<number>``.
1593
1594.. note::
1595
1596 AArch32 uses the legacy convention. The checker function has the format
1597 ``check_errata_<erratum_id>`` and the workaround has the format
1598 ``errata_<cpu_number>_<erratum_id>_wa`` where ``cpu_number`` is the shortform
1599 letter and number name of the CPU.
1600
1601 For CVEs the ``erratum_id`` also becomes ``cve_<year>_<number>``.
1602
1603Errata framework helpers
1604^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
1605
1606Writing these errata involves lots of boilerplate and repetitive code. On
1607AArch64 there are helpers to omit most of this. They are located in
1608``include/lib/cpus/aarch64/cpu_macros.S`` and the preferred way to implement
1609errata. Please see their comments on how to use them.
1610
1611The most common type of erratum workaround, one that just sets a "chicken" bit
1612in some arbitrary register, would have an implementation for the Cortex-A77,
1613erratum #1925769 like::
1614
1615 workaround_reset_start cortex_a77, ERRATUM(1925769), ERRATA_A77_1925769
1616 sysreg_bit_set CORTEX_A77_CPUECTLR_EL1, CORTEX_A77_CPUECTLR_EL1_BIT_8
1617 workaround_reset_end cortex_a77, ERRATUM(1925769)
1618
1619 check_erratum_ls cortex_a77, ERRATUM(1925769), CPU_REV(1, 1)
1620
1621Status reporting
1622^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
1623
1624In a debug build of TF-A, on a CPU that comes out of reset, both BL1 and the
1625runtime firmware (BL31 in AArch64, and BL32 in AArch32) will invoke a generic
1626errata status reporting function. It will read the ``errata_entries`` list of
1627that cpu and will report whether each known erratum was applied and, if not,
1628whether it should have been.
Douglas Raillardd7c21b72017-06-28 15:23:03 +01001629
1630Reporting the status of errata workaround is for informational purpose only; it
1631has no functional significance.
1632
1633Memory layout of BL images
1634--------------------------
1635
1636Each bootloader image can be divided in 2 parts:
1637
1638- the static contents of the image. These are data actually stored in the
1639 binary on the disk. In the ELF terminology, they are called ``PROGBITS``
1640 sections;
1641
1642- the run-time contents of the image. These are data that don't occupy any
1643 space in the binary on the disk. The ELF binary just contains some
1644 metadata indicating where these data will be stored at run-time and the
1645 corresponding sections need to be allocated and initialized at run-time.
1646 In the ELF terminology, they are called ``NOBITS`` sections.
1647
1648All PROGBITS sections are grouped together at the beginning of the image,
Dan Handley610e7e12018-03-01 18:44:00 +00001649followed by all NOBITS sections. This is true for all TF-A images and it is
1650governed by the linker scripts. This ensures that the raw binary images are
1651as small as possible. If a NOBITS section was inserted in between PROGBITS
1652sections then the resulting binary file would contain zero bytes in place of
1653this NOBITS section, making the image unnecessarily bigger. Smaller images
1654allow faster loading from the FIP to the main memory.
Douglas Raillardd7c21b72017-06-28 15:23:03 +01001655
Samuel Holland31a14e12018-10-17 21:40:18 -05001656For BL31, a platform can specify an alternate location for NOBITS sections
1657(other than immediately following PROGBITS sections) by setting
1658``SEPARATE_NOBITS_REGION`` to 1 and defining ``BL31_NOBITS_BASE`` and
1659``BL31_NOBITS_LIMIT``.
1660
Douglas Raillardd7c21b72017-06-28 15:23:03 +01001661Linker scripts and symbols
1662~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
1663
1664Each bootloader stage image layout is described by its own linker script. The
1665linker scripts export some symbols into the program symbol table. Their values
Dan Handley610e7e12018-03-01 18:44:00 +00001666correspond to particular addresses. TF-A code can refer to these symbols to
1667figure out the image memory layout.
Douglas Raillardd7c21b72017-06-28 15:23:03 +01001668
Dan Handley610e7e12018-03-01 18:44:00 +00001669Linker symbols follow the following naming convention in TF-A.
Douglas Raillardd7c21b72017-06-28 15:23:03 +01001670
1671- ``__<SECTION>_START__``
1672
1673 Start address of a given section named ``<SECTION>``.
1674
1675- ``__<SECTION>_END__``
1676
1677 End address of a given section named ``<SECTION>``. If there is an alignment
1678 constraint on the section's end address then ``__<SECTION>_END__`` corresponds
1679 to the end address of the section's actual contents, rounded up to the right
1680 boundary. Refer to the value of ``__<SECTION>_UNALIGNED_END__`` to know the
1681 actual end address of the section's contents.
1682
1683- ``__<SECTION>_UNALIGNED_END__``
1684
1685 End address of a given section named ``<SECTION>`` without any padding or
1686 rounding up due to some alignment constraint.
1687
1688- ``__<SECTION>_SIZE__``
1689
1690 Size (in bytes) of a given section named ``<SECTION>``. If there is an
1691 alignment constraint on the section's end address then ``__<SECTION>_SIZE__``
1692 corresponds to the size of the section's actual contents, rounded up to the
1693 right boundary. In other words, ``__<SECTION>_SIZE__ = __<SECTION>_END__ - _<SECTION>_START__``. Refer to the value of ``__<SECTION>_UNALIGNED_SIZE__``
1694 to know the actual size of the section's contents.
1695
1696- ``__<SECTION>_UNALIGNED_SIZE__``
1697
1698 Size (in bytes) of a given section named ``<SECTION>`` without any padding or
1699 rounding up due to some alignment constraint. In other words,
1700 ``__<SECTION>_UNALIGNED_SIZE__ = __<SECTION>_UNALIGNED_END__ - __<SECTION>_START__``.
1701
Dan Handley610e7e12018-03-01 18:44:00 +00001702Some of the linker symbols are mandatory as TF-A code relies on them to be
1703defined. They are listed in the following subsections. Some of them must be
1704provided for each bootloader stage and some are specific to a given bootloader
1705stage.
Douglas Raillardd7c21b72017-06-28 15:23:03 +01001706
1707The linker scripts define some extra, optional symbols. They are not actually
1708used by any code but they help in understanding the bootloader images' memory
1709layout as they are easy to spot in the link map files.
1710
1711Common linker symbols
1712^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
1713
1714All BL images share the following requirements:
1715
1716- The BSS section must be zero-initialised before executing any C code.
1717- The coherent memory section (if enabled) must be zero-initialised as well.
1718- The MMU setup code needs to know the extents of the coherent and read-only
1719 memory regions to set the right memory attributes. When
1720 ``SEPARATE_CODE_AND_RODATA=1``, it needs to know more specifically how the
1721 read-only memory region is divided between code and data.
1722
1723The following linker symbols are defined for this purpose:
1724
1725- ``__BSS_START__``
1726- ``__BSS_SIZE__``
1727- ``__COHERENT_RAM_START__`` Must be aligned on a page-size boundary.
1728- ``__COHERENT_RAM_END__`` Must be aligned on a page-size boundary.
1729- ``__COHERENT_RAM_UNALIGNED_SIZE__``
1730- ``__RO_START__``
1731- ``__RO_END__``
1732- ``__TEXT_START__``
Michal Simek80c530e2023-04-27 14:26:03 +02001733- ``__TEXT_END_UNALIGNED__``
Douglas Raillardd7c21b72017-06-28 15:23:03 +01001734- ``__TEXT_END__``
1735- ``__RODATA_START__``
Michal Simek80c530e2023-04-27 14:26:03 +02001736- ``__RODATA_END_UNALIGNED__``
Douglas Raillardd7c21b72017-06-28 15:23:03 +01001737- ``__RODATA_END__``
1738
1739BL1's linker symbols
1740^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
1741
1742BL1 being the ROM image, it has additional requirements. BL1 resides in ROM and
1743it is entirely executed in place but it needs some read-write memory for its
1744mutable data. Its ``.data`` section (i.e. its allocated read-write data) must be
1745relocated from ROM to RAM before executing any C code.
1746
1747The following additional linker symbols are defined for BL1:
1748
1749- ``__BL1_ROM_END__`` End address of BL1's ROM contents, covering its code
1750 and ``.data`` section in ROM.
1751- ``__DATA_ROM_START__`` Start address of the ``.data`` section in ROM. Must be
1752 aligned on a 16-byte boundary.
1753- ``__DATA_RAM_START__`` Address in RAM where the ``.data`` section should be
1754 copied over. Must be aligned on a 16-byte boundary.
1755- ``__DATA_SIZE__`` Size of the ``.data`` section (in ROM or RAM).
1756- ``__BL1_RAM_START__`` Start address of BL1 read-write data.
1757- ``__BL1_RAM_END__`` End address of BL1 read-write data.
1758
1759How to choose the right base addresses for each bootloader stage image
1760~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
1761
Dan Handley610e7e12018-03-01 18:44:00 +00001762There is currently no support for dynamic image loading in TF-A. This means
1763that all bootloader images need to be linked against their ultimate runtime
1764locations and the base addresses of each image must be chosen carefully such
1765that images don't overlap each other in an undesired way. As the code grows,
1766the base addresses might need adjustments to cope with the new memory layout.
Douglas Raillardd7c21b72017-06-28 15:23:03 +01001767
1768The memory layout is completely specific to the platform and so there is no
1769general recipe for choosing the right base addresses for each bootloader image.
