treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle
The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst)
clearly says:
It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers.
Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make
headers self-contained.
Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header:
void foo(bd_t *bd);
This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined.
To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h>
#include <asm/u-boot.h>
void foo(bd_t *bd);
Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly.
If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward
declaration as follows:
struct bd_info;
void foo(struct bd_info *bd);
Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake.
I used coccinelle to generate this commit.
The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows:
<smpl>
@@
typedef bd_t;
@@
-bd_t
+struct bd_info
</smpl>
Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
diff --git a/drivers/net/eepro100.c b/drivers/net/eepro100.c
index 45ea3b7..feba532 100644
--- a/drivers/net/eepro100.c
+++ b/drivers/net/eepro100.c
@@ -779,7 +779,7 @@
}
#ifndef CONFIG_DM_ETH
-static int eepro100_init(struct eth_device *dev, bd_t *bis)
+static int eepro100_init(struct eth_device *dev, struct bd_info *bis)
{
struct eepro100_priv *priv =
container_of(dev, struct eepro100_priv, dev);
@@ -819,7 +819,7 @@
return ret;
}
-int eepro100_initialize(bd_t *bis)
+int eepro100_initialize(struct bd_info *bis)
{
struct eepro100_priv *priv;
struct eth_device *dev;