nand: Sync with Linux v4.1
Update the NAND code to match Linux v4.1. The previous sync was
from Linux v3.15 in commit 4e67c57125290b25.
CONFIG_SYS_NAND_RESET_CNT is removed, as the upstream Linux code now
has its own timeout. Plus, CONFIG_SYS_NAND_RESET_CNT was undocumented
and not selected by any board.
Signed-off-by: Scott Wood <scottwood@freescale.com>
diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nand/nand_bbt.c b/drivers/mtd/nand/nand_bbt.c
index 34b8ddc..00f28a4 100644
--- a/drivers/mtd/nand/nand_bbt.c
+++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/nand_bbt.c
@@ -199,12 +199,12 @@
res = mtd_read(mtd, from, len, &retlen, buf);
if (res < 0) {
if (mtd_is_eccerr(res)) {
- pr_info("nand_bbt: ECC error in BBT at "
- "0x%012llx\n", from & ~mtd->writesize);
+ pr_info("nand_bbt: ECC error in BBT at 0x%012llx\n",
+ from & ~mtd->writesize);
return res;
} else if (mtd_is_bitflip(res)) {
- pr_info("nand_bbt: corrected error in BBT at "
- "0x%012llx\n", from & ~mtd->writesize);
+ pr_info("nand_bbt: corrected error in BBT at 0x%012llx\n",
+ from & ~mtd->writesize);
ret = res;
} else {
pr_info("nand_bbt: error reading BBT\n");
@@ -578,8 +578,8 @@
if (td->pages[i] == -1)
pr_warn("Bad block table not found for chip %d\n", i);
else
- pr_info("Bad block table found at page %d, version "
- "0x%02X\n", td->pages[i], td->version[i]);
+ pr_info("Bad block table found at page %d, version 0x%02X\n",
+ td->pages[i], td->version[i]);
}
return 0;
}
@@ -723,12 +723,10 @@
res = mtd_read(mtd, to, len, &retlen, buf);
if (res < 0) {
if (retlen != len) {
- pr_info("nand_bbt: error reading block "
- "for writing the bad block table\n");
+ pr_info("nand_bbt: error reading block for writing the bad block table\n");
return res;
}
- pr_warn("nand_bbt: ECC error while reading "
- "block for writing bad block table\n");
+ pr_warn("nand_bbt: ECC error while reading block for writing bad block table\n");
}
/* Read oob data */
ops.ooblen = (len >> this->page_shift) * mtd->oobsize;
@@ -1280,6 +1278,7 @@
int nand_default_bbt(struct mtd_info *mtd)
{
struct nand_chip *this = mtd->priv;
+ int ret;
/* Is a flash based bad block table requested? */
if (this->bbt_options & NAND_BBT_USE_FLASH) {
@@ -1298,8 +1297,11 @@
this->bbt_md = NULL;
}
- if (!this->badblock_pattern)
- nand_create_badblock_pattern(this);
+ if (!this->badblock_pattern) {
+ ret = nand_create_badblock_pattern(this);
+ if (ret)
+ return ret;
+ }
return nand_scan_bbt(mtd, this->badblock_pattern);
}
@@ -1332,9 +1334,8 @@
block = (int)(offs >> this->bbt_erase_shift);
res = bbt_get_entry(this, block);
- pr_debug("nand_isbad_bbt(): bbt info for offs 0x%08x: "
- "(block %d) 0x%02x\n",
- (unsigned int)offs, block, res);
+ pr_debug("nand_isbad_bbt(): bbt info for offs 0x%08x: (block %d) 0x%02x\n",
+ (unsigned int)offs, block, res);
switch (res) {
case BBT_BLOCK_GOOD: