| Alternative Boot Flows |
| ====================== |
| |
| EL3 payloads alternative boot flow |
| ---------------------------------- |
| |
| On a pre-production system, the ability to execute arbitrary, bare-metal code at |
| the highest exception level is required. It allows full, direct access to the |
| hardware, for example to run silicon soak tests. |
| |
| Although it is possible to implement some baremetal secure firmware from |
| scratch, this is a complex task on some platforms, depending on the level of |
| configuration required to put the system in the expected state. |
| |
| Rather than booting a baremetal application, a possible compromise is to boot |
| ``EL3 payloads`` through TF-A instead. This is implemented as an alternative |
| boot flow, where a modified BL2 boots an EL3 payload, instead of loading the |
| other BL images and passing control to BL31. It reduces the complexity of |
| developing EL3 baremetal code by: |
| |
| - putting the system into a known architectural state; |
| - taking care of platform secure world initialization; |
| - loading the SCP_BL2 image if required by the platform. |
| |
| When booting an EL3 payload on Arm standard platforms, the configuration of the |
| TrustZone controller is simplified such that only region 0 is enabled and is |
| configured to permit secure access only. This gives full access to the whole |
| DRAM to the EL3 payload. |
| |
| The system is left in the same state as when entering BL31 in the default boot |
| flow. In particular: |
| |
| - Running in EL3; |
| - Current state is AArch64; |
| - Little-endian data access; |
| - All exceptions disabled; |
| - MMU disabled; |
| - Caches disabled. |
| |
| .. _alt_boot_flows_el3_payload: |
| |
| Booting an EL3 payload |
| ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ |
| |
| The EL3 payload image is a standalone image and is not part of the FIP. It is |
| not loaded by TF-A. Therefore, there are 2 possible scenarios: |
| |
| - The EL3 payload may reside in non-volatile memory (NVM) and execute in |
| place. In this case, booting it is just a matter of specifying the right |
| address in NVM through ``EL3_PAYLOAD_BASE`` when building TF-A. |
| |
| - The EL3 payload needs to be loaded in volatile memory (e.g. DRAM) at |
| run-time. |
| |
| To help in the latter scenario, the ``SPIN_ON_BL1_EXIT=1`` build option can be |
| used. The infinite loop that it introduces in BL1 stops execution at the right |
| moment for a debugger to take control of the target and load the payload (for |
| example, over JTAG). |
| |
| It is expected that this loading method will work in most cases, as a debugger |
| connection is usually available in a pre-production system. The user is free to |
| use any other platform-specific mechanism to load the EL3 payload, though. |
| |
| |
| Preloaded BL33 alternative boot flow |
| ------------------------------------ |
| |
| Some platforms have the ability to preload BL33 into memory instead of relying |
| on TF-A to load it. This may simplify packaging of the normal world code and |
| improve performance in a development environment. When secure world cold boot |
| is complete, TF-A simply jumps to a BL33 base address provided at build time. |
| |
| For this option to be used, the ``PRELOADED_BL33_BASE`` build option has to be |
| used when compiling TF-A. For example, the following command will create a FIP |
| without a BL33 and prepare to jump to a BL33 image loaded at address |
| 0x80000000: |
| |
| .. code:: shell |
| |
| make PRELOADED_BL33_BASE=0x80000000 PLAT=fvp all fip |
| |
| -------------- |
| |
| *Copyright (c) 2019, Arm Limited. All rights reserved.* |