[MEDIUM] http: don't use trash to realign large buffers
The trash buffer may now be smaller than a buffer because we can tune
it at run time. This causes a risk when we're trying to use it as a
temporary buffer to realign unaligned requests, because we may have to
put up to a full buffer into it.
Instead of doing a double copy, we're now relying on an open-coded
bouncing copy algorithm. The principle is that we move one byte at
a time to its final place, and if that place also holds a byte, then
we move it too, and so on. We finish when we've moved all the buffer.
It limits the number of memory accesses, but since it proceeds one
byte at a time and with random walk, it's not cache friendly and
should be slower than a double copy. However, it's only used in
extreme situations and the difference will not be noticeable.
It has been extensively tested and works reliably.
3 files changed