BUG/MINOR: checks: tcp-check actions are enums, not flags

In recent commit 5ecb77f (MEDIUM: checks: add send/expect tcp based check),
bitfields were mistakenly used at some places for the actions. Fortunately,
the only two actions right now are 1 and 2 so they don't share any bit in
common and the bug has no impact.

No backport is needed.
diff --git a/include/types/checks.h b/include/types/checks.h
index d7d9725..956df3a 100644
--- a/include/types/checks.h
+++ b/include/types/checks.h
@@ -106,9 +106,9 @@
 	unsigned char lr[HANA_OBS_SIZE];	/* result for l4/l7: 0 = ignore, 1 - error, 2 - OK */
 };
 
-/* bits for tcpcheck_rule->action */
+/* possible actions for tcpcheck_rule->action */
 enum {
-	TCPCHK_ACT_SEND        = 1,             /* send action, regular string format */
+	TCPCHK_ACT_SEND        = 0,             /* send action, regular string format */
 	TCPCHK_ACT_EXPECT,                      /* expect action, either regular or binary string */
 };
 
diff --git a/src/checks.c b/src/checks.c
index 6373783..9282e89 100644
--- a/src/checks.c
+++ b/src/checks.c
@@ -1998,7 +1998,7 @@
 		if (&cur->list == head)
 			break;
 
-		if (check->current_step->action & TCPCHK_ACT_SEND) {
+		if (check->current_step->action == TCPCHK_ACT_SEND) {
 			/* reset the read buffer */
 			if (*check->bi->data != '\0') {
 				*check->bi->data = '\0';
@@ -2029,7 +2029,7 @@
 			cur = (struct tcpcheck_rule *)cur->list.n;
 			check->current_step = cur;
 		} /* end 'send' */
-		else if (check->current_step->action & TCPCHK_ACT_EXPECT) {
+		else if (check->current_step->action == TCPCHK_ACT_EXPECT) {
 			if (unlikely(check->result & SRV_CHK_FAILED))
 				goto out_end_tcpcheck;
 
@@ -2111,7 +2111,7 @@
 				else {
 					cur = (struct tcpcheck_rule*)cur->list.n;
 					check->current_step = cur;
-					if (check->current_step->action & TCPCHK_ACT_EXPECT)
+					if (check->current_step->action == TCPCHK_ACT_EXPECT)
 						goto tcpcheck_expect;
 					__conn_data_stop_recv(conn);
 				}
@@ -2122,7 +2122,7 @@
 				if (cur->inverse) {
 					cur = (struct tcpcheck_rule*)cur->list.n;
 					check->current_step = cur;
-					if (check->current_step->action & TCPCHK_ACT_EXPECT)
+					if (check->current_step->action == TCPCHK_ACT_EXPECT)
 						goto tcpcheck_expect;
 					__conn_data_stop_recv(conn);
 				}