treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle
The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst)
clearly says:
It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers.
Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make
headers self-contained.
Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header:
void foo(bd_t *bd);
This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined.
To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h>
#include <asm/u-boot.h>
void foo(bd_t *bd);
Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly.
If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward
declaration as follows:
struct bd_info;
void foo(struct bd_info *bd);
Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake.
I used coccinelle to generate this commit.
The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows:
<smpl>
@@
typedef bd_t;
@@
-bd_t
+struct bd_info
</smpl>
Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
diff --git a/board/freescale/mx35pdk/mx35pdk.c b/board/freescale/mx35pdk/mx35pdk.c
index 63fea37..fc024c4 100644
--- a/board/freescale/mx35pdk/mx35pdk.c
+++ b/board/freescale/mx35pdk/mx35pdk.c
@@ -254,7 +254,7 @@
return 0;
}
-int board_eth_init(bd_t *bis)
+int board_eth_init(struct bd_info *bis)
{
#if defined(CONFIG_SMC911X)
int rc = smc911x_initialize(0, CONFIG_SMC911X_BASE);
@@ -268,7 +268,7 @@
struct fsl_esdhc_cfg esdhc_cfg = {MMC_SDHC1_BASE_ADDR};
-int board_mmc_init(bd_t *bis)
+int board_mmc_init(struct bd_info *bis)
{
static const iomux_v3_cfg_t sdhc1_pads[] = {
MX35_PAD_SD1_CMD__ESDHC1_CMD,