BUG/MAJOR: http: fix breakage of "reqdeny" causing random crashes
Commit 108b1dd ("MEDIUM: http: configurable http result codes for
http-request deny") introduced in 1.6-dev2 was incomplete. It introduced
a new field "rule_deny_status" into struct http_txn, which is filled only
by actions "http-request deny" and "http-request tarpit". It's then used
in the deny code path to emit the proper error message, but is used
uninitialized when the deny comes from a "reqdeny" rule, causing random
behaviours ranging from returning a 200, an empty response, or crashing
the process. Often upon startup only 200 was returned but after the fields
are used the crash happens. This can be sped up using -dM.
There's no need at all for storing this status in the http_txn struct
anyway since it's used immediately after being set. Let's store it in
a temporary variable instead which is passed as an argument to function
http_req_get_intercept_rule().
As an extra benefit, removing it from struct http_txn reduced the size
of this struct by 8 bytes.
This fix must be backported to 1.6 where the bug was detected. Special
thanks to Falco Schmutz for his detailed report including an exploitable
core and a reproducer.
diff --git a/src/proto_http.c b/src/proto_http.c
index 4165042..d79a782 100644
--- a/src/proto_http.c
+++ b/src/proto_http.c
@@ -3276,10 +3276,12 @@
* further processing of the request (auth, deny, ...), and defaults to
* HTTP_RULE_RES_STOP if it executed all rules or stopped on an allow, or
* HTTP_RULE_RES_CONT if the last rule was reached. It may set the TX_CLTARPIT
- * on txn->flags if it encounters a tarpit rule.
+ * on txn->flags if it encounters a tarpit rule. If <deny_status> is not NULL
+ * and a deny/tarpit rule is matched, it will be filled with this rule's deny
+ * status.
*/
enum rule_result
-http_req_get_intercept_rule(struct proxy *px, struct list *rules, struct stream *s)
+http_req_get_intercept_rule(struct proxy *px, struct list *rules, struct stream *s, int *deny_status)
{
struct session *sess = strm_sess(s);
struct http_txn *txn = s->txn;
@@ -3325,12 +3327,14 @@
return HTTP_RULE_RES_STOP;
case ACT_ACTION_DENY:
- txn->rule_deny_status = rule->deny_status;
+ if (deny_status)
+ *deny_status = rule->deny_status;
return HTTP_RULE_RES_DENY;
case ACT_HTTP_REQ_TARPIT:
txn->flags |= TX_CLTARPIT;
- txn->rule_deny_status = rule->deny_status;
+ if (deny_status)
+ *deny_status = rule->deny_status;
return HTTP_RULE_RES_DENY;
case ACT_HTTP_REQ_AUTH:
@@ -4090,6 +4094,7 @@
struct redirect_rule *rule;
struct cond_wordlist *wl;
enum rule_result verdict;
+ int deny_status = HTTP_ERR_403;
if (unlikely(msg->msg_state < HTTP_MSG_BODY)) {
/* we need more data */
@@ -4110,7 +4115,7 @@
/* evaluate http-request rules */
if (!LIST_ISEMPTY(&px->http_req_rules)) {
- verdict = http_req_get_intercept_rule(px, &px->http_req_rules, s);
+ verdict = http_req_get_intercept_rule(px, &px->http_req_rules, s, &deny_status);
switch (verdict) {
case HTTP_RULE_RES_YIELD: /* some data miss, call the function later. */
@@ -4156,7 +4161,7 @@
/* parse the whole stats request and extract the relevant information */
http_handle_stats(s, req);
- verdict = http_req_get_intercept_rule(px, &px->uri_auth->http_req_rules, s);
+ verdict = http_req_get_intercept_rule(px, &px->uri_auth->http_req_rules, s, &deny_status);
/* not all actions implemented: deny, allow, auth */
if (verdict == HTTP_RULE_RES_DENY) /* stats http-request deny */
@@ -4285,9 +4290,9 @@
manage_client_side_cookies(s, req);
txn->flags |= TX_CLDENY;
- txn->status = http_err_codes[txn->rule_deny_status];
+ txn->status = http_err_codes[deny_status];
s->logs.tv_request = now;
- http_reply_and_close(s, txn->status, http_error_message(s, txn->rule_deny_status));
+ http_reply_and_close(s, txn->status, http_error_message(s, deny_status));
stream_inc_http_err_ctr(s);
sess->fe->fe_counters.denied_req++;
if (sess->fe != s->be)