dm: sf: Add tests for SPI flash
Add a simple test for SPI that uses SPI flash. It operates by creating a
SPI flash file and using the 'sf test' command to test that all
operations work correctly.
Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
Acked-by: Jagannadha Sutradharudu Teki <jagannadh.teki@gmail.com>
diff --git a/test/dm/sf.c b/test/dm/sf.c
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..57dd134
--- /dev/null
+++ b/test/dm/sf.c
@@ -0,0 +1,43 @@
+/*
+ * Copyright (C) 2013 Google, Inc
+ *
+ * SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0+
+ */
+
+#include <common.h>
+#include <dm.h>
+#include <fdtdec.h>
+#include <spi.h>
+#include <spi_flash.h>
+#include <asm/state.h>
+#include <dm/ut.h>
+#include <dm/test.h>
+#include <dm/util.h>
+
+/* Test that sandbox SPI flash works correctly */
+static int dm_test_spi_flash(struct dm_test_state *dms)
+{
+ /*
+ * Create an empty test file and run the SPI flash tests. This is a
+ * long way from being a unit test, but it does test SPI device and
+ * emulator binding, probing, the SPI flash emulator including
+ * device tree decoding, plus the file-based backing store of SPI.
+ *
+ * More targeted tests could be created to perform the above steps
+ * one at a time. This might not increase test coverage much, but
+ * it would make bugs easier to find. It's not clear whether the
+ * benefit is worth the extra complexity.
+ */
+ ut_asserteq(0, run_command_list(
+ "sb save hostfs - spi.bin 0 200000;"
+ "sf probe;"
+ "sf test 0 10000", -1, 0));
+ /*
+ * Since we are about to destroy all devices, we must tell sandbox
+ * to forget the emulation device
+ */
+ sandbox_sf_unbind_emul(state_get_current(), 0, 0);
+
+ return 0;
+}
+DM_TEST(dm_test_spi_flash, DM_TESTF_SCAN_PDATA | DM_TESTF_SCAN_FDT);