DOC: internals: document the pools architecture and API

The purpose here is to explain how memory pools work, what their
architecture is depending on the build options (4 possible combinations),
and how the various build options affect their behavior.

Two pool-specific macros that were previously documented in initcalls
were moved to pools.txt.
diff --git a/doc/internals/api/initcalls.txt b/doc/internals/api/initcalls.txt
index 3a7b14b..b52c4ab 100644
--- a/doc/internals/api/initcalls.txt
+++ b/doc/internals/api/initcalls.txt
@@ -310,8 +310,7 @@
 
   Used internally to declare a new pool. This is made by calling function
   create_pool_callback() with these arguments at stage STG_POOL. Do not use it
-  directly, use either DECLARE_POOL() or DECLARE_STATIC_POOL() instead (see
-  below).
+  directly, use either DECLARE_POOL() or DECLARE_STATIC_POOL() instead.
 
 - REGISTER_POST_CHECK(fct)
 
@@ -337,30 +336,3 @@
 
   Registers a call to register_server_deinit(fct) at stage STG_REGISTER.
 
-
-6. Other initialization macros
-
-On top of the INITCALL family of macros, a few other convenient macros were
-created in order to simplify declarations or allocations:
-
-- DECLARE_POOL(ptr, name, size)
-
-  Placed at the top level of a file, this declares a global memory pool as
-  variable <ptr>, name <name> and size <size> bytes per element. This is made
-  via a call to REGISTER_POOL() and by assigning the resulting pointer to
-  variable <ptr>. <ptr> will be created of type "struct pool_head *". If the
-  pool needs to be visible outside of the function (which is likely), it will
-  also need to be declared somewhere as "extern struct pool_head *<ptr>;". It
-  is recommended to place such declarations very early in the source file so
-  that the variable is already known to all subsequent functions which may use
-  it.
-
-- DECLARE_STATIC_POOL(ptr, name, size)
-
-  Placed at the top level of a file, this declares a static memory pool as
-  variable <ptr>, name <name> and size <size> bytes per element. This is made
-  via a call to REGISTER_POOL() and by assigning the resulting pointer to local
-  variable <ptr>. <ptr> will be created of type "static struct pool_head *". It
-  is recommended to place such declarations very early in the source file so
-  that the variable is already known to all subsequent functions which may use
-  it.
diff --git a/doc/internals/api/pools.txt b/doc/internals/api/pools.txt
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..381cf95
--- /dev/null
+++ b/doc/internals/api/pools.txt
@@ -0,0 +1,525 @@
+2022-01-04 - Pools structure and API
+
+1. Background
+-------------
+
+Memory allocation is a complex problem covered by a massive amount of
+literature. Memory allocators found in field cover a broad spectrum of
+capabilities, performance, fragmentation, efficiency etc.
+
+The main difficulty of memory allocation comes from finding the optimal chunks
+for arbitrary sized requests, that will still preserve a low fragmentation
+level. Doing this well is often expensive in CPU usage and/or memory usage.
+
+In programs like HAProxy that deal with a large number of fixed size objects,
+there is no point having to endure all this risk of fragmentation, and the
+associated costs (sometimes up to several milliseconds with certain minimalist
+allocators) are simply not acceptable. A better approach consists in grouping
+frequently used objects by size, knowing that due to the high repetitiveness of
+operations, a freed object will immediately be needed for another operation.
+
+This grouping of objects by size is what is called a pool. Pools are created
+for certain frequently allocated objects, are usually merged together when they
+are of the same size (or almost the same size), and significantly reduce the
+number of calls to the memory allocator.
+
+With the arrival of threads, pools started to become a bottleneck so they now
+implement an optional thread-local lockless cache. Finally with the arrival of
+really efficient memory allocator in modern operating systems, the shared part
+has also become optional so that it doesn't consume memory if it does not bring
+any value.
+
+
+2. Principles
+-------------
+
+The pools architecture is selected at build time. The main options are:
+
+  - thread-local caches and process-wide shared pool enabled (1)
+
+    This is the default situation on most operating systems. Each thread has
+    its own local cache, and when depleted it refills from the process-wide
+    pool that avoids calling the standard allocator too often. It is possible
+    to force this mode at build time by setting CONFIG_HAP_GLOBAL_POOLS.
