treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle
The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst)
clearly says:
It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers.
Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make
headers self-contained.
Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header:
void foo(bd_t *bd);
This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined.
To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h>
#include <asm/u-boot.h>
void foo(bd_t *bd);
Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly.
If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward
declaration as follows:
struct bd_info;
void foo(struct bd_info *bd);
Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake.
I used coccinelle to generate this commit.
The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows:
<smpl>
@@
typedef bd_t;
@@
-bd_t
+struct bd_info
</smpl>
Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
diff --git a/drivers/mmc/fsl_esdhc_imx.c b/drivers/mmc/fsl_esdhc_imx.c
index 5b61eeb..644f465 100644
--- a/drivers/mmc/fsl_esdhc_imx.c
+++ b/drivers/mmc/fsl_esdhc_imx.c
@@ -1292,7 +1292,7 @@
return 0;
};
-int fsl_esdhc_initialize(bd_t *bis, struct fsl_esdhc_cfg *cfg)
+int fsl_esdhc_initialize(struct bd_info *bis, struct fsl_esdhc_cfg *cfg)
{
struct fsl_esdhc_plat *plat;
struct fsl_esdhc_priv *priv;
@@ -1336,7 +1336,7 @@
return 0;
}
-int fsl_esdhc_mmc_init(bd_t *bis)
+int fsl_esdhc_mmc_init(struct bd_info *bis)
{
struct fsl_esdhc_cfg *cfg;
@@ -1360,7 +1360,7 @@
return 0;
}
-void fdt_fixup_esdhc(void *blob, bd_t *bd)
+void fdt_fixup_esdhc(void *blob, struct bd_info *bd)
{
const char *compat = "fsl,esdhc";