OPTIM: dns: use an atomic check for the list membership
The crash that was fixed by commit 7045590d8 ("BUG/MAJOR: dns: attempt
to lock globaly for msg waiter list instead of use barrier") was now
completely analysed and confirmed to be partially a result of the
debugging code added to LIST_INLIST(), which was looking at both
pointers and their reciprocals, and that, if used in a concurrent
context, could perfectly return false if a neighbor was being added or
removed while the current one didn't change, allowing the LIST_APPEND
to fail.
As the LIST API was not designed to be used in a concurrent context,
we should not rely on LIST_INLIST() but on the newly introduced
LIST_INLIST_ATOMIC().
This patch simply reverts the commit above to switch to the new test,
saving a lock during potentially long operations. It was verified that
the check doesn't fail anymore.
It is unsure what the performance impact of the fix above could be in
some contexts. If any performance regression is observed, it could make
sense to backport this patch, along with the previous commit introducing
the LIST_INLIST_ATOMIC() macro.
diff --git a/src/dns.c b/src/dns.c
index 1f03dee..818c4e7 100644
--- a/src/dns.c
+++ b/src/dns.c
@@ -175,9 +175,21 @@
ds->rx_msg.len = 0;
+ /* This barrier is here to ensure that all data is
+ * stored if the appctx detect the elem is out of the
+ * list.
+ */
+ __ha_barrier_store();
+
LIST_DEL_INIT(&ds->waiter);
if (ds->appctx) {
+ /* This second barrier is here to ensure that
+ * the waked up appctx won't miss that the elem
+ * is removed from the list.
+ */
+ __ha_barrier_store();
+
/* awake appctx because it may have other
* message to receive
*/
@@ -618,10 +630,8 @@
* delete from the list
*/
- /* lock the dns_stream_server containing lists heads */
- HA_SPIN_LOCK(DNS_LOCK, &ds->dss->lock);
-
- if (!LIST_INLIST(&ds->waiter)) {
+ __ha_barrier_load();
+ if (!LIST_INLIST_ATOMIC(&ds->waiter)) {
while (1) {
uint16_t query_id;
struct eb32_node *eb;
@@ -700,9 +710,13 @@
* wait_sess list where the task processing
* response will pop available responses
*/
+ HA_SPIN_LOCK(DNS_LOCK, &ds->dss->lock);
+
BUG_ON(LIST_INLIST(&ds->waiter));
LIST_APPEND(&ds->dss->wait_sess, &ds->waiter);
+ HA_SPIN_UNLOCK(DNS_LOCK, &ds->dss->lock);
+
/* awake the task processing the responses */
task_wakeup(ds->dss->task_rsp, TASK_WOKEN_INIT);
@@ -712,14 +726,12 @@
if (!LIST_INLIST(&ds->waiter)) {
/* there is no more pending data to read and the con was closed by the server side */
if (!co_data(si_oc(si)) && (si_oc(si)->flags & CF_SHUTW)) {
- HA_SPIN_UNLOCK(DNS_LOCK, &ds->dss->lock);
goto close;
}
}
}
- HA_SPIN_UNLOCK(DNS_LOCK, &ds->dss->lock);
return;
close:
si_shutw(si);