commit 4ec7e2dac8596c333f803a9bf91e1b2d925cbeec
author Sandrine Bailleux <sandrine.bailleux@arm.com> Tue Jul 12 09:12:24 2016 +0100
committer Sandrine Bailleux <sandrine.bailleux@arm.com> Mon Jul 25 12:57:42 2016 +0100
tree fbddd292aacd76eef9490d8262879c382aa243fc
parent 7304f45397281582cd74bf42fc12f955ceaa12c6

Ensure addresses in is_mem_free() don't overflow

This patch adds some runtime checks to prevent some potential
pointer overflow issues in the is_mem_free() function. The overflow
could happen in the case where the end addresses, computed as the
sum of a base address and a size, results in a value large enough
to wrap around. This, in turn, could lead to unpredictable behaviour.

If such an overflow is detected, the is_mem_free() function will now
declare the memory region as not free. The overflow is detected using
a new macro, called check_uptr_overflow().

This patch also modifies all other places in the 'bl_common.c' file
where an end address was computed as the sum of a base address and a
size and instead keeps the two values separate. This avoids the need
to handle pointer overflows everywhere. The code doesn't actually need
to compute any end address before the is_mem_free() function is called
other than to print information message to the serial output.

This patch also introduces 2 slight changes to the reserve_mem()
function:

 - It fixes the end addresses passed to choose_mem_pos(). It was
   incorrectly passing (base + size) instead of (base + size - 1).

 - When the requested allocation size is 0, the function now exits
   straight away and says so using a warning message.
   Previously, it used to actually reserve some memory. A zero-byte
   allocation was not considered as a special case so the function
   was using the same top/bottom allocation mechanism as for any
   other allocation. As a result, the smallest area of memory starting
   from the requested base address within the free region was
   reserved.

Change-Id: I0e695f961e24e56ffe000718014e0496dc6e1ec6