+
+  - thread-local caches only are enabled (2)
+
+    This is the situation on operating systems where a fast and modern memory
+    allocator is detected and when it is estimated that the process-wide shared
+    pool will not bring any benefit. This detection is automatic at build time,
+    but may also be forced at build tmie by setting CONFIG_HAP_NO_GLOBAL_POOLS.
+
+  - pass-through to the standard allocator (3)
+
+    This is used when one absolutely wants to disable pools and rely on regular
+    malloc() and free() calls, essentially in order to trace memory allocations
+    by call points, either internally via DEBUG_MEM_STATS, or externally via
+    tools such as Valgrind. This mode of operation may be forced at build time
+    by setting DEBUG_NO_POOLS.
+
+  - pass-through to an mmap-based allocator for debugging (4)
+
+    This is used only during deep debugging when trying to detect various
+    conditions such as use-after-free. In this case each allocated object's
+    size is rounded up to a multiple of a page size (4096 bytes) and an
+    integral number of pages is allocated for each object using mmap(),
+    surrounded by two unaccessible holes that aim to detect some out-of-bounds
+    accesses. Released objects are instantly freed using munmap() so that any
+    immediate subsequent access to the memory area crashes the process if the
+    area had not been reallocated yet. This mode can be enabled at build time
+    by setting DEBUG_UAF. It tends to consume a lot of memory and not to scale
+    at all with concurrent calls, that tends to make the system stall. The
+    watchdog may even trigger on some slow allocations.
+
+There are no more provisions for running with a shared pool but no thread-local
+cache: the shared pool's main goal is to compensate for the expensive calls to
+the memory allocator. This gain may be huge on tiny systems using basic
+allocators, but the thread-local cache will already achieve this. And on larger
+threaded systems, the shared pool's benefit is visible when the underlying
+allocator scales poorly, but in this case the shared pool would suffer from
+the same limitations without its thread-local cache and wouldn't provide any
+benefit.
+
+Summary of the various operation modes:
+
+                  (1)            (2)            (3)            (4)
+
+                  User           User           User           User
+                   |              |              |              |
+      pool_alloc() V              V              |              |
+              +---------+    +---------+         |              |
+              | Thread  |    | Thread  |         |              |
+              |  Local  |    |  Local  |         |              |
+              |  Cache  |    |  Cache  |         |              |
+              +---------+    +---------+         |              |
+                   |              |              |              |
+    pool_refill*() V              |              |              |
+              +---------+         |              |              |
+              | Shared  |         |              |              |
+              |  Pool   |         |              |              |
+              +---------+         |              |              |
+                   |              |              |              |
+          malloc() V              V              V              |
+              +---------+    +---------+    +---------+         |
+              | Library |    | Library |    | Library |         |
+              +---------+    +---------+    +---------+         |
+                   |              |              |              |
+            mmap() V              V              V              V
+              +---------+    +---------+    +---------+    +---------+
+              |   OS    |    |   OS    |    |   OS    |    |   OS    |
+              +---------+    +---------+    +---------+    +---------+
+
+One extra build define, DEBUG_FAIL_ALLOC, is used to enforce random allocation
+failure in pool_alloc() by randomly returning NULL, to test that callers
+properly handle allocation failures. In this case the desired average rate of
+allocation failures can be fixed by global setting "tune.fail-alloc" expressed
+in percent.
+
+The thread-local caches contain the freshest objects whose total size amounts
+to CONFIG_HAP_POOL_CACHE_SIZE bytes, which is typically was 1MB before 2.6 and
+is 512kB after. The aim is to keep hot objects that still fit in the CPU core's
+private L2 cache. Once these objects do not fit into the cache anymore, there's
+no benefit keeping them local to the thread, so they'd rather be returned to
+the shared pool or the main allocator so that any other thread may make use of
+them.
+
+
+3. Storage in thread-local caches
+---------------------------------
+
+This section describes how objects are linked in thread local caches. This is
+not meant to be a concern for users of the pools API but it can be useful when
+inspecting post-mortem dumps or when trying to figure certain size constraints.
+
+Objects are stored in the local cache using a doubly-linked list. This ensures
+that they can be visited by freshness order like a stack, while at the same
+time being able to access them from oldest to newest when it is needed to
+evict coldest ones first:
+
+  - releasing an object to the cache always puts it on the top.
+
+  - allocating an object from the cache always takes the topmost one, hence the
+    freshest one.