1770However, there are tools to aid in understanding the memory layout. These are
1771the link map files: ``build/<platform>/<build-type>/bl<x>/bl<x>.map``, with ``<x>``
1772being the stage bootloader. They provide a detailed view of the memory usage of
1773each image. Among other useful information, they provide the end address of
1774each image.
1775
1776- ``bl1.map`` link map file provides ``__BL1_RAM_END__`` address.
1777- ``bl2.map`` link map file provides ``__BL2_END__`` address.
1778- ``bl31.map`` link map file provides ``__BL31_END__`` address.
1779- ``bl32.map`` link map file provides ``__BL32_END__`` address.
1780
1781For each bootloader image, the platform code must provide its start address
1782as well as a limit address that it must not overstep. The latter is used in the
1783linker scripts to check that the image doesn't grow past that address. If that
1784happens, the linker will issue a message similar to the following:
1785
1786::
1787
1788 aarch64-none-elf-ld: BLx has exceeded its limit.
1789
1790Additionally, if the platform memory layout implies some image overlaying like
1791on FVP, BL31 and TSP need to know the limit address that their PROGBITS
1792sections must not overstep. The platform code must provide those.
1793
Soby Mathew97b1bff2018-09-27 16:46:41 +01001794TF-A does not provide any mechanism to verify at boot time that the memory
1795to load a new image is free to prevent overwriting a previously loaded image.
1796The platform must specify the memory available in the system for all the
1797relevant BL images to be loaded.
Douglas Raillardd7c21b72017-06-28 15:23:03 +01001798
1799For example, in the case of BL1 loading BL2, ``bl1_plat_sec_mem_layout()`` will
1800return the region defined by the platform where BL1 intends to load BL2. The
1801``load_image()`` function performs bounds check for the image size based on the
1802base and maximum image size provided by the platforms. Platforms must take
1803this behaviour into account when defining the base/size for each of the images.
1804
Dan Handley610e7e12018-03-01 18:44:00 +00001805Memory layout on Arm development platforms
Douglas Raillardd7c21b72017-06-28 15:23:03 +01001806^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
1807
Dan Handley610e7e12018-03-01 18:44:00 +00001808The following list describes the memory layout on the Arm development platforms:
Douglas Raillardd7c21b72017-06-28 15:23:03 +01001809
1810- A 4KB page of shared memory is used for communication between Trusted
1811 Firmware and the platform's power controller. This is located at the base of
1812 Trusted SRAM. The amount of Trusted SRAM available to load the bootloader
1813 images is reduced by the size of the shared memory.
1814
1815 The shared memory is used to store the CPUs' entrypoint mailbox. On Juno,
1816 this is also used for the MHU payload when passing messages to and from the
1817 SCP.
1818
Soby Mathew492e2452018-06-06 16:03:10 +01001819- Another 4 KB page is reserved for passing memory layout between BL1 and BL2
1820 and also the dynamic firmware configurations.
1821
Douglas Raillardd7c21b72017-06-28 15:23:03 +01001822- On FVP, BL1 is originally sitting in the Trusted ROM at address ``0x0``. On
1823 Juno, BL1 resides in flash memory at address ``0x0BEC0000``. BL1 read-write
1824 data are relocated to the top of Trusted SRAM at runtime.
1825
Soby Mathew492e2452018-06-06 16:03:10 +01001826- BL2 is loaded below BL1 RW
1827
Sandrine Bailleux15530dd2019-02-08 15:26:36 +01001828- EL3 Runtime Software, BL31 for AArch64 and BL32 for AArch32 (e.g. SP_MIN),
Douglas Raillardd7c21b72017-06-28 15:23:03 +01001829 is loaded at the top of the Trusted SRAM, such that its NOBITS sections will
Soby Mathew492e2452018-06-06 16:03:10 +01001830 overwrite BL1 R/W data and BL2. This implies that BL1 global variables
1831 remain valid only until execution reaches the EL3 Runtime Software entry
1832 point during a cold boot.
Douglas Raillardd7c21b72017-06-28 15:23:03 +01001833
Sandrine Bailleux15530dd2019-02-08 15:26:36 +01001834- On Juno, SCP_BL2 is loaded temporarily into the EL3 Runtime Software memory
Paul Beesleyf2ec7142019-10-04 16:17:46 +00001835 region and transferred to the SCP before being overwritten by EL3 Runtime
Douglas Raillardd7c21b72017-06-28 15:23:03 +01001836 Software.
1837
1838- BL32 (for AArch64) can be loaded in one of the following locations:
1839
1840 - Trusted SRAM
1841 - Trusted DRAM (FVP only)
1842 - Secure region of DRAM (top 16MB of DRAM configured by the TrustZone
1843 controller)
1844
Soby Mathew492e2452018-06-06 16:03:10 +01001845 When BL32 (for AArch64) is loaded into Trusted SRAM, it is loaded below
1846 BL31.
Douglas Raillardd7c21b72017-06-28 15:23:03 +01001847
Douglas Raillardd7c21b72017-06-28 15:23:03 +01001848The location of the BL32 image will result in different memory maps. This is
1849illustrated for both FVP and Juno in the following diagrams, using the TSP as
1850an example.
1851
Paul Beesleyba3ed402019-03-13 16:20:44 +00001852.. note::
1853 Loading the BL32 image in TZC secured DRAM doesn't change the memory
1854 layout of the other images in Trusted SRAM.
Douglas Raillardd7c21b72017-06-28 15:23:03 +01001855
Sathees Balya90950092018-11-15 14:22:30 +00001856CONFIG section in memory layouts shown below contains:
1857
1858::
1859
1860 +--------------------+
1861 |bl2_mem_params_descs|
1862 |--------------------|
1863 | fw_configs |
1864 +--------------------+
1865
1866``bl2_mem_params_descs`` contains parameters passed from BL2 to next the
1867BL image during boot.
1868
Manish V Badarkheece96fd2020-06-13 09:42:28 +01001869``fw_configs`` includes soc_fw_config, tos_fw_config, tb_fw_config and fw_config.
Sathees Balya90950092018-11-15 14:22:30 +00001870
Soby Mathew492e2452018-06-06 16:03:10 +01001871**FVP with TSP in Trusted SRAM with firmware configs :**
Douglas Raillardd7c21b72017-06-28 15:23:03 +01001872(These diagrams only cover the AArch64 case)
1873
1874::
1875
Soby Mathew492e2452018-06-06 16:03:10 +01001876 DRAM
1877 0xffffffff +----------+
Manish V Badarkhe638ac182023-03-07 10:21:30 +00001878 | EL3 TZC |
1879 0xffe00000 |----------| (secure)
1880 | AP TZC |
1881 0xff000000 +----------+
Soby Mathew492e2452018-06-06 16:03:10 +01001882 : :
Manish V Badarkhe70d8eee2022-04-12 21:11:56 +01001883 0x82100000 |----------|
Soby Mathew492e2452018-06-06 16:03:10 +01001884 |HW_CONFIG |
Manish V Badarkhe70d8eee2022-04-12 21:11:56 +01001885 0x82000000 |----------| (non-secure)
Soby Mathew492e2452018-06-06 16:03:10 +01001886 | |
1887 0x80000000 +----------+
1888
Manish V Badarkhe70d8eee2022-04-12 21:11:56 +01001889 Trusted DRAM
1890 0x08000000 +----------+
1891 |HW_CONFIG |
1892 0x07f00000 |----------|
1893 : :
1894 | |
1895 0x06000000 +----------+
1896
Douglas Raillardd7c21b72017-06-28 15:23:03 +01001897 Trusted SRAM
Soby Mathew492e2452018-06-06 16:03:10 +01001898 0x04040000 +----------+ loaded by BL2 +----------------+
1899 | BL1 (rw) | <<<<<<<<<<<<< | |
1900 |----------| <<<<<<<<<<<<< | BL31 NOBITS |
1901 | BL2 | <<<<<<<<<<<<< | |
Douglas Raillardd7c21b72017-06-28 15:23:03 +01001902 |----------| <<<<<<<<<<<<< |----------------|
1903 | | <<<<<<<<<<<<< | BL31 PROGBITS |
Soby Mathew492e2452018-06-06 16:03:10 +01001904 | | <<<<<<<<<<<<< |----------------|
1905 | | <<<<<<<<<<<<< | BL32 |
Manish V Badarkheece96fd2020-06-13 09:42:28 +01001906 0x04003000 +----------+ +----------------+
Sathees Balya90950092018-11-15 14:22:30 +00001907 | CONFIG |
Soby Mathew492e2452018-06-06 16:03:10 +01001908 0x04001000 +----------+
Douglas Raillardd7c21b72017-06-28 15:23:03 +01001909 | Shared |
