Simon Glass | 069fb77 | 2014-02-26 15:59:17 -0700 | [diff] [blame] | 1 | Driver Model |
| 2 | ============ |
| 3 | |
| 4 | This README contains high-level information about driver model, a unified |
| 5 | way of declaring and accessing drivers in U-Boot. The original work was done |
| 6 | by: |
| 7 | |
| 8 | Marek Vasut <marex@denx.de> |
| 9 | Pavel Herrmann <morpheus.ibis@gmail.com> |
| 10 | Viktor Křivák <viktor.krivak@gmail.com> |
| 11 | Tomas Hlavacek <tmshlvck@gmail.com> |
| 12 | |
| 13 | This has been both simplified and extended into the current implementation |
| 14 | by: |
| 15 | |
| 16 | Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
| 17 | |
| 18 | |
| 19 | Terminology |
| 20 | ----------- |
| 21 | |
| 22 | Uclass - a group of devices which operate in the same way. A uclass provides |
| 23 | a way of accessing invidual devices within the group, but always |
| 24 | using the same interface. For example a GPIO uclass provides |
| 25 | operations for get/set value. An I2C uclass may have 10 I2C ports, |
| 26 | 4 with one driver, and 6 with another. |
| 27 | |
| 28 | Driver - some code which talks to a peripheral and presents a higher-level |
| 29 | interface to it. |
| 30 | |
| 31 | Device - an instance of a driver, tied to a particular port or peripheral. |
| 32 | |
| 33 | |
| 34 | How to try it |
| 35 | ------------- |
| 36 | |
| 37 | Build U-Boot sandbox and run it: |
| 38 | |
| 39 | make sandbox_config |
| 40 | make |
| 41 | ./u-boot |
| 42 | |
| 43 | (type 'reset' to exit U-Boot) |
| 44 | |
| 45 | |
| 46 | There is a uclass called 'demo'. This uclass handles |
| 47 | saying hello, and reporting its status. There are two drivers in this |
| 48 | uclass: |
| 49 | |
| 50 | - simple: Just prints a message for hello, doesn't implement status |
| 51 | - shape: Prints shapes and reports number of characters printed as status |
| 52 | |
| 53 | The demo class is pretty simple, but not trivial. The intention is that it |
| 54 | can be used for testing, so it will implement all driver model features and |
| 55 | provide good code coverage of them. It does have multiple drivers, it |
| 56 | handles parameter data and platdata (data which tells the driver how |
| 57 | to operate on a particular platform) and it uses private driver data. |
| 58 | |
| 59 | To try it, see the example session below: |
| 60 | |
| 61 | =>demo hello 1 |
| 62 | Hello '@' from 07981110: red 4 |
| 63 | =>demo status 2 |
| 64 | Status: 0 |
| 65 | =>demo hello 2 |
| 66 | g |
| 67 | r@ |
| 68 | e@@ |
| 69 | e@@@ |
| 70 | n@@@@ |
| 71 | g@@@@@ |
| 72 | =>demo status 2 |
| 73 | Status: 21 |
| 74 | =>demo hello 4 ^ |
| 75 | y^^^ |
| 76 | e^^^^^ |
| 77 | l^^^^^^^ |
| 78 | l^^^^^^^ |
| 79 | o^^^^^ |
| 80 | w^^^ |
| 81 | =>demo status 4 |
| 82 | Status: 36 |
| 83 | => |
| 84 | |
| 85 | |
| 86 | Running the tests |
| 87 | ----------------- |
| 88 | |
| 89 | The intent with driver model is that the core portion has 100% test coverage |
| 90 | in sandbox, and every uclass has its own test. As a move towards this, tests |
| 91 | are provided in test/dm. To run them, try: |
| 92 | |
| 93 | ./test/dm/test-dm.sh |
| 94 | |
| 95 | You should see something like this: |
| 96 | |
| 97 | <...U-Boot banner...> |
| 98 | Running 12 driver model tests |
| 99 | Test: dm_test_autobind |
| 100 | Test: dm_test_autoprobe |
| 101 | Test: dm_test_children |
| 102 | Test: dm_test_fdt |
| 103 | Test: dm_test_gpio |
| 104 | sandbox_gpio: sb_gpio_get_value: error: offset 4 not reserved |
| 105 | Test: dm_test_leak |
| 106 | Warning: Please add '#define DEBUG' to the top of common/dlmalloc.c |
| 107 | Warning: Please add '#define DEBUG' to the top of common/dlmalloc.c |
| 108 | Test: dm_test_lifecycle |