+
+  - scanning for older objects to evict starts from the bottom, where the
+    oldest ones are located
+
+To that end, each thread-local cache keeps a list head in the "list" member of
+its "pool_cache_head" descriptor, that links all objects cast to type
+"pool_cache_item" via their "by_pool" member.
+
+Note that the mechanism described above only works for a single pool. When
+trying to limit the total cache size to a certain value, all pools included,
+there is also a need to arrange all objects from all pools together in the
+local caches. For this, each thread_ctx maintains a list head of recently
+released objects, all pools included, in its member "pool_lru_head". All items
+in a thread-local cache are linked there via their "by_lru" member.
+
+This means that releasing an object using pool_free() consists in inserting
+it at the beginning of two lists:
+  - the local pool_cache_head's "list" list head
+  - the thread context's "pool_lru_head" list head
+
+Allocating an object consists in picking the first entry from the pool's "list"
+and deleting its "by_pool" and "by_lru" links.
+
+Evicting an object consists in scanning the thread context's "pool_lru_head"
+backwards and deleting the object's "by_pool" and "by_lru" links.
+
+Given that entries are both inserted and removed synchronously, we have the
+guarantee that the oldest object in the thread's LRU list is always the oldest
+object in its pool, and that the next element is the cache's list head. This is
+what allows the LRU eviction mechanism to figure what pool an object belongs to
+when releasing it.
+
+Note:
+ | Since a pool_cache_item has two list entries, on 64-bit systems it will be
+ | 32-bytes long. This is the smallest size that a pool may be, and any smaller
+ | size will automatically be rounded up to this size.
+
+When build option DEBUG_MEMORY_POOLS is set, pool objects and allocated with
+one extra pointer compared to the requested size, so that the bytes that follow
+the memory area point to the pool descriptor itself as long as the object is
+allocated via pool_alloc(). Upon releasing via pool_free(), the pointer is
+compared and the code will crash in if it differs. This allows to detect both
+memory overflows and object released to the wrong pool (code bug resulting from
+a copy-paste error typically).
+
+Thus an object will look like this depending whether it's in the cache or is
+currently in use:
+
+             in cache                 in use
+          +------------+          +------------+
+       <--+  by_pool.p |          |   N bytes  |
+          |  by_pool.n +-->       |            |
+          +------------+          |N=16 min on |
+       <--+  by_lru.p  |          |  32-bit,   |
+          |  by_lru.n  +-->       |  32 min on |
+          +------------+          |  64-bit    |
+          :            :          :            :
+          |   N bytes  |          |            |
+          +------------+          +------------+ \   optional, only if
+          :  (unused)  :          :  pool ptr  :  >  DEBUG_MEMORY_POOLS
+          +------------+          +------------+ /   is set at build time
+
+Right now no provisions are made to return objects aligned on larger boundaries
+than those currently covered by malloc() (i.e. two pointers). This need appears
+from time to time and the layout above might evolve a little bit if needed.
+
+
+4. Storage in the process-wide shared pool
+------------------------------------------
+
+In order for the shared pool not to be a contention point in a multi-threaded
+environment, objects are allocated from or released to shared pools by clusters
+of a few objects at once. The maximum number of objects that may be moved to or
+from a shared pool at once is defined by CONFIG_HAP_POOL_CLUSTER_SIZE at build
+time, and currently defaults to 8.
+
+In order to remain scalable, the shared pool has to make some tradeoffs to
+limit the number of atomic operations and the duration of any locked operation.
+As such, it's composed of a single-linked list of clusters, themselves made of
+a single-linked list of objects.
+
+Clusters and objects are of the same type "pool_item" and are accessed from the
+pool's "free_list" member. This member points to the latest pool_item inserted
+into the pool by a release operation. And the pool_item's "next" member points
+to the next pool_item, which was the one present in the pool's free_list just
+before the pool_item was inserted, and the last pool_item in the list simply
+has a NULL "next" field.
+
+The pool_item's "down" pointer points down to the next objects part of the same
+cluster, that will be released or allocated at the same time as the first one.
+Each of these items also has a NULL "next" field, and are chained by their
+respective "down" pointers until the last one is detected by a NULL value.
