image: Be a little more verbose when checking signatures
It is useful to be a little more specific about what is being checked.
Update a few messages to help with this.
Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
diff --git a/common/image-fit.c b/common/image-fit.c
index 3d0cd56..47fc84a 100644
--- a/common/image-fit.c
+++ b/common/image-fit.c
@@ -1951,7 +1951,7 @@
fit_uname = fit_get_name(fit, noffset, NULL);
}
if (noffset < 0) {
- puts("Could not find subimage node\n");
+ printf("Could not find subimage node type '%s'\n", prop_name);
bootstage_error(bootstage_id + BOOTSTAGE_SUB_SUBNODE);
return -ENOENT;
}
diff --git a/tools/image-host.c b/tools/image-host.c
index 76a361b..b3ec197 100644
--- a/tools/image-host.c
+++ b/tools/image-host.c
@@ -1034,7 +1034,8 @@
if (!cfg_noffset)
return -1;
- printf("Verifying Hash Integrity ... ");
+ printf("Verifying Hash Integrity for node '%s'... ",
+ fdt_get_name(fit, cfg_noffset, NULL));
ret = fit_config_verify(fit, cfg_noffset);
if (ret)
return ret;