1910 0x04000000 +----------+
1911
1912 Trusted ROM
1913 0x04000000 +----------+
1914 | BL1 (ro) |
1915 0x00000000 +----------+
1916
Soby Mathew492e2452018-06-06 16:03:10 +01001917**FVP with TSP in Trusted DRAM with firmware configs (default option):**
Douglas Raillardd7c21b72017-06-28 15:23:03 +01001918
1919::
1920
Soby Mathewb1bf0442018-02-16 14:52:52 +00001921 DRAM
1922 0xffffffff +--------------+
Manish V Badarkhe638ac182023-03-07 10:21:30 +00001923 | EL3 TZC |
1924 0xffe00000 |--------------| (secure)
1925 | AP TZC |
1926 0xff000000 +--------------+
Soby Mathewb1bf0442018-02-16 14:52:52 +00001927 : :
Manish V Badarkhe70d8eee2022-04-12 21:11:56 +01001928 0x82100000 |--------------|
Soby Mathewb1bf0442018-02-16 14:52:52 +00001929 | HW_CONFIG |
Manish V Badarkhe70d8eee2022-04-12 21:11:56 +01001930 0x82000000 |--------------| (non-secure)
Soby Mathewb1bf0442018-02-16 14:52:52 +00001931 | |
1932 0x80000000 +--------------+
Douglas Raillardd7c21b72017-06-28 15:23:03 +01001933
Manish V Badarkhe70d8eee2022-04-12 21:11:56 +01001934 Trusted DRAM
Soby Mathewb1bf0442018-02-16 14:52:52 +00001935 0x08000000 +--------------+
Manish V Badarkhe70d8eee2022-04-12 21:11:56 +01001936 | HW_CONFIG |
1937 0x07f00000 |--------------|
1938 : :
1939 | BL32 |
Soby Mathewb1bf0442018-02-16 14:52:52 +00001940 0x06000000 +--------------+
Douglas Raillardd7c21b72017-06-28 15:23:03 +01001941
Soby Mathewb1bf0442018-02-16 14:52:52 +00001942 Trusted SRAM
Soby Mathew492e2452018-06-06 16:03:10 +01001943 0x04040000 +--------------+ loaded by BL2 +----------------+
1944 | BL1 (rw) | <<<<<<<<<<<<< | |
1945 |--------------| <<<<<<<<<<<<< | BL31 NOBITS |
1946 | BL2 | <<<<<<<<<<<<< | |
Soby Mathewb1bf0442018-02-16 14:52:52 +00001947 |--------------| <<<<<<<<<<<<< |----------------|
1948 | | <<<<<<<<<<<<< | BL31 PROGBITS |
Soby Mathew492e2452018-06-06 16:03:10 +01001949 | | +----------------+
Manish V Badarkheece96fd2020-06-13 09:42:28 +01001950 0x04003000 +--------------+
Sathees Balya90950092018-11-15 14:22:30 +00001951 | CONFIG |
Soby Mathewb1bf0442018-02-16 14:52:52 +00001952 0x04001000 +--------------+
1953 | Shared |
1954 0x04000000 +--------------+
1955
1956 Trusted ROM
1957 0x04000000 +--------------+
1958 | BL1 (ro) |
1959 0x00000000 +--------------+
Douglas Raillardd7c21b72017-06-28 15:23:03 +01001960
Soby Mathew492e2452018-06-06 16:03:10 +01001961**FVP with TSP in TZC-Secured DRAM with firmware configs :**
Douglas Raillardd7c21b72017-06-28 15:23:03 +01001962
1963::
1964
1965 DRAM
1966 0xffffffff +----------+
Manish V Badarkhe638ac182023-03-07 10:21:30 +00001967 | EL3 TZC |
1968 0xffe00000 |----------| (secure)
1969 | AP TZC |
1970 | (BL32) |
Douglas Raillardd7c21b72017-06-28 15:23:03 +01001971 0xff000000 +----------+
1972 | |
Manish V Badarkhe70d8eee2022-04-12 21:11:56 +01001973 0x82100000 |----------|
Soby Mathew492e2452018-06-06 16:03:10 +01001974 |HW_CONFIG |
Manish V Badarkhe70d8eee2022-04-12 21:11:56 +01001975 0x82000000 |----------| (non-secure)
Douglas Raillardd7c21b72017-06-28 15:23:03 +01001976 | |
1977 0x80000000 +----------+
1978
Manish V Badarkhe70d8eee2022-04-12 21:11:56 +01001979 Trusted DRAM
1980 0x08000000 +----------+
1981 |HW_CONFIG |
1982 0x7f000000 |----------|
1983 : :
1984 | |
1985 0x06000000 +----------+
1986
Douglas Raillardd7c21b72017-06-28 15:23:03 +01001987 Trusted SRAM
Soby Mathew492e2452018-06-06 16:03:10 +01001988 0x04040000 +----------+ loaded by BL2 +----------------+
1989 | BL1 (rw) | <<<<<<<<<<<<< | |
1990 |----------| <<<<<<<<<<<<< | BL31 NOBITS |
1991 | BL2 | <<<<<<<<<<<<< | |
Douglas Raillardd7c21b72017-06-28 15:23:03 +01001992 |----------| <<<<<<<<<<<<< |----------------|
1993 | | <<<<<<<<<<<<< | BL31 PROGBITS |
Soby Mathew492e2452018-06-06 16:03:10 +01001994 | | +----------------+
Manish V Badarkheece96fd2020-06-13 09:42:28 +01001995 0x04003000 +----------+
Sathees Balya90950092018-11-15 14:22:30 +00001996 | CONFIG |
Douglas Raillardd7c21b72017-06-28 15:23:03 +01001997 0x04001000 +----------+
1998 | Shared |
1999 0x04000000 +----------+
2000
2001 Trusted ROM
2002 0x04000000 +----------+
2003 | BL1 (ro) |
2004 0x00000000 +----------+
2005
Soby Mathew492e2452018-06-06 16:03:10 +01002006**Juno with BL32 in Trusted SRAM :**
Douglas Raillardd7c21b72017-06-28 15:23:03 +01002007
2008::
2009
Manish V Badarkhe638ac182023-03-07 10:21:30 +00002010 DRAM
2011 0xFFFFFFFF +----------+
2012 | SCP TZC |
2013 0xFFE00000 |----------|
2014 | EL3 TZC |
2015 0xFFC00000 |----------| (secure)
2016 | AP TZC |
2017 0xFF000000 +----------+
2018 | |
2019 : : (non-secure)
2020 | |
2021 0x80000000 +----------+
2022
2023
Douglas Raillardd7c21b72017-06-28 15:23:03 +01002024 Flash0
2025 0x0C000000 +----------+
2026 : :
2027 0x0BED0000 |----------|
2028 | BL1 (ro) |
2029 0x0BEC0000 |----------|
2030 : :
2031 0x08000000 +----------+ BL31 is loaded
2032 after SCP_BL2 has
2033 Trusted SRAM been sent to SCP
Soby Mathew492e2452018-06-06 16:03:10 +01002034 0x04040000 +----------+ loaded by BL2 +----------------+
2035 | BL1 (rw) | <<<<<<<<<<<<< | |
2036 |----------| <<<<<<<<<<<<< | BL31 NOBITS |
2037 | BL2 | <<<<<<<<<<<<< | |
Douglas Raillardd7c21b72017-06-28 15:23:03 +01002038 |----------| <<<<<<<<<<<<< |----------------|
2039 | SCP_BL2 | <<<<<<<<<<<<< | BL31 PROGBITS |
Chris Kayf8fa4652020-03-12 13:50:26 +00002040 | | <<<<<<<<<<<<< |----------------|
Soby Mathew492e2452018-06-06 16:03:10 +01002041 | | <<<<<<<<<<<<< | BL32 |
2042 | | +----------------+
2043 | |
2044 0x04001000 +----------+
Douglas Raillardd7c21b72017-06-28 15:23:03 +01002045 | MHU |
2046 0x04000000 +----------+
2047
Soby Mathew492e2452018-06-06 16:03:10 +01002048**Juno with BL32 in TZC-secured DRAM :**
Douglas Raillardd7c21b72017-06-28 15:23:03 +01002049
2050::
2051
2052 DRAM
Manish V Badarkhe638ac182023-03-07 10:21:30 +00002053 0xFFFFFFFF +----------+
2054 | SCP TZC |
2055 0xFFE00000 |----------|
2056 | EL3 TZC |
2057 0xFFC00000 |----------| (secure)
2058 | AP TZC |
2059 | (BL32) |
2060 0xFF000000 +----------+
Douglas Raillardd7c21b72017-06-28 15:23:03 +01002061 | |
2062 : : (non-secure)
2063 | |
2064 0x80000000 +----------+
2065
2066 Flash0
2067 0x0C000000 +----------+
2068 : :
2069 0x0BED0000 |----------|
2070 | BL1 (ro) |
2071 0x0BEC0000 |----------|
2072 : :
2073 0x08000000 +----------+ BL31 is loaded
2074 after SCP_BL2 has
2075 Trusted SRAM been sent to SCP
Soby Mathew492e2452018-06-06 16:03:10 +01002076 0x04040000 +----------+ loaded by BL2 +----------------+
2077 | BL1 (rw) | <<<<<<<<<<<<< | |
2078 |----------| <<<<<<<<<<<<< | BL31 NOBITS |
2079 | BL2 | <<<<<<<<<<<<< | |
Douglas Raillardd7c21b72017-06-28 15:23:03 +01002080 |----------| <<<<<<<<<<<<< |----------------|
2081 | SCP_BL2 | <<<<<<<<<<<<< | BL31 PROGBITS |
Chris Kayf8fa4652020-03-12 13:50:26 +00002082 | | +----------------+
Douglas Raillardd7c21b72017-06-28 15:23:03 +01002083 0x04001000 +----------+
2084 | MHU |
2085 0x04000000 +----------+
2086
Paul Beesleyd2fcc4e2019-05-29 13:59:40 +01002087.. _firmware_design_fip:
Sathees Balya17d8eed2019-01-30 15:56:44 +00002088
Douglas Raillardd7c21b72017-06-28 15:23:03 +01002089Firmware Image Package (FIP)
2090----------------------------
2091
2092Using a Firmware Image Package (FIP) allows for packing bootloader images (and
Dan Handley610e7e12018-03-01 18:44:00 +00002093potentially other payloads) into a single archive that can be loaded by TF-A
2094from non-volatile platform storage. A driver to load images from a FIP has
2095been added to the storage layer and allows a package to be read from supported
2096platform storage. A tool to create Firmware Image Packages is also provided
2097and described below.