+
+This results in the following layout:
+
+      pool           pool_item   pool_item   pool_item
+    +-----------+    +------+    +------+    +------+
+    | free_list +--> | next +--> | next +--> | NULL |
+    +-----------+    +------+    +------+    +------+
+                     | down |    | NULL |    | down |
+                     +--+---+    +------+    +--+---+
+                        |                       |
+                        V                       V
+                     +------+                +------+
+                     | NULL |                | NULL |
+                     +------+                +------+
+                     | down |                | NULL |
+                     +--+---+                +------+
+                        |
+                        V
+                     +------+
+                     | NULL |
+                     +------+
+                     | NULL |
+                     +------+
+
+Allocating an entry is only a matter of performing two atomic allocations on
+the free_list and reading the pool's "next" value:
+
+  - atomically mark the free_list as being updated by writing a "magic" pointer
+  - read the first pool_item's "next" field
+  - atomically replace the free_list with this value
+
+This results in a fast operation that instantly retrieves a cluster at once.
+Then outside of the critical section entries are walked over and inserted into
+the local cache one at a time. In order to keep the code simple and efficient,
+objects allocated from the shared pool are all placed into the local cache, and
+only then the first one is allocated from the cache. This operation is
+performed by the dedicated function pool_refill_local_from_shared() which is
+called from pool_get_from_cache() when the cache is empty. It means there is an
+overhead of two list insert/delete operations for the first object and that
+could be avoided at the expense of more complex code in the fast path, but this
+is negligible since it only concerns objects that need to be visited anyway.
+
+Freeing a group of objects consists in performing the operation the other way
+around:
+
+  - atomically mark the free_list as being updated by writing a "magic" pointer
+  - write the free_list value to the to-be-released item's "next" entry
+  - atomically replace the free_list with the pool_item's pointer
+
+The cluster will simply have to be prepared before being sent to the shared
+pool. The operation of releasing a cluster at once is performed by function
+pool_put_to_shared_cache() which is called from pool_evict_last_items() which
+itself is responsible for building the clusters.
+
+Due to the way objects are stored, it is important to try to group objects as
+much as possible when releasing them because this is what will condition their
+retrieval as groups as well. This is the reason why pool_evict_last_items()
+uses the LRU to find a first entry but tries to pick several items at once from
+a single cache. Tests have shown that CONFIG_HAP_POOL_CLUSTER_SIZE set to 8
+achieves up to 6-6.5 objects on average per operation, which effectively
+divides by as much the average time spent per object by each thread and pushes
+the contention point further.
+
+Also, grouping items in clusters is a property of the process-wide shared pool
+and not of the thread-local caches. This means that there is no grouped
+operation when not using the shared pool (mode "2" in the diagram above).
+
+
+5. API
+------
+
+The following functions are public and available for user code:
+
+struct pool_head *create_pool(char *name, uint size, uint flags)
+        Create a new pool named <name> for objects of size <size> bytes. Pool
+        names are truncated to their first 11 characters. Pools of very similar
+        size will usually be merged if both have set the flag MEM_F_SHARED in
+        <flags>. When DEBUG_DONT_SHARE_POOLS was set at build time, the pools
+        also need to have the exact same name to be merged. In addition, unless
+        MEM_F_EXACT is set in <flags>, the object size will usually be rounded
+        up to the size of pointers (16 or 32 bytes). The name that will appear
+        in the pool upon merging is the name of the first created pool. The
+        returned pointer is the new (or reused) pool head, or NULL upon error.
+        Pools created this way must be destroyed using pool_destroy().
+
+void *pool_destroy(struct pool_head *pool)
+        Destroy pool <pool>, that is, all of its unused objects are freed and
+        the structure is freed as well if the pool didn't have any used objects
+        anymore. In this case NULL is returned. If some objects remain in use,
+        the pool is preserved and its pointer is returned. This ought to be
+        used essentially on exit or in rare situations where some internal
+        entities that hold pools have to be destroyed.
+
+void pool_destroy_all(void)
+        Destroy all pools, without checking which ones still have used entries.
+        This is only meant for use on exit.
+
+void *__pool_alloc(struct pool_head *pool, uint flags)
+        Allocate an entry from the pool <pool>. The allocator will first look
+        for an object in the thread-local cache if enabled, then in the shared
+        pool if enabled, then will fall back to the operating system's default
+        allocator. NULL is returned if the object couldn't be allocated (due to
+        configured limits or lack of memory). Object allocated this way have to
+        be released using pool_free(). Like with malloc(), by default the
+        contents of the returned object are undefined. If memory poisonning is
+        enabled, the object will be filled with the poisonning byte. If the
+        global "pool.fail-alloc" setting is non-zero and DEBUG_FAIL_ALLOC is
+        enabled, a random number generator will be called to randomly return a
+        NULL. The allocator's behavior may be adjusted using a few flags passed
+        in <flags>:
+           - POOL_F_NO_POISON : when set, disables memory poisonning (e.g. when
+             pointless and expensive, like for buffers)
+           - POOL_F_MUST_ZERO : when set, the memory area will be zeroed before
+             being returned, similar to what calloc() does
+           - POOL_F_NO_FAIL : when set, disables the random allocation failure,
+             e.g. for use during early init code or critical sections.
