docs/security_advisories/security-advisory-tfv-6.rst - filogic/atf - Gitiles

 Advisory TFV-6 (CVE-2017-5753, CVE-2017-5715, CVE-2017-5754)
 ============================================================

 +----------------+-------------------------------------------------------------+
 | Title          | Trusted Firmware-A exposure to speculative processor        |
 |                | vulnerabilities using cache timing side-channels            |
 +================+=============================================================+
 | CVE ID         | `CVE-2017-5753`_ / `CVE-2017-5715`_ / `CVE-2017-5754`_      |
 +----------------+-------------------------------------------------------------+
 | Date           | 03 Jan 2018 (Updated 11 Jan, 18 Jan, 26 Jan, 30 Jan and 07  |
 |                | June 2018)                                                  |
 +----------------+-------------------------------------------------------------+
 | Versions       | All, up to and including v1.4                               |
 | Affected       |                                                             |
 +----------------+-------------------------------------------------------------+
 | Configurations | All                                                         |
 | Affected       |                                                             |
 +----------------+-------------------------------------------------------------+
 | Impact         | Leakage of secure world data to normal world                |
 +----------------+-------------------------------------------------------------+
 | Fix Version    | `Pull Request #1214`_, `Pull Request #1228`_,               |
 |                | `Pull Request #1240`_ and `Pull Request #1405`_             |
 +----------------+-------------------------------------------------------------+
 | Credit         | Google / Arm                                                |
 +----------------+-------------------------------------------------------------+

 This security advisory describes the current understanding of the Trusted
 Firmware-A exposure to the speculative processor vulnerabilities identified by
 `Google Project Zero`_.  To understand the background and wider impact of these
 vulnerabilities on Arm systems, please refer to the `Arm Processor Security
 Update`_.

 Variant 1 (`CVE-2017-5753`_)
 ----------------------------

 At the time of writing, no vulnerable patterns have been observed in upstream TF
 code, therefore no workarounds have been applied or are planned.

 Variant 2 (`CVE-2017-5715`_)
 ----------------------------

 Where possible on vulnerable CPUs, Arm recommends invalidating the branch
 predictor as early as possible on entry into the secure world, before any branch
 instruction is executed. There are a number of implementation defined ways to
 achieve this.

 For Cortex-A57 and Cortex-A72 CPUs, the Pull Requests (PRs) in this advisory
 invalidate the branch predictor when entering EL3 by disabling and re-enabling
 the MMU.

 For Cortex-A73 and Cortex-A75 CPUs, the PRs in this advisory invalidate the
 branch predictor when entering EL3 by temporarily dropping into AArch32
 Secure-EL1 and executing the ``BPIALL`` instruction. This workaround is
 significantly more complex than the "MMU disable/enable" workaround. The latter
 is not effective at invalidating the branch predictor on Cortex-A73/Cortex-A75.

 Note that if other privileged software, for example a Rich OS kernel, implements
 its own branch predictor invalidation during context switch by issuing an SMC
 (to execute firmware branch predictor invalidation), then there is a dependency
 on the PRs in this advisory being deployed in order for those workarounds to
 work. If that other privileged software is able to workaround the vulnerability
 locally (for example by implementing "MMU disable/enable" itself), there is no
 such dependency.

 `Pull Request #1240`_ and `Pull Request #1405`_ optimise the earlier fixes by
 implementing a specified `CVE-2017-5715`_ workaround SMC
 (``SMCCC_ARCH_WORKAROUND_1``) for use by normal world privileged software. This
 is more efficient than calling an arbitrary SMC (for example ``PSCI_VERSION``).
 Details of ``SMCCC_ARCH_WORKAROUND_1`` can be found in the `CVE-2017-5715
 mitigation specification`_.  The specification and implementation also enable
 the normal world to discover the presence of this firmware service.

 On Juno R1 we measured the round trip latency for both the ``PSCI_VERSION`` and
 ``SMCCC_ARCH_WORKAROUND_1`` SMCs on Cortex-A57, using both the "MMU
 disable/enable" and "BPIALL at AArch32 Secure-EL1" workarounds described above.
 This includes the time spent in test code conforming to the SMC Calling
 Convention (SMCCC) from AArch64. For the ``SMCCC_ARCH_WORKAROUND_1`` cases, the
 test code uses SMCCC v1.1, which reduces the number of general purpose registers
 it needs to save/restore. Although the ``BPIALL`` instruction is not effective
 at invalidating the branch predictor on Cortex-A57, the drop into Secure-EL1
 with MMU disabled that this workaround entails effectively does invalidate the
 branch predictor. Hence this is a reasonable comparison.