Douglas Raillardd7c21b72017-06-28 15:23:03 +01002098
2099Firmware Image Package layout
2100~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
2101
2102The FIP layout consists of a table of contents (ToC) followed by payload data.
2103The ToC itself has a header followed by one or more table entries. The ToC is
Jett Zhou75566102017-11-24 16:03:58 +08002104terminated by an end marker entry, and since the size of the ToC is 0 bytes,
2105the offset equals the total size of the FIP file. All ToC entries describe some
2106payload data that has been appended to the end of the binary package. With the
2107information provided in the ToC entry the corresponding payload data can be
2108retrieved.
Douglas Raillardd7c21b72017-06-28 15:23:03 +01002109
2110::
2111
2112 ------------------
2113 | ToC Header |
2114 |----------------|
2115 | ToC Entry 0 |
2116 |----------------|
2117 | ToC Entry 1 |
2118 |----------------|
2119 | ToC End Marker |
2120 |----------------|
2121 | |
2122 | Data 0 |
2123 | |
2124 |----------------|
2125 | |
2126 | Data 1 |
2127 | |
2128 ------------------
2129
2130The ToC header and entry formats are described in the header file
2131``include/tools_share/firmware_image_package.h``. This file is used by both the
Dan Handley610e7e12018-03-01 18:44:00 +00002132tool and TF-A.
Douglas Raillardd7c21b72017-06-28 15:23:03 +01002133
2134The ToC header has the following fields:
2135
2136::
2137
2138 `name`: The name of the ToC. This is currently used to validate the header.
2139 `serial_number`: A non-zero number provided by the creation tool
2140 `flags`: Flags associated with this data.
2141 Bits 0-31: Reserved
2142 Bits 32-47: Platform defined
2143 Bits 48-63: Reserved
2144
2145A ToC entry has the following fields:
2146
2147::
2148
2149 `uuid`: All files are referred to by a pre-defined Universally Unique
2150 IDentifier [UUID] . The UUIDs are defined in
2151 `include/tools_share/firmware_image_package.h`. The platform translates
2152 the requested image name into the corresponding UUID when accessing the
2153 package.
2154 `offset_address`: The offset address at which the corresponding payload data
2155 can be found. The offset is calculated from the ToC base address.
2156 `size`: The size of the corresponding payload data in bytes.
Etienne Carriere7421bf12017-08-23 15:43:33 +02002157 `flags`: Flags associated with this entry. None are yet defined.
Douglas Raillardd7c21b72017-06-28 15:23:03 +01002158
2159Firmware Image Package creation tool
2160~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
2161
Dan Handley610e7e12018-03-01 18:44:00 +00002162The FIP creation tool can be used to pack specified images into a binary
2163package that can be loaded by TF-A from platform storage. The tool currently
2164only supports packing bootloader images. Additional image definitions can be
2165added to the tool as required.
Douglas Raillardd7c21b72017-06-28 15:23:03 +01002166
2167The tool can be found in ``tools/fiptool``.
2168
2169Loading from a Firmware Image Package (FIP)
2170~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
2171
2172The Firmware Image Package (FIP) driver can load images from a binary package on
Dan Handley610e7e12018-03-01 18:44:00 +00002173non-volatile platform storage. For the Arm development platforms, this is
Douglas Raillardd7c21b72017-06-28 15:23:03 +01002174currently NOR FLASH.
2175
2176Bootloader images are loaded according to the platform policy as specified by
Dan Handley610e7e12018-03-01 18:44:00 +00002177the function ``plat_get_image_source()``. For the Arm development platforms, this
Douglas Raillardd7c21b72017-06-28 15:23:03 +01002178means the platform will attempt to load images from a Firmware Image Package
2179located at the start of NOR FLASH0.
2180
Dan Handley610e7e12018-03-01 18:44:00 +00002181The Arm development platforms' policy is to only allow loading of a known set of
Douglas Raillardd7c21b72017-06-28 15:23:03 +01002182images. The platform policy can be modified to allow additional images.
2183
Dan Handley610e7e12018-03-01 18:44:00 +00002184Use of coherent memory in TF-A
2185------------------------------
Douglas Raillardd7c21b72017-06-28 15:23:03 +01002186
2187There might be loss of coherency when physical memory with mismatched
2188shareability, cacheability and memory attributes is accessed by multiple CPUs
Dan Handley610e7e12018-03-01 18:44:00 +00002189(refer to section B2.9 of `Arm ARM`_ for more details). This possibility occurs
2190in TF-A during power up/down sequences when coherency, MMU and caches are
2191turned on/off incrementally.
Douglas Raillardd7c21b72017-06-28 15:23:03 +01002192
Dan Handley610e7e12018-03-01 18:44:00 +00002193TF-A defines coherent memory as a region of memory with Device nGnRE attributes
2194in the translation tables. The translation granule size in TF-A is 4KB. This
2195is the smallest possible size of the coherent memory region.
Douglas Raillardd7c21b72017-06-28 15:23:03 +01002196
2197By default, all data structures which are susceptible to accesses with
2198mismatched attributes from various CPUs are allocated in a coherent memory
Paul Beesleyf8640672019-04-12 14:19:42 +01002199region (refer to section 2.1 of :ref:`Porting Guide`). The coherent memory
2200region accesses are Outer Shareable, non-cacheable and they can be accessed with
2201the Device nGnRE attributes when the MMU is turned on. Hence, at the expense of
2202at least an extra page of memory, TF-A is able to work around coherency issues
2203due to mismatched memory attributes.
Douglas Raillardd7c21b72017-06-28 15:23:03 +01002204
2205The alternative to the above approach is to allocate the susceptible data
2206structures in Normal WriteBack WriteAllocate Inner shareable memory. This
2207approach requires the data structures to be designed so that it is possible to
2208work around the issue of mismatched memory attributes by performing software
2209cache maintenance on them.
2210
Dan Handley610e7e12018-03-01 18:44:00 +00002211Disabling the use of coherent memory in TF-A
2212~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Douglas Raillardd7c21b72017-06-28 15:23:03 +01002213
2214It might be desirable to avoid the cost of allocating coherent memory on
Dan Handley610e7e12018-03-01 18:44:00 +00002215platforms which are memory constrained. TF-A enables inclusion of coherent
2216memory in firmware images through the build flag ``USE_COHERENT_MEM``.
Douglas Raillardd7c21b72017-06-28 15:23:03 +01002217This flag is enabled by default. It can be disabled to choose the second
2218approach described above.
2219
2220The below sections analyze the data structures allocated in the coherent memory
2221region and the changes required to allocate them in normal memory.
2222
2223Coherent memory usage in PSCI implementation
2224~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
2225
2226The ``psci_non_cpu_pd_nodes`` data structure stores the platform's power domain
2227tree information for state management of power domains. By default, this data
Dan Handley610e7e12018-03-01 18:44:00 +00002228structure is allocated in the coherent memory region in TF-A because it can be
Paul Beesley1fbc97b2019-01-11 18:26:51 +00002229accessed by multiple CPUs, either with caches enabled or disabled.
Douglas Raillardd7c21b72017-06-28 15:23:03 +01002230
2231.. code:: c
2232
2233 typedef struct non_cpu_pwr_domain_node {
2234 /*
2235 * Index of the first CPU power domain node level 0 which has this node
2236 * as its parent.
2237 */
2238 unsigned int cpu_start_idx;
2239
2240 /*
2241 * Number of CPU power domains which are siblings of the domain indexed
2242 * by 'cpu_start_idx' i.e. all the domains in the range 'cpu_start_idx
2243 * -> cpu_start_idx + ncpus' have this node as their parent.
2244 */
2245 unsigned int ncpus;
2246
2247 /*
2248 * Index of the parent power domain node.
Douglas Raillardd7c21b72017-06-28 15:23:03 +01002249 */
2250 unsigned int parent_node;
2251
2252 plat_local_state_t local_state;
2253
2254 unsigned char level;
2255
2256 /* For indexing the psci_lock array*/
2257 unsigned char lock_index;
2258 } non_cpu_pd_node_t;
2259
2260In order to move this data structure to normal memory, the use of each of its
2261fields must be analyzed. Fields like ``cpu_start_idx``, ``ncpus``, ``parent_node``
2262``level`` and ``lock_index`` are only written once during cold boot. Hence removing
2263them from coherent memory involves only doing a clean and invalidate of the
2264cache lines after these fields are written.
2265
2266The field ``local_state`` can be concurrently accessed by multiple CPUs in
2267different cache states. A Lamport's Bakery lock ``psci_locks`` is used to ensure
Paul Beesley1fbc97b2019-01-11 18:26:51 +00002268mutual exclusion to this field and a clean and invalidate is needed after it
Douglas Raillardd7c21b72017-06-28 15:23:03 +01002269is written.