| 109 | Test: dm_test_operations |
| 110 | Test: dm_test_ordering |
| 111 | Test: dm_test_platdata |
| 112 | Test: dm_test_remove |
| 113 | Test: dm_test_uclass |
| 114 | Failures: 0 |
| 115 | |
| 116 | (You can add '#define DEBUG' as suggested to check for memory leaks) |
| 117 | |
| 118 | |
| 119 | What is going on? |
| 120 | ----------------- |
| 121 | |
| 122 | Let's start at the top. The demo command is in common/cmd_demo.c. It does |
| 123 | the usual command procesing and then: |
| 124 | |
| 125 | struct device *demo_dev; |
| 126 | |
| 127 | ret = uclass_get_device(UCLASS_DEMO, devnum, &demo_dev); |
| 128 | |
| 129 | UCLASS_DEMO means the class of devices which implement 'demo'. Other |
| 130 | classes might be MMC, or GPIO, hashing or serial. The idea is that the |
| 131 | devices in the class all share a particular way of working. The class |
| 132 | presents a unified view of all these devices to U-Boot. |
| 133 | |
| 134 | This function looks up a device for the demo uclass. Given a device |
| 135 | number we can find the device because all devices have registered with |
| 136 | the UCLASS_DEMO uclass. |
| 137 | |
| 138 | The device is automatically activated ready for use by uclass_get_device(). |
| 139 | |
| 140 | Now that we have the device we can do things like: |
| 141 | |
| 142 | return demo_hello(demo_dev, ch); |
| 143 | |
| 144 | This function is in the demo uclass. It takes care of calling the 'hello' |
| 145 | method of the relevant driver. Bearing in mind that there are two drivers, |
| 146 | this particular device may use one or other of them. |
| 147 | |
| 148 | The code for demo_hello() is in drivers/demo/demo-uclass.c: |
| 149 | |
| 150 | int demo_hello(struct device *dev, int ch) |
| 151 | { |
| 152 | const struct demo_ops *ops = device_get_ops(dev); |
| 153 | |
| 154 | if (!ops->hello) |
| 155 | return -ENOSYS; |
| 156 | |
| 157 | return ops->hello(dev, ch); |
| 158 | } |
| 159 | |
| 160 | As you can see it just calls the relevant driver method. One of these is |
| 161 | in drivers/demo/demo-simple.c: |
| 162 | |
| 163 | static int simple_hello(struct device *dev, int ch) |
| 164 | { |
| 165 | const struct dm_demo_pdata *pdata = dev_get_platdata(dev); |
| 166 | |
| 167 | printf("Hello from %08x: %s %d\n", map_to_sysmem(dev), |
| 168 | pdata->colour, pdata->sides); |
| 169 | |
| 170 | return 0; |
| 171 | } |
| 172 | |
| 173 | |
| 174 | So that is a trip from top (command execution) to bottom (driver action) |
| 175 | but it leaves a lot of topics to address. |
| 176 | |
| 177 | |
| 178 | Declaring Drivers |
| 179 | ----------------- |
| 180 | |
| 181 | A driver declaration looks something like this (see |
| 182 | drivers/demo/demo-shape.c): |
| 183 | |
| 184 | static const struct demo_ops shape_ops = { |
| 185 | .hello = shape_hello, |
| 186 | .status = shape_status, |
| 187 | }; |
| 188 | |
| 189 | U_BOOT_DRIVER(demo_shape_drv) = { |
| 190 | .name = "demo_shape_drv", |
| 191 | .id = UCLASS_DEMO, |
| 192 | .ops = &shape_ops, |
| 193 | .priv_data_size = sizeof(struct shape_data), |
| 194 | }; |
| 195 | |
| 196 | |
| 197 | This driver has two methods (hello and status) and requires a bit of |
| 198 | private data (accessible through dev_get_priv(dev) once the driver has |
| 199 | been probed). It is a member of UCLASS_DEMO so will register itself |
| 200 | there. |
| 201 | |
| 202 | In U_BOOT_DRIVER it is also possible to specify special methods for bind |
| 203 | and unbind, and these are called at appropriate times. For many drivers |
| 204 | it is hoped that only 'probe' and 'remove' will be needed. |
| 205 | |
| 206 | The U_BOOT_DRIVER macro creates a data structure accessible from C, |
