tools: copyfile: use 64k instead of 512 buffer
This is a trivial but significant optimization:
mkimage took >200ms (and 49489 writes (of which 49456 512)),
now it takes 110ms (and 419 writes (of which 386 64k)).
sendfile is much more appropriate for this and is done in one syscall,
but doesn't bring any significant speedups over 64k r/w
at the 13M size ranges, so there's no need to introduce
#if __linux__
while((size = sendfile(fd_dst, fd_src, NULL, 128 * 1024 * 1024)) > 0)
;
if(size != -1) {
ret = 0;
goto out;
}
#endif
Also extract the buffer size to a macro.
Signed-off-by: Ahelenia Ziemiańska <nabijaczleweli@nabijaczleweli.xyz>
Reviewed-by: Dragan Simic <dsimic@manjaro.org>
diff --git a/tools/fit_common.c b/tools/fit_common.c
index 2d417d4..d1cde16 100644
--- a/tools/fit_common.c
+++ b/tools/fit_common.c
@@ -23,6 +23,8 @@
#include <image.h>
#include <u-boot/crc.h>
+#define COPYFILE_BUFSIZE (64 * 1024)
+
void fit_print_header(const void *fit, struct image_tool_params *params)
{
fit_print_contents(fit);
@@ -145,14 +147,14 @@
goto out;
}
- buf = calloc(1, 512);
+ buf = calloc(1, COPYFILE_BUFSIZE);
if (!buf) {
printf("Can't allocate buffer to copy file\n");
goto out;
}
while (1) {
- size = read(fd_src, buf, 512);
+ size = read(fd_src, buf, COPYFILE_BUFSIZE);
if (size < 0) {
printf("Can't read file %s\n", src);
goto out;