bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit
There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that
could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to
use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead.
Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
diff --git a/cmd/bdinfo.c b/cmd/bdinfo.c
index 996546f..dfd50ae 100644
--- a/cmd/bdinfo.c
+++ b/cmd/bdinfo.c
@@ -55,8 +55,8 @@
for (i = 0; i < CONFIG_NR_DRAM_BANKS; ++i) {
if (bd->bi_dram[i].size) {
bdinfo_print_num_l("DRAM bank", i);
- bdinfo_print_num_l("-> start", bd->bi_dram[i].start);
- bdinfo_print_num_l("-> size", bd->bi_dram[i].size);
+ bdinfo_print_num_ll("-> start", bd->bi_dram[i].start);
+ bdinfo_print_num_ll("-> size", bd->bi_dram[i].size);
}
}
}