 The results were as follows:

 +------------------------------------------------------------------+-----------+
 | Test                                                             | Time (ns) |
 +==================================================================+===========+
 | ``PSCI_VERSION`` baseline (without PRs in this advisory)         | 515       |
 +------------------------------------------------------------------+-----------+
 | ``PSCI_VERSION`` baseline (with PRs in this advisory)            | 527       |
 +------------------------------------------------------------------+-----------+
 | ``PSCI_VERSION`` with "MMU disable/enable"                       | 930       |
 +------------------------------------------------------------------+-----------+
 | ``SMCCC_ARCH_WORKAROUND_1`` with "MMU disable/enable"            | 386       |
 +------------------------------------------------------------------+-----------+
 | ``PSCI_VERSION`` with "BPIALL at AArch32 Secure-EL1"             | 1276      |
 +------------------------------------------------------------------+-----------+
 | ``SMCCC_ARCH_WORKAROUND_1`` with "BPIALL at AArch32 Secure-EL1"  | 770       |
 +------------------------------------------------------------------+-----------+

 Due to the high severity and wide applicability of this issue, the above
 workarounds are enabled by default (on vulnerable CPUs only), despite some
 performance and code size overhead. Platforms can choose to disable them at
 compile time if they do not require them. `Pull Request #1240`_ disables the
 workarounds for unaffected upstream platforms.

 For vulnerable AArch32-only CPUs (for example Cortex-A8, Cortex-A9 and
 Cortex-A17), the ``BPIALL`` instruction should be used as early as possible on
 entry into the secure world. For Cortex-A8, also set ``ACTLR[6]`` to 1 during
 early processor initialization. Note that the ``BPIALL`` instruction is not
 effective at invalidating the branch predictor on Cortex-A15. For that CPU, set
 ``ACTLR[0]`` to 1 during early processor initialization, and invalidate the
 branch predictor by performing an ``ICIALLU`` instruction.

 On AArch32 EL3 systems, the monitor and secure-SVC code is typically tightly
 integrated, for example as part of a Trusted OS. Therefore any Variant 2
 workaround should be provided by vendors of that software and is outside the
 scope of TF. However, an example implementation in the minimal AArch32 Secure
 Payload, ``SP_MIN`` is provided in `Pull Request #1228`_.

 Other Arm CPUs are not vulnerable to this or other variants. This includes
 Cortex-A76, Cortex-A53, Cortex-A55, Cortex-A32, Cortex-A7 and Cortex-A5.

 For more information about non-Arm CPUs, please contact the CPU vendor.

 Variant 3 (`CVE-2017-5754`_)
 ----------------------------

 This variant is only exploitable between Exception Levels within the same
 translation regime, for example between EL0 and EL1, therefore this variant
 cannot be used to access secure memory from the non-secure world, and is not
 applicable for TF. However, Secure Payloads (for example, Trusted OS) should
 provide mitigations on vulnerable CPUs to protect themselves from exploited
 Secure-EL0 applications.

 The only Arm CPU vulnerable to this variant is Cortex-A75.

 .. _Google Project Zero: https://googleprojectzero.blogspot.co.uk/2018/01/reading-privileged-memory-with-side.html
 .. _Arm Processor Security Update: http://www.arm.com/security-update
 .. _CVE-2017-5753: http://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2017-5753
 .. _CVE-2017-5715: http://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2017-5715
 .. _CVE-2017-5754: http://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2017-5754
 .. _Pull Request #1214: https://github.com/ARM-software/arm-trusted-firmware/pull/1214
 .. _Pull Request #1228: https://github.com/ARM-software/arm-trusted-firmware/pull/1228
 .. _Pull Request #1240: https://github.com/ARM-software/arm-trusted-firmware/pull/1240
 .. _Pull Request #1405: https://github.com/ARM-software/arm-trusted-firmware/pull/1405
 .. _CVE-2017-5715 mitigation specification: https://developer.arm.com/cache-speculation-vulnerability-firmware-specification
	Advisory TFV-6 (CVE-2017-5753, CVE-2017-5715, CVE-2017-5754)
	============================================================

