BUG/MEDIUM: polling: fix possible CPU hogging of worker processes after receiving SIGUSR1.

When run in daemon mode (i.e. with at least one forked process) and using
the epoll poller, sending USR1 (graceful shutdown) to the worker processes
can cause some workers to start running at 100% CPU. Precondition is having
an established HTTP keep-alive connection when the signal is received.

The cloned (during fork) listening sockets do not get closed in the parent
process, thus they do not get removed from the epoll set automatically
(see man 7 epoll). This can lead to the process receiving epoll events
that it doesn't feel responsible for, resulting in an endless loop around
epoll_wait() delivering these events.

The solution is to explicitly remove these file descriptors from the epoll
set. To not degrade performance, care was taken to only do this when
neccessary, i.e. when the file descriptor was cloned during fork.

Signed-off-by: Conrad Hoffmann <conrad@soundcloud.com>
[wt: a backport to 1.4 could be studied though chances to catch the bug are low]
diff --git a/src/ev_epoll.c b/src/ev_epoll.c
index 2849ec6..9d359b2 100644
--- a/src/ev_epoll.c
+++ b/src/ev_epoll.c
@@ -46,6 +46,19 @@
 #endif
 
 /*
+ * Immediately remove file descriptor from epoll set upon close.
+ * Since we forked, some fds share inodes with the other process, and epoll may
+ * send us events even though this process closed the fd (see man 7 epoll,
+ * "Questions and answers", Q 6).
+ */
+REGPRM1 static void __fd_clo(int fd)
+{
+	if (unlikely(fdtab[fd].cloned)) {
+		epoll_ctl(epoll_fd, EPOLL_CTL_DEL, fd, &ev);
+	}
+}
+
+/*
  * Linux epoll() poller
  */
 REGPRM2 static void _do_poll(struct poller *p, int exp)
@@ -267,7 +280,7 @@
 	p->pref = 300;
 	p->private = NULL;
 
-	p->clo  = NULL;
+	p->clo  = __fd_clo;
 	p->test = _do_test;
 	p->init = _do_init;
 	p->term = _do_term;
diff --git a/src/fd.c b/src/fd.c
index 66f1e8b..c238bc8 100644
--- a/src/fd.c
+++ b/src/fd.c
@@ -438,6 +438,13 @@
  */
 int fork_poller()
 {
+	int fd;
+	for (fd = 0; fd <= maxfd; fd++) {
+		if (fdtab[fd].owner) {
+			fdtab[fd].cloned = 1;
+		}
+	}
+
 	if (cur_poller.fork) {
 		if (cur_poller.fork(&cur_poller))
 			return 1;