| 207 | so driver model can find the drivers that are available. |
| 208 | |
| 209 | The methods a device can provide are documented in the device.h header. |
| 210 | Briefly, they are: |
| 211 | |
| 212 | bind - make the driver model aware of a device (bind it to its driver) |
| 213 | unbind - make the driver model forget the device |
| 214 | ofdata_to_platdata - convert device tree data to platdata - see later |
| 215 | probe - make a device ready for use |
| 216 | remove - remove a device so it cannot be used until probed again |
| 217 | |
| 218 | The sequence to get a device to work is bind, ofdata_to_platdata (if using |
| 219 | device tree) and probe. |
| 220 | |
| 221 | |
| 222 | Platform Data |
| 223 | ------------- |
| 224 | |
| 225 | Where does the platform data come from? See demo-pdata.c which |
| 226 | sets up a table of driver names and their associated platform data. |
| 227 | The data can be interpreted by the drivers however they like - it is |
| 228 | basically a communication scheme between the board-specific code and |
| 229 | the generic drivers, which are intended to work on any board. |
| 230 | |
| 231 | Drivers can acceess their data via dev->info->platdata. Here is |
| 232 | the declaration for the platform data, which would normally appear |
| 233 | in the board file. |
| 234 | |
| 235 | static const struct dm_demo_cdata red_square = { |
| 236 | .colour = "red", |
| 237 | .sides = 4. |
| 238 | }; |
| 239 | static const struct driver_info info[] = { |
| 240 | { |
| 241 | .name = "demo_shape_drv", |
| 242 | .platdata = &red_square, |
| 243 | }, |
| 244 | }; |
| 245 | |
| 246 | demo1 = driver_bind(root, &info[0]); |
| 247 | |
| 248 | |
| 249 | Device Tree |
| 250 | ----------- |
| 251 | |
| 252 | While platdata is useful, a more flexible way of providing device data is |
| 253 | by using device tree. With device tree we replace the above code with the |
| 254 | following device tree fragment: |
| 255 | |
| 256 | red-square { |
| 257 | compatible = "demo-shape"; |
| 258 | colour = "red"; |
| 259 | sides = <4>; |
| 260 | }; |
| 261 | |
| 262 | |
| 263 | The easiest way to make this work it to add a few members to the driver: |
| 264 | |
| 265 | .platdata_auto_alloc_size = sizeof(struct dm_test_pdata), |
| 266 | .ofdata_to_platdata = testfdt_ofdata_to_platdata, |
| 267 | .probe = testfdt_drv_probe, |
| 268 | |
| 269 | The 'auto_alloc' feature allowed space for the platdata to be allocated |
| 270 | and zeroed before the driver's ofdata_to_platdata method is called. This |
| 271 | method reads the information out of the device tree and puts it in |
| 272 | dev->platdata. Then the probe method is called to set up the device. |
| 273 | |
| 274 | Note that both methods are optional. If you provide an ofdata_to_platdata |
| 275 | method then it wlil be called first (after bind). If you provide a probe |
| 276 | method it will be called next. |
| 277 | |
| 278 | If you don't want to have the platdata automatically allocated then you |
| 279 | can leave out platdata_auto_alloc_size. In this case you can use malloc |
| 280 | in your ofdata_to_platdata (or probe) method to allocate the required memory, |
| 281 | and you should free it in the remove method. |
| 282 | |
| 283 | |
| 284 | Declaring Uclasses |
| 285 | ------------------ |
| 286 | |
| 287 | The demo uclass is declared like this: |
| 288 | |
| 289 | U_BOOT_CLASS(demo) = { |
| 290 | .id = UCLASS_DEMO, |
| 291 | }; |
| 292 | |
| 293 | It is also possible to specify special methods for probe, etc. The uclass |
| 294 | numbering comes from include/dm/uclass.h. To add a new uclass, add to the |
| 295 | end of the enum there, then declare your uclass as above. |
| 296 | |
| 297 | |
| 298 | Data Structures |