2270
2271Bakery lock data
2272~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
2273
2274The bakery lock data structure ``bakery_lock_t`` is allocated in coherent memory
2275and is accessed by multiple CPUs with mismatched attributes. ``bakery_lock_t`` is
2276defined as follows:
2277
2278.. code:: c
2279
2280 typedef struct bakery_lock {
2281 /*
2282 * The lock_data is a bit-field of 2 members:
2283 * Bit[0] : choosing. This field is set when the CPU is
2284 * choosing its bakery number.
2285 * Bits[1 - 15] : number. This is the bakery number allocated.
2286 */
2287 volatile uint16_t lock_data[BAKERY_LOCK_MAX_CPUS];
2288 } bakery_lock_t;
2289
2290It is a characteristic of Lamport's Bakery algorithm that the volatile per-CPU
2291fields can be read by all CPUs but only written to by the owning CPU.
2292
2293Depending upon the data cache line size, the per-CPU fields of the
2294``bakery_lock_t`` structure for multiple CPUs may exist on a single cache line.
2295These per-CPU fields can be read and written during lock contention by multiple
2296CPUs with mismatched memory attributes. Since these fields are a part of the
2297lock implementation, they do not have access to any other locking primitive to
2298safeguard against the resulting coherency issues. As a result, simple software
2299cache maintenance is not enough to allocate them in coherent memory. Consider
2300the following example.
2301
2302CPU0 updates its per-CPU field with data cache enabled. This write updates a
2303local cache line which contains a copy of the fields for other CPUs as well. Now
2304CPU1 updates its per-CPU field of the ``bakery_lock_t`` structure with data cache
2305disabled. CPU1 then issues a DCIVAC operation to invalidate any stale copies of
2306its field in any other cache line in the system. This operation will invalidate
2307the update made by CPU0 as well.
2308
2309To use bakery locks when ``USE_COHERENT_MEM`` is disabled, the lock data structure
2310has been redesigned. The changes utilise the characteristic of Lamport's Bakery
Sandrine Bailleux15530dd2019-02-08 15:26:36 +01002311algorithm mentioned earlier. The bakery_lock structure only allocates the memory
Douglas Raillardd7c21b72017-06-28 15:23:03 +01002312for a single CPU. The macro ``DEFINE_BAKERY_LOCK`` allocates all the bakery locks
Chris Kay33bfc5e2023-02-14 11:30:04 +00002313needed for a CPU into a section ``.bakery_lock``. The linker allocates the memory
Sandrine Bailleux15530dd2019-02-08 15:26:36 +01002314for other cores by using the total size allocated for the bakery_lock section
2315and multiplying it with (PLATFORM_CORE_COUNT - 1). This enables software to
Douglas Raillardd7c21b72017-06-28 15:23:03 +01002316perform software cache maintenance on the lock data structure without running
2317into coherency issues associated with mismatched attributes.
2318
2319The bakery lock data structure ``bakery_info_t`` is defined for use when
2320``USE_COHERENT_MEM`` is disabled as follows:
2321
2322.. code:: c
2323
2324 typedef struct bakery_info {
2325 /*
2326 * The lock_data is a bit-field of 2 members:
2327 * Bit[0] : choosing. This field is set when the CPU is
2328 * choosing its bakery number.
2329 * Bits[1 - 15] : number. This is the bakery number allocated.
2330 */
2331 volatile uint16_t lock_data;
2332 } bakery_info_t;
2333
2334The ``bakery_info_t`` represents a single per-CPU field of one lock and
2335the combination of corresponding ``bakery_info_t`` structures for all CPUs in the
2336system represents the complete bakery lock. The view in memory for a system
2337with n bakery locks are:
2338
2339::
2340
Chris Kay33bfc5e2023-02-14 11:30:04 +00002341 .bakery_lock section start
Douglas Raillardd7c21b72017-06-28 15:23:03 +01002342 |----------------|
2343 | `bakery_info_t`| <-- Lock_0 per-CPU field
2344 | Lock_0 | for CPU0
2345 |----------------|
2346 | `bakery_info_t`| <-- Lock_1 per-CPU field
2347 | Lock_1 | for CPU0
2348 |----------------|
2349 | .... |
2350 |----------------|
2351 | `bakery_info_t`| <-- Lock_N per-CPU field
2352 | Lock_N | for CPU0
2353 ------------------
2354 | XXXXX |
2355 | Padding to |
2356 | next Cache WB | <--- Calculate PERCPU_BAKERY_LOCK_SIZE, allocate
2357 | Granule | continuous memory for remaining CPUs.
2358 ------------------
2359 | `bakery_info_t`| <-- Lock_0 per-CPU field
2360 | Lock_0 | for CPU1
2361 |----------------|
2362 | `bakery_info_t`| <-- Lock_1 per-CPU field
2363 | Lock_1 | for CPU1
2364 |----------------|
2365 | .... |
2366 |----------------|
2367 | `bakery_info_t`| <-- Lock_N per-CPU field
2368 | Lock_N | for CPU1
2369 ------------------
2370 | XXXXX |
2371 | Padding to |
2372 | next Cache WB |
2373 | Granule |
2374 ------------------
2375
2376Consider a system of 2 CPUs with 'N' bakery locks as shown above. For an
Sandrine Bailleux15530dd2019-02-08 15:26:36 +01002377operation on Lock_N, the corresponding ``bakery_info_t`` in both CPU0 and CPU1
Chris Kay33bfc5e2023-02-14 11:30:04 +00002378``.bakery_lock`` section need to be fetched and appropriate cache operations need
Douglas Raillardd7c21b72017-06-28 15:23:03 +01002379to be performed for each access.
2380
Dan Handley610e7e12018-03-01 18:44:00 +00002381On Arm Platforms, bakery locks are used in psci (``psci_locks``) and power controller
Douglas Raillardd7c21b72017-06-28 15:23:03 +01002382driver (``arm_lock``).
2383
2384Non Functional Impact of removing coherent memory
2385~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
2386
2387Removal of the coherent memory region leads to the additional software overhead
2388of performing cache maintenance for the affected data structures. However, since
2389the memory where the data structures are allocated is cacheable, the overhead is
2390mostly mitigated by an increase in performance.
2391
2392There is however a performance impact for bakery locks, due to:
2393
2394- Additional cache maintenance operations, and
2395- Multiple cache line reads for each lock operation, since the bakery locks
2396 for each CPU are distributed across different cache lines.
2397
2398The implementation has been optimized to minimize this additional overhead.
2399Measurements indicate that when bakery locks are allocated in Normal memory, the
2400minimum latency of acquiring a lock is on an average 3-4 micro seconds whereas
2401in Device memory the same is 2 micro seconds. The measurements were done on the
Dan Handley610e7e12018-03-01 18:44:00 +00002402Juno Arm development platform.
Douglas Raillardd7c21b72017-06-28 15:23:03 +01002403
2404As mentioned earlier, almost a page of memory can be saved by disabling
2405``USE_COHERENT_MEM``. Each platform needs to consider these trade-offs to decide
2406whether coherent memory should be used. If a platform disables
2407``USE_COHERENT_MEM`` and needs to use bakery locks in the porting layer, it can
2408optionally define macro ``PLAT_PERCPU_BAKERY_LOCK_SIZE`` (see the
Paul Beesleyf8640672019-04-12 14:19:42 +01002409:ref:`Porting Guide`). Refer to the reference platform code for examples.
Douglas Raillardd7c21b72017-06-28 15:23:03 +01002410
2411Isolating code and read-only data on separate memory pages
2412----------------------------------------------------------
2413
Dan Handley610e7e12018-03-01 18:44:00 +00002414In the Armv8-A VMSA, translation table entries include fields that define the
Douglas Raillardd7c21b72017-06-28 15:23:03 +01002415properties of the target memory region, such as its access permissions. The
2416smallest unit of memory that can be addressed by a translation table entry is
2417a memory page. Therefore, if software needs to set different permissions on two
2418memory regions then it needs to map them using different memory pages.
2419
2420The default memory layout for each BL image is as follows:
2421
2422::
2423
2424 | ... |
2425 +-------------------+
2426 | Read-write data |
2427 +-------------------+ Page boundary
2428 | <Padding> |
2429 +-------------------+
2430 | Exception vectors |
2431 +-------------------+ 2 KB boundary
2432 | <Padding> |
2433 +-------------------+
2434 | Read-only data |
2435 +-------------------+
2436 | Code |
2437 +-------------------+ BLx_BASE
2438
Paul Beesleyba3ed402019-03-13 16:20:44 +00002439.. note::
2440 The 2KB alignment for the exception vectors is an architectural
2441 requirement.
Douglas Raillardd7c21b72017-06-28 15:23:03 +01002442
2443The read-write data start on a new memory page so that they can be mapped with
2444read-write permissions, whereas the code and read-only data below are configured
2445as read-only.
2446
2447However, the read-only data are not aligned on a page boundary. They are
2448contiguous to the code. Therefore, the end of the code section and the beginning
2449of the read-only data one might share a memory page. This forces both to be
2450mapped with the same memory attributes. As the code needs to be executable, this
2451means that the read-only data stored on the same memory page as the code are
2452executable as well. This could potentially be exploited as part of a security
2453attack.