	+----------------+-------------------------------------------------------------+
	\| Title \| Trusted Firmware-A exposure to speculative processor \|
	\| \| vulnerabilities using cache timing side-channels \|
	+================+=============================================================+
	\| CVE ID \| `CVE-2017-5753`_ / `CVE-2017-5715`_ / `CVE-2017-5754`_ \|
	+----------------+-------------------------------------------------------------+
	\| Date \| 03 Jan 2018 (Updated 11 Jan, 18 Jan, 26 Jan, 30 Jan and 07 \|
	\| \| June 2018) \|
	+----------------+-------------------------------------------------------------+
	\| Versions \| All, up to and including v1.4 \|
	\| Affected \| \|
	+----------------+-------------------------------------------------------------+
	\| Configurations \| All \|
	\| Affected \| \|
	+----------------+-------------------------------------------------------------+
	\| Impact \| Leakage of secure world data to normal world \|
	+----------------+-------------------------------------------------------------+
	\| Fix Version \| `Pull Request #1214`_, `Pull Request #1228`_, \|
	\| \| `Pull Request #1240`_ and `Pull Request #1405`_ \|
	+----------------+-------------------------------------------------------------+
	\| Credit \| Google / Arm \|
	+----------------+-------------------------------------------------------------+

	This security advisory describes the current understanding of the Trusted
	Firmware-A exposure to the speculative processor vulnerabilities identified by
	`Google Project Zero`_. To understand the background and wider impact of these
	vulnerabilities on Arm systems, please refer to the `Arm Processor Security
	Update`_.

	Variant 1 (`CVE-2017-5753`_)
	----------------------------

	At the time of writing, no vulnerable patterns have been observed in upstream TF
	code, therefore no workarounds have been applied or are planned.

	Variant 2 (`CVE-2017-5715`_)
	----------------------------

	Where possible on vulnerable CPUs, Arm recommends invalidating the branch
	predictor as early as possible on entry into the secure world, before any branch
	instruction is executed. There are a number of implementation defined ways to
	achieve this.

	For Cortex-A57 and Cortex-A72 CPUs, the Pull Requests (PRs) in this advisory
	invalidate the branch predictor when entering EL3 by disabling and re-enabling
	the MMU.

	For Cortex-A73 and Cortex-A75 CPUs, the PRs in this advisory invalidate the
	branch predictor when entering EL3 by temporarily dropping into AArch32
	Secure-EL1 and executing the ``BPIALL`` instruction. This workaround is
	significantly more complex than the "MMU disable/enable" workaround. The latter
	is not effective at invalidating the branch predictor on Cortex-A73/Cortex-A75.

	Note that if other privileged software, for example a Rich OS kernel, implements
	its own branch predictor invalidation during context switch by issuing an SMC
	(to execute firmware branch predictor invalidation), then there is a dependency
	on the PRs in this advisory being deployed in order for those workarounds to
	work. If that other privileged software is able to workaround the vulnerability
	locally (for example by implementing "MMU disable/enable" itself), there is no
	such dependency.

	`Pull Request #1240`_ and `Pull Request #1405`_ optimise the earlier fixes by
	implementing a specified `CVE-2017-5715`_ workaround SMC
	(``SMCCC_ARCH_WORKAROUND_1``) for use by normal world privileged software. This
	is more efficient than calling an arbitrary SMC (for example ``PSCI_VERSION``).
	Details of ``SMCCC_ARCH_WORKAROUND_1`` can be found in the `CVE-2017-5715
	mitigation specification`_. The specification and implementation also enable
	the normal world to discover the presence of this firmware service.

	On Juno R1 we measured the round trip latency for both the ``PSCI_VERSION`` and
	``SMCCC_ARCH_WORKAROUND_1`` SMCs on Cortex-A57, using both the "MMU
	disable/enable" and "BPIALL at AArch32 Secure-EL1" workarounds described above.
	This includes the time spent in test code conforming to the SMC Calling
	Convention (SMCCC) from AArch64. For the ``SMCCC_ARCH_WORKAROUND_1`` cases, the
	test code uses SMCCC v1.1, which reduces the number of general purpose registers
	it needs to save/restore. Although the ``BPIALL`` instruction is not effective
	at invalidating the branch predictor on Cortex-A57, the drop into Secure-EL1
	with MMU disabled that this workaround entails effectively does invalidate the
	branch predictor. Hence this is a reasonable comparison.

