BUG/MAJOR: queue: set SF_ASSIGNED when setting strm->target on dequeue

Commit 82cd5c13a ("OPTIM: backend: skip LB when we know the backend is
full") has uncovered a long-burried bug in the dequeing code: when a
server releases a connection, it picks a new one from the proxy's or
its queue. Technically speaking it only picks a pendconn which is a
link between a position in the queue and a stream. It then sets this
pendconn's target to itself, and wakes up the stream's task so that
it can try to connect again.

The stream then goes through the regular connection setup phases,
calls back_try_conn_req() which calls pendconn_dequeue(), which
sets the stream's target to the pendconn's and releases the pendconn.
It then reaches assign_server() which sees no SF_ASSIGNED and calls
assign_server_and_queue() to perform load balancing or queuing. This
one first destroys the stream's target and gets ready to perform load
balancing. At this point we're load-balancing for no reason since we
already knew what server was available. And this is where the commit
above comes into play: the check for the backend's queue above may
detect other connections that arrived in between, and will immediately
return FULL, forcing this request back into the queue. If the server
had a very low maxconn (e.g. 1 due to a long slowstart), it's possible
that this evicted connection was the last one on the server and that
no other one will ever be present to process the queue. Usually a
regularly processed request will still have its own srv_conn that will
be used during stream_free() to dequeue other connections. But if the
server had a down-up cycle, then a call to pendconn_grab_from_px()
may start to dequeue entries which had no srv_conn and which will have
no server slot to offer when they expire, thus maintaining the situation
above forever. Worse, as new requests arrive, there are always some
requests in the queue and the situation feeds on itself.

The correct fix here is to properly set SF_ASSIGNED in pendconn_dequeue()
when the stream's target is assigned (as it's what this flag means), so
as to avoid a load-balancing pass when dequeuing.

Many thanks to Pierre Cheynier for the numerous detailed traces he
provided that helped narrow this problem down.

This could be backported to all stable versions, but in practice only
2.3 and above are really affected since the presence of the commit
above. Given how tricky this code is it's better to limit it to those
versions that really need it.
1 file changed