2454
2455TF provides the build flag ``SEPARATE_CODE_AND_RODATA`` to isolate the code and
2456read-only data on separate memory pages. This in turn allows independent control
2457of the access permissions for the code and read-only data. In this case,
2458platform code gets a finer-grained view of the image layout and can
2459appropriately map the code region as executable and the read-only data as
2460execute-never.
2461
2462This has an impact on memory footprint, as padding bytes need to be introduced
Paul Beesley1fbc97b2019-01-11 18:26:51 +00002463between the code and read-only data to ensure the segregation of the two. To
Douglas Raillardd7c21b72017-06-28 15:23:03 +01002464limit the memory cost, this flag also changes the memory layout such that the
2465code and exception vectors are now contiguous, like so:
2466
2467::
2468
2469 | ... |
2470 +-------------------+
2471 | Read-write data |
2472 +-------------------+ Page boundary
2473 | <Padding> |
2474 +-------------------+
2475 | Read-only data |
2476 +-------------------+ Page boundary
2477 | <Padding> |
2478 +-------------------+
2479 | Exception vectors |
2480 +-------------------+ 2 KB boundary
2481 | <Padding> |
2482 +-------------------+
2483 | Code |
2484 +-------------------+ BLx_BASE
2485
2486With this more condensed memory layout, the separation of read-only data will
2487add zero or one page to the memory footprint of each BL image. Each platform
2488should consider the trade-off between memory footprint and security.
2489
Dan Handley610e7e12018-03-01 18:44:00 +00002490This build flag is disabled by default, minimising memory footprint. On Arm
Douglas Raillardd7c21b72017-06-28 15:23:03 +01002491platforms, it is enabled.
2492
Jeenu Viswambharane3f22002017-09-22 08:32:10 +01002493Publish and Subscribe Framework
2494-------------------------------
2495
2496The Publish and Subscribe Framework allows EL3 components to define and publish
2497events, to which other EL3 components can subscribe.
2498
2499The following macros are provided by the framework:
2500
2501- ``REGISTER_PUBSUB_EVENT(event)``: Defines an event, and takes one argument,
2502 the event name, which must be a valid C identifier. All calls to
2503 ``REGISTER_PUBSUB_EVENT`` macro must be placed in the file
2504 ``pubsub_events.h``.
2505
2506- ``PUBLISH_EVENT_ARG(event, arg)``: Publishes a defined event, by iterating
2507 subscribed handlers and calling them in turn. The handlers will be passed the
2508 parameter ``arg``. The expected use-case is to broadcast an event.
2509
2510- ``PUBLISH_EVENT(event)``: Like ``PUBLISH_EVENT_ARG``, except that the value
2511 ``NULL`` is passed to subscribed handlers.
2512
2513- ``SUBSCRIBE_TO_EVENT(event, handler)``: Registers the ``handler`` to
2514 subscribe to ``event``. The handler will be executed whenever the ``event``
2515 is published.
2516
2517- ``for_each_subscriber(event, subscriber)``: Iterates through all handlers
2518 subscribed for ``event``. ``subscriber`` must be a local variable of type
2519 ``pubsub_cb_t *``, and will point to each subscribed handler in turn during
2520 iteration. This macro can be used for those patterns that none of the
2521 ``PUBLISH_EVENT_*()`` macros cover.
2522
2523Publishing an event that wasn't defined using ``REGISTER_PUBSUB_EVENT`` will
2524result in build error. Subscribing to an undefined event however won't.
2525
2526Subscribed handlers must be of type ``pubsub_cb_t``, with following function
2527signature:
2528
Paul Beesley493e3492019-03-13 15:11:04 +00002529.. code:: c
Jeenu Viswambharane3f22002017-09-22 08:32:10 +01002530
2531 typedef void* (*pubsub_cb_t)(const void *arg);
2532
2533There may be arbitrary number of handlers registered to the same event. The
2534order in which subscribed handlers are notified when that event is published is
2535not defined. Subscribed handlers may be executed in any order; handlers should
2536not assume any relative ordering amongst them.
2537
2538Publishing an event on a PE will result in subscribed handlers executing on that
2539PE only; it won't cause handlers to execute on a different PE.
2540
2541Note that publishing an event on a PE blocks until all the subscribed handlers
2542finish executing on the PE.
2543
Dan Handley610e7e12018-03-01 18:44:00 +00002544TF-A generic code publishes and subscribes to some events within. Platform
2545ports are discouraged from subscribing to them. These events may be withdrawn,
2546renamed, or have their semantics altered in the future. Platforms may however
2547register, publish, and subscribe to platform-specific events.
Dimitris Papastamosa7921b92017-10-13 15:27:58 +01002548
Jeenu Viswambharane3f22002017-09-22 08:32:10 +01002549Publish and Subscribe Example
2550~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
2551
2552A publisher that wants to publish event ``foo`` would:
2553
2554- Define the event ``foo`` in the ``pubsub_events.h``.
2555
Paul Beesley493e3492019-03-13 15:11:04 +00002556 .. code:: c
Jeenu Viswambharane3f22002017-09-22 08:32:10 +01002557
2558 REGISTER_PUBSUB_EVENT(foo);
2559
2560- Depending on the nature of event, use one of ``PUBLISH_EVENT_*()`` macros to
2561 publish the event at the appropriate path and time of execution.
2562
2563A subscriber that wants to subscribe to event ``foo`` published above would
2564implement:
2565
Sandrine Bailleuxf5a91002019-02-08 10:50:28 +01002566.. code:: c
Jeenu Viswambharane3f22002017-09-22 08:32:10 +01002567
Sandrine Bailleuxf5a91002019-02-08 10:50:28 +01002568 void *foo_handler(const void *arg)
2569 {
2570 void *result;
Jeenu Viswambharane3f22002017-09-22 08:32:10 +01002571
Sandrine Bailleuxf5a91002019-02-08 10:50:28 +01002572 /* Do handling ... */
Jeenu Viswambharane3f22002017-09-22 08:32:10 +01002573
Sandrine Bailleuxf5a91002019-02-08 10:50:28 +01002574 return result;
2575 }
Jeenu Viswambharane3f22002017-09-22 08:32:10 +01002576
Sandrine Bailleuxf5a91002019-02-08 10:50:28 +01002577 SUBSCRIBE_TO_EVENT(foo, foo_handler);
Jeenu Viswambharane3f22002017-09-22 08:32:10 +01002578
Daniel Boulby468f0d72018-09-18 11:45:51 +01002579
2580Reclaiming the BL31 initialization code
2581~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
2582
2583A significant amount of the code used for the initialization of BL31 is never
2584needed again after boot time. In order to reduce the runtime memory
2585footprint, the memory used for this code can be reclaimed after initialization
2586has finished and be used for runtime data.
2587
2588The build option ``RECLAIM_INIT_CODE`` can be set to mark this boot time code
2589with a ``.text.init.*`` attribute which can be filtered and placed suitably
Paul Beesley1fbc97b2019-01-11 18:26:51 +00002590within the BL image for later reclamation by the platform. The platform can
2591specify the filter and the memory region for this init section in BL31 via the
Daniel Boulby468f0d72018-09-18 11:45:51 +01002592plat.ld.S linker script. For example, on the FVP, this section is placed
2593overlapping the secondary CPU stacks so that after the cold boot is done, this
2594memory can be reclaimed for the stacks. The init memory section is initially
Paul Beesley1fbc97b2019-01-11 18:26:51 +00002595mapped with ``RO``, ``EXECUTE`` attributes. After BL31 initialization has
Daniel Boulby468f0d72018-09-18 11:45:51 +01002596completed, the FVP changes the attributes of this section to ``RW``,
2597``EXECUTE_NEVER`` allowing it to be used for runtime data. The memory attributes
2598are changed within the ``bl31_plat_runtime_setup`` platform hook. The init
2599section section can be reclaimed for any data which is accessed after cold
2600boot initialization and it is upto the platform to make the decision.
2601
Paul Beesleyf8640672019-04-12 14:19:42 +01002602.. _firmware_design_pmf:
2603
Douglas Raillardd7c21b72017-06-28 15:23:03 +01002604Performance Measurement Framework
2605---------------------------------
2606
2607The Performance Measurement Framework (PMF) facilitates collection of
Dan Handley610e7e12018-03-01 18:44:00 +00002608timestamps by registered services and provides interfaces to retrieve them
2609from within TF-A. A platform can choose to expose appropriate SMCs to
2610retrieve these collected timestamps.
Douglas Raillardd7c21b72017-06-28 15:23:03 +01002611
2612By default, the global physical counter is used for the timestamp
2613value and is read via ``CNTPCT_EL0``. The framework allows to retrieve
2614timestamps captured by other CPUs.
2615
2616Timestamp identifier format
2617~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
2618
2619A PMF timestamp is uniquely identified across the system via the
2620timestamp ID or ``tid``. The ``tid`` is composed as follows:
2621
2622::
2623
2624 Bits 0-7: The local timestamp identifier.
2625 Bits 8-9: Reserved.
2626 Bits 10-15: The service identifier.
2627 Bits 16-31: Reserved.
2628
2629#. The service identifier. Each PMF service is identified by a
2630 service name and a service identifier. Both the service name and
2631 identifier are unique within the system as a whole.
2632
2633#. The local timestamp identifier. This identifier is unique within a given
2634 service.