+
+void *pool_alloc(struct pool_head *pool)
+        This is an exact equivalent of __pool_alloc(pool, 0). It is the regular
+        way to allocate entries from a pool.
+
+void *pool_alloc_nocache(struct pool_head *pool)
+        Allocate an entry from the pool <pool>, bypassing the cache. If shared
+        pools are enabled, they will be consulted first. Otherwise the object
+        is allocated using the operating system's default allocator. This is
+        essentially used during early boot to pre-allocate a number of objects
+        for pools which require a minimum number of entries to exist.
+
+void *pool_zalloc(struct pool_head *pool)
+        This is an exact equivalent of __pool_alloc(pool, POOL_F_MUST_ZERO).
+
+void pool_free(struct pool_head *pool, void *ptr)
+        Free an entry allocate from one of the pool_alloc() functions above
+        from pool <pool>. The object will be placed into the thread-local cache
+        if enabled, or in the shared pool if enabled, or will be released using
+        the operating system's default allocator. When memory poisonning is
+        enabled, the area will be overwritten before being released. This can
+        sometimes help detect use-after-free conditions. When a local cache is
+        enabled, if the local cache size becomes larger than 75% of the maximum
+        size configured at build time, some objects will be evicted to the
+        shared pool. Such objects are taken first from the same pool, but if
+        the total size is really huge, other pools might be checked as well.
+        Some extra checks enabled at build time may enforce extra checks so
+        that the process will immediately crash if the object was not allocated
+        from this pool or experienced an overflow or some memory corruption.
+
+void pool_flush(struct pool_head *pool)
+        Free all unused objects from shared pool <pool>. Thread-local caches
+        are not affected. This is essentially used when running low on memory
+        or when stopping, in order to release a maximum amount of memory for
+        the new process.
+
+void pool_gc(struct pool_head *pool)
+        Free all unused objects from all pools, but respecting the minimum
+        number of spare objects required for each of them. Then, for operating
+        systems which support it, indicate the system that all unused memory
+        can be released. Thread-local caches are not affected. This operation
+        differs from pool_flush() in that it is run locklessly, under thread
+        isolation, and on all pools in a row. It is called by the SIGQUIT
+        signal handler and upon exit. Note that the obsolete argument <pool> is
+        not used and the convention is to pass NULL there.
+
+void dump_pools_to_trash(void)
+        Dump the current status of all pools into the trash buffer. This is
+        essentially used by the "show pools" CLI command or the SIGQUIT signal
+        handler to dump them on stderr. The total report size may not exceed
+        the size of the trash buffer. If it does, some entries will be missing.
+
+void dump_pools(void)
+        Dump the current status of all pools to stderr. This just calls
+        dump_pools_to_trash() and writes the trash to stderr.
+
+int pool_total_failures(void)
+        Report the total number of failed allocations. This is solely used to
+        report the "PoolFailed" metrics of the "show info" output. The total
+        is calculated on the fly by summing the number of failures in all pools
+        and is only meant to be used as an indicator rather than a precise
+        measure.
+
+ulong pool_total_allocated(void)
+        Report the total number of bytes allocated in all pools, for reporting
+        in the "PoolAlloc_MB" field of the "show info" output. The total is
+        calculated on the fly by summing the number of allocated bytes in all
+        pools and is only meant to be used as an indicator rather than a
+        precise measure.
+
+ulong pool_total_used(void)
+        Report the total number of bytes used in all pools, for reporting in
+        the "PoolUsed_MB" field of the "show info" output. The total is
+        calculated on the fly by summing the number of used bytes in all pools
+        and is only meant to be used as an indicator rather than a precise
+        measure. Note that objects present in caches are accounted as used.
+
+Some other functions exist and are only used by the pools code itself. While
+not strictly forbidden to use outside of this code, it is generally recommended
+to avoid touching them in order not to create undesired dependencies that will
+complicate maintenance.