| 299 | --------------- |
| 300 | |
| 301 | Driver model uses a doubly-linked list as the basic data structure. Some |
| 302 | nodes have several lists running through them. Creating a more efficient |
| 303 | data structure might be worthwhile in some rare cases, once we understand |
| 304 | what the bottlenecks are. |
| 305 | |
| 306 | |
| 307 | Changes since v1 |
| 308 | ---------------- |
| 309 | |
| 310 | For the record, this implementation uses a very similar approach to the |
| 311 | original patches, but makes at least the following changes: |
| 312 | |
| 313 | - Tried to agressively remove boilerplate, so that for most drivers there |
| 314 | is little or no 'driver model' code to write. |
| 315 | - Moved some data from code into data structure - e.g. store a pointer to |
| 316 | the driver operations structure in the driver, rather than passing it |
| 317 | to the driver bind function. |
| 318 | - Rename some structures to make them more similar to Linux (struct device |
| 319 | instead of struct instance, struct platdata, etc.) |
| 320 | - Change the name 'core' to 'uclass', meaning U-Boot class. It seems that |
| 321 | this concept relates to a class of drivers (or a subsystem). We shouldn't |
| 322 | use 'class' since it is a C++ reserved word, so U-Boot class (uclass) seems |
| 323 | better than 'core'. |
| 324 | - Remove 'struct driver_instance' and just use a single 'struct device'. |
| 325 | This removes a level of indirection that doesn't seem necessary. |
| 326 | - Built in device tree support, to avoid the need for platdata |
| 327 | - Removed the concept of driver relocation, and just make it possible for |
| 328 | the new driver (created after relocation) to access the old driver data. |
| 329 | I feel that relocation is a very special case and will only apply to a few |
| 330 | drivers, many of which can/will just re-init anyway. So the overhead of |
| 331 | dealing with this might not be worth it. |
| 332 | - Implemented a GPIO system, trying to keep it simple |
| 333 | |
| 334 | |
| 335 | Things to punt for later |
| 336 | ------------------------ |
| 337 | |
| 338 | - SPL support - this will have to be present before many drivers can be |
| 339 | converted, but it seems like we can add it once we are happy with the |
| 340 | core implementation. |
| 341 | - Pre-relocation support - similar story |
| 342 | |
| 343 | That is not to say that no thinking has gone into these - in fact there |
| 344 | is quite a lot there. However, getting these right is non-trivial and |
| 345 | there is a high cost associated with going down the wrong path. |
| 346 | |
| 347 | For SPL, it may be possible to fit in a simplified driver model with only |
| 348 | bind and probe methods, to reduce size. |
| 349 | |
| 350 | For pre-relocation we can simply call the driver model init function. Then |
| 351 | post relocation we throw that away and re-init driver model again. For drivers |
| 352 | which require some sort of continuity between pre- and post-relocation |
| 353 | devices, we can provide access to the pre-relocation device pointers. |
| 354 | |
| 355 | Uclasses are statically numbered at compile time. It would be possible to |
| 356 | change this to dynamic numbering, but then we would require some sort of |
| 357 | lookup service, perhaps searching by name. This is slightly less efficient |
| 358 | so has been left out for now. One small advantage of dynamic numbering might |
| 359 | be fewer merge conflicts in uclass-id.h. |
| 360 | |
| 361 | |
| 362 | Simon Glass |
| 363 | sjg@chromium.org |
| 364 | April 2013 |
| 365 | Updated 7-May-13 |
| 366 | Updated 14-Jun-13 |
| 367 | Updated 18-Oct-13 |
| 368 | Updated 5-Nov-13 |