2635
2636Registering a PMF service
2637~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
2638
2639To register a PMF service, the ``PMF_REGISTER_SERVICE()`` macro from ``pmf.h``
2640is used. The arguments required are the service name, the service ID,
2641the total number of local timestamps to be captured and a set of flags.
2642
2643The ``flags`` field can be specified as a bitwise-OR of the following values:
2644
2645::
2646
2647 PMF_STORE_ENABLE: The timestamp is stored in memory for later retrieval.
2648 PMF_DUMP_ENABLE: The timestamp is dumped on the serial console.
2649
2650The ``PMF_REGISTER_SERVICE()`` reserves memory to store captured
2651timestamps in a PMF specific linker section at build time.
2652Additionally, it defines necessary functions to capture and
2653retrieve a particular timestamp for the given service at runtime.
2654
Dan Handley610e7e12018-03-01 18:44:00 +00002655The macro ``PMF_REGISTER_SERVICE()`` only enables capturing PMF timestamps
2656from within TF-A. In order to retrieve timestamps from outside of TF-A, the
Douglas Raillardd7c21b72017-06-28 15:23:03 +01002657``PMF_REGISTER_SERVICE_SMC()`` macro must be used instead. This macro
2658accepts the same set of arguments as the ``PMF_REGISTER_SERVICE()``
2659macro but additionally supports retrieving timestamps using SMCs.
2660
2661Capturing a timestamp
2662~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
2663
2664PMF timestamps are stored in a per-service timestamp region. On a
2665system with multiple CPUs, each timestamp is captured and stored
2666in a per-CPU cache line aligned memory region.
2667
2668Having registered the service, the ``PMF_CAPTURE_TIMESTAMP()`` macro can be
2669used to capture a timestamp at the location where it is used. The macro
2670takes the service name, a local timestamp identifier and a flag as arguments.
2671
2672The ``flags`` field argument can be zero, or ``PMF_CACHE_MAINT`` which
2673instructs PMF to do cache maintenance following the capture. Cache
2674maintenance is required if any of the service's timestamps are captured
2675with data cache disabled.
2676
2677To capture a timestamp in assembly code, the caller should use
2678``pmf_calc_timestamp_addr`` macro (defined in ``pmf_asm_macros.S``) to
2679calculate the address of where the timestamp would be stored. The
2680caller should then read ``CNTPCT_EL0`` register to obtain the timestamp
2681and store it at the determined address for later retrieval.
2682
2683Retrieving a timestamp
2684~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
2685
Dan Handley610e7e12018-03-01 18:44:00 +00002686From within TF-A, timestamps for individual CPUs can be retrieved using either
2687``PMF_GET_TIMESTAMP_BY_MPIDR()`` or ``PMF_GET_TIMESTAMP_BY_INDEX()`` macros.
2688These macros accept the CPU's MPIDR value, or its ordinal position
2689respectively.
Douglas Raillardd7c21b72017-06-28 15:23:03 +01002690
Dan Handley610e7e12018-03-01 18:44:00 +00002691From outside TF-A, timestamps for individual CPUs can be retrieved by calling
2692into ``pmf_smc_handler()``.
Douglas Raillardd7c21b72017-06-28 15:23:03 +01002693
Paul Beesley493e3492019-03-13 15:11:04 +00002694::
Douglas Raillardd7c21b72017-06-28 15:23:03 +01002695
2696 Interface : pmf_smc_handler()
2697 Argument : unsigned int smc_fid, u_register_t x1,
2698 u_register_t x2, u_register_t x3,
2699 u_register_t x4, void *cookie,
2700 void *handle, u_register_t flags
2701 Return : uintptr_t
2702
2703 smc_fid: Holds the SMC identifier which is either `PMF_SMC_GET_TIMESTAMP_32`
2704 when the caller of the SMC is running in AArch32 mode
2705 or `PMF_SMC_GET_TIMESTAMP_64` when the caller is running in AArch64 mode.
2706 x1: Timestamp identifier.
2707 x2: The `mpidr` of the CPU for which the timestamp has to be retrieved.
2708 This can be the `mpidr` of a different core to the one initiating
2709 the SMC. In that case, service specific cache maintenance may be
2710 required to ensure the updated copy of the timestamp is returned.
2711 x3: A flags value that is either 0 or `PMF_CACHE_MAINT`. If
2712 `PMF_CACHE_MAINT` is passed, then the PMF code will perform a
2713 cache invalidate before reading the timestamp. This ensures
2714 an updated copy is returned.
2715
2716The remaining arguments, ``x4``, ``cookie``, ``handle`` and ``flags`` are unused
2717in this implementation.
2718
2719PMF code structure
2720~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
2721
2722#. ``pmf_main.c`` consists of core functions that implement service registration,
2723 initialization, storing, dumping and retrieving timestamps.
2724
2725#. ``pmf_smc.c`` contains the SMC handling for registered PMF services.
2726
2727#. ``pmf.h`` contains the public interface to Performance Measurement Framework.
2728
2729#. ``pmf_asm_macros.S`` consists of macros to facilitate capturing timestamps in
2730 assembly code.
2731
2732#. ``pmf_helpers.h`` is an internal header used by ``pmf.h``.
2733
Dan Handley610e7e12018-03-01 18:44:00 +00002734Armv8-A Architecture Extensions
2735-------------------------------
Douglas Raillardd7c21b72017-06-28 15:23:03 +01002736
Dan Handley610e7e12018-03-01 18:44:00 +00002737TF-A makes use of Armv8-A Architecture Extensions where applicable. This
2738section lists the usage of Architecture Extensions, and build flags
2739controlling them.
Douglas Raillardd7c21b72017-06-28 15:23:03 +01002740
Manish Pandeyacdaac22023-05-12 14:51:39 +01002741Build options
2742~~~~~~~~~~~~~
2743
2744``ARM_ARCH_MAJOR`` and ``ARM_ARCH_MINOR``
2745
2746These build options serve dual purpose
2747
2748- Determine the architecture extension support in TF-A build: All the mandatory
2749 architectural features up to ``ARM_ARCH_MAJOR.ARM_ARCH_MINOR`` are included
2750 and unconditionally enabled by TF-A build system.
2751
Govindraj Raja81525652023-07-18 13:55:33 -05002752- ``ARM_ARCH_MAJOR`` and ``ARM_ARCH_MINOR`` are passed to a march.mk build utility
2753 this will try to come up with an appropriate -march value to be passed to compiler
2754 by probing the compiler and checking what's supported by the compiler and what's best
2755 that can be used. But if platform provides a ``MARCH_DIRECTIVE`` then it will used
2756 directly and compiler probing will be skipped.
Manish Pandeyacdaac22023-05-12 14:51:39 +01002757
2758The build system requires that the platform provides a valid numeric value based on
2759CPU architecture extension, otherwise it defaults to base Armv8.0-A architecture.
2760Subsequent Arm Architecture versions also support extensions which were introduced
2761in previous versions.
Douglas Raillardd7c21b72017-06-28 15:23:03 +01002762
Paul Beesleyd2fcc4e2019-05-29 13:59:40 +01002763.. seealso:: :ref:`Build Options`
Douglas Raillardd7c21b72017-06-28 15:23:03 +01002764
2765For details on the Architecture Extension and available features, please refer
2766to the respective Architecture Extension Supplement.
2767
Dan Handley610e7e12018-03-01 18:44:00 +00002768Armv8.1-A
2769~~~~~~~~~
Douglas Raillardd7c21b72017-06-28 15:23:03 +01002770
2771This Architecture Extension is targeted when ``ARM_ARCH_MAJOR`` >= 8, or when
2772``ARM_ARCH_MAJOR`` == 8 and ``ARM_ARCH_MINOR`` >= 1.
2773
Soby Mathewad042012019-09-25 14:03:41 +01002774- By default, a load-/store-exclusive instruction pair is used to implement
2775 spinlocks. The ``USE_SPINLOCK_CAS`` build option when set to 1 selects the
2776 spinlock implementation using the ARMv8.1-LSE Compare and Swap instruction.
2777 Notice this instruction is only available in AArch64 execution state, so
2778 the option is only available to AArch64 builds.
Douglas Raillardd7c21b72017-06-28 15:23:03 +01002779
Dan Handley610e7e12018-03-01 18:44:00 +00002780Armv8.2-A
2781~~~~~~~~~
Isla Mitchellc4a1a072017-08-07 11:20:13 +01002782
Antonio Nino Diaz633703a2019-02-19 13:14:06 +00002783- The presence of ARMv8.2-TTCNP is detected at runtime. When it is present, the
2784 Common not Private (TTBRn_ELx.CnP) bit is enabled to indicate that multiple
Sandrine Bailleuxfee6e262018-01-29 14:48:15 +01002785 Processing Elements in the same Inner Shareable domain use the same
2786 translation table entries for a given stage of translation for a particular
2787 translation regime.
Isla Mitchellc4a1a072017-08-07 11:20:13 +01002788
Jeenu Viswambharancbad6612018-08-15 14:29:29 +01002789Armv8.3-A
2790~~~~~~~~~
2791
Antonio Nino Diaz594811b2019-01-31 11:58:00 +00002792- Pointer authentication features of Armv8.3-A are unconditionally enabled in
2793 the Non-secure world so that lower ELs are allowed to use them without
2794 causing a trap to EL3.
2795
2796 In order to enable the Secure world to use it, ``CTX_INCLUDE_PAUTH_REGS``
2797 must be set to 1. This will add all pointer authentication system registers
2798 to the context that is saved when doing a world switch.