+
+A few macros exist to ease the declaration of pools:
+
+DECLARE_POOL(ptr, name, size)
+        Placed at the top level of a file, this declares a global memory pool
+        as variable <ptr>, name <name> and size <size> bytes per element. This
+        is made via a call to REGISTER_POOL() and by assigning the resulting
+        pointer to variable <ptr>. <ptr> will be created of type "struct
+        pool_head *". If the pool needs to be visible outside of the function
+        (which is likely), it will also need to be declared somewhere as
+        "extern struct pool_head *<ptr>;". It is recommended to place such
+        declarations very early in the source file so that the variable is
+        already known to all subsequent functions which may use it.
+
+DECLARE_STATIC_POOL(ptr, name, size)
+        Placed at the top level of a file, this declares a static memory pool
+        as variable <ptr>, name <name> and size <size> bytes per element. This
+        is made via a call to REGISTER_POOL() and by assigning the resulting
+        pointer to local variable <ptr>. <ptr> will be created of type "static
+        struct pool_head *". It is recommended to place such declarations very
+        early in the source file so that the variable is already known to all
+        subsequent functions which may use it.
+
+
+6. Build options
+----------------
+
+A number of build-time defines allow to tune the pools behavior. All of them
+have to be enabled using "-Dxxx" or "-Dxxx=yyy" in the makefile's DEBUG
+variable.
+
+DEBUG_NO_POOLS
+        When this is set, pools are entirely disabled, and allocations are made
+        using malloc() instead. This is not recommended for production but may
+        be useful for tracing allocations.
+
+DEBUG_MEMORY_POOLS
+        When this is set, an extra pointer is allocated at the end of each
+        object to reference the pool the object was allocated from and detect
+        buffer overflows. Then, pool_free() will provoke a crash in case it
+        detects an anomaly (pointer at the end not matching the pool).
+
+DEBUG_FAIL_ALLOC
+        When enabled, a global setting "tune.fail-alloc" may be set to a non-
+        zero value representing a percentage of memory allocations that will be
+        made to fail in order to stress the calling code.
+
+DEBUG_DONT_SHARE_POOLS
+        When enabled, pools of similar sizes are not merged unless the have the
+        exact same name.
+
+DEBUG_UAF
+        When enabled, pools are disabled and all allocations and releases pass
+        through mmap() and munmap(). The memory usage significantly inflates
+        and the performance degrades, but this allows to detect a lot of
+        use-after-free conditions by crashing the program at the first abnormal
+        access. This should not be used in production.
+
+DEBUG_MEM_STATS
+        When enabled, all malloc/calloc/realloc/strdup/free calls are accounted
+        for per call place (file+line number), and may be displayed or reset on
+        the CLI using "debug dev memstats". This is essentially used to detect
+        potential leaks or abnormal usages. When pools are enabled (default),
+        such calls are rare and the output will mostly contain calls induced by
+        libraries. When pools are disabled, about all calls to pool_alloc() and
+        pool_free() will also appear since they will be remapped to standard
+        functions.
+
+CONFIG_HAP_GLOBAL_POOLS
+        When enabled, process-wide shared pools will be forcefully enabled even
+        if not considered useful on the platform. The default is to let haproxy
+        decide based on the OS and C library.
+
+CONFIG_HAP_NO_GLOBAL_POOLS
+        When enabled, process-wide shared pools will be forcefully disabled
+        even if considered useful on the platform. The default is to let
+        haproxy decide based on the OS and C library.
+
+CONFIG_HAP_POOL_CACHE_SIZE
+        This allows one to define the size of the per-thread cache, in bytes.
+        The default value is 512 kB (524288). Smaller values will use less
+        memory at the expense of a possibly higher CPU usage when using many
+        threads. Higher values will give diminishing returns on performance
+        while using much more memory. Usually there is no benefit in using
+        more than a per-core L2 cache size. It would be better not to set this
+        value lower than a few times the size of a buffer (bufsize, defaults to
+        16 kB).
+
+CONFIG_HAP_POOL_CLUSTER_SIZE
+        This allows one to define the maximum number of objects that will be
+        groupped together in an allocation from the shared pool. Values 4 to 8
+        have experimentally shown good results with 16 threads. On systems with
+        more cores or losely coupled caches exhibiting slow atomic operations,
+        it could possibly make sense to slightly increase this value.