	The results were as follows:

	+------------------------------------------------------------------+-----------+
	\| Test \| Time (ns) \|
	+==================================================================+===========+
	\| ``PSCI_VERSION`` baseline (without PRs in this advisory) \| 515 \|
	+------------------------------------------------------------------+-----------+
	\| ``PSCI_VERSION`` baseline (with PRs in this advisory) \| 527 \|
	+------------------------------------------------------------------+-----------+
	\| ``PSCI_VERSION`` with "MMU disable/enable" \| 930 \|
	+------------------------------------------------------------------+-----------+
	\| ``SMCCC_ARCH_WORKAROUND_1`` with "MMU disable/enable" \| 386 \|
	+------------------------------------------------------------------+-----------+
	\| ``PSCI_VERSION`` with "BPIALL at AArch32 Secure-EL1" \| 1276 \|
	+------------------------------------------------------------------+-----------+
	\| ``SMCCC_ARCH_WORKAROUND_1`` with "BPIALL at AArch32 Secure-EL1" \| 770 \|
	+------------------------------------------------------------------+-----------+

	Due to the high severity and wide applicability of this issue, the above
	workarounds are enabled by default (on vulnerable CPUs only), despite some
	performance and code size overhead. Platforms can choose to disable them at
	compile time if they do not require them. `Pull Request #1240`_ disables the
	workarounds for unaffected upstream platforms.

	For vulnerable AArch32-only CPUs (for example Cortex-A8, Cortex-A9 and
	Cortex-A17), the ``BPIALL`` instruction should be used as early as possible on
	entry into the secure world. For Cortex-A8, also set ``ACTLR[6]`` to 1 during
	early processor initialization. Note that the ``BPIALL`` instruction is not
	effective at invalidating the branch predictor on Cortex-A15. For that CPU, set
	``ACTLR[0]`` to 1 during early processor initialization, and invalidate the
	branch predictor by performing an ``ICIALLU`` instruction.

	On AArch32 EL3 systems, the monitor and secure-SVC code is typically tightly
	integrated, for example as part of a Trusted OS. Therefore any Variant 2
	workaround should be provided by vendors of that software and is outside the
	scope of TF. However, an example implementation in the minimal AArch32 Secure
	Payload, ``SP_MIN`` is provided in `Pull Request #1228`_.

	Other Arm CPUs are not vulnerable to this or other variants. This includes
	Cortex-A76, Cortex-A53, Cortex-A55, Cortex-A32, Cortex-A7 and Cortex-A5.

	For more information about non-Arm CPUs, please contact the CPU vendor.

	Variant 3 (`CVE-2017-5754`_)
	----------------------------

	This variant is only exploitable between Exception Levels within the same
	translation regime, for example between EL0 and EL1, therefore this variant
	cannot be used to access secure memory from the non-secure world, and is not
	applicable for TF. However, Secure Payloads (for example, Trusted OS) should
	provide mitigations on vulnerable CPUs to protect themselves from exploited
	Secure-EL0 applications.

	The only Arm CPU vulnerable to this variant is Cortex-A75.

	.. _Google Project Zero: https://googleprojectzero.blogspot.co.uk/2018/01/reading-privileged-memory-with-side.html
	.. _Arm Processor Security Update: http://www.arm.com/security-update
	.. _CVE-2017-5753: http://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2017-5753
	.. _CVE-2017-5715: http://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2017-5715
	.. _CVE-2017-5754: http://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2017-5754
	.. _Pull Request #1214: https://github.com/ARM-software/arm-trusted-firmware/pull/1214
	.. _Pull Request #1228: https://github.com/ARM-software/arm-trusted-firmware/pull/1228
	.. _Pull Request #1240: https://github.com/ARM-software/arm-trusted-firmware/pull/1240
	.. _Pull Request #1405: https://github.com/ARM-software/arm-trusted-firmware/pull/1405
	.. _CVE-2017-5715 mitigation specification: https://developer.arm.com/cache-speculation-vulnerability-firmware-specification