Jeenu Viswambharancbad6612018-08-15 14:29:29 +01002799
Alexei Fedorov2831d582019-03-13 11:05:07 +00002800 The TF-A itself has support for pointer authentication at runtime
Alexei Fedorov90f2e882019-05-24 12:17:09 +01002801 that can be enabled by setting ``BRANCH_PROTECTION`` option to non-zero and
Antonio Nino Diaz25cda672019-02-19 11:53:51 +00002802 ``CTX_INCLUDE_PAUTH_REGS`` to 1. This enables pointer authentication in BL1,
2803 BL2, BL31, and the TSP if it is used.
2804
Alexei Fedorov2831d582019-03-13 11:05:07 +00002805 Note that Pointer Authentication is enabled for Non-secure world irrespective
2806 of the value of these build flags if the CPU supports it.
2807
Alexei Fedorovb567e5d2019-03-11 16:51:47 +00002808 If ``ARM_ARCH_MAJOR == 8`` and ``ARM_ARCH_MINOR >= 3`` the code footprint of
2809 enabling PAuth is lower because the compiler will use the optimized
2810 PAuth instructions rather than the backwards-compatible ones.
2811
Alexei Fedorov90f2e882019-05-24 12:17:09 +01002812Armv8.5-A
2813~~~~~~~~~
2814
2815- Branch Target Identification feature is selected by ``BRANCH_PROTECTION``
Manish Pandey34a305e2021-10-21 21:53:49 +01002816 option set to 1. This option defaults to 0.
Justin Chadwell55c73512019-07-18 16:16:32 +01002817
Govindraj Rajac1be66f2024-03-07 14:42:20 -06002818- Memory Tagging Extension feature has few variants but not all of them require
2819 enablement from EL3 to be used at lower EL. e.g. Memory tagging only at
2820 EL0(MTE) does not require EL3 configuration however memory tagging at
2821 EL2/EL1 (MTE2) does require EL3 enablement and we need to set this option
2822 ``ENABLE_FEAT_MTE2`` to 1. This option defaults to 0.
Alexei Fedorov90f2e882019-05-24 12:17:09 +01002823
Dan Handley610e7e12018-03-01 18:44:00 +00002824Armv7-A
2825~~~~~~~
Etienne Carriere1374fcb2017-11-08 13:48:40 +01002826
2827This Architecture Extension is targeted when ``ARM_ARCH_MAJOR`` == 7.
2828
Dan Handley610e7e12018-03-01 18:44:00 +00002829There are several Armv7-A extensions available. Obviously the TrustZone
2830extension is mandatory to support the TF-A bootloader and runtime services.
Etienne Carriere1374fcb2017-11-08 13:48:40 +01002831
Dan Handley610e7e12018-03-01 18:44:00 +00002832Platform implementing an Armv7-A system can to define from its target
Etienne Carriere1374fcb2017-11-08 13:48:40 +01002833Cortex-A architecture through ``ARM_CORTEX_A<X> = yes`` in their
Paul Beesley1fbc97b2019-01-11 18:26:51 +00002834``platform.mk`` script. For example ``ARM_CORTEX_A15=yes`` for a
Etienne Carriere1374fcb2017-11-08 13:48:40 +01002835Cortex-A15 target.
2836
2837Platform can also set ``ARM_WITH_NEON=yes`` to enable neon support.
Paul Beesleyf2ec7142019-10-04 16:17:46 +00002838Note that using neon at runtime has constraints on non secure world context.
Dan Handley610e7e12018-03-01 18:44:00 +00002839TF-A does not yet provide VFP context management.
Etienne Carriere1374fcb2017-11-08 13:48:40 +01002840
2841Directive ``ARM_CORTEX_A<x>`` and ``ARM_WITH_NEON`` are used to set
2842the toolchain target architecture directive.
2843
2844Platform may choose to not define straight the toolchain target architecture
Govindraj Rajacd10c6e2023-05-30 16:52:15 -05002845directive by defining ``MARCH_DIRECTIVE``.
Etienne Carriere1374fcb2017-11-08 13:48:40 +01002846I.e:
2847
Paul Beesley493e3492019-03-13 15:11:04 +00002848.. code:: make
Etienne Carriere1374fcb2017-11-08 13:48:40 +01002849
Govindraj Raja81525652023-07-18 13:55:33 -05002850 MARCH_DIRECTIVE := -march=armv7-a
Etienne Carriere1374fcb2017-11-08 13:48:40 +01002851
Douglas Raillardd7c21b72017-06-28 15:23:03 +01002852Code Structure
2853--------------
2854
Dan Handley610e7e12018-03-01 18:44:00 +00002855TF-A code is logically divided between the three boot loader stages mentioned
2856in the previous sections. The code is also divided into the following
2857categories (present as directories in the source code):
Douglas Raillardd7c21b72017-06-28 15:23:03 +01002858
2859- **Platform specific.** Choice of architecture specific code depends upon
2860 the platform.
2861- **Common code.** This is platform and architecture agnostic code.
2862- **Library code.** This code comprises of functionality commonly used by all
2863 other code. The PSCI implementation and other EL3 runtime frameworks reside
2864 as Library components.
2865- **Stage specific.** Code specific to a boot stage.
2866- **Drivers.**
2867- **Services.** EL3 runtime services (eg: SPD). Specific SPD services
2868 reside in the ``services/spd`` directory (e.g. ``services/spd/tspd``).
2869
2870Each boot loader stage uses code from one or more of the above mentioned
2871categories. Based upon the above, the code layout looks like this:
2872
2873::
2874
2875 Directory Used by BL1? Used by BL2? Used by BL31?
2876 bl1 Yes No No
2877 bl2 No Yes No
2878 bl31 No No Yes
2879 plat Yes Yes Yes
2880 drivers Yes No Yes
2881 common Yes Yes Yes
2882 lib Yes Yes Yes
2883 services No No Yes
2884
Sandrine Bailleux15530dd2019-02-08 15:26:36 +01002885The build system provides a non configurable build option IMAGE_BLx for each
2886boot loader stage (where x = BL stage). e.g. for BL1 , IMAGE_BL1 will be
Dan Handley610e7e12018-03-01 18:44:00 +00002887defined by the build system. This enables TF-A to compile certain code only
2888for specific boot loader stages
Douglas Raillardd7c21b72017-06-28 15:23:03 +01002889
2890All assembler files have the ``.S`` extension. The linker source files for each
2891boot stage have the extension ``.ld.S``. These are processed by GCC to create the
2892linker scripts which have the extension ``.ld``.
2893
2894FDTs provide a description of the hardware platform and are used by the Linux
2895kernel at boot time. These can be found in the ``fdts`` directory.
2896
Paul Beesleyf8640672019-04-12 14:19:42 +01002897.. rubric:: References
Douglas Raillardd7c21b72017-06-28 15:23:03 +01002898
Paul Beesleyf8640672019-04-12 14:19:42 +01002899- `Trusted Board Boot Requirements CLIENT (TBBR-CLIENT) Armv8-A (ARM DEN0006D)`_
2900
Manish V Badarkhe9d24e9b2023-06-15 09:14:33 +01002901- `PSCI`_
Paul Beesleyf8640672019-04-12 14:19:42 +01002902
Sandrine Bailleuxd9202df2020-04-17 14:06:52 +02002903- `SMC Calling Convention`_
Paul Beesleyf8640672019-04-12 14:19:42 +01002904
2905- :ref:`Interrupt Management Framework`
Douglas Raillardd7c21b72017-06-28 15:23:03 +01002906
2907--------------
2908
Boyan Karatotev1dcba8f2024-11-19 11:27:01 +00002909*Copyright (c) 2013-2025, Arm Limited and Contributors. All rights reserved.*
Douglas Raillardd7c21b72017-06-28 15:23:03 +01002910
laurenw-arm03e7e612020-04-16 10:02:17 -05002911.. _SMCCC: https://developer.arm.com/docs/den0028/latest
Manish V Badarkhe9d24e9b2023-06-15 09:14:33 +01002912.. _PSCI: https://developer.arm.com/documentation/den0022/latest/
Petre-Ionut Tudor620a7022019-09-27 15:13:21 +01002913.. _Arm ARM: https://developer.arm.com/docs/ddi0487/latest
laurenw-arm03e7e612020-04-16 10:02:17 -05002914.. _SMC Calling Convention: https://developer.arm.com/docs/den0028/latest
Sandrine Bailleuxf2384172024-02-02 11:16:12 +01002915.. _Trusted Board Boot Requirements CLIENT (TBBR-CLIENT) Armv8-A (ARM DEN0006D): https://developer.arm.com/docs/den0006/latest
Zelalem Aweke023b1a42021-10-21 13:59:45 -05002916.. _Arm Confidential Compute Architecture (Arm CCA): https://www.arm.com/why-arm/architecture/security-features/arm-confidential-compute-architecture
Manish Pandey493bdc42023-07-21 13:08:53 +01002917.. _AArch64 exception vector table: https://developer.arm.com/documentation/100933/0100/AArch64-exception-vector-table
Douglas Raillardd7c21b72017-06-28 15:23:03 +01002918
Paul Beesley814f8c02019-03-13 15:49:27 +00002919.. |Image 1| image:: ../resources/diagrams/rt-svc-descs-layout.png