fix incorrect usage of DT node unit address in comments
The DT spec demands a unit-address in a node name to match the "reg"
property in that node. Newer dtc versions will throw warnings if this is
not the case.
Fix all occurences in the tree where node names were mentioned in
comments, to not give bad examples to the reader.
Signed-off-by: Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@arm.com>
diff --git a/common/image-fit.c b/common/image-fit.c
index b785d8a..f6e956a 100644
--- a/common/image-fit.c
+++ b/common/image-fit.c
@@ -330,7 +330,7 @@
/*
* Check subnode name, must be equal to "hash" or "signature".
* Multiple hash/signature nodes require unique unit node
- * names, e.g. hash@1, hash@2, signature@1, signature@2, etc.
+ * names, e.g. hash-1, hash-2, signature-1, signature-2, etc.
*/
name = fit_get_name(fit, noffset, NULL);
if (!strncmp(name, FIT_HASH_NODENAME, strlen(FIT_HASH_NODENAME))) {
@@ -1111,7 +1111,7 @@
/*
* Check subnode name, must be equal to "hash".
* Multiple hash nodes require unique unit node
- * names, e.g. hash@1, hash@2, etc.
+ * names, e.g. hash-1, hash-2, etc.
*/
if (!strncmp(name, FIT_HASH_NODENAME,
strlen(FIT_HASH_NODENAME))) {
@@ -1348,15 +1348,15 @@
*
* / o image-tree
* |-o images
- * | |-o fdt@1
- * | |-o fdt@2
+ * | |-o fdt-1
+ * | |-o fdt-2
* |
* |-o configurations
- * |-o config@1
- * | |-fdt = fdt@1
+ * |-o config-1
+ * | |-fdt = fdt-1
* |
- * |-o config@2
- * |-fdt = fdt@2
+ * |-o config-2
+ * |-fdt = fdt-2
*
* / o U-Boot fdt
* |-compatible = "foo,bar", "bim,bam"