tree b790259623bf16128f91f5e4fc4530baee69e9c2
parent 5ddf1ce9c479480e2b5976f340714e29831ed2ea
author Willy Tarreau <w@1wt.eu> 1601058748 +0200
committer Willy Tarreau <w@1wt.eu> 1602235650 +0200
encoding latin1

MEDIUM: listeners: now use the listener's ->enable/disable

At each place we used to manipulate the FDs directly we can now call
the listener protocol's enable/disable/rx_enable/rx_disable depending
on whether the state changes on the listener or the receiver. One
exception currently remains in listener_accept() which is a bit special
and which should be split into 2 or 3 parts in the various protocol
layers.

The test of fd_updt in do_unbind_listener() that was added by commit
a51885621 ("BUG/MEDIUM: listeners: Don't call fd_stop_recv() if fd_updt
is NULL.") could finally be removed since that part is correctly handled
in the low-level disable() function.

One disable() was added in resume_listener() before switching to LI_FULL
because rx_resume() enables polling on the FD for the receiver while
we want to disable it if the listener is full. There are different
ways to clean this up in the future. One of them could be to consider
that TCP receivers only act at the listener level. But in fact it does
not translate reality. The reality is that only the receiver is paused
and that the listener's state ought not be affected here. Ultimately
the resume_listener() function should be split so that the part
controlled by the protocols only acts on the receiver, and that the
receiver itself notifies the upper listener about the change so that
the listener protocol may decide to disable or enable polling. Conversely
the listener should automatically update its receiver when they share the
same state. Since there is no harm proceeding like this, let